TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES v. FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD
The tenant had failed to perform the stipulations required by clause 9 and was in arrears as at the 31 July 2007 deadline and therefore lost the right to exercise the option to renew; independently, the tenant's denial of the landlord's title amounted to repudiation which the landlord accepted; section 58 CPO did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time and the alleged breach only disqualified renewal, so landlord's Order 14 application is granted in part.
- Citation
- TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES v. FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD
- Parties
- Landlord: Fortune Concept; Tenant: Tong Chor Yin, Augustine
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Case Number
- HCA160/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant Summary Judgment / Order 14 Application (high Court)
- Outcome
- Part grant of summary judgment for the landlord
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture, Option to Renew, Summary Judgment, Statutory Notice (s58 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fortune Concept
Landlord
Tong Chor Yin, Augustine
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Summary Judgment / Order 14 Application (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether tenant lost entitlement to exercise option to renew under clause 9 by failing to perform stipulations as at 31 July 2007
- 2 Whether tenant's denial of landlord's title amounted to repudiation permitting forfeiture/termination
- 3 Whether s58 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance prevents landlord's claim for forfeiture or relief
Ratio Decidendi
The tenant had failed to perform the stipulations required by clause 9 and was in arrears as at the 31 July 2007 deadline and therefore lost the right to exercise the option to renew; independently, the tenant's denial of the landlord's title amounted to repudiation which the landlord accepted; section 58 CPO did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time and the alleged breach only disqualified renewal, so landlord's Order 14 application is granted in part.
Court Disposition
Part grant of summary judgment for the landlord
Orders
- Paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 are granted.
- No order is made in respect of paragraphs (2), (3) and (5) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment