TING YUK AND OTHERS v. TING YEE WA AND OTHERS
The plaintiffs proved multiple remittances and consequential losses flowing directly from defendants' fraudulent misrepresentations and are entitled to restitution of those remitted funds and proved consequential losses; unparticularised or unpleaded claims fail; claim for compound interest rejected for lack of particulars; exemplary damages awarded to punish and deter; appropriate pre-judgment interest fixed at commercial borrowing rate plus 1% (from payment dates for remittances and from service of writ for other damages) and judgment rate thereafter; costs to plaintiffs on party-and-party basis subject to taxation per Legal Aid Regulations.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 893
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: TING YUK; 2nd Plaintiff: IP WAI MAN; 3rd Plaintiff (ceased Participation): TING LAI SHAN (formerly TING YUNG); 1st Defendant: TING YEE WA (also known as Robert TING); 2nd Defendant: CHAN SIK YING (also known as Cindy CHAN); 3rd Defendant: TING YAU KAR (also known as Erica TING); 4th Defendant: TING YAU LI (also known as Shirley TING); 5th Defendant: TSOPANIDIS NICHOLAS (also known as TSOPANIDIS NICHOLAOS)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2018
- Case Number
- HCA422/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Deceit/fraud (civil Tort) / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment (defendants Defaulted)
- Outcome
- Judgment for 1st and 2nd plaintiffs; 1st–5th defendants ordered jointly and severally to pay specified sums in HKD and AUD with interest and costs
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation (deceit), Assessment of Damages, Restitution of Remitted Funds, Exemplary Damages, Pre Judgment Interest, Compound Interest, Mitigation, Pleading and Particularity
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TING YUK
1st Plaintiff
IP WAI MAN
2nd Plaintiff
TING LAI SHAN (formerly TING YUNG)
3rd Plaintiff (ceased Participation)
TING YEE WA (also known as Robert TING)
1st Defendant
CHAN SIK YING (also known as Cindy CHAN)
2nd Defendant
TING YAU KAR (also known as Erica TING)
3rd Defendant
TING YAU LI (also known as Shirley TING)
4th Defendant
TSOPANIDIS NICHOLAS (also known as TSOPANIDIS NICHOLAOS)
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Deceit/fraud (civil Tort) / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment (defendants Defaulted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Are remittances induced by defendants recoverable as damages for deceit?
- 2 What items of consequential loss flow directly from the fraud and are proved?
- 3 Whether compound interest may be awarded and on what basis?
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs proved multiple remittances and consequential losses flowing directly from defendants' fraudulent misrepresentations and are entitled to restitution of those remitted funds and proved consequential losses; unparticularised or unpleaded claims fail; claim for compound interest rejected for lack of particulars; exemplary damages awarded to punish and deter; appropriate pre-judgment interest fixed at commercial borrowing rate plus 1% (from payment dates for remittances and from service of writ for other damages) and judgment rate thereafter; costs to plaintiffs on party-and-party basis subject to taxation per Legal Aid Regulations.
Court Disposition
Judgment for 1st and 2nd plaintiffs; 1st–5th defendants ordered jointly and severally to pay specified sums in HKD and AUD with interest and costs
Orders
- 1st to 5th defendants to pay 1st and 2nd plaintiffs jointly and severally HK$5,506,586.06 and A$1,384,303.96 for damages arising from the fraud
- For remittances (HK$1,275,039.11 and A$1,384,303.96) defendants to pay pre-judgment interest at commercial borrowing rate plus 1% from respective dates of payment until date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment