CHAN CHUNG WAI and Other v. CHEUNG WAI PUI and Others
Noting concessions and pleadings, the court held that Companies Registry notices implying dates of appointment justified ordering production of the corresponding minutes for the 6th and 7th Defendants (items 8 and 9). Correspondence alleged but neither referenced nor admitted was not ordered as premature. Requests for documents about brands (items 11 and 12) were set aside as premature pending further particularisation of the pleadings. Costs before the Master were ordered against the Defendants with certificate for counsel; costs of the hearing of the appeal were ordered against the Plaintiffs as the Defendants substantially succeeded.
- Citation
- CHAN CHUNG WAI and Other v. CHEUNG WAI PUI and Others
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN CHUNG WAI; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN CHUNG CHUN; 3rd Plaintiff: CHAN CHUNG YIN; 4th Plaintiff: CHU PUI CHING; 1st Defendant: CHEUNG WAI PUI; 2nd Defendant: CHANG KUO HSIEN; 3rd Defendant: CHANG WEI CHUNG; 4th Defendant: WAI WAN CHIN; 5th Defendant: RAINBOW COME LIMITED; 6th Defendant: JIN JIANG TRADING COMPANY (H.K.) LIMITED; 7th Defendant: ELEGANT VIEW LIMITED; 8th Defendant: JAN NAM HONG LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 1998
- Case Number
- HCA8721/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Master's Order / Decision on Interlocutory Discovery and Costs
- Outcome
- Master's order varied in part (items 8 and 9) and set aside in part (items 11 and 12)
- Legal Topics
- Further and Better List of Documents, Disclosure of Corporate Records, Directors' Appointments, Pleadings Particularity, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN CHUNG WAI
1st Plaintiff
CHAN CHUNG CHUN
2nd Plaintiff
CHAN CHUNG YIN
3rd Plaintiff
CHU PUI CHING
4th Plaintiff
CHEUNG WAI PUI
1st Defendant
CHANG KUO HSIEN
2nd Defendant
CHANG WEI CHUNG
3rd Defendant
WAI WAN CHIN
4th Defendant
RAINBOW COME LIMITED
5th Defendant
JIN JIANG TRADING COMPANY (H.K.) LIMITED
6th Defendant
ELEGANT VIEW LIMITED
7th Defendant
JAN NAM HONG LIMITED
8th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Master's Order / Decision on Interlocutory Discovery and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master properly ordered further and better discovery for specified items
- 2 Whether notices to Companies Registry require production of board and general meeting minutes
- 3 Whether correspondence and documents relating to brands should be ordered absent particularised pleadings
Ratio Decidendi
Noting concessions and pleadings, the court held that Companies Registry notices implying dates of appointment justified ordering production of the corresponding minutes for the 6th and 7th Defendants (items 8 and 9). Correspondence alleged but neither referenced nor admitted was not ordered as premature. Requests for documents about brands (items 11 and 12) were set aside as premature pending further particularisation of the pleadings. Costs before the Master were ordered against the Defendants with certificate for counsel; costs of the hearing of the appeal were ordered against the Plaintiffs as the Defendants substantially succeeded.
Court Disposition
Master's order varied in part (items 8 and 9) and set aside in part (items 11 and 12)
Orders
- Item (8) varied to: All notices to the Companies Registry, minutes of board meetings and minutes of general meetings including annual general meetings and extraordinary general meetings of the 6th Defendant in relation to the appointment of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants and Kwok Lo Sum as directors or secretary of...
- Item (9) varied to: All notices to the Companies Registry, minutes of board meetings and minutes of general meetings including annual general meetings and extraordinary general meetings of the 7th Defendant in relation to the appointment of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants as directors or secretary of the 7th...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment