FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD v. TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES

FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD v. TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES

Tenant lost the right to exercise the renewal option because, as at 31 July 2007, he was in arrears and had a persistent history of late payment amounting to failure of the condition precedent; additionally the tenant's pleaded denial of the landlord's title constituted repudiation fatal to the tenant's position; section 58 did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time once the option was lost. Therefore the landlord's Order 14 relief in paragraphs (1) and (4) succeeds.

Citation
FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD v. TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES
Parties
Landlord: Fortune Concept; Tenant: Tong Chor Yin, Augustine
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
31 July 2008
Case Number
HCA293/2008
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant; Summary Judgment (order 14) / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Order 14 summary judgment granted in part: paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 granted; no order as to paragraphs (2), (3) and (5).
Legal Topics
Forfeiture, Option to Renew, Summary Judgment, Re Entry, Title Denial, Statutory Notice (s58)
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fortune Concept

Landlord

Tong Chor Yin, Augustine

Tenant

Procedural Posture

Landlord and Tenant; Summary Judgment (order 14) / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether tenant forfeited right to exercise option to renew by being in arrears and repeatedly late with management fee payments as at 31 July 2007
  2. 2 Whether tenant's denial of landlord's title constituted repudiation that defeated tenant's position
  3. 3 Whether s58 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance Cap.219 prevents landlord's claim without prior notice

Ratio Decidendi

Tenant lost the right to exercise the renewal option because, as at 31 July 2007, he was in arrears and had a persistent history of late payment amounting to failure of the condition precedent; additionally the tenant's pleaded denial of the landlord's title constituted repudiation fatal to the tenant's position; section 58 did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time once the option was lost. Therefore the landlord's Order 14 relief in paragraphs (1) and (4) succeeds.

Court Disposition

Order 14 summary judgment granted in part: paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 granted; no order as to paragraphs (2), (3) and (5).

Orders

  • Paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 are granted.
  • No order is made in respect of paragraphs (2), (3) and (5) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008.