YEUNG KAM YAU AND ANOTHER v. LAU LAWERENCE WING CHEE AND ANOTHER
The vendor failed to produce the written consent for side windows by completion and did not satisfactorily answer the requisition; that failure constituted a repudiatory breach permitting the purchasers to lawfully terminate the agreement; subsequent production of the consent did not remedy the vendor's breach or affect the purchasers' right to rescind.
- Citation
- YEUNG KAM YAU AND ANOTHER v. LAU LAWERENCE WING CHEE AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Yeung Kam Yau; 2nd Plaintiff: Lam Kiu; 1st Defendant: Lau Lawerence Wing Chee; 2nd Defendant: Mok Pui Man Paula
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2002
- Case Number
- DCMP3206/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Vendor and Purchaser Summons / Judgment (district Court)
- Outcome
- Agreement lawfully terminated by the Plaintiffs for vendor's repudiatory breach; defendants ordered to repay deposit with interest; costs reserved by order nisi.
- Legal Topics
- Good Title, Requisitions, Rescission for Repudiatory Breach, Completion, Land Grant Consent for Alterations
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yeung Kam Yau
1st Plaintiff
Lam Kiu
2nd Plaintiff
Lau Lawerence Wing Chee
1st Defendant
Mok Pui Man Paula
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Vendor and Purchaser Summons / Judgment (district Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the vendor satisfactorily answered purchaser's requisitions to show good title
- 2 Whether the side windows requisition was properly raised and specific
- 3 Whether failure to produce written consent for side windows at completion was a repudiatory breach entitling rescission
Ratio Decidendi
The vendor failed to produce the written consent for side windows by completion and did not satisfactorily answer the requisition; that failure constituted a repudiatory breach permitting the purchasers to lawfully terminate the agreement; subsequent production of the consent did not remedy the vendor's breach or affect the purchasers' right to rescind.
Court Disposition
Agreement lawfully terminated by the Plaintiffs for vendor's repudiatory breach; defendants ordered to repay deposit with interest; costs reserved by order nisi.
Orders
- Defendants to repay HK$96,000 to the Plaintiffs with interest at 8.72% from the date of the originating summons to the date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate to final payment
- Order nisi that Defendants pay the costs of the Plaintiffs of this action, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment