TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES v. FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD

TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES v. FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD

The tenant had failed to perform the stipulations required by clause 9 and was in arrears as at the 31 July 2007 deadline and therefore lost the right to exercise the option to renew; independently, the tenant's denial of the landlord's title amounted to repudiation which the landlord accepted; section 58 CPO did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time and the alleged breach only disqualified renewal, so landlord's Order 14 application is granted in part.

Citation
TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES v. FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD
Parties
Landlord: Fortune Concept; Tenant: Tong Chor Yin, Augustine
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
31 July 2008
Case Number
HCA160/2008
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Summary Judgment / Order 14 Application (high Court)
Outcome
Part grant of summary judgment for the landlord
Legal Topics
Forfeiture, Option to Renew, Summary Judgment, Statutory Notice (s58 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance)
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fortune Concept

Landlord

Tong Chor Yin, Augustine

Tenant

Procedural Posture

Landlord and Tenant Summary Judgment / Order 14 Application (high Court)

  1. 1 Whether tenant lost entitlement to exercise option to renew under clause 9 by failing to perform stipulations as at 31 July 2007
  2. 2 Whether tenant's denial of landlord's title amounted to repudiation permitting forfeiture/termination
  3. 3 Whether s58 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance prevents landlord's claim for forfeiture or relief

Ratio Decidendi

The tenant had failed to perform the stipulations required by clause 9 and was in arrears as at the 31 July 2007 deadline and therefore lost the right to exercise the option to renew; independently, the tenant's denial of the landlord's title amounted to repudiation which the landlord accepted; section 58 CPO did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time and the alleged breach only disqualified renewal, so landlord's Order 14 application is granted in part.

Court Disposition

Part grant of summary judgment for the landlord

Orders

  • Paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 are granted.
  • No order is made in respect of paragraphs (2), (3) and (5) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008.