SUNION DEVELOPMENT LTD v. NAM HOI BUS SERVICES CO LTD
Court found as fact that Sunion (through Lam) and Polyunit (through Ho and Leung) represented the Property to be open storage land suitable and lawful for Nam Hoi's intended use; Nam Hoi relied on those representations; vehicle parking fell within the contractual open storage use so Nam Hoi did not breach the Tenancy and Sunion's forfeiture was wrongful; Sunion is liable under the Misrepresentation Ordinance for inducing the contract; Polyunit breached statutory duties by failing to verify land use and is liable to Nam Hoi in respect of counterclaim items recoverable in law; damages were assessed and limited to proven items (relocation, refunds) while other claimed business losses were...
- Citation
- SUNION DEVELOPMENT LTD v. NAM HOI BUS SERVICES CO LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim): Sunion Development Limited; Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim): Nam Hoi Bus Services Company Limited; 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): Leung Lai Chu Judy (trading as Polyunit Property Agency Co)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2012
- Case Number
- DCCJ4935/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Tenancy Dispute With Counterclaim for Misrepresentation and Statutory Claims / Judgment (trial)
- Outcome
- Judgment for both sides in part: Sunion awarded mesne profits; Nam Hoi awarded parts of counterclaim against Sunion and Polyunit; Sunion and Polyunit found liable for misrepresentations/statutory breaches in relation to inducing the Tenancy.
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture of Lease, Mesne Profits, Statutory Misrepresentation Liability, Statutory Duty of Estate Agents (s36), Damages and Mitigation, Agent Authority and Ratification
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sunion Development Limited
Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim)
Nam Hoi Bus Services Company Limited
Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Leung Lai Chu Judy (trading as Polyunit Property Agency Co)
2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Tenancy Dispute With Counterclaim for Misrepresentation and Statutory Claims / Judgment (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Nam Hoi breached the Tenancy by parking vehicles on the Property
- 2 If breach, whether Sunion entitled to terminate Tenancy and claim vacant possession and mesne profits and amount
- 3 Whether Sunion and/or Polyunit made misrepresentations inducing Nam Hoi to enter the Tenancy
Ratio Decidendi
Court found as fact that Sunion (through Lam) and Polyunit (through Ho and Leung) represented the Property to be open storage land suitable and lawful for Nam Hoi's intended use; Nam Hoi relied on those representations; vehicle parking fell within the contractual open storage use so Nam Hoi did not breach the Tenancy and Sunion's forfeiture was wrongful; Sunion is liable under the Misrepresentation Ordinance for inducing the contract; Polyunit breached statutory duties by failing to verify land use and is liable to Nam Hoi in respect of counterclaim items recoverable in law; damages were assessed and limited to proven items (relocation, refunds) while other claimed business losses were...
Court Disposition
Judgment for both sides in part: Sunion awarded mesne profits; Nam Hoi awarded parts of counterclaim against Sunion and Polyunit; Sunion and Polyunit found liable for misrepresentations/statutory breaches in relation to inducing the Tenancy.
Orders
- Nam Hoi shall pay Sunion HKD 230000 being mesne profits up to 19 October 2011 at HKD 10,000 per month
- Sunion and Polyunit shall pay Nam Hoi HKD 80000 being relocation expenses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment