FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD v. TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES
Tenant lost the right to exercise the renewal option because, as at 31 July 2007, he was in arrears and had a persistent history of late payment amounting to failure of the condition precedent; additionally the tenant's pleaded denial of the landlord's title constituted repudiation fatal to the tenant's position; section 58 did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time once the option was lost. Therefore the landlord's Order 14 relief in paragraphs (1) and (4) succeeds.
- Citation
- FORTUNE CONCEPT GROUP LTD v. TONG CHOR YIN AUGUSTINE t/a AUGUSTINE C.Y. TONG & CO., SOLICITORS & NOTARIES
- Parties
- Landlord: Fortune Concept; Tenant: Tong Chor Yin, Augustine
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Case Number
- HCA293/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant; Summary Judgment (order 14) / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Order 14 summary judgment granted in part: paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 granted; no order as to paragraphs (2), (3) and (5).
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture, Option to Renew, Summary Judgment, Re Entry, Title Denial, Statutory Notice (s58)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fortune Concept
Landlord
Tong Chor Yin, Augustine
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant; Summary Judgment (order 14) / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether tenant forfeited right to exercise option to renew by being in arrears and repeatedly late with management fee payments as at 31 July 2007
- 2 Whether tenant's denial of landlord's title constituted repudiation that defeated tenant's position
- 3 Whether s58 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance Cap.219 prevents landlord's claim without prior notice
Ratio Decidendi
Tenant lost the right to exercise the renewal option because, as at 31 July 2007, he was in arrears and had a persistent history of late payment amounting to failure of the condition precedent; additionally the tenant's pleaded denial of the landlord's title constituted repudiation fatal to the tenant's position; section 58 did not apply because the lease expired by effluxion of time once the option was lost. Therefore the landlord's Order 14 relief in paragraphs (1) and (4) succeeds.
Court Disposition
Order 14 summary judgment granted in part: paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 granted; no order as to paragraphs (2), (3) and (5).
Orders
- Paragraphs (1) and (4) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008 are granted.
- No order is made in respect of paragraphs (2), (3) and (5) of the landlord's summons dated 2 April 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment