ORIENTAL PRESS GROUP LTD AND ANOTHER v. FEVAWORKS SOLUTIONS LTD
The court concluded plaintiffs did not meet the stringent threshold for an interlocutory injunction in defamation; defendants operated as passive hosts/ISPs capable of invoking innocent dissemination, removed complained-of material upon notice, and pre-moderation was impracticable and would unduly infringe freedom...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- ORIENTAL PRESS GROUP LTD AND ANOTHER v. FEVAWORKS SOLUTIONS LTD
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Oriental Press Group Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Oriental Daily Publisher Limited; 3rd Plaintiff: The Sun News Publisher Limited; 4th Plaintiff: Ma Ching Kwan; Defendant: Fevaworks Solutions Limited; Defendant: Alive! Media & Communications Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2009
- Case Number
- HCA2140/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Injunction Application in Defamation Actions Involving Internet Publications / Heard in Chambers; Interlocutory Application Determined; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' summons for interlocutory injunction dismissed; no interim restraining order granted
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Publication by Isps, Innocent Dissemination, Website Hosting Liability, Procedural Threshold for Interim Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oriental Press Group Limited
1st Plaintiff
Oriental Daily Publisher Limited
2nd Plaintiff
The Sun News Publisher Limited
3rd Plaintiff
Ma Ching Kwan
4th Plaintiff
Fevaworks Solutions Limited
Defendant
Alive! Media & Communications Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Injunction Application in Defamation Actions Involving Internet Publications / Heard in Chambers; Interlocutory Application Determined; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to restrain alleged defamatory postings on a public internet forum
- 2 Whether the defendants are publishers or merely passive hosts/ISPs (innocent disseminators) and thus liable
- 3 Whether plaintiffs satisfied the stringent Bonnard v Perryman test for interlocutory injunctions in defamation
Ratio Decidendi
The court concluded plaintiffs did not meet the stringent threshold for an interlocutory injunction in defamation; defendants operated as passive hosts/ISPs capable of invoking innocent dissemination, removed complained-of material upon notice, and pre-moderation was impracticable and would unduly infringe freedom of speech; accordingly the interlocutory injunction application was dismissed and costs were ordered against plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' summons for interlocutory injunction dismissed; no interim restraining order granted
Orders
- Summons dismissed (interlocutory injunction refused) in HCA2140/2008 and HCA597/2009
- Order nisi for costs to defendants in both actions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment