POWER PLUS LTD v. FRUIT DESIGN & BUILD LTD
On proper construction of the tenancy's forfeiture clause, the security deposit forfeited 'as and for liquidated damages' was intended as a pre-estimate of the landlord's loss and thus must be credited against the judgment; because the forfeited deposit exceeded the judgment and no evidence was adduced of additional quantified loss, the garnishee order nisi attaching the respondent's bank account was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- POWER PLUS LTD v. FRUIT DESIGN & BUILD LTD
- Parties
- Applicant / Landlord: Applicant (Landlord); Respondent / Tenant: Respondent (Tenant); Garnishee: Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2016
- Case Number
- LDPD173/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Garnishee Proceedings Arising From Landlord and Tenant Dispute / Hearing on Summons to Set Aside Garnishee Order Nisi / Show Cause Hearing
- Outcome
- Garnishee order nisi dismissed/discharged with costs against the applicant
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture of Security Deposit, Garnishee Order, Set Off/credit, Construction of Forfeiture Clause, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (Landlord)
Applicant / Landlord
Respondent (Tenant)
Respondent / Tenant
Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Garnishee Proceedings Arising From Landlord and Tenant Dispute / Hearing on Summons to Set Aside Garnishee Order Nisi / Show Cause Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether landlord entitled to forfeit security deposit absolutely without giving credit when enforcing consent judgment
- 2 Whether forfeited deposit characterised as liquidated damages must be credited against landlord's judgment
- 3 Whether money attached under garnishee order is properly subject to execution when deposit covers judgment and further unquantified losses are alleged
Ratio Decidendi
On proper construction of the tenancy's forfeiture clause, the security deposit forfeited 'as and for liquidated damages' was intended as a pre-estimate of the landlord's loss and thus must be credited against the judgment; because the forfeited deposit exceeded the judgment and no evidence was adduced of additional quantified loss, the garnishee order nisi attaching the respondent's bank account was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Garnishee order nisi dismissed/discharged with costs against the applicant
Orders
- Garnishee order nisi dismissed/discharged
- Costs awarded to respondent assessed at HKD 37472.5
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment