GREEN LIGHT MULTIPLEX CO. LTD (formerly known as GREEN LIGHT MARKETING CO. LTD and GLM INTERNATIONAL LTD) v. LAM SHI YAN
The 1st defendant, as General Manager, owed fiduciary and implied contractual duties; he breached those duties by actively procuring Abacus to treat Pinetum as its exclusive distributor and by diverting a mature business opportunity (P533) to Automatic Limited, thereby causing provable loss to the plaintiff in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2101
- Parties
- Plaintiff: GREEN LIGHT MULTIPLEX CO. LIMITED; 1st Defendant: LAM SHI YAN; 2nd Defendant (discontinued): HO MAN FAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2024
- Case Number
- HCA2294/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Dispute: Breach of Employment Contract, Fiduciary Duties and Related Commercial Torts / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff in part. Constructive dismissal and several asserted breaches by plaintiff rejected. 1st defendant found liable for breach of fiduciary and contractual duties in relation to Abacus inducement and diversion of P533 opportunity and liable for losses on Univision and HKZM Bridge projects; 1st...
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms of Employment Contract, Duty of Fidelity and Good Faith, Constructive Dismissal, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Inducement of Third Party to Breach Contract, Loss of Chance, Mitigation of Loss, Damages Quantification, Set Off, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GREEN LIGHT MULTIPLEX CO. LIMITED
Plaintiff
LAM SHI YAN
1st Defendant
HO MAN FAN
2nd Defendant (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Employment Dispute: Breach of Employment Contract, Fiduciary Duties and Related Commercial Torts / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether specified terms were implied into the Employment Agreement
- 2 Whether the 1st defendant owed fiduciary duties to the plaintiff and their scope
- 3 Whether the plaintiff repudiated the Employment Agreement or constructively dismissed the 1st defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st defendant, as General Manager, owed fiduciary and implied contractual duties; he breached those duties by actively procuring Abacus to treat Pinetum as its exclusive distributor and by diverting a mature business opportunity (P533) to Automatic Limited, thereby causing provable loss to the plaintiff in the Univision, HKZM Bridge and P533 matters. Other claims (Discovery Park, Consignment Arrangement, portions of Happy Valley) were not sufficiently proved. The Employment Agreement ended on 7 November 2014; the plaintiff’s claim succeeds in part and the 1st defendant’s counterclaim succeeds in part for performance bonus only.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff in part. Constructive dismissal and several asserted breaches by plaintiff rejected. 1st defendant found liable for breach of fiduciary and contractual duties in relation to Abacus inducement and diversion of P533 opportunity and liable for losses on Univision and HKZM Bridge projects; 1st...
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiff against 1st defendant for damages totalling HK$2,566,560.65 (Univision HK$271,652.21; HKZM Bridge HK$2,223,408.44; P533 HK$71,500.00)
- Set off of 1st defendant's counterclaim performance bonus HK$196,520.78 against plaintiff's award
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment