FG HEMISPHERE ASSOCIATES LLC v. DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO AND OTHERS
The Court held that the DRC is entitled to sovereign immunity from execution in Hong Kong in respect of the two ICC awards because the underlying transactions are sovereign in nature (not commercial) and the DRC did not validly waive immunity; accordingly the Hong Kong Court lacks jurisdiction to enforce those awards against the DRC and the ex parte enforcement orders must be set aside.
- Citation
- FG HEMISPHERE ASSOCIATES LLC v. DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: FG Hemisphere Associates LLC; 1st Defendant: Democratic Republic of the Congo; 2nd Defendant: China Railway Group (Hong Kong) Limited; 3rd Defendant: China Railway Resources Development Limited; 4th Defendant: China Railway Sino-Congo Mining Limited; 5th Defendant: China Railway Group Limited; Intervener: Secretary for Justice
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2008
- Case Number
- HCMP928/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards / Recognition and Enforcement Proceedings / Interlocutory Hearing on Summons to Set Aside Ex Parte Enforcement Order and Jurisdictional Challenge
- Outcome
- Court declared it has no jurisdiction over the DRC in these proceedings and set aside the leave to enforce the two ICC awards as judgments against the DRC; injunction against the DRC discharged; related service orders set aside; originating summons against DRC dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- State Immunity From Execution, Restrictive Vs Absolute Immunity, Waiver of Immunity, Service of Process, Forum Non Conveniens, Assignment of Arbitral Awards, Public Policy (maintenance/champerty), Substituted Service, Government Intervention
- Source Language
- ET
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FG Hemisphere Associates LLC
Plaintiff
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1st Defendant
China Railway Group (Hong Kong) Limited
2nd Defendant
China Railway Resources Development Limited
3rd Defendant
China Railway Sino-Congo Mining Limited
4th Defendant
China Railway Group Limited
5th Defendant
Secretary for Justice
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards / Recognition and Enforcement Proceedings / Interlocutory Hearing on Summons to Set Aside Ex Parte Enforcement Order and Jurisdictional Challenge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Hong Kong Court has jurisdiction to enforce ICC awards against a foreign state (DRC) given sovereign immunity
- 2 Whether the transactions (CA/JVA/SCA/SJVA and Entry Fees) are commercial so as to fall within restrictive immunity exception
- 3 Whether DRC waived immunity by submitting to ICC arbitration and by ICC Rules/seat choices
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the DRC is entitled to sovereign immunity from execution in Hong Kong in respect of the two ICC awards because the underlying transactions are sovereign in nature (not commercial) and the DRC did not validly waive immunity; accordingly the Hong Kong Court lacks jurisdiction to enforce those awards against the DRC and the ex parte enforcement orders must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Court declared it has no jurisdiction over the DRC in these proceedings and set aside the leave to enforce the two ICC awards as judgments against the DRC; injunction against the DRC discharged; related service orders set aside; originating summons against DRC dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that this Court has no jurisdiction over the DRC in these proceedings
- Discharge of injunction granted by Saw J in paragraph 2 of his Order dated 16 May 2008 as against the DRC
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment