Grace International Ltd. v. The Incorporated Owners of Fontana Gardens and Other
House Rule (j) of the DMC for Block A could not lawfully authorise the managing agents or owners to disconnect a flat's water supply because disconnection/reconnection of inside services constitutes an 'alteration' requiring the Water Authority's written permission under Cap.102; additionally the 15 December 1995...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- Grace International Ltd. v. The Incorporated Owners of Fontana Gardens and Other
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Grace International Ltd.; 1st Defendant: The Incorporated Owners of Fontana Gardens; 2nd and 3rd Defendants: Fontana Gardens Owners and Occupiers Association; Alico Management Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1996
- Case Number
- HCA13338/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Dispute Concerning Building Management, Injunction and Counterclaim for Management Charges and Damages / Judgment at Trial (high Court)
- Outcome
- Injunction granted restraining defendants from disconnecting or interfering with water supply to Plaintiff's three units except temporary disconnection necessitated by pipeworks to entire blocks; Plaintiff held liable for arrears of management fees totalling HKD 79,619.25; Plaintiff awarded damages for repair costs...
- Legal Topics
- Injunction, Water Supply Disconnection, Deed of Mutual Covenant (dmc), Building Management Ordinance (cap.344), Waterworks Ordinance (cap.102), Management Charges and Surcharges, Duty to Repair, Set Off
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grace International Ltd.
Plaintiff
The Incorporated Owners of Fontana Gardens
1st Defendant
Fontana Gardens Owners and Occupiers Association; Alico Management Limited
2nd and 3rd Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Dispute Concerning Building Management, Injunction and Counterclaim for Management Charges and Damages / Judgment at Trial (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether House Rule (j) or DMC empowered managing agents/owners to disconnect inside water services
- 2 Whether disconnection/reconnection constituted an alteration requiring Water Authority permission under Cap.102
- 3 Whether the 1st Defendant was validly incorporated and its management committee validly constituted under Cap.344
Ratio Decidendi
House Rule (j) of the DMC for Block A could not lawfully authorise the managing agents or owners to disconnect a flat's water supply because disconnection/reconnection of inside services constitutes an 'alteration' requiring the Water Authority's written permission under Cap.102; additionally the 15 December 1995 resolution purporting to amend House Rules for Blocks B and D was invalid due to irregular constitution of the management committee under Cap.344 and defective notice; accordingly the injunction restraining defendants from disconnecting water was granted; the Plaintiff was nonetheless liable for certain arrears of management fees (net $79,619.25) but entitled to set-off damages...
Court Disposition
Injunction granted restraining defendants from disconnecting or interfering with water supply to Plaintiff's three units except temporary disconnection necessitated by pipeworks to entire blocks; Plaintiff held liable for arrears of management fees totalling HKD 79,619.25; Plaintiff awarded damages for repair costs...
Orders
- Injunction restraining Defendants from disconnecting or interfering with water supply to Plaintiff's three units in Blocks A, B and D except for temporary disconnection necessitated by pipeworks to entire blocks
- Plaintiff liable for arrears of management fees and related surcharge insofar as applicable amounting to HKD 79,619.25
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment