GE TRANSPORTATION (SHENYANG) CO, LTD v. A-POWER ENERGY GENERATION SYSTEMS,LTD AND OTHERS
On the pleadings the court was satisfied Head Dragon and ANE had notice of A-Power's indebtedness and, by transferring Liaoning shares at a significant undervalue after an interim/arbitral order, intended to render A-Power judgment‑proof; that disposition was voidable under s.60 CPO and also supported liability for inducing breach; accordingly default judgment was entered setting aside the transfer and ordering consequential relief and assessment of damages.
- Citation
- GE TRANSPORTATION (SHENYANG) CO, LTD v. A-POWER ENERGY GENERATION SYSTEMS,LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: GE Transportation (Shenyang) Co, Ltd; 1st Defendant: A-Power Energy Generation Systems, Ltd; 2nd Defendant: Head Dragon Holdings Limited; 3rd Defendant: Asia New Energy Group Limited; 4th Defendant: Lu Jinxiang; 5th Defendant: Zhang Yuqiang; 6th Defendant: Liaoning Hi-Tech Energy Group Co, Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2014
- Case Number
- HCA1720/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Civil Action (contract, Conspiracy, Proprietary Relief) / Application for Default Judgment Under Order 19 Rule 7; Judgment in Default Granted
- Outcome
- Default judgment granted against the 2nd and 3rd defendants; Share Transfer Agreement dated 3 May 2012 set aside; consequential relief granted; damages to be assessed by a Master.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Voidable Transactions, Fraudulent Conveyance, Inducing Breach of Contract, Damages, Disclosure Orders, Enforcement of Arbitral Award
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GE Transportation (Shenyang) Co, Ltd
Plaintiff
A-Power Energy Generation Systems, Ltd
1st Defendant
Head Dragon Holdings Limited
2nd Defendant
Asia New Energy Group Limited
3rd Defendant
Lu Jinxiang
4th Defendant
Zhang Yuqiang
5th Defendant
Liaoning Hi-Tech Energy Group Co, Ltd
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Action (contract, Conspiracy, Proprietary Relief) / Application for Default Judgment Under Order 19 Rule 7; Judgment in Default Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Share Transfer Agreement was voidable as a disposition made with intent to defraud under s.60 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance
- 2 Whether Head Dragon and ANE had knowledge and intention to render A-Power judgment‑proof by transferring the Liaoning shares at undervalue
- 3 Whether Head Dragon and ANE induced a breach of A-Power's obligations under the guarantee attracting damages
Ratio Decidendi
On the pleadings the court was satisfied Head Dragon and ANE had notice of A-Power's indebtedness and, by transferring Liaoning shares at a significant undervalue after an interim/arbitral order, intended to render A-Power judgment‑proof; that disposition was voidable under s.60 CPO and also supported liability for inducing breach; accordingly default judgment was entered setting aside the transfer and ordering consequential relief and assessment of damages.
Court Disposition
Default judgment granted against the 2nd and 3rd defendants; Share Transfer Agreement dated 3 May 2012 set aside; consequential relief granted; damages to be assessed by a Master.
Orders
- Share Transfer Agreement dated 3 May 2012 between Head Dragon and ANE set aside
- ANE to disclose by affirmation within 14 days whether it is legal and/or beneficial owner of the Liaoning shares and, if part only, identify which part
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment