GUANGDONG FOODSTUFFS IMPORT & EXPORT (GROUP) CORPORATION AND ANOTHER v. TUNG FOOK CHINESE WINE (1982) CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER

bjbj JUDGMENT HIGH COURT ACTION NOS.7759, 9547 AND 11061 OF 1995 29th October 1998 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NOS.7759, 9547 AND 11061 OF 1995 ------------- HCA7759/95 HCA9547/95 BETWEEN GUANGDONG FOODSTUFFS IMPORT & EXPORT 1st Plaintiff (GROUP) CORPORATION YAU SHING HONG PROVISIONS LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff and TUNG FOOK CHINESE WINE (1982) CO. LTD. 1st Defendant SHIWAN BREWERY OF FOSHAN CITY IN 2nd Defendant GUANGDONG PROVINCE (By Original Action) -------------- (CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE PATRICK CHAN DATED 4th OCTOBER 1995) ------------------ AND BETWEEN GUANGDONG FOODSTUFFS IMPORT & EXPORT Plaintiff (GROUP) CORPORATION by Counterclaim and SHIWAN BREWERY OF FOSHAN CITY IN 1st Defendant GUANGDONG PROVINCE by Counterclaim CHUNG TAI WINE & SPIRIT COMPANY LIMITED 2nd Defendant by Counterclaim (By Counterclaim) ------------------ (CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER OF MASTER CANNON OF HIGH COURT DATED 3rd APRIL 1996) ---------------------- AND HCA11061/1995 BETWEEN GUANGDONG FOODSTUFFS IMPORT & EXPORT Plaintiff (GROUP) CORPORATION and TUNG FOOK CHINESE WINE (1982) CO. LTD. 1st Defendant CHINA RESOURCES ADVERTISING & EXHIBITION CO. LTD. 2nd Defendant -------------------- Coram : Hon Mr Justice Cheung in Court Dates of hearing : 4th - 7th, 13th 15th, 18th 20th, 27th - 29th May 1998, 2nd 5th, 8th 12th, 15th 18th, 22nd 26th, 29th - 30th June 1998, 2nd, 3rd, 10th, 13th 15th, 17th, 20th 23rd, 25th , 27th 29th July 1998, 21st 25th, 28th 30th September 1998, 8th and 9th October 1998 Date of handing down judgment : 29th October 1998 ------------------------ J U D G M E N T ------------------------ Part I 1. Introduction These actions are concerned with the intellectual property rights of two rice wine, namely, Super Mellow Mijiu ( wcps|R Super Mellow Mijiu, the copyright of the labels of the two wine, injurious falsehood and unlawful interference with business and contractual relationships. 2. The parties (1) Guangdong Foodstuffs Import & Export (Group) Corporation ( ) GDF is a state owned corporation established in 1954 under the Laws of the People s Republic of China ( the Mainland ). It s principal place of business is in Guangzhou. GDF has for many years carried on business in the export of foodstuffs including livestock, poultry, vegetables, fruits, soy sauce, rice wine, canned and other processed foods. These are products of the Guangdong Province in the Mainland. The products have been exported to Hong Kong, Macau and countries throughout the world. GDF claims ownership of the goodwill of the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu. It claims to be the owner of the copyright in the labels of the two rice wine. (2) Yau Shing Hong Provisions Limited ( Yau Shing Hong ) Yau Shing Hong is a Hong Kong company and has been the distributor in Hong Kong of GDF s Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu since February 1995. (3) Tung Fook Chinese Wine (1982) Co. Ltd. ( Tung Fook (1982) ) Tung Fook (1982) is a Hong Kong company incorporated in 1982. It was the distributor in Hong Kong of GDF s Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu from 1982 to January 1995. Since January 1995, Tung Fook (1982) has distributed in Hong Kong the Zu Miao ( Guangdong Province ( Shiwan Brewery ) Shiwan Brewery is a state owned distillery and a maker of rice wine in Shiwan Town, Foshan, Guangdong Province. Before 1995, it produced for GDF (this is the case of GDF) the Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu. Since 1995, it produced for export to Hong Kong the Zu Miao Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu. (5) China Resources Advertising & Exhibition Company Limited ( ) CRA is a Hong Kong company carrying on business as an advertising agent and designer in advertising. GDF claims that it commissioned China Advertising Company, the predecessors of CRA, to design the label of the Super Mellow Mijiu. By an assignment dated 1st September 1995, CRA assigned the copyright in the label to Tung Fook (1982). (6) Chung Wine & Spirit Company Limited ( Chung ) Chung Tai and its predecessor were the distributors in Hong Kong of GDF s Pearl River Bridge Shiwan Mijiu. Since 1995, Chung Tai distributed in Hong Kong the Zu Miao Shiwan Mijiu. (7) Foshan Foods Import & Export Company of Guangdong ( Foshan Foods ) Foshan Foods is not a party in the actions. However it played a major role in the disputes. It is a state owned enterprises based in Foshan. Foshan Foods was the sub branch company of GDF from 1961 to 1994. 3. Cause of dispute The Plaintiffs case is that from 1974 or 1975, GDF started to sell in Hong Kong, through its Hong Kong distributor, the Pearl River Bridge Shiwan Mijiu. Starting from 1979, GDF had been selling through its local distributor the Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu. The wine were produced by the Shiwan Brewery. They were exported to Hong Kong by Foshan Foods for and on behalf of GDF. In January 1995, Tung Fook (1982) and Chung Tai introduced for sale in Hong Kong the Zu Miao brand of Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu. The wine were produced by Shiwan Brewery and supplied by Foshan Foods. This led to the present dispute between the parties. 4. Background (1) Export trade Before I deal with the history of the two wine, I will briefly set out the Plaintiffs case on the economic background of the Mainland between 1949 and 1995, and the relationship of the units engaged in foreign trade. From its establishment in 1949 and until the introduction of the open door policy in the 1980s, the Mainland vigorously adopted a centralized planned economy. The export of foodstuffs was vested in the China National Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Import and Export Corporation ( S=~lQ S=~lQ /elQ S[Oq\0W@S/elQ w[Oq\ \/elQ S). Foshan Foods was a coastal company. (2) Relationship between CNC and GDF Under the planned economy, GDF had to comply with the export plans prepared by CNC. This means that GDF had to earn the required level of foreign currency from the export trade and the earning had to be remitted to CNC. CNC would in turn provide the resources, both in terms of finance and raw material, to enable GDF to fulfill the target. The Mainland introduced the open door policy on economic matters in the 1980s. However, the lifting of export control of foodstuffs only came about in 1993. Before 1993, export of foodstuffs was tightly controlled by the state. One reason was that the export of foodstuff was a loss making business. (3) Changes in 1988 In 1988, there was a severance of relationship between GDF and CNC. The financial control by CNC on provincial companies such as GDF was severed. Instead, the provincial companies, such as GDF would be responsible to the provincial authorities the financial target they had This system lasted from 1988, 1989 and 1990. (4) Changes in 1991 In 1991, there was a further change in that the provincial companies had to be self sufficient in four respects : (1) management of their organization; (2) profit and loss in their trading; (3) control of their organization; and (4) development of their business. Whereas under the contract system d by it, Foshan Foods and Shiwan Brewery. During the export control period, GDF was the only company which could export the rice wine and decide on : (a) the kinds of rice wine, the quantity and the overseas markets they were to be exported; (b) which person or company was to be engaged as distributor for a particular product in a given market; (c) the supply and price of product; (d) which of GDF s trade marks was to be used; (e) which sub branch companies should be appointed as the coastal company to carry out supply and shipment under sales contracts signed with overseas distributors; and (f) which factory should be appointed to make the products. Furthermore, during this period, GDF had the sole power to : (a) introduce a new product in any market; (b) terminate an existing product in any market; (c) terminate a particular overseas distributor; (d) terminate the assignment of a coastal company; and (e) terminate appointment of a factory as a maker of its product. (1) Signing of sales contracts Sales contracts with overseas buyers were signed by GDF in the two annual Trade Fairs held in Guangzhou every Spring (15th April to 15th May) and Autumn (15th October to 15th November). The duration of the contract signed at each Trade Fair was six months. Prior to the Fair, GDF would decide which customer it would sign the contract with, the type of goods and the quantity involved. Contracts would be signed by representatives designated by GDF. (2) Execution of sales contracts GDF carried out the sales contracts by assigning the supply and shipment of its products to one or more of the coastal companies. These coastal company would establish direct contact with the factory appointed on matters such as costs and quality control. The coastal company would arrange for shipment and custom clearance of the goods to be shipped to the distributors who had signed the sales contract with GDF. The distributors would issue documentary credit in favour of the coastal company which would issue invoices for the goods and present shipping and commercial documents for negotiation of the documentary credit. The coastal company would receive the credit proceeds and pay the factory on invoices issued to the coastal company. The surplus, if any, were held by the coastal company for GDF. If a loss was made, it would be made good by GDF eventually. (3) Relationship of GDF and Foshan Foods Mr Hu Chang Fu, who until 1996 was the General Manager and the representative of GDF, stated that the relationship between GDF and it complish these plans by co ordinating its sub branch companies. They would have to achieve the plans transmitted by GDF. They would have to submit to GDF their annual targets of production. GDF would then allocate the resources to the sub branch companies. In terms of finance, the sub branch companies had to report to GDF its financial position on a regular basis by monthly, quarterly and yearly reports. It had to send to GDF profits made in a given year, and where losses were sustained, GDF would make good such losses. The sub branch companies could not and had no right to decide on their own finance and expenditures. The financial and planning peg was removed in 1993 and 1994 respectively. After 1994, the sub branch companies were no longer required to submit their annual production targets to GDF or comply with the plans of GDF. Further, after 1993 they would no longer be financially dependent on GDF. The sub branch companies could carry out business on their own subject to possible control of the local export authorities in their district. After the severance with its former sub branch companies, GDF was re grouped and was later called Guangdong Foodstuffs Import & Export (Group) Corporation. Certain previous departments within GDF were incorporated as companies under GDF s direct control. However links with the former sub branch companies are still maintained. About 40 of them, including Foshan Foods, voluntarily joined Guangdong Foodstuffs Import & Export Enterprise Group ( GDF Enterprise Group ). This group is headed by GDF. According to Mr Hu, this served as some kind of chamber of commerce for the various former sub branch companies. GDF would provide co ordination among the members of this group and assistance to expand the export market on foodstuff. (4) Pearl River Bridge marks Since the late 1950s, the products of GDF were marketed in the overseas countries under one or more of its trade marks. In the case of rice wine and soy sauce, the name and mark Pearl River Bridge s_lKjLr) sKj) lKj) 979 onwards, GDF was registered in the Mainland as the owners of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark of wine, soy sauce and other products. CNC still retains ownership of the trade mark in relation to canned foods. It was decided by CNC to hold the trade mark on canned foods for the time being. The reason for retaining the ownership of the trade mark was to take into account changes in the administrative structure of Hainan Island and Guangzhou City which ceased to be under the administrative control of the Guangdong Province. In Hong Kong, CNC was registered as the owner of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark on wine on 3rd November 1970. On 19th November 1991, CNC assigned the trade mark and related goodwill in respect of wine, spirits and liquor to GDF (Bundle J/17). The assignment was accepted by the Trade Mark Office on 26th May 1996 (Bundle D11/486). CNC was also the owner of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark in 11 foreign countries. In 1990 to 1991 it transferred the ownership of the trade marks to GDF. (5) Production base GDF would provide the sub branch companies with the necessary finance to build factories for the production of articles destined for export purposes. The raw material used in the production would be provided by GDF to the sub branch companies which in turn would provide the same to the factories. When the sub branch companies purchased articles from the factories, it would be conducted on the basis of a purchase and sale with the sub branch companies paying the factories the price of the goods in RMB. (6) Transportation of goods The actual transportation of goods would be carried out by the sub branch companies. However, GDF would provide trucks and ships to the sub branch companies and GDF would also assist the sub branch companies to build piers. When a sub branch company was unable to carry out the transportation, GDF would assist it in arranging transportation. (7) Quality control Quality control of products was exercised by the sub branch companies. However, GDF also exercised control by carrying out inspection of products and sending heads of department or trade representatives to inspect the production together with the representatives of the sub branch companies. There would be regular meetings between GDF and the sub branch on matters of production and quality control. GDF could stop the production export and cancel the right of the sub branch companies to purchase the goods from the factories. (8) Local factories The factories belonged to the local authori wcps|R ]N_l e Processed Foods Department and attended by the staff involved in the wine trade of the sub branch companies, Mr Lor informed those present that GDF had decided to introduce new rice wine in Hong Kong and invited their views on the subject. Having listened to the views, it was decided that GDF would introduce four new products into the Hong Kong market as part of the Pearl River Bridge rice wine range. GDF named these four products as -Nq\s|R wcps|R \ s| R ors for the rice wine, namely : Name of Product Coastal Co. Brewery Distributor in Hong Kong 1. Zhongshan Mijiu Shiqi Foods Shiqi Distillery Kwong Tai Sik Pun 2. Shiwan Mijiu Foshan Foods Shiwan Brewery Chung Tai 3. Shiqi Mijiu Shiqi Foods Shiqi Distillery Tai Shun 4. Red Shuang Jin Guangzhou Cereals and Oils Import & Export Corp. Bai Yuen Distillery (in Guangzhou) Yau Shing Hong The raw materials, packaging materials and capital for the introduction of these rice wine, as, indeed, in the case of all other rice wine, were provided by GDF. The new wine were introduced in the Hong Kong market in or about 1975. They were all exported and marketed under their own labels bearing the Pearl River Bridge mark. As for the labels, Mr Lor instructed Mr Chiu Kong of Foshan Foods to arrange for the label design of the Shiwan Mijiu. The other coastal companies were also asked to arrange for the label design of the other three rice wine assigned to them. The labels had to be submitted by the coastal companies for his approval. Each of the label design for the four rice wine were later submitted to him and he approved them eventually. The label of the Shiwan Mijiu was as follows: After a year or so, Wu Fung Hong reported to GDF that the Hong Kong market was rendered slightly chaotic with the simultaneous influx of the four different kinds of new wine and suggested that GDF should cut down the number of wine. Mr Lor consulted his colleagues and later decided to terminate all the four new wine and int ^qgs|R and Chung Tai was appointed the distributor of the wine. About a year after the introduction of the Guangdong Mijiu, Madam Wong, a manageress of Chung Tai, asked Mr Lor to reinstate the Shiwan Mijiu in the Hong Kong market. Mr Lor after consulting his colleagues at the Processed Foods Department later agreed to reintroduce the Shiwan Mijiu for Chung Tai. Yau Shing Hong also asked Mr Lor to reintroduce the other three rice wine which had been terminated. After consideration, Mr Lor agreed to reintrodu here. He also supported Mr s idea. Mr Chiu then informed Mr Chen Bing Hao and others of the Shiwan Brewery of the decision. Mr Chiu told them to prepare the samples and also design the label of the wine. When the samples were ready, he took the samples to the Trade Fair. The samples were shown to Mr Cheung Shing Hung (also known as Mr Cheung Chun) of Chung Tai which later became the distributor of Shiwan Mijiu. Chung Tai was introduced to Foshan Foods by Wu Fung Hong. Mr Chiu said that the distributor was decided by Wu Fung Hong, neither GDF nor Foshan Foods could decide on the distributor. Mr Chiu said that a few designs on the label were prepared by Shiwan Brewery, the one that was chosen was the label now being used on the Shiwan Mijiu. The design he saw was in colour but without the Pearl River Bridge trade mark or the name of the company. The design was also shown to Mr Lor. The samples of wine were taken back to Hong Kong for tasting by representatives of Chung Tai. They also saw t D}D}w -Nq\s|R \s|R labels for GDF s approval. He said that the labels need not be approved by GDF. He said that there were many products and their labels were not subject to GDF s approval. The concept of copyright did not exist at that time. Mr Chiu could not recall when was the name Shiwan Mijiu being decided. He said that the label was taken to Foshan Foods and shown to Mr Yau Koon Wah of GDF who was in Foshan Foods at that time. He denied that Mr Koon Wah had supplied him with the Pearl River Bridge standard design which was to be used on the new label. Mr Chiu further said that he took the samples of wine to the 1975 Trade Fair. He also showed to Mr Sik of Wu Fung Hong two identical labels which were not yet printed. He said that he had taken six seven bottles of sample to the Trade Fair, but only three to four bottles were given to Chung Tai. In respect of the name Shiwan Mijiu, he said that the words *Y TR [Oq\ irlQ [Oq\ ]@\) wcps|R wcp en instructed the colour printing factory in Foshan City to design the label for the new wine. He told the designer that the product was intended for both export and internal sale. Hence, the space in the middle part of the label was left blank for the trade mark to be inserted. Afterwards a number of designs were produced by the designer. By February/March 1975, the basic design was agreed upon. The design was required to be approved by the local Revolutionary Committee to see if the content was politically acceptable. The original colour design was lost but the draft at Exhibit D11 was the draft prepared for the purpose of preparation of colour scheme. Mr Chiu of Foshan Foods was shown the design and was happy with it. Mr Chen said in June/July 1975, production of the Shiwan Mijiu began for export purposes. By 1978, there was internal sale of the wine. He denied that he had knowledge that four new wine were introduced in Hong Kong between 1975 to 1978. C. Mr Chan Wan Fai DW15 Mr Chan Wan wcps|R N6q) factory that the products were for export and asked it to produce the labels quickly. He also told the factory that Foshan Foods would be responsible for the paper required for the printing of the label. D. Cancellation of the Shiwan Mijiu Mr Chiu said that during a Trade Fair, a vi ]N_lR ^qgs|R eas Shiwan Mijiu was selling at a higher price. Eventually, the decision to introduce Guangdong Mijiu was made. Mr Chiu did not know how the decision was made, he said that Wu Fung Hong notified GDF of the change and GDF issued notice to change the wine to Guangdong Mijiu. After the change, representations were made to higher authorities to revive the Shiwan Mijiu and the wine was revived about a year later. Mr Chiu said that Chung Tai had done a lot of work in this regard. Mr Chen Bing Hao said that in 1978 at a conference organized by Foshan Foods on industry and trade, the Shiwan Brewery learned that the export of the Shiwan Mijiu was to be cancelled and instead, the Shiwan Brewery together with other breweries would export a wine called the Guangdong Mijiu. It objected and had, by letter dated 25th March 1978 and another letter of 8th May 1979, asked the authority for the retention of the Shiwan Mijiu. The letters were addressed to the local units and Foshan Foods but not to GDF. The Shiwan Mijiu wcpLr wcps|R s_lKjLr per Mellow Mijiu would be handled by Tung Fook; (2) Tung Fook would provide the packaging material for the wine which would be deducted from the cost of the price of the wine; (3) Tung Fook would design the label for the wine in Hong Kong, Tung Fook would pay the design fees which would be later deducted from the price of the goods. The right to the label belonged to GDF; (4) Foshan Food was to be the coastal company ( abels and the machines for installing the cap. At this meeting Mr Lor also specified that the Pearl River Bridge trade mark must be in the middle of the label and the label must state that the production of the wine was under the supervision of GDF. Mr Lor also said that the label would belong to GDF. After this meeting, there were a number of further meetings, but Shiwan Brewery did not take part in these meetings. Chung Yuen asked Mr Chiu of Foshan Foods to prepare a number of samples of the rice ^JTlQ Mellow Mijiu and Chung Hau Yuen took the design to Mr Kwok of Wu Fung Hong. He also showed the design to his father, Mr Chung Cheong, who had no views on the matter. After the label was approved by Wu Fung Hong, Mr Chung showed the label to Mr Lor of GDF at the Spring Trade Fair of 1979. The design fee was about $1,000 odd and was deducted from the price of the wine. The labels were printed in Hong Kong and paid for by Tung Fook, the cost was again deducted from the price of the wine. The label of the Super Mellow Mijiu was as follows In the Trade Fair, Mr Kwok told Mr Lor that a memorandum needed to be issued to Tung Fook. Mr Lor then asked Mr Tang Kwan ( Tang ) to prepare the memorandum. The memorandum was dated 12th May 1979 (Defendants Core Bundle 34-1). Chung Hau Yuen signed on behalf of Tung Fook and Mr Tang signed on behalf of Foshan Foods. The memorandum stated that : e[Oq\ Q/elQ OKNyr SsTI{ ^ N#j u"uKN O(uKN S_jI{ 0GW1u >k-Ncbd Y g*g vKNU e,g@ws^I{ |^yTSFU Yuen then dealt with Foshan Foods directly, because there was no need to deal with GDF. The first contract on the Super Mellow Mijiu was signed in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1979. This contract was no longer available. The contract was signed by Chung Yuen on behalf of Tung Fook and Mr Tang of the wine group of the Trade Fair. (ii) Promotion Chung Hau Yuen also promoted the wine by using an advertising agency. He conceived of the idea of promoting the wine as the of the rice wine ( ^WSL Sey) old Chung Yuen that in principle GDF agreed to let him handle Super Mellow Mijiu and he asked Chung Yuen to set up a new company for this purpose. Chung Hau Yuen signed the sales contract with GDF at the Autumn Trade Fair of 1981 and in the early part of 1982, at the at there might be changes in the distributorship and the distributorship might be given back to Tung Fook. At the Trade Fair, Chung Hau Yuen saw Mr Tang who was the leader of the wine group and Mr Chiu. Mr Tang told Chung Hau Yuen that he could not sign the contract for the wine with him and he was asked to see GDF. A meeting was arranged with Mr Hung Man ( eviously been advised by Guangnam Hong not to sign any contract in case he was not given the sole distributorship. He did not sign any contract and returned to Hong Kong. He approached Guangnam Hong and Wu Fung Hong for assistance. Mr Wong Shuang Kong ( Xn_l) fter the closing of the Trade Fair, Mr Wong asked Chung Yuen to open the letters of credit in favour of Foshan Foods. A few days later, Mr Wong told him that despite his efforts, he was not able to ask GDF to give the sole distributorship to him. The Super Mellow Mijiu had to be handled by two distributors. Chung Yuen was also asked to sign on a contract which had already been signed by Mr Tang and stamped with a chop. He had no alternative but to sign on the contract. He did not notice the date that was placed on the contract. The contract was dated 1st November 1982. (v) Termination of the distributorship There were price competitions by Bo Man Hong and Tung Fook (1982) which took over from Tung Fook. This affected other types of rice wine. As a result, Guangnam Hong and GDF told Foshan Foods to stop the supply of Super Mellow Mijiu to the two distributors. In 1982, a team from Foshan Foods came to Hong Kong. Mr Lor Qing Qin va Yuen sought the help of Foshan Foods and GDF, but Mr of GDF merely said that he would look into the problem. Chung Hau Yuen felt that GDF was not trustworthy and he had lost interest in the business. He sold the whole of the wine stock to a company called City Mineral Water n4l d become the East Canada distributor of GDF for the Pearl River Bridge Brand soy sauce. (vi) Cross examination of Chung Hau Yuen Chung Hau Yuen was cross examined at great length. The purpose was to show that he was not a credible witness. It was suggested that the events described by him did not take place, namely, the design of the label was not conceived by him but by Mr Ngai and the meeting in February 1979 on the Super Mellow Mijiu did not take place. The Defendants case was that there never was a meeting in February 1979 in which decision was made by GDF on the Super Mellow Mijiu. Chung Hau Yuen said that the tasting of samples was held sometime between the meeting in February 1979 and the Autumn Trade Fair of 1979. He could not give the exact date of the tasting. He denied that samples were provided to him in Hong Kong on the new product. In a letter dated 12th June 1979, (Bundle D(2), p.916) sent by Foshan Foodstuff to Tung Fook, it referred to Tung Fook s request to send further samples of the rice wine. He said he did make such request but he had never received the samples in Hong Kong. He was referred to a draft designs of the words of Super Mellow Mijiu. They were dated 2nd July 1978 and 25th July 1978 respectively. He said that he did not know whether the dates were correct or not, but if they were the correct dates, then Mr Kwok must have already by then agreed to his proposal and had asked the advertising agency to prepare the design. As to the design of the label, it was sketched by Mr Ngai in front of him in his office. He agreed that he and Mr Kwok had jointly raised the idea of using the shape of a Chinese chop as part of the label. The chop was quite similar to the logo of the Independent Commission Against Corruption and this idea was conceived by him. The diamond shape of the logo was also conceived by him. He denied that the chop shape and the diamond shape of the label were conceived by Mr Ngai. He denied that the words wcpsO wcp hat the idea was raised by GDF. Chung Yuen denied that it was Tung Fook who paid for the design fees and Tung Fook had not sought the reimbursement of the fees. (vii) 1995 Visit of Foshan Foods and subsequent events He was also cross examined about his visit to Foshan in 1995 and a letter he wrote to Foshan Foods in November 1995. The parties agreed that I need not be concerned with these matters. B. PW3, Tang Kwan ( oRD}w . He also introduced Chung Yuen to the glass factory in Shiqi to make the glass cups for the Super Mellow Mijiu. C. Mr Lor Mr Lor confirmed the evidence of Chung Yuen on how the Super Mellow Mijiu came into being. (2) Defendants evidence A. Mr Chen Bing Hao Mr Chen Bing Hao said that in June 1978, Mr Chiu and Mr Fung lly said he could not recall whether Chung Yuen came as well, eventually he agreed that Chung Yuen also came. By that time the Brewery had developed six to seven samples; they were tasted but found not acceptable. The request was to develop a pro *Y TR raised. Mr Chung Cheong said that Shiwan Brewery was to deal with the wine while Tung Fook was to deal with the design in Hong Kong. After the visit, the Shiwan Brewery continued to develop the new wine. By September/October 1978, Shiwan Brewery had decided on the new wine. In February/March 1979, the basic product was produced and six samples were provided to Foshan Foods. Some time later, Foshan Foods told them that the wine was good but asked for the bitterness in the taste to be removed. Mr Chen then decided to mix the product with old wine from the Shiwan Brewery. The alcoholic content of the product was adjusted. Six new samples were delivered to Foshan Foods for tasting. These samples were delivered to Tung Fook by Foshan Foods. About 10 days later, the Shiwan Brewery was told to produce the wine. In about April/May 1979, Chung Cheong, his wife and Chung Hau Yuen came to the Shiwan Brewery together with Mr Chiu of Foshan Foods, Kuk Bor of GDF, Mr Kwok of Wu Fung Hong and representatives from the Foshan Light Industrial Bureau. The new wine was highly praised at this meeting and the alcoholic content was agreed upon. The parties then decided on the name of the wine. The visitors brought a draft design which was similar to the present Super Mellow Mijiu label. On the main label two names appeared, namely, }s|R g/c) wcpsO wcpsO back label would not be added for the time being. Mr Chen gave the order to produce the new wine in June 1979. The raw material for the production was provided by Foshan Foods. The glass bottles were provided by glass bottle factories in the Mainland. The Super Mellow Mijiu labels were supplied by Tung Fook from Hong Kong. The first contract on the Super Mellow Mijiu was dated 11th October 1979 (Bundle D12/74) and the first batch of wine was delivered to Foshan Foods in October 1979. From 1980 onwards, there was also internal sale of the Super Mellow Mijiu. The internal sale increased each year. Mr Chen denied that before the tasting in April and May 1979, the name Super Mellow Mijiu was already decided. He further denied that the Shiwan Brewery was not required to be consulted on the name of the new wine and he denied that his evidence of the discussion on the name of the Super Mellow Mijiu was for the purpose of raising the level of involvement by Shiwan Brewery in this litigation. B. Mr Chan uR6R that the product belonged to it, other factories in the Guangdong Province also produced products with the same name. C. Mr Chiu Kong Mr Chiu also said that Mr Chung Cheong of Tung Fook suggested the idea of producing the new wine. Mr Chung Cheong was a native in the Foshan area and he suggested the Shiwan Brewery to produce a better quality wine. On an occasion in which the long as a short distance away and met Mr Chen and the others. Mr Chiu could not recall how many tastings were made or where the tastings were conducted. Although Mr Chiu in his evidence chief said that it was Mr Chung Cheong who mentioned about the new wine, he said, in his cross examination, that before Mr Chung Cheong came, he had already heard from Chung Yuen in the Trade Fair that Tung Fook wanted the new wine in the market. Mr Kwok was also present. Mr Chiu denied that there was a discussion on the Super Mellow Mijiu in the office of GDF in February 1979. He also said that he could not recall such a meeting and if there were such a meeting, he should have remembered it. In his evidence chief, Mr Chiu seemed to say that Mr Chung Cheong and the parties had visited the Shiwan Brewery twice. However, in cross examination, Mr Chiu admitted that he was not present in the second visit. He also said Mr Chung Cheong only brought along the two wine on the second visit. While Mr Chiu was initially assertive that the first contract of the Super Mellow Mijiu was discussed between him and Mr Chung Cheong and Chung Hau Yuen, he somehow relented in cross examination when it was put to him that Mr Chung Cheong was not present in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1979. Mr Chiu said in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1981, Chung Hau Yuen informed him that his father had died and his mother did not want to handle the Super Mellow Mijiu. Chung Yuen wanted to set up Bo Hong to handle the Super Mellow Mijiu. Mr Chiu told him that there was no problem. He said that the decision to give the distributorship to Bo Hong was not made by him alone. It was also not made by Mr alone. He denied that the change required GDF s approval. He said that the decision vested with Wu Fung Hong. The contract on the supply of the Supper Mellow Mijiu was signed again with Tung Fook in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1982. Since Chung Yuen had done a lot of work for the wine, he could not be excluded totally from the distributorship of the Super Mellow Mijiu. Mr Chiu said that he had suggested to Mr Lau Hung Man of GDF that both Tung Fook and Bo Hong should handle the wine but he did not know who made the actual decision. Mr Chiu stated that because of the difference in price offered by Tung Fook (1982) and Bo Man Hong on the Super Mellow Mijiu, Mr Yuan had a discussion with them on the matter. He said the meeting with Tung Fook (1982) and Bo Man Hong was chaired by Mr Yuan. Mr Chiu did not take part in the meeting. The agreement dated 29th March 1985 was prepared and drafted by Mr Yuan. D. Mr Chung Cheung Mr Chung Cheung is the eldest son of Mr Chung Cheong. He took over the operation of Tung Fook after the death of his father. A limited company, namely Tung Fook (1982) was established. Although in his witness statement he stated that his father developed the Super Mellow Mijiu, obviously he was not in a position to give personal knowledge on this matter. He gave evidence on how he was refused the distribution contract of Super Mellow Mijiu in the Trade Fair and his attempts to get back the distributorship through the assistance of his acquaintances in various Chinese government departments. He said he was refused the contract in the Autumn Trade Fair 1981, he eventually met Mr Lau Hung g, Mr was also present. Mr Lau told Chung Cheung that he should set up a limited company and hire Chung Yuen as the manager. Bo Hong should be allowed to carry on trading for six months. After the meeting, Chung Who Cheung was asked by his acquaintance in the Mainland to prepare a record of the meeting and the copies were to be sent to the relevant organizations. Chung Cheung prepared the record (Bundle C4/97). His acquaintance told him that he would send the copies of the record to the organizations. By a letter dated 10th September 1982, Tung Fook offered Chung Yuen to be the manager of the sales department of Tung Fook from 1st December 1982. The offer was rejected by Chung Yuen. Chung Cheung attended the Autumn Trade Fair of 1982. He met Ms Kuk and Mr Chiu and placed the orders with them. However, no contract was signed and it was only after ten days that a meeting was set up in which he met Mr Hu, Ms Kuk, Mr Tang and Mr Chiu. Mr Hu announced that the Super Mellow Mijiu distributorship would be given to Tung Fook. He also stated that all contracts signed outside the Trade Fair was illegal. Chung Who Cheung, however, did not know what Mr Hu meant by that. Later, Chung Who Cheung gave the order to Mr Chiu who confirmed that the terms of sale would be the same as before. E. Mr Yuan Jin Yuan : Cancellation of Bo Man Hong s Distributorship DW3 Yuan Jin Yuan ( Yuan k (1982) in the same product. Foshan Foods had warned both Tung Fook (1982) and Bo Man Hong to comply with the contract terms, otherwise it would cancel the contracts with them (telex dated 28th November 1984, D12/58). In a meeting in Hong Kong in March 1985, Mr Yuan met the representative of both companies. He drafted an agreement requesting both companies to sign. The agreement dated 29th March 1985 (D5/2313) was signed by Tung Fook (1982). Mr Yuan said that Chung Hau Yuen should have signed a similar agreement, otherwise he would not have continued to supply the wine to Bo Hong. After the meeting in March 1985, Bo Hong was still distributing the wine in the pier and shortly thereafter Foshan Foods cancelled the contract with Bo Hong. The agreement of 29th March 1985 was signed within the authority of Mr Yuan. He did not inform GDF of this. Further the decision to stop the supply to Bo Hong was also not made known to GDF. F. DW9 Mr Ngai Chung ^JTlQ usiness Department and retired in 1990 as the Assistant Manager of Customers Service. Before he joined China Advertising, he worked in Wu Fung Hong. He knew Mr Chung Cheong very well in the various business promotion activities of Chinese products. In relation to the design of the Super Mellow Mijiu label, he said that he was asked by Mr Kwok of Wu Fung Hong to prepare a design for a new rice wine. He was told that the design should not be similar to other rice wine already in the market. At that time -Nq\s|R \s|R wcps|R c%f) ) is squarish, it would be put in the centre of the design. The names of other wine were usually placed horizontally from left to right. He thought of the design of a Chinese seal or chop and the words would begin from top to bottom. During the discussion, he made sketches of his design in front of Mr Kwok. Then he asked his production unit to prepare a layout ( wsTS raft (in black and white) was supplied to Mr Kwok. Mr Ngai, however, was not given back the final draft for the purpose of printing. Mr Ngai also said that the idea of two dragons on the main label and the colouring all came from him. Afterwards, when Mr Ngai visited Tung Fook he asked Mr Chung Cheong about the draft label and whether the business of the new wine was finalized. Mr Chung Cheong asked him to talk to Chung Yuen on the matter. About a year later, Chung Yuen told Mr Ngai that the new wine would soon be arriving in Hong Kong and asked him to design posters for the Super Mellow Mijiu. The matter was then handled by an assistant of Mr Ngai. Mr Ngai said that China Advertising received a design fee for the label, this was included in the charge for supplying the poster to Chung Yuen. The gist of Mr Ngai s evidence is that the design of the Super Mellow Mijiu label was discussed between him and Mr Kwok. It was after he had prepared the design that he talked to Chung Hau Yuen. Mr Ngai had previously signed three written documents for this case, the first was in the form of a statement in Chinese while the other two were affirmations. The first statement was dated 16th September 1995. He said he was asked by a former colleague of China Advertising to meet Mr Dong of GDF and a solicitor. The solicitor prepared the statement for him to sign. In this statement, he said that it was Chung Hau Yuen who instructed him to prepare the Super Mellow Mijiu label. It was stated that in 1979, Chung Yuen of Tung Fook telephoned him and asked him to prepare a design for the label of a wine. He then went to Chung Yuen s office. On arrival in Tung Fook, Mr Chung Cheong told him that the matter of the design would be handled by Chung Yuen and he could discuss the matter with Chung Yuen. Chung Yuen told him that Tung Fook would introduce a rice wine and he hoped that it would be distinctive from the other wine of Tung Fook. Chung Yuen had also asked him about the names c%f) Hong to consult his views. On 18th September 1995, Mr Ngai made an affirmation ( the first affirmation ). He was told by the lawyer that it was a matter of procedure to sign the document. Apart from some minor aspects, the content of the affirmation was the same as the Chinese statement. Mr Ngai said that the contents of these two documents were different from what he had told the lawyer. Nonetheless, he was asked by the lawyer to sign these two documents. When he was asked to prepare to sign the affirmation, he told the lawyer that it was in English and he did not understand English and the lawyer orally explained to him in Cantonese about the content. Apart from these two documents, Mr Ngai had given a further affirmation ( the second affirmation ) to the Defendants solicitors. In it he stated that part of the content of the first affirmation was not what he had said and he made the second affirmation to clarify the position. In the second affirmation, he said that he had informed the Plaintiffs lawyer and Mr Dong that it was Chung Yuen of Tung Fook who contacted him for the design of the labels. He also stated that he did not tell the lawyer that Mr Chung Cheong had retired at that time and that the business of Tung Fook was handled by Chung Yuen. Further, Chung Hau Yuen did not mention about rice wine from Guangdong. In the first affirmation, it was stated that : 5. .... I was instructed by Mr Chung Yuen to design and write this Chinese characters of me some indication about how he wanted the label to be, and after getting an understanding of what he wanted I started to design the labels by expressing the ideas on paper and preparing drafts. Mr Chung Hau Yuen, and other people like Mr Kwok Kang Kai of Ng Fung Hong, gave their comments and after several exchange of ideas and several amendments by the design staff of China Advertising, the final version of the labels for the Super Mellow Mijiu were finalized. Mr Ngai also denied that Chung Yuen took him to see Mr Kwok. He further denied he had said that the words were added to the product by Chung Yuen himself. (3) The solicitors evidence : rebuttal of Ngai Chung s evidence The Plaintiffs called Mr Kwong Mun Fai, the solicitor who described the meeting he had with Mr Ngai and Mr Dong and a Vice Manager of China Advertising on 16th September 1995. He had also prepared an affidavit about the meeting. Mr Kwong said that he explained to Mr Ngai the purpose of the meeting and that he had to ask him the facts surrounding the design of the label of the Super Mellow Mijiu. He then asked Mr Ngai on the history of the design and told him specifically that he was required to tell the truth no more and no less. Mr Ngai then gave him an account of what had happened. Mr Kwong also asked him some questions on matters specifically which he answered. After Mr Ngai had finished, he reduced the information into a Chinese written statement. He asked Mr Ngai to read the statement. He read and confirmed the statement by signing his name and initialing the amendments on the statement. He then told Mr Ngai that he would be preparing an affirmation based on what he had said and Mr Ngai would be asked to sign the affirmation in the next few days. A few days later, when the affirmation (i.e. the first affirmation) was ready, he asked Mr Ngai to come to his office so that he could bring him to another solicitor to have the affirmation affirmed. Mr Ngai, however, told him that he could not leave his office. He then arranged Mr Eddy Wong of Messrs Anthony Kwan & Co. to go with him to meet Mr Ngai in order to administer the oath. Arriving at Mr Ngai s office, he introduced Mr Ngai to Mr Wong and explained to him that Mr Wong s role was to administer his oath on the affirmation. He then explained to Mr Ngai in Chinese the contents of the first affirmation paragraph by paragraph. After he finished, he asked Mr Ngai whether he agreed with the contents. Mr Ngai said he agreed. Mr Wong also asked Mr Ngai whether he understood the affirmation and Mr Ngai answered in the affirmative. Mr Wong then asked Mr Ngai to sign the affirmation. No pressure was brought to bear on Mr Ngai. Mr Eddy Wong had also prepared an affirmation dealing with the taking of the affirmation of Mr Ngai. The evidence of the two solicitors was not challenged. 8. Deterioration of relationship between GDF and Foshan Foods : The 1993 Soy sauce Incident The evidence was given by Mr Hu and Mr Dong Shi Sen ( ju n on its origin. GDF decided to notify the other sub branches of this matter. Following the notice by GDF, Foshan Foods and Mr Yuan wrote to GDF on the incident. Foshan Foods further approached GDF to explain the position. By a notice dated 18th November 1993, GDF informed the various sub branches and organizations that GDF would not consider signing a new trade mark licence with Foshan Foods. By a letter dated 4th December 1993 to GDF, Foshan Foods accepted the criticism made by GDF. It also requested GDF to sign a new trade mark licence with Foshan Foods. But GDF did not allow Foshan Foods to use the Pearl River Bridge trade mark on soy sauce but only on other products. Mr Yuan did not dispute what had happened in relation to the soy sauce incident. He merely stated that the wrong was done by two staff of Foshan Foods. He said that he sent the self criticism letter because he wished to complete the contracts on the supply of the Pearl River Bridge soy sauce. 9. Trade mark licence On 30th December 1993, GDF entered into a trade mark licence with Foshan Foods for the use of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark on the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu (Bundle J/1). Foshan Foods said that the agreement was signed on 7th January 1994. The duration of the licence was until 1st February 1995. 10. Production Letter By a Production Letter signed by Shiwan Brewery in April 1994, GDF entrusted Shiwan Brewery to produce three types of wine with the Pearl River Bridge trade mark, namely, s_lKjLr wcps|R [Oq\ wcpR TKNyr wcps|R I{GW p[Oq\ Pq} TLrFU s_lKjLr TKN0W eyrr R|vU\mi ]4XKN ^LrFU p1XT{ ~^ASt^ O \r t N_N g v9e2 ^LrFU 0[Oq\ q 0W[#j ^Lryr wcps|R 0-N'YR mi gP u|vR mi gP /n0W@SKN w[Oq\ N]N]N NASkQ [Oq\ wcpR TKNck wcps|R ] g1 t^wk wcps *Y T NXN hssO u=r 0 Pq} TLr"u TKN0W eyrr s_lKjLrFU Rs|R ^Lr 0FU Rs|R 1u[Oq\ fwQyrr ^LrFU 0yrdkr [Oq\ wcpR N]N]N NASkQ r Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu labels are as follows : (1) Mr Dong s view Mr Dong said that the advertisement was misleading and incorrect because : (1) the Pearl River Bridge trade mark was held by GDF and Foshan Foods had no right to change the brand name of the products; (2) the advertisement referred to the production of N4l 0WSwm ]N_l; s the real or genuine product because the Pearl River Bridge line of rice wine had been on sale from the 1970 s to 1994. And GDF had allowed Foshan Foods to use the trade mark until 1st February 1995. Mr Dong reported the matter to Mr Hu and GDF decided to appoint Yau Shing Hong to be the distributor of the Pearl River Bridge rice wine in Hong Kong. A new brewery was appointed to produce the Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu. 12. Announcement by GDF On 25th February 1995, GDF advertised in the newspapers that it was the owner of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark and had not authorized any company to change the Pearl River Bridge line of rice wine to any other label. The announcement was made in response to the notice issued by Foshan Foods and Shiwan Factory in the newspaper. 13. Registration by Tung Fook (1982) of the Super Mellow Mijiu trade mark On 29th, 30th and 31st May 1995, Tung Fook (1982) advertised in the Tin Tin Daily News that it was the owner of the Super Mellow Mijiu trade mark. The [Oq\ wcpR u"uKN hswQ O1u[Oq\ QLrFU gQFh \(uN \(u k /n0W@S ]4X N|v wcpR wcpR N,glQ _NPc ,glQ Vckr zsS\Pbk O kL &TGR wcpR ^qg[Oq\ v6RKN \(ur ing Hong of the advertisement and it was then discovered for the first time that Tung Fook (1982) had applied for registration of the trade mark No.02010/95 on 8th June 1993. (See Certificate of Registration dated 20th March 1995, Bundle CB/297). 14. Newspaper Article On 2nd June 1995 an article appeared in the Tin Tin Daily News on the confusion caused by the Pearl River Bridge Brand and the Zu Miao brand Super Mellow Mijiu (Bundle CB/286)). 15. Actions taken by Tung Fook (1982) On 8th June 1995, Hastings & Co., the solicitors for Tung Fook (1982), wrote to Yau Shing Hong stating that Tung Fook (1982) was the registered owner of the Super Mellow Mijiu trade mark and alleged Yau Shing Hong had infringed the trade mark and passed off wine of Tung Fook (1982). GDF was informed by Yau Shing Hong of this letter. As GDF was not familiar with the laws of Hong Kong, it decided to ask Yau Shing Hong to design a new label for the Super Mellow Mijiu for the purpose of testing the Hong Kong market. In June or July 1995, GDF s Super Mellow Mijiu with the new label was sold in Hong Kong. The wine with the new label was also advertised in the newspaper. After the advertisement, Tung Fook (1982) s solicitors issued letters to the Park n Shop Supermarket in Hong Kong demanding it to stop selling the Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu. After GDF was informed of this by Yau Shing Hong, it decided to seek legal advice and after consulting lawyers in Hong Kong, GDF commenced the present proceedings. GDF also resumed the use of the old Super Mellow Mijiu label. 16. Withdrawal of stocks from Park n Shop DW7 Mr Leung Koon Hei is a Director and Deputy General Manager of Yau Shing Hong. He said that after Park n Shop received Hastings letter in July 1995, Yau Shing Hong was forced to withdraw the stock from Park n Shop. Park n Shop only resumed the sale of the Super Mellow Mijiu in November 1995. Mr Leung had calculated the loss of the four months sale in the sum of HK$103,063. The particulars are set out at Bundle B6/207. 17. Litigation in the Mainland There had been litigation between Shiwan Brewery and GDF in the Mainland concerning the use of the labels and names of the wine. There were also competiting registration of the trade marks. The parties agreed that these matters are of no relevance to the present litigation. Part II 1. Findings on the Shiwan Mijiu (1) Plaintiffs evidence I accept the evidence of Mr Lor and Mr Tang on the history of Shiwan Mijiu. Mr Lor was in charge of the Processed Food Department of GDF when the decision to introduce the wine was made. He was the only one who could give a comprehensive picture of the history of Shiwan Mijiu from its development to its subsequent cancellation and later revival. I find his evidence truthful. Mr Tang signed the contract with Chung Tai for the Shiwan Mijiu in the Autumn Trade Fair 1975. In my view one of the best evidence which supported the decision to introduce four new wine in 1975 was the contract signed in the same Trade F -Nq\s|R dence on the Shiwan Mijiu. I find him to be selective in his memory. His denial of attending the conference which discussed the introduction of four new wine (he also denied attending the conference in February 1979 in which the Super Mellow Mijiu was agreed to be introduced) was a deliberate attempt of not telling the truth. I do not accept that a new wine could be introduced after discussion between a sub branch company and the brewery. It would be too much of an co incidence that at some time, three other types of new wine were also introduced without GDF agreeing to their production. Although Mr Chiu denied that the production of the new wine would require the approval of GDF because he said that Wu Fung Hong had already given its approval, his view was different from that of Mr Yuan who said that the approval of GDF, Foshan Foods and Wu Fung Hong must all be obtained first. (3) Assessment of Mr Chen During the planned economy, Shiwan Brewery was only a production unit. It was not engaged in the export trade. I do not accept that in relation to a decision which introduced four new wine to the Hong Kong market, the name of the wine would be left to the production unit. I find that the names of the four new wine were already decided at an earlier stage at the conference of the Processed Food Section before Shiwan Brewery was instructed to produce the wine. As it was only involved in the actual production of the wine, it would not know many of the decisions reached earlier or how the export was to be carried out. (4) Assessment of Mr Cheung s evidence Mr Cheung Loy Chun of Chung Tai also gave evidence on how Chung Tai became the distributor of the Shiwan Mijiu and his efforts in trying to revive the Shiwan Mijiu after its cancellation. His evidence does not advance the Defendants case further. The Plaintiffs case as disclosed by Mr Tang is that Mr Tang was introduced to Mr Cheung in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1975 and the contract for the Shiwan Mijiu was signed at that Trade Fair. Mr Cheung s evidence was that he was promised by Mr Sik of Wu Fung Hong before the Spring Trade Fair that Chung Tai would be given the distributorship. Mr Cheung and another person from Chung Tai, namely, Mr Kung Shui Chian had attended the Spring Trade Fair of 1975. At this Trade Fair, they were introduced to Mr Chiu and they were given samples of the Shiwan Mijiu and labels of the Shiwan Mijiu. The episode of the Spring Trade Fair was not even put to the Plaintiffs witnesses. It is apparent from the evidence adduced in this case that the Defendants are trying to boost the role played by Foshan Foods and minimize the importance of GDF. Mr Cheung and Mr Kung s evidence are not reliable. The labels for the Shiwan Mijiu could not possibly have been given to them at the Spring Trade Fair of 1975. Even according to Mr Chen, the draft label was only shown to Chiu Kong in the Spring Trade Fair of 1975 who returned it to him two or three days later and printing of the labels only started in June or July of that year. 2. Findings on Super Mellow Mijiu (1) Assessment of Chung Hau Yuen In my view, Chung Hau Yuen is a truthful witness. The impression that comes out from his two and a half days of evidence is that he is a man with an acute business sense. I have no doubt whatsoever that he conceived the idea of the Super Mellow Mijiu and it was through his efforts that this product came to the market and became a success. He obviously, after so many years, still took great pride in what he had achieved in this regard. I accept his evidence relating to the meeting with GDF in February 1979 and the wine tasting in Shiwan Brewery that took place on an occasion between February and May 1979. I accept his evidence that he also conceived of the label design of the Super Mellow Mijiu. He accepted that Mr Kwok might have discussed with Mr Ngai in 1978 about the name and design of the Super Mellow Mijiu. Mr Tang S.C., Counsel for the Defendants, submitted that Chung Yuen had deliberately minimized the role of Mr Chung Cheong in the development of the Super Mellow Mijiu. He stated that Mr Chung Cheong was a well established wine merchant; he was the representative of the Chambers of Commerce, and he had been received by the Mainland as a State guest. None of these, in my view, casts doubt on the credibility of Chung Yuen s evidence. By the time the Super Mellow Mijiu was developed, I find as a fact that Mr Chung Cheong had let his younger son taking over the operation of the wine business. Even according to Mr Ngai, he was told by Mr Chung Cheong to discuss the matter of the Super Mellow Mijiu label with Chung Yuen. Mr Tang Tak Kwan further stated that from 1977 to 1978 onwards, Mr Chung Cheong had stopped going to the Trade Fair. I accept Chung Yuen s evidence that the reason why he set up Bo Man Hong was not because he deliberately left Tung Fook and set up a rival business. Bo Man was the alias of his father. Obviously, there was sibling rivalry and discord within the family and he was not the favourite son of his mother. For someone who had to give up his studies to comply with the wishes of his father to work in Tung Fook, it would be very difficult indeed to accept the sudden intrusion at the scene of his elder brother Chung Cheung who obviously was the favoured son of the mother. I further accept his evidence that after the meeting with the Foshan Foods representatives in Hong Kong in March 1985, he did not sign the written agreement drafted by Mr Yuan. Had he done so, one would expect a copy or the original of the document to be in the possession of Foshan Foods. I further accept his evidence as to why he had eventually lost interest in the wine business. Obviously he was disillusioned with the approach of GDF in first granting him the distributorship of the Super Mellow Mijiu and then allowed Tung Fook (1982) to be a co distributor. The problem with GDF failing to actively assist him when he encountered problems from the distributor of idence It was suggested that Mr Lor had mishandled the distributorship of the Super Mellow Mijiu and was thus side stepped by GDF in later dealings of the wine. The evidence showed that Mr Lor was in fact promoted in GDF and his lack of knowledge on subsequent dealings of the wine was not attributable to his being reprimanded for not handling the distributorship properly. (3) Assessment of Mr Ngai s evidence I do not find Mr Ngai to be a credible witness, he is now 70 years of age and he was dealing with a matter that took place 20 years ago. Although he maintained that he remembered the Super Mellow Mijiu design because it was his design, obviously, his evidence on the circumstances in which the design came into being was faulted. He repeatedly said in his evidence that he had done many designs before. In my view, either he was deliberately lying or he was totally confused and could not remember what had actually transpired. The Plaintiffs accepted that Mr Ngai might have some contact with Mr Kwok in 1978 and Mr Ngai might have done some work before, but the idea all came from Chung Hau Yuen. I accept the evidence of Chung Hau Yuen that it was he who had suggested how the design should be like. I accept what the two solicitors said regarding the taking of the Chinese statement and the first affirmation of Mr Ngai. I find that no pressure was brought on Mr Ngai when he signed these two documents. There are differences in the contents of the first and second documents. But in the main, they confirmed that it was Chung Hau Yuen who had contacted Mr Ngai and discussed the Super Mellow Mijiu design. While there may be minor disputes to the contents of the first affirmation, the overall impression one gets from reading Mr Ngai s second affirmation is that it was Chung Hau Yuen who first contacted him and discussed with him about the design. This is totally contrary to his evidence in Court which suggested that Chung Yuen only came into the picture after the design was finalized. (4) Assessment of Mr Chen Bing Hao s evidence I do not find Mr Chen Bing Hao to be a credible witness. The impression of his evidence is that he attempted to raise the role of Shiwan Brewery in the Super Mellow Mijiu episode. I do not accept Mr Chen s evidence that the name of the Super Mellow Mijiu was discussed in April/May 1979 in Shiwan Brewery. By that time, the name of the wine had already been decided. Mr Chen said that in April/May 1979, the label that was brought to Shiwan Brewery was blank in the middle a }s|R Chun, who allegedly advised on the name of Super Mellow Mijiu. This was not something that was put to the Plaintiffs witnesses. I do not accept that such an event had occurred. On the Defendants own case, if the dates inserted on the draft design of the words and logo of Super Mellow Mijiu were correct, then the name of Super Mellow Mijiu must have been decided before April and May 1979 which Mr Ngai said was the time the name was decided. This is inherently improbable. (5) Assessment of Chan Wan Fai ame of the wine had clearly appeared on the label and Mr Chan s evidence was a concerted attempt together with Chen and Mr Chiu to minimize the role of Chung Yuen in this regard. I find that the name of the Super Mellow Mijiu had been chosen before the tasting in the Brewery. I have given due consideration to the fact that as the events took place many years ago, the memory of the witnesses might not be as factually accurate as one is dealing with recent events. But even with this consideration, the overall impression is that the inaccuracy is due to more than merely lapses in memory. Although Mr Chan said that Mr Chung Cheong was the one who raised the matters such as the use of the glass cups for the wine, he conceded that he referred to the role played by Mr Chung Cheong because he was the head of Tung Fook. Mr Chan also said that it was Shiwan Brewery who suggested the name Super Mellow Mijiu. In his written declaration dated 15th August 1995, he stated that it was Tung Fook who decided on vuBf/f n the label was printed, the name was mentioned by Tung Fook. His statement, however, did not mention about Shiwan Brewery suggesting the name. He explained that the statement did not give details of the discussion between the parties. I find it difficult to accept his explanation. I consider this to be an afterthought. There had been a long history of litigation between GDF and the Shiwan Brewery, and the matter regarding the discussion of the name of Super Mellow Mijiu ought to have been raised by the Defendants earlier. The evidence of what Mr So said was clearly hearsay in nature. Mr So had in fact attended court but chosen not to give evidence. The explanation given was that he was ill. I would attach no weight to what Mr So had allegedly said. I do not accept the evidence of the Defendants witnesses who deposed to what Mr So had said. I do not accept that in the discussions in 1979, the question of local flavour was raised. (6) Assessment of Mr Chiu s evidence Obviously, Mr Chiu was selective in his evidence. While he could give detail account of the names of persons who attended certain meetings, he could not recall important event such as the 1974 conference in which the four types of new wine were to be introduced by GDF in the market, nor could he recall the important meeting on the Super Mellow Mijiu in February 1979. Although he said he was 65 years of age, I do not accept that his lack of memory on these important issues was due to his age. It was rather a deliberate attempt not to reveal the truth of the development in these two wine. Another example of this is his evidence regarding the label of the Super Mellow Mijiu. While he praised the design of the label, he said that he could not recall whether the name of the wine was placed on the label. Similar evidence came from DW15 Chan Fai. (7) Contract with Bo Man Hong I accept what Mr Tang said regarding the signing of the contract dated 1st November 1982 with Bo Hong. What he had disclosed in his evidence earlier did not contradict with what he subsequently said on this matter. His earlier evidence merely stated that he did not know whether after the contract with Tung Fook (1982) signed in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1982, there was further supply of products to Bo Hong. Chung Yuen was not cross examined on the contract with Bo Man Hong dated 1st November 1982 when his evidence was taken in Canada. He also prepared a written witness statement dealing with this contract which I had referred to earlier. The admissibility of the statement was not contested but the content was. There really is no evidence to contradict what Mr Tang and Chung Hau Yuen said on the contract with Bo Man Hong. (8) Assessment of Chung Cheung s evidence The record of the meeting between Mr Lau and Chung Cheung in the Spring Trade Fair of 1982 was not sent to GDF. It is the Plaintiffs case that only Mr Hu and Ms Kuk were present at this meeting. During the cross examination of Chung Cheung, he said that the original photocopy of the record of meeting was still with Tung Fook (1982). He was asked to locate the document. On the following day, he said he was unable to find the original photocopy. He said that the photocopy, together with other documents, were given to his solicitors and they had not returned the documents to him. Mr Tang, S.C., informed the Court that Hastings & Co. had conducted a search of their office and could not find the original photocopy. Then on the next day, Chung Cheung said that he had found the original photocopy. He said that the document was given back to him by Hastings & Co. together with other documents but he did not realise the document was in that bundle of documents. The bundle was with the representatives of Shiwan Brewery who were staying in a hotel in Hong Kong. He only discovered the document after he tried to look for it again. The Plaintiffs had contested the authenticity of the document at the opening of the case and suggested that the record was not a contemporary document. This document was only disclosed on 11th 1998, a few days into the trial. Chung Cheung said that he had the original photocopy for a long time. The original photocopy in fact was found by him two to three months before the trial. Although he said that he did not know whether the document was important or not, he also said that he was reluctant to reveal his documents to the Plaintiffs. His explanation was not credible. He must have realised the importance of the document, otherwise ^ qg uthenticity of the record of the meeting. In my view, the only explanation for Chung Cheung s reluctance to produce the original photocopy is that he was concerned with the challenge to the authenticity of the document by the Plaintiffs. I find his explanation on how he was unable to locate the document suspicious. Mr Lau of GDF had since died and was of course unable to give evidence. Mr Tang, S.C., submitted that the contemporary evidence supported Chung Who Cheung s case that there was such a meet [oR;N Lau had informed him that the distributorship would be given to Tung Fook (1982) and Bo Man Hong. None of these, in my view, casts doubt on Mr s evidence in this regard. He was adamant that he did not know how Bo Hong became the distributor again. In my view, it may well be that Mr Lau had separately dealt with this matter with Chung Cheung and with Chung Yuen. It is not necessary to speculate on the matter. But as far as Mr Hu was concerned, his role was merely to tell Chung Cheung that Tung Fook would be given back the distributorship. I accept Mr s evidence that it was he who informed Chung Cheung that he would be given the distributorship. I do not accept Chung Cheung to be a credible witness. What he said regarding the meeting of May 1982 was inherently incredible. If what he said was true, GDF would hand back the distributorship to him in the Autumn Trade Fair of 1982. GDF had also suggested the elaborate arrangement of inviting Chung Yuen to be a directo ached with GDF on the change of distributorship. The impression one gets from his evidence is that he did not treat the agreement as something of importance or significance. Yet it was important for him to reduce the agreement into writing so as to bind GDF. He had further gone so far as to obtain a letter from Mr Lin in which Mr Lin asked his friend to intervene in the matter because the question of the distributorship with Tung Fook had not been satisfactorily resolved. The letter was dated 26th August 1982, which was three months after the alleged meeting. In a further letter dated 30th September 1982, written by Chung Cheung to GDF, regarding Guangnam Hong s refusal to take the orders of Tung Fook, he merely asked GDF to deal with the matter fairly ( totally inconsistent with the terms of the alleged meeting. On the other hand, the letter of 30th September 1982 was consistent with Mr Hu telling him and his mother that GDF would consider their request to be given back the distributorship. At the Autumn Trade Fair of 1982, Chung Who Cheung had to wait for ten days before the distributorship was given back to him. This is consistent with the Plaintiffs case that the decision to give the distributorship to Tung Fook (1982) was only reached at the Trade Fair. Likewise, Chung Cheung s evidence that in the Autumn Trade Fair 1981, Mr Lau had promised to give him back the distributorship at the next trade fair was equally incredible. Mr Hu must be a bold person and acted contrary to the instructions of his superior if, notwithstanding the clear direction of Mr Lau, he chose to give the contract to Bo Hong at the find that the ultimate decision rested with GDF on the change of distributorship. Chung Cheung must have realized that this was the case, otherwise, he would not have taken all the steps of securing supports from his acquaintances. Part III 1. Passing off (1) The Law Passing off is concerned with misrepresentations made by one trader which damage the goodwill of another. Misrepresentation, damage and goodwill are the three essential elements of the plot of passing off : The Law of Passing off by Wadlow, 2nd Edn. (2) Relevant date In passing off action, the relevant date must be earlier than the date of the writ, for there must have been an actual or threatened infraction by the Defendants of a pre existing reputation : J.C. Penney v. Penneys [1975] FSR 367 at 381. The parties agreed that the relevant time is early 1995 when the Zu Miao Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu were introduced by the Shiwan Brewery in Hong Kong. (3) Goodwill The meaning of goodwill was discussed in the Privy Council decision of Star Industrial Company Limited v. Yap Kwee Kor (trading as New Star Industrial Co.) [1975] FSR 256. Lord Diplock at p.269 stated that : ....A passing off action is a remedy for the invasion of a right of property not in the mark, name or get up improperly used, but in the business or goodwill likely to be injured by the misrepresentation made by passing off one person s goods as the goods of another. Goodwill, as the subject of proprietary rights, is incapable of subsisting by itself. It has no independent existence apart from the business to which it is attached. It is local in character and divisible; if the business is carried on in several countries a separate goodwill attaches to it in each. So when the business is abandoned in one country in which it has acquired a goodwill the goodwill in that country perishes with it although the business may continue to be carried on in other countries. Goodwill is the benefit and advantage of the good name, reputation and connection of a business. It is the attractive force which brings in customers. It is the one thing which distinguishes an old established business from a new business at its first start : The Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Muller & Co. s Margarine Ltd. [1901] A.C. 217, per Lord Macnaghten. (4) Misrepresentation In A.G. Spalding & Bros. v. A.W. Gamage Ltd. [1915] 32 R.P.C.273 Lord Parker at 284 stated that : My Lords, the basis of a passing off action being a false representation by the defendant, it must be proved in each case as a fact that the false representation was made. It may, of course, have been made in express words, but cases of express misrepresentation of this sort are rare. The more common case is, where the representation is implied in the use or imitation of a mark, trade name, or get up with which the goods of another are associated in the minds of the public, or of a particular class of the public. (5) Ownership of Goodwill Wadlow in the Law of Passing Off para.2.53 stated this : ...... Goodwill is created by trading activities, but it often happens that more than one business is involved in the sequence which results in goods or services being made available to the consuming public. If so, then the question arises of which of those businesses is the owner of goodwill which the law recognizes as damaged when a third party passes off his goods or business as those with which the public is acquainted. The problem arises in two main contexts. One is where two or more businesses which have previously worked together fall out. ...... There are two distinct, and not necessarily consistent, standards in this passage. One is to ask who is in fact most responsible for the character or quality of the goods; the other is to ask who is perceived by the public as being responsible. The latter is the more important, but it does not provide a complete answer to the problem because in many cases the public is not concerned with identifying or distinguishing between the various parties who may be associated with the goods. If so, actual control provides a less conclusive test, but one which does yield a definite answer. To expand, the following questions are relevant as to who owns the goodwill in respect of a particular line of goods, or, mutatis mutandis, a business for the provision of services: Are the goods bought on the strength of the reputation of an identifiable trader? Who does the public perceive as responsible for the character or quality of the goods? Who would be blamed if they were bad? Who is most responsible in fact for the character or quality of the goods? What circumstances support or contradict the claim of any particular trader to be the owner of the goodwill? For example, goodwill is more likely to belong to the manufacturer if the goods are distributed through more than one dealer, either at once or in succession. If more than one manufacturer supplies goods to a dealer and they are indistinguishable, the dealer is more likely to own the goodwill. If none of these gives a result, the goodwill may generally be assumed to belong to the actual manufacturer of the goods. In T. Oertli AG v. E. J. Bowman (London) Ltd. and Others [1957] 16 RPC 388 (Court of Appeal) and [1959] RPC 1 (House of Lords), OAG the manufacturers in Switzerland of a mixing machine there known as Turmix , granted to P. Ltd. an exclusive licence to manufacture and sell the machines in Great Britain, and to use the Trade Mark Turmix which OAG had registered in Great Britain. The licence was informally transferred from P. Ltd. to B. Ltd. with the knowledge and consent of OAG. B. Ltd. manufactured and sold the machines under the name of Turmix but neither on the machines nor their containers, nor on their stationery, etc., was there any reference to OAG. After the licence was terminated, B. Ltd. continued to sell the machine under this name but then commenced to manufacture and sell a machine called Magimix which they stated was an improvement on their former machine. OAG then commenced an action alleging, inter alia, that B. Ltd. had passed off their goods as the goods of OAG. Jenkins, L.J. held that : . It is, of course, essential to the success of any claim in respect of passing off based on the use of a given mark or get up that the plaintiff should be able to show that the disputed mark or get up has become by user in this country distinctive of the plaintiff s goods so that the use in relation to any goods of the kind dealt in by the plaintiff or that mark or get up will be understood by the trade and the public in this country as meaning that the goods are the plaintiff s goods. The gist of the action is that the plaintiff, by using and making known the mark or get up in relation to his goods, and thus causing it to be associated or identified with those goods, has acquired a quasi proprietary right to the exclusive use of the mark or get up in relation to goods of that kind, which right is invaded by any person who, by using the same or some deceptively similar mark or get up in relation to goods not of the plaintiff s manufacture, induces customers to buy from him goods not of the plaintiff s manufacture as goods of the plaintiff s manufacture, thereby diverting to himself orders intended for and rightfully belonging to the plaintiff. But, as appears from Kerly on Trade Marks , 7th Edition, at page 521, . it is not, however, necessary to show that the customers who knew the goods of the plaintiff s firm by a particular name or get up knew anything whatever about the plaintiff. It is immaterial that they did not even know his name; for it is sufficient to prove that purchasers of his goods recognized, by the use of the marks in question in connection with them, that they were goods of a particular class, and to show that such class is, in fact, constituted by his goods. (emphasis added) See also William Edge & Sons Ld. v. William Niccolls & Sons Ld., [1911] A.C. 693. Nevertheless, if the plaintiff cannot prove the association or identification of the disputed mark or get up in this country with goods in fact of his manufacture, the action fails in limine. The court held that B. Ltd. s manufacture and sale of Turmix machines did nothing to make the word Turmix distinctive of the Plaintiff s goods in Great Britain. Lord Reid in the House of Lords held that : . during the currency of the Appellants licence to Bowmans, Bowmans made and marketed the Turmix machines without the Appellants having controlled or having had any power to control the manufacturer, distribution or sale of the machines, and without there having been notice of any kind to purchasers that the Appellants had any connection with the machines. From this case, the two tests to be used in ascertaining ownership of goodwill are the public perception test and the control test. As Wadlow at para 2.54 observed, the plaintiff in a passing off action must be a business whose goodwill fulfills two essential requirements : (1) the goodwill should relate specifically to the goods or services in question and, (2) it should be goodwill quoad the consuming public for those goods, whether or not the public are the immediate customers of the Plaintiff. In Dental Manufacturing Company Limited v. C. de Trey & Co. [1912] 3 KB 76, X was the sole agent for sale in UK of an article made by a manufacturer in USA. X sold the article just as it was made and got up by the manufacturer. Nothing in the of the article as sold by it indicated any association of it or its business with that article. It sued a company for passing off when that company manufactured and sold articles of the same kind with a get up similar to the article supplied by the US manufacturer. The court rejected the sole agent s action, Fletcher Moulton L.J. held that : . But in this case it is clear that in no proper sense of the word were these goods ever regarded by the public as, nor were they in truth, De Trey & Co. s (i.e. the sole agent s) goods, and there never was any representation on the part of the plaintiffs that the alleged infringing articles were De Trey & Co. s goods. Buckley L.J. held that : . The plaintiff s goods need not be goods manufactured by the plaintiff. They may be goods which he purchases, or which he imports, or otherwise acquires, and which he sells under some which conveys that they are goods which, whether made, imported, or sold by him, carry with them the advantage of the reputation that the plaintiff s well known firm are responsible for their quality or their character. A further illustration of this principle is the case of J. Defries & Sons Ltd. and Another v. Electric and Ordnance Accessories Company Ltd. [1906] 23 RPC 341. The Plaintiffs were the American manufacturers of, and their English agents for, the sale of electrical lamps and other accessories. In 1896, an English Syndicate called the Stewart Electrical Syndicate Ld. began to sell in England lamps made to their order by the American Company, and sold by them under the name Stewart Arc Lamps. In 1903 the Syndicate was wound up, and in 1904 the Receiver sold its goodwill and its rights to the use of the word Stewart in connection with the goods by auction to the Defendants, who continued the sale of the goods under that name. The Plaintiffs having commenced to sell similar goods under the name Stewart sought an injunction to restrain the Defendants from selling them under that name; the Defendants thereupon counterclaimed for similar relief. The plaintiff s claim was dismissed, the defendants obtained the injunction against the plaintiff. Joyce J. held that the word Stewart as associated with lamps and other wares had only one meaning and that was that those wares were wares vended by the Stewart syndicate. The position is to be contrasted with Hirsch v. Jonas [1876] 3 D. 584. The plaintiff was a cigar merchant in London, he registered a label and he requested the manufacturer at Havannh who supplied him with the cigars of a particular description, to affix the label to each box consigned to him. The manufacturer affixed the label with his own name as manufacturer to all the boxes so consigned. The plaintiff subsequently discovered that the manufacturer was supplying cigars of the same description and with the same label to the defendants who were the manufacturer s agent. The plaintiff s application for an interlocutory injunction against the defendants were refused, the Court held that the only representation on the box was that the cigars were those of the manufacturer. (6) Foreign businesses and their representatives Wadlow at para.2.57 stated that : A foreign business may have a goodwill in the jurisdiction even though it may not trade here in its own right. It is sufficient that customers for its goods are to be found here, whether or not the foreign business is in direct contractual relations with them. In particular, if the foreign business is represented by a legally distinct person of whatever capacity then the goodwill will in general belong to the foreign business rather than its local representative provided that the foreign business is recognised as the ultimate source of the goods. It is not necessary, or common, for the relationship to be one of agency in the strict legal sense. ... The relevant English goodwill most clearly belongs to the foreign business if the foreign business is in fact predominantly responsible for the character or quality of the goods and the English business is held out as representing the foreign one, either expressly or by implication. On general principles it is unnecessary for the foreign business to be known by name provided its existence is known or assumed. The most important factor would appear to be the state of the public mind, so that if the public attributes the goods to the foreign business then it may not matter that the foreign business does not manufacture them, and may exercise less control over the local business or the goods themselves than the public may suppose. (emphasis added) (7) Importers, dealers and retailers Wadlow at para.2.60 stated that : It is possible for a business which imports to have a goodwill in its capacity as an importer, and likewise for any business which is known to obtain its goods from third parties to have a goodwill which reflects public trust in its ability to select or handle goods to a particular standard. This goodwill can co exist with the goodwill of another business such as that of a manufacturer in the sense that the public may prefer goods manufactured by A and imported or otherwise handled by B to goods known to be manufactured by A but handled by another. This, however, is rare. (8) Licensor and licensee If a valid licence of a name or mark is in operation, then the goodwill in respect of the business so carried on accrues to the licensor rather than to the licensee : Wadlow para.2.62. The licensee acquires no interest in the name or mark, and must cease using it on termination of the licence. Provided the licence is a valid one, it does not matter that the licensee may be held out as the provider of the goods in question, and may in fact be primarily responsible for their character or quality. 2. Ownership of the Goodwill of Shiwan Mijiu and Super Mellow Mijiu There is no dispute between the parties that goodwill subsists in the Pearl River Bridge Shiwan Mijiu and the Super Mellow Mijiu which was acquired by years of sale and marketing. There is a likelihood of confusion among the purchasing public if the same labels are to be used but with the different trade marks. There is likely to be damage occasioned to the goodwill and reputation by the likelihood of confusion. The real dispute is on the ownership of the goodwill. (1) Economic structure The Plaintiffs case is that GDF has the goodwill to the Shiwan Mijiu and the Super Mellow Mijiu. The Defendants disputed this and contended that Foshan Foods was instrumental in obtaining the wine from the Shiwan Brewery and selling them to Hong Kong through the Hong Kong distributors. Both parties have called evidence on the economic structure of the Mainland during the planned economy and the period afterwards. The Plaintiffs evidence came from Mr Hu and Mr Lor while the Defendants evidence came from Mr Yuan, and to a certain extent from Mr Cheung Chun. The relevance of the evidence is to establish the control of GDF over Foshan Foods and hence over the two wine resulting in GDF having the goodwill of the two wine. I accept the evidence of Mr Hu and Mr Lor. (2) Starting point : constitutions of the enterprises The topic of the economic structure of the Mainland is a vast subject. Different witnesses from each side had given different views on the role of CNC, GDF and the sub branch companies and their relationship with each other. It would be dangerous and confusing to go into their evidence without a clear framework of the relationship of the parties. The starting point is to look at the constitutions of these enterprises. CNC s articles of association is not available but those of GDF and the sub branch companies are available. These documents are : the Articles of Association of GDF, the Standard Articles of Association of the sub branch companies ( Standard Articles ) and also the document approving the setting up of Foshan Foods. (3) GDF s Articles of Association The Articles of Association S=~lQ N!|1zlQ \milQ /fwQ ghs N0WMO l@b g6R>y ,{]N S(W0W b#~- z/elQ /f4X- ,{AS 0?eV{ \,g (W N { WgQ ;N k ,{AS _ N c=~lQ D}T~/elQ 1u,glQ SD}T~/elQ TSFU ,{AS N RI{GW S=~lQ 0/elQ j1u,glQ Ts^a &N1X 0D}T~@bl\/elQ ShQb 0/elQ RI{GW S,glQ ;N k) tate s overall policy and planning. Clause puts the matter beyond doubt that planning, finance and business of the sub branches are subject to the leadership of GDF. (4) Document of 21st June 1961 If one is to ascertain the relationship between GDF and Foshan Foods prior to 1988, then one turns to the earlier document (D1 76) dated 21st f@\ [Oq\ S@bl\mi R/e_j 02QK &N c { W \ Nl\/elQ T/elQ /elQ RI{;m UMO) ument clearly does not support Foshan Foods contention that it was engaged in independent exporting activities. All that it showed was that Foshan Foods was an independent accounting body. (6) Standard Articles The Standard Articles of the sub branch companies adopted in 1987 are also clear that the sub branches were subject to the business leadership of GDF. The Standard Articles were approved by the ,glQ S/elQ \milQ l\hQ l@b g6R ,glQ v?eV{ Mzui U\ \ p|vU\ d'Ywm ]4X g ,{ N ,glQ ,glQ s @W ,glQ R N g ,{mQ ,glQ R/f p;m\u 04l"u^ SI{mi u"u4X @bl\hQb (WlQ c N ,{kQ cgq 0 Omiw TePhQw >wvu [\O;N l;N k)R ,{]N S cFU @SgQ- Uhs8h ,{AS ,glQ vQ-N ,{AS ,glQ gAm 1u-N ,{AS ,glQ v 0 \ W,gmi ,{AS N ,glQ S/fhs ,{AS ,glQ ?eV{ aljm d that the imposition of the name of GDF in the full title of the sub branches would carry no significant meaning. Under Article 1, the sub branch was clearly described as GDF s subordinate company. Although the sub branches were legal entities and independent accounting units, Article 5 clearly stated that they were subject to the administrative leadership and management of the local Foreign Trade Bureau, while the business leadership belonged to that of GDF. The food export functions of the sub branches under Clause 6(1) of the Articles were clearly subject to the earlier Article 5 which dealt with the business leadership of GDF. Clause 13 stated that the sub branches finance was pegged to GDF and had to pay profit to GDF and loss would be reimbursed from GDF. In my view the Standard Articles formalized the position of the parties in the past. Foshan Foods remained to be the executing unit of GDF. (7) Mr Yuan s evidence on Articles of Association During the cross examination of Mr Yuan, he said that according to his memory when Foshan Foods applied for business registration in 1988, the Articles of Association that was adopted was different from the Standard Articles. It had never been put to the Plaintiffs witnesses that there was another set of Articles. An inspection was then carried out during Mr Yuan s evidence by Foshan Foods at the office of the Business Registration Bureau in Guangzhou. Three articles were found in the file namely, the Standard Article, another set of Articles ( the New S=~lQ S[Oq\ ]/elQ [Oq\ S/elQ =~GR [Oq\ S/elQ S/f-N S=~lQ \milQ /fhQ l@b g6R T/f9h T?eV{zl 0(Wq} N?eV{ Mzui U\ \ D}%R_j [Oq\ S/elQ S=~lQ T[Oq\ [Oq\ S/elQ l\-N S=~lQ W,gmi Y gmi w[Oq\ =~GR w[Oq\ N!|1zlQ /f>y l@b g6R YwQ ghs N0WMO e/f cgq ?eV{ (Ws^I{ Mzui U\ \ S6e/S ,{ N { W T P2Qmi ,{ N D}T~_j ,{AS t/flQ ,{AS ,{AS Tvu0W R1Xh I{ g ,{ASkQ h9eBf an explained that in 1996 when Foshan Foods upgraded its record office, the staff in charge was not aware of the history of Foshan Foods and had wrongly put down February 1987 on the New Articles. (10) Foshan Foods using the Standard Articles I find Foshan Foods had been using the Standard Articles until the unpegging of the financial and planning pegs. It could not have used either the Handwritten Articles or the New Articles before that time. In the 1988 business registration of Foshan Foods lodge This does not lessen the control of GDF over Foshan Foods. GDF was involved with foodstuffs while GCO was involved with cereal and oil. The leadership of these two enterprises over Foshan Foods was not mutually exclusive. Once this basic premises is ascertained, then the evidence regarding the economic structure of the Mainland will fall into place. The evidence points towards one conclusion only, namely the goodwill of the two wine established in Hong Kong through these years belongs to GDF. (11) Administrative role of Foshan Foods Mr Yuan emphasized the importance of the status of Foshan Foods by referring to the administrative functions it exercised over other sub branch companies in the area. There is no doubt at some period of time Foshan Foods was responsible for the management and coordination of some sub i`s^ -N q\ WSwm N4l [Oq\ f@\. f@\m ocument of 21st June 1961, it is stated that the sub branch companies could not carry out foreign trade activities. Mr Yuan said that by 1975 when he joined Foshan Foods, the sub branch companies had already carried out export activities. Apart from this change, there is no evidence that there was a fundamental change in the status of Foshan Foods towards GDF. It was suggested that in the business registration certificate of GDF of 16th April 1982, the listed subsidiary units of GDF did not include Foshan Foods. Also GDF s own Articles referred only to its subsidiary units. From the evidence it is clear that GDF had its own subsidiary companies, which did not include Foshan Foods. But at the same time Foshan Foods was a sub branch company of GDF under the hierarchy of the foreign trade enterprises. This is clear from the constitutional documents. It is a bold argument that because Foshan Foods was not a subsidiary of GDF, it was accordingly not a sub branch company of GDF. (12) GDF : business leaders -N.Y Omi) Omi) e not helpful and do not advance the Defendants case on the role of the enterprises. Mr Yuan said in his evidence in chief that in relation to the sub branches, GDF exercised administrative management only. It did not exercise any business management over them. In cross examination, he conceded that the administrative management by GDF was business in nature. In fact the very example given by Mr Yuan on the administrative management of GDF, namely, the coordination of the competing interest of the various sub branches wishing to export the same product must be in the nature of the business operation of the export trade. In any event, what Mr Yuan said about the administrative management of GDF on Foshan Foods and other sub branches cannot be correct. If it was merely exercising an administrative function, it would be superfluous branches including Foshan Foods. The Shiwan Mijiu and the Super Mellow Mijiu are the best examples of the business leadership of GDF over Foshan Foods. (13) Other sub branches Mr Yuan further denied that GDF set up other sub branches. He said the setting up of the sub branch companies was decided by the local authorities and it was not the wish of GDF to have these companies established. He gave the example of Zhongsha -Nq\/elQ Vn/elQ against the setting up of this company, but again the local authorities asked the Provincial Government to set up this company. Mr Yuan said that Foshan Foods assisted in the setting up of the sub branch companies by sending out working teams there and by organizing the first exports from these companies. In respect of the examples given by Mr Yuan on the setting up of sub branches which GDF disapproved, he really was not in a position to give evidence as to what had actually transpired in the setting up of these companies. Afterall, witnesses from GDF were not cross examined on those matters. I accept Mr s evidence that GDF established the sub branch companies. (14) Planning peg The Plaintiffs case is that until 1988 business plans were transmitted from CNC to GDF which in turn transmitted the plans to the sub branch companies in the Guangdong Province. From 1988 until 1993, GDF continued to transmit plans to the sub branches. These plans had to be complied with by the sub branch companies. Mr Yuan said that parallel to the hierarchy of enterprises engaged in foreign trade was a line of government bodies dealing with foreign trade and planning. These bodies existed from the local area to the provincial level and onto the central level. The economic plans were prepared by the planning unit of the government. Before the plans were transmitted from above, they were firstly formulated from below and reported to a higher level. In other words, the sub branch companies in the counties and towns ( ]#~lQ The two relevant units of that level would discuss the plans with Foshan Foods. After the plans had been formulated, they would be referred to the provincial level. At the provincial level, the two similar units would discuss the plans with GDF. After the plans were discussed, they would be referred to the Central Government where the planning unit, the foreign trade unit and CNC would discuss and approve of the plans. CNC would transmit the plan to GDF which would in turn transmit the plans to the various sub branch companies. At the same time, the central foreign trade unit would transmit the plans to the same unit on the provincial level which in turn would transmit them to the same unit in the local area. The foreign trade unit would also transmit the plans to the enterprises engaged in foreign trade in the hierarchy [Oq\0W@S N'`) ans transmitted to Foshan Foods by the Foshan Foreign Trade Bureau. Mr Yuan disagreed with Mr s comment that GDF could decide whether to transmit the plans to Foshan Foods or not. Mr Yuan said that in the planned economy, plans were decided by the planning authority and were based on the history and quantity of production of the area. GDF JXJX ompanies, they came from CNC to GDF and then to the various sub branch companies. At the same time the local authorities also provided the plans to the sub branch companies. In my view, the Defendants case is not advanced any further by saying the plans transmitted from the local government were more important than those from CNC and GDF. These two lines of transmission were part of the system at that time. The Defendants admitted that the two plans were consistent and GDF had the right to adjust the pl [Oq\L to complete the plan but it was not mandatory to do so. Even if this document was only intended to be used from 1988 onwards when the contract system was introduced, it showed that plans from the local governments were instructive in nature only. The actual carrying out of the business activities was obviously done by the CNC line of companies. The local authorities no doubt also played a role in the administration of Foshan Foods because the personnel working in Foshan Foods were appointed by the Foshan area local authorities and GDF had no right to remove them. But it is clear from the Standard Articles the Foshan Foreign Trade Bureau was exercising administrative leadership of Foshan Foods. This unit also had to ensure that Foshan Foods in performing the export plan was able to purchase ( f Foshan Foods was reimbursed by CNC through GDF. The local authorities were not responsible to reimburse Foshan Foods of the trading loss. Mr Yuan was reluctant to agree that the plans formulated by Foshan Foods would have to be transmitted to GDF. It is clear that such plans would have to be transmitted. This is clear from the document entitled : W,gmi N]N]N q}6eq}/e uld be reimbursed from CNC. From 1988 to 1990, the system was one of contract system. This means the provincial governments were required to fulfill the target of foreign currency earning with the Central Government. To achieve this goal, GDF, like other State business enterprises in the province, had to fulfill a target of foreign currency earnings for the provincial government. GDF would sub contract the task to the various sub branches. The first round of contract system was in 1988, 1989 and 1990. The second stage of the contract system occurred in 1991 and 1992. In January 1993, the sub branches were unpegged financially from GDF. Mr Yuan disagreed that Foshan Foods was pegged to GDF in terms of finance (and also planning). He said that this is contrary to the State Council Document of 1988, which stated that : ... [hQb 6R9ei 6R9ei W,ggQ N!|1z S6e/S 0 Ns~ Y/SM S6e/S WxegQ Y/SM c3^xeM S6e/S Y/S6eeQ \xeFU S=~lQ S&Nq} =~lQ N1uvQ S=~lQ S=~lQ R/e_j Omid =~lQ N>e0W Yu(u. had actually incurred a loss of $300,000 and this amount was not reimbursed. It had to bear this loss itself. The statement by Mr Yuan that Foshan Foods was not pegged to GDF financially and in terms of planning was a bold one. It certainly was incorrect in respect of the situation before 1988. Even after 1988, I find that Foshan Foods was still pegged to GDF financially and in terms of planning. What had changed from 1988 until 1993 was that instead of GDF being responsible to CNC, it became responsible to the provincial authorities. I do not accept Mr Yuan s evidence that from 1988 to 1993, the situation had changed so drastically that what had taken place in the past in terms of financial and planning peg was completely removed. On the contrary, the document dated 15th N]N]N v nS N]N]N Nt^ 0 Ns~ T Ns~ T Ns~=~M 0R,g0W@S Omi N]N]N Nt^ N>e0W }eQvu0W d N [ Ns~ Qq}L| Yuf}vu0W?e 0& . b|vU\ d the occurrence does not support Mr Yuan s suggestion that from 1988 to 1993, Foshan Foods was financially and in terms of planning independent from GDF. The Defendants further argued that the pegging of Foshan Foods to GDF did not mean that GDF owned the goodwill to the two wine. I disagree. The financial pegging of Foshan Foods to GDF, viewed in the context that Foshan Foods was the executing unit of GDF, must be the strongest indication that GDF owned the goodwill of the two wine. (17) Trading loss -N.Y mental question is that the figures had to be decided, and the task was vested with GDF. This is another illustration of the leading role and the control of GDF towards Foshan Foods. (18) Reimbursement of trading loss Mr Hu said that GDF could decide how much to reimburse the branch companies which had suffered trading loss. As have been seen earlier trading loss would inevitably incur in the export trade in the planned economy. Mr Yuan said that the total amount of reimbursement transmitted from CNC was based on the loss incurred by the sub branches. The reimbursement would be based on the actual loss incurred by the branch companies. GDF did not have the power to decide how much reimbursement would be given to them. Mr Yuan, however, agreed that if GDF managed to obtain more reimbursement from CNC, then it could use the excess to assist those companies which were in financial difficulties. In terms of Clause 13 of the Standard Articles, Mr Yuan said that the income received by the export companies would be transmitted to CNC. The profit and loss belonged to CNC. The role of GDF was to coordinate the reports of the sub branches and then report to CNC. CNC would then transmit the money to GDF and GCO. The money did not belong to GDF. The important issue in this regard is that in the foreign trade hierarchy, GDF was directly responsible to deal with the trading loss of Foshan Foods. This confirmed the subordinate role of Foshan Foods in the economic structure of export trade and the control of GDF over Foshan Foods. (19) Loans Mr Yuan said that under the planned economy, money required for trading was provided to Foshan Foods in two ways : First by way of loan from the Central Government. This was the State s support of foreign trade, the money would be transmitted from the Bank of China in Beijing to its branch in Foshan and Foshan Foods would borrow from the bank. The second was also the State s assistance of export trade. Money and raw material would be supplied from CNC to GDF to Foshan Foods. Mr Yuan disagreed with Mr s evidence that GDF and the bank agreed on the limit of the loans that might be obtained by the sub branches. Mr Yuan said that the foreign trade bureau had a foreign trade capital and it was allotted to the Bank of China in Guangdong which in turn allotted a portion of the capital to each area. The amount to be lent to Foshan Foods was based on the trading activities of Foshan Foods. I accept Mr s evidence that GDF in fact discussed with the bank on the limit of the loans to be allowed to the sub branches. Mr Yuan was certainly not in a position to give evidence on the allotments of loans between GDF and the bank. (20) Export quota Mr Yuan disputed Mr s evidence that any export that exceeded or outside the plan must have the approval of GDF first. Mr Yuan said that if the activities were carried out in accordance with the plan, GDF could not interfere with Foshan Foods. In relation to exports that would exceed the plan, Foshan Foods would make the ]yr>m ld first approach GDF to see if the quota could be given. Mr Yuan said that the function of GFD was to manage and coordinate, but it could not disallow Foshan Foods from engaging in export activities. An example he gave was of pigs. That was a profitable export and every coastal companies were competing to export and the role of GDF was to carry out minor co ordination ed, Foshan Foods could go to CNC because the export of rice wine was Foshan Foods traditional export. One handicap faced by Mr Yuan is his position in the economic structure. He was, after all, only concerned with the activities in the Foshan area. The Foshan area is only part of the Guangdong province. Without a doubt, because of its strategic position in the Pearl River Delta, Foshan is blessed with fertile soil and it produces an abundance of agricultural, fishery and poultry products. It has been s|KN l. In any event, even based on Mr Yuan s own evidence, if GDF was authorised to co ordinate the activities of the sub branch companies in the whole of the province, then clearly it had to adjust their competitive claims resulting in their not being able to export as much as they liked. The Shiwan Mijiu is clearly an example that GDF could discontinue the export of a particular product. Furthermore, there were certain products the sub branches could not export, for example, sugar. They were handled exclusively by GDF. This re affirmed the dominant position of GDF. (21) Packagings/Raw materials/distributor/price Although the packaging for the products were provided by GDF to the sub branches, they were ultimately provided by CNC. Likewise, although the raw materials were provided by GDF to the sub branches, ultimately the raw materials were provided by CNC. This is shown in a document entitled : 0 c N T/elQ 0/elQ 6e{v g8h \ WSwm#~ ects the importance of GDF in this regard. The raw material and packaging of course came from CNC but it was GDF which co ordinated the allocation of the materials. There might be circumstances in which raw materials had to be acquired other than from CNC. I find this to be the exception rather than the rule. Even in such a situation, GDF was still a party to the purchase of the raw material as illustrated by the contract dated 11th December 1980. Mr Yuan said that decisions on the distributor, price and packaging were reached after discussions by GDF, Foshan Foods and GDF s agent in Hong Kong, namely, either Wu Fung Hong or Guangnam Hong. Wu Fung Hong formerly represented GDF as its agent in Hong Kong, later on Guangnam Hong took over. It represents the interest of the Guangdong Provincial Government in Hong Kong. Wu Fung Hong is a State organisation and wielded considerable power but again, Mr Yuan is not in a position to tell the role of GDF in its dealings with these two organisations. Despite his initial position, he conceded that GDF had to be consulted on the appointment of distributors. I find that GDF decided on the distributors, price and labels for the two wine. No doubt GDF would take heed of the views of the agents, after all, they were more familiar with the market situation in Hong Kong, but the final decision on these matters clearly laid with GDF. The change of distributorship of the Super Mellow Mijiu initially from Tung Fook to Bo Man Hong then later to both of them was clearly the best illustration of GDF s authority in this regard. One can find a further example of the deciding role of GDF in the appointment of Hong Kong Rice Merchants Enterprises Co. Ltd. and Tai Wah Chinese Sauce Co. Ltd. as distributors in soy sauce : Notice dated 29th October 1981. By a letter dated 25th April 1984 Bo Hong announced that it was appointed by CNC, GDF and Foshan Foods as the distributor of to the constitutional documents and the activities that are outlined in this part of the judgment. What Bo Hong said cannot be determinative of the issue. In any event, the letter did not refer exclusively to Foshan Foods. (22) Assets Mr Hu had at one stage categorically stated that the assets of Foshan Foods belonged to GDF. Mr Yuan said that before 1988, the assets of Foshan Foods and GDF belonged to CNC but he vehemently denied that GDF owned the assets of Foshan Foods. It is a difficult question as to who owned the assets of Foshan Foods and GDF. It is not appropriate to make a general ruling about the ownership of the different types of assets of these two companies. In any event it is not necessary to do so for the purpose of this case. Passing off is concerned with the question of goodwill, which is a form of legal property. The point is best understood by reference to Wadlow at para. 2.05 : Although the passages cited above speak in terms of damage being caused either to the plaintiff s business or to his goodwill, the two are not strictly speaking comparable. Goodwill is undoubtedly legal property and its nature is reasonably well understood. A business, however, is something rather broader and would not normally be thought of as a form of property at all. This may account for Lord Parker s caution in accepting that passing off necessarily protects a proprietary right. English law has tended to understand passing off primarily in terms of damage to goodwill, partly because goodwill has not always been distinguished from the plaintiff s reputation in the indicia taken by the defendant. It is sometimes said that goodwill itself is the essential basis of the action for passing off. This is an attractive point of view. First, it deals with the question of why damages for passing off are not recoverable by every business in the chain of distribution from manufacturer to retailer. In general, only one business in the chain is likely to have any relevant goodwill with the consuming public and it is only that business which can complain of passing off. However, if damage to business generally were sufficient, then each party from manufacturer to retailer would apparently be able to sue, since an order lost is a loss to all. Secondly, goodwill is undoubtedly a form of legal property. It has a clearly understood meaning, and is particularly liable to be damaged by the misrepresentations recognised in passing off. The concept of business is wide and indeterminate in comparison. In so far as the goodwill of these two wine is concerned, it belonged to GDF. The business activities of these two wine were carried out by GDF through Foshan Foods. The goodwill of the two wine did not belong to CNC because from 1988 onwards, GDF was no longer pegged to CNC and the goodwill acquired from 1988 onwards belonged to GDF. Even before 1988, the goodwill of the two wine did not belong to CNC because the actual business of the two wine was controlled by GDF. I will deal with the position of Shiwa ppeared in many documents including the accounts and reports from Foshan Foods to GDF and from GDF s reports to CNC. I accept the evidence of Mr Lor on the meaning of this term. Mr Lor said that this item had two meanings. First, it was an item relating to statistics and accounting and second it was a method of trade. On the first aspect, it is clear from the document entitled W,gmi N]N]N term means that GDF or the sub branches would purchase the products, export them and receive payment for the sale. However, the difference between GDF and the sub branches in this aspect is that while GDF could carry out this activity on its own, the self trading export of the sub branches was under the plan transmitted by GDF to the sub branches and the control of GDF. The sub branches must account the profit and loss of such activities to GDF which would reimburse the loss to the sub branches. As the Shiwan Mijiu and the Super Mellow Mijiu were produced in the locality of Foshan Foods, they were Foshan Foods self trading export under the plans transmitted by GDF. It is incorrect simply to refer to the literal meaning of the term and conclude that Foshan Foods was engaged in independent trading activities. Foshan Foods right of self trading export was confined to Hong Kong and Macau. It had no right to UMO NU Y /SM I accept Mr s evidence. One fundamental principle that has to be borne in mind is that until 1993, with the exception of Guangzhou, GDF was the only entity in Guangdong which could carry out trade in foodstuff with foreign traders. This covered all overseas markets including Hong Kong and Macau. Guangzhou was an exception because since the 1980s it became a specially listed city with direct links t ion and control. It is clear from the constitution documents of Foshan Foods that ever since 1961, there was no reference to any independent self trading right. The foreign trade activities of Foshan Foods was clearly within the responsibilities given to it by GDF. As a trading arm or executing unit of GDF, it would be natural for Foshan Foods to be given export right so that, for example, custom requirements could be met. This, however, does not mean that the export activities of Foshan Foods was carried out independently and distinct from its responsibility as a trading arm of GDF. Mr Tang S.C. argued that the distinction between Foshan Foods being entitled to deal with the Hong Kong and Macau market and GDF handling all other overseas markets showed that Foshan Foods had the independent trading right. He referred to GDF (W N }*g g S \/n S \/n 0#~lQ S \/n wgklQ b1u[Oq\lQ s1u_l b1u_l 0#~lQ m0W@S 0#~lQ eas export because the sub branches were not familiar with international trade practice and lack proficiency in English. GDF s overseas export does not assist the Defendants that Foshan Foods was engaged in independent trading activities. If anything, the overseas trade demonstrated that Foshan Foods was not free to carry out export trading activities as it wished. The 1987 report submitted by GDF to CNC (Exhibit P21) is the clearest indication that Foshan Foods was not engaged in any independent trading n=~ N1X) ding export of the sub branches were not individually listed in the report. If these activities were indeed carried out independent from the plans of GDF, one would expect individual items to appear in the report. The restriction on the trading activities of Foshan Foods continued to at least January 1993 when the financial peg was severed or January 1994 when the planning peg was severed. (24) Trade Fairs/Contracts Before 1993, when Foshan Foods was unpegged from GDF, its name appeared in the sales contracts signed at Trade Fairs. In my view, this did not make it a seller of these products. I accept the evidence of the Plaintiffs that the name of Foshan Foods appeared in the contracts because it was the coastal company responsible for the export of the goods. The Defendants witnesses such as Chung Cheung and Mr Cheung said that at the Trade Fairs they would discuss the purchase of wine directly with Mr Chiu, the representative of Foshan Foods. It may be, as a matter of convenience, the distributors and the Hong Kong merchants would discuss with Mr Chiu on products which Foshan Foods would eventually ship to them. After all, it was not disputed that the purchasers would open letters of credit directly in favour of Foshan Foods. However, this does not mean that the contracts that were eventually signed were the contracts between Foshan Foods and the distributors. From the evidence, Mr Chiu had only signed contracts in the Trade Fair in 1983. He could not recall whether he was the group leader of the wine group in that year. In my view, it was likely that he was the wine group leader of that year. The notice given by CNC in respect of the 1991 Autumn Trade Fair (Bundle D(1)/476 489) is a good indication as to the function of GDF. At p.489 one can see the number of representatives from each province attending the Trade Fair. In respect of Guangdong, representatives came from GDF and GCO. In respect of the wine group, there were 26 members. The group leader and deputy group leader were appointed from the provincial food companies and the sales representatives would also come from the provinces engaged in wine trade. Obviously, GDF had to decide who from the various coastal companies would be attending the Trade Fair as representatives of Guangdong in the wine group. (25) Others I accept the majority of the quality inspection of the products was carried out by the sub branches which acquired the products from the factories, but Mr Yuan agreed that GDF also carried out quality inspection. This is another indication of the business leadership of GDF and its control over the products. Export permits were required for certain products including wine between 1986 and 1993. Mr Yuan accepted that GDF applied for the permits on behalf of the sub branches. Evidence was adduced as to the description of the supplying or applying units in the permits. In my view, it is not necessary to deal with these matters in detail. The business leadership of GDF is shown by the fact that it had to apply for the export permits on behalf of the sub branches. On advertising fees, Mr Yuan said that the distributors would report to Foshan Foods on the advertising fees because the fees would have to be deducted from the cost of production. I do not rule out that this had happened, but it must be borne in mind that the advertising fees were dealt with by the Hong Kong distributors with GDF s agents in Hong Kong, namely, Guangnam Hong and Wu Fung Hong. (26) Mr Cheung s evidence One of the Defendants witnesses, namely Mr Cheung, attempted to give some evidence on the functions of GDF and its relationship with the sub branches. He said that the function of GDF was to manage the whole of the food export in Guangdong. It was an administrative unit. Although it was a superior unit, it had no substantial trading activities. He also said that Foshan Foods was also an administrative unit but at a lower level. Although Mr Cheung has years of trading activities with the Mainland, he obviously was not in a position to give any useful evidence on the economic structure of the Mainland during the planned economy. Certainly Mr Tang, S.C., did not tender him as an expert witness in this regard. Mr Cheung was not aware of the provisions of the Articles of Association of GDF and the sub branches. When he stated that GDF had no trading activities, he was not aware that GDF had in fact engaged directly in the export of sugar. His comment that Foshan Foods was also an administrative unit is equally off the mark. While Foshan Food may at one stage managed some of the sub branches in the local areas, it was ultimately an unit subject to the control of GDF in terms of planning, finance and business. He said that GDF was an administrative management unit because it only acquired and purchased the products from the local areas. But that was how the system operated. He was not in a position to tell the structure and function of the enterprises that dealt with foreign trade. Mr Cheung said that the distributorship of the Shiwan Mijiu was given to Chung Tai by Wu Fung Hong. The decisions to regroup the four wine into one and the later revival of the Shiwan Mijiu were all made by Wu Fung Hong. He said that as Wu Fung Hong was based in Hong Kong, it exercised a lot of power, it was the only arm of the Mainland Government which was aware of the demands of the customers in Hong Kong. Evidence of the same vein was given by Mr Chiu. The role of Wu Fung Hong should clearly be recognized but obviously Mr Cheung and Mr Chiu were trying to play down the importance of GDF. What Mr Cheung said about the decision of Wu Fung Hong on the Shiwan Mijiu flies in the face of what he had written to the Mayor of the Guangdong Province in his letter dated 10th May 1995. In this letter, he stated that : NkQt^%f wiQt^JS kt^mQ, v TLr"u wcps|R vs|R ^qgs|R NLrP[ he control GDF had over the product. I am unable to conclude from the evidence that the reintroduction of the Shiwan Mijiu was the result of intervention or pressure from higher government bodies. The decision was made by GDF. The significance of this episode in fact turns the other way, namely, neither Shiwan Brewery nor Foshan Foods was able on its own to decide what products they could produce or sell during the planned economy. (27) Publication Vice Premier Li Lan Ching ( Ng P] noR=~ 0-N v9ei |vU\ vuBf 6R NX[(W N/f 6R/f(W"u y Nb_ T|vU\w T'YK N.z^ 8^yr oD}T~ FO(WgQ N/f \mi2 S=~lQ N'`2 6^ g \mi2 }6RI{ =~KN vuBf N/f ch was neither a full administrative unit nor a full enterprise, must be considered in the context in which it was said. He was simply describing the unique role of the foreign trade enterprise in a planned economy. Earlier, at page 78, he stated that :- Omi;N \mi=~lQ SvQ@bl\ v/elQ 0vQ;N Omi/fmi =~lQ 0=~lQ /elQ /fD}T~ S cFU wQ6^ g \mi=~lQ |q};N \mi=~lQ |q};N rms the role of GDF by reference to the constitutional documents and its trading activities. (28) Control test satisfied A review of the role of GDF clearly confirms that it has satisfied the control test in proving ownership of the goodwill in the two wine. It is ultimately and most responsible for the products. 3. Relevance of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark (1) Mark denoting trade source In considering the goodwill of the two wine, it is necessary to bear in mind the use of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark on their labels and in advertisements. The significance of the use of the mark is best illustrated by Wadlow at p.104 : With a well known and widely used mark it is often obvious who owns the goodwill in the line of business in respect of which it is used. Two interchangeable items may stand side side on the supermarket shelf, and may even have been made in the same factory. It is self evident that the goodwill for the supermarket own brand belongs to the retailer, and that of the nationally advertised market leader to the manufacturer. However, passing off is not confined to misuse of household names. All that is necessary for a mark to be capable of being protected is that the public should rely on the mark as denoting that the quality or character of the goods so marked is the responsibility of some one trader. The public need not be able to identify him by name, they need not even know the capacity in which he stands in relation to the goods. ( the goodwill may be determined, irrespective of the way the goods are marked. Lord Herschell in Powell v. The Birmingham Vinegar Brewery Company Ltd. [1897] AC 710 stated that : I think that the fallacy of the Appellants argument rests on this : that it is assumed that one trader cannot be passing off his goods as the manufacture of another unless it be shown that the persons purchasing the goods known of the manufacturer by name, and have in their mind when they purchase the goods that they are made by a particular individual. It seems to me that one man may quite well pass off his goods as the goods of another if he passes them off to people who will accept them as the manufacture of another, though they do not know that other by name at all. (emphasis added) A similar view was expressed by Jenkins L.J. in T. Oertli when he approved of the comments in Kerly. (2) Trade connection required Wadlow at para. 2.11 stated that if the plaintiff cannot fairly be said in engage in any kind of trade at all then he cannot sue for passing off. ... The concept of trader for the purposes of passing off is extremely wide. No general definition exists and to give one would risk excluding unusual businesses for no good reason. However, it seems that any person who derives an income from the provision of goods and services can be said to be a trader. [T]he word trade is widely interpreted and includes persons engaged in a professional, artistic or literary occupation. Examples include writers, a cartoonist, performers, and, in Australia, professional ballroom dancers. In a very early case a barrister recovered nominal damages in his capacity as the author of a legal textbook, but not for alleged damage to his professional practice as such. It is not necessary for the plaintiff to aim to trade at a profit, nor does it matter that the trade may be carried on for public or altruistic reasons. The British Broadcasting Corporation has been a successful plaintiff, as has a statutory totalisator board. In Kerly s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names 12th Edition at para 2-15, the authors dealing with the requirement of the connection in the course of trade for the purpose of trade mark registration stated that : In the earlier days of trade marks, the connection indicated was generally with a manufacturer; and observations may be found in which, no doubt unintentionally, words are used which might suggest that trade marks always indicated a manufacturing source. Such a limitation has never been recognised. ... ..... It is in accordance with current business practice that an entrepreneur may do no more than organise the putting of goods upon the market, and yet may cause them to be marked with his mark. It is submitted that the wording of the present Act is wide enough for that to be use of the mark by him as a trade mark, provided that the purpose of its use is indeed to show that the goods are his and he retains control over the use made of the mark. Thus a proprietor of a mark who does not himself manufacture the marked goods nor apply the mark, but who retains for himself either the power to control the activities of the trader who actually applies the mark (as where that trader is a subsidiary company of the proprietor), or the power to ensure compliance with manufacturing specifications or standards of quality that he lays down, is sufficiently connected in the course of trade with the goods to which the mark is applied to be properly registered. The current insistence on control by the proprietor has little logic to it. What matters is that the proprietor is willing, by authorising use of his mark, to put his reputation behind the goods. How he satisfies himself that the goods are suitable for this should no more concern the law of trade marks, than the workshop practices of a manufacturing proprietor do. It is clear from the case of G.E. Trade Mark [1973] RPC 297 (House of Lords) the English Trade Mark Act gave recognition to right in equity to prevent deception as to the origin of the goods. Lord Diplock at page 325 stated that The right of property in a trade mark was recognised at common law before it was the subject of any enactment. The Act of 1875 did not itself create any right of property in trade marks. As its title itself indicates and its provisions confirm, it simply provided for the registration of trade marks and spelled out the consequences of registration and non registration upon the proprietary rights of the owner of the trade mark and the remedies available to him for the protection of those proprietary rights. The Act of 1875 must, therefore, be construed in the light of the common law relating to trade marks in 1875. I use the expression common law to include the doctrines of equity applied in what at that time was the separate court of chancery. And at p. 326 he stated that : But the interest of the public in not being deceived about the origin of goods had and has to be accommodated with the vested right of property of traders in trade marks which they have honestly adopted and which by public use have attracted a valuable goodwill. The Hong Kong position is the same, the trade mark is used for the purpose of indicating a trade connection. Section 2 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, Cap 43 defines a trade mark relating to goods as follows : trade mark relating to goods use the mark, whether with or without any indication of the identity of that person; In Molyslip Trade Mark [1978] RPC 211 the question was whether a registered proprietor had exercised control over the mark. It was held by the Trade Mark Register that : The fact that they (i.e. the registered proprietor) could terminate the provision on quality control if, for example, there were complaints about the unsatisfactory nature of the products (which I am not suggesting will in fact happen) seems to me to ensure that the RPs do retain control over the quality of the goods sold under the marks and that there is a sufficient connection in the course of trade between the products and the RPs to satisfy section 68 of the Act. (3) Pearl River Bridge products The Pearl River Bridge trade mark had been used on GDF products since the 1950s. It can hardly be disputed that the Pearl River Bridge trade mark enjoys a long reputation in Hong Kong. Before the introduction of the Shiwan Mijiu in 1975, there were alread ]N_l ^qgs|R -Nq\s|R rchant is the distributor of the bottled Pearl River Bridge soy sauce. There are different types of Pearl River Bridge soy sauce. Apart from one particular type, the seller of the Pearl River Bridge soy sauce is GDF. Pearl River Bridge soy sauce has a large market in Hong Kong, although in recent years there has been a decline in the sales figures. In the 1970 s, according to a survey of the domestic households, the Pearl River Bridge soy sauce captured 70% of the market. In recent years the percentage is between 30 to 40%. Mr Yong accounted the drop to the competition in the soy sauce market by other brands such as Amoy, Lee Kee, Tung Chun and Kam Lan. There is also supply of other brands of soy sauce in recent years from other parts of the Guangdong [O q\ WSwm -Nq\ s the factor in the breaking up of the relationship between the two companies. Mr Yuan obviously attached great importance to the Pearl River Bridge soy sauce. All the public witnesses had heard of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark. Even with the Defendants public witnesses, with the exception of DW11 R(g=k, N \ mark was held by CNC on behalf of GDF. I accept this to be correct. The subsequent transfer of the trade mark registration to GDF in Hong Kong and in foreign countries clearly indicated that CNC was holding the trade mark for and on behalf of GDF. The assignment in Hong Kong was for the consideration of $10. It covered both the trade mark and the goodwill generated from the use of the labels. The transfer of the trade mark from CNC to GDF in some foreign countries had not been carried out. I accept the Plaintiffs evidence this was due to the problem created by associated trade mark. As CNC was still the owner of the trade mark in respect of the canned food, it could not sign the associated trade mark in respect of wine to GDF. I further accept Mr s evidence that the reason why CNC retained the canned food trade mark registration was because of the matters relating to the changes in the administrative structure of Hai Nan Island and Guangzhou City which ceased to be under the administrative control Wq\) NqQ(uFU ]FUL \mi=~lQ |q}FU \@bl\ 0/elQ 0/elQ O(uMR _=~lQ O(u N vOUL qQ(uFU /fwk ~^t^ qQ(uFU TMR|vU\ N'Ywk N>e .z!q OmiU}!q|vU\ \(u k/f "u k v!qb_ qQ g qQ(u qQ(uFU vAmL _N/f(W qQ(uFU O6qX[(W _0beu N2 NKQ g qQ(u muiq_ O(uFU jOUL t=~@\ =~lQ \milQ S1\vQ \mi=~lQ 1u0W =~lQ \mi=~lQ ]FUL t=~@\3u P(uFU SGR N/f 1\1u e trade mark was still a uniform trade mark which could be used by all the foreign trade enterprises as of right. (6) Trade marks of the provinces In further support of the Defendants contention, Mr Cheung said that it was the requirement of the State that food products from Guangdong should use the Pearl River Bridge trade mark. Likewise, product Nwm) _lLr. 0~v)RLr 0wm)Y 0wmpS RLr %fLr. 6eLr YIQogLr. [OKbK as used could not be right because many of the other trade marks of GDF were registered much earlier than 1975. (7) The source of the Pearl River Bridge products The Defendants contention that the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark merely indicated products using that trade mark came from Guangdong cannot be right. It is clear from the labels of the wine that the trade origin of the products is specified. In respect of the Shiwan Mijiu main label, from 1975 to 1991, it bore the words in Chinese People ^ qg not need to be decided on such a narrow basis. As shown from Powell, T Oertli and Wadlow, it is sufficient if the public rely on the mark as denoting that the quality and character of the goods so marked is the responsibility of some trader. The public need not be able to identify him by a name. The public witnesses of both sides had heard of the Pearl River Bridge brand (some for many years) and they could identify products such as wine and soy sauce produced with this brand. The source of the products is clearly identified by the words on the label : it was a company in the Guangdong province. This company could only be GDF who is the owner of the trade mark and ultimately responsible for the products produced with the trade mark. It would be absurd, if despite the singular company named on the label, different products bearing the same label would be considered by the public to be produced by different companies. In my view, GDF has also fulfilled the public perception test in proving the ownership of the goodwill of the two wine. In any event, after 1991, the full name of GDF appears on the main label. The goodwill generated from 1991 to 1995 by reference to the name of GDF on the main label would certainly belong to GDF. (8) Trade mark licences Furthermore, irrespective of the past position, from 1987 onwards, the sub branches were using the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark on licence from GDF. This must be the best indication that the concept of an uniform trade mark was no longer applicable after that time. The mark was used only with the permission of GDF. Foshan Foods had been using the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark under licence from GDF since 1987. The first licence was dated 30th April 1987 in relation to wine (D2/904) and soy sauce (D11/353), the second licence agreement was dated 30th December 1993 and was on wine. The second licence was part of the documents introduced after the Trade Mark Conference organised by GDF in 1993. Representatives of CNC and the former sub branches attended as well. The other documents include the Trade Mark and Bar Code Regulations which clearly stated that the Pearl River Bridge trade mark was registered in the name of GDF and could only be used with the permission of GDF. It further provided that the labels of the export products could not be altered and the licensees could not imitate the trade mark, get up and design of GDF s products. Mr Yuan said that even though Foshan Foods had used a lot of effort in relation to the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark, because the mark was registered in the name of GDF, it decided to sign the licence agreements. It complied with the law on trade mark. Mr Yan said that the 1987 trade mark licence agreement with GDF was signed because at that time Foshan Foods was still pegged to the Central Government in terms of finance. The second licence agreement dated 30th December 1993 was signed because this followed the 1987 agreement and there was no problem in signing. At that time, the trade mark law was introduced and money would be required to manage the trade marks. The explanation of Mr Yuan and Mr Yan on why Foshan Foods signed the two licence agreements does not in any way detract from the position that Foshan Foods used the Pearl River Bridge trade mark under licence from GDF. The fact that no charge was payable under the first licence agreement, and that under the second licence agreement, the licence fee was to be used for the administration of the trade mark ( all the sub branches. Once it has been established that GDF is the owner of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark, it is an inevitable conclusion that the goodwill acquired on the two wine belong to GDF as well. Because the reputation of the two wine was built on the reputation of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark, and the trade mark is so inextricably linked to the products and the labels, that it is not possible to consider the goodwill of the two wine without regard to the reputation of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark. The reputation acquired through the use of the trade mark by licences would also belong to GDF. Mr Tang S.C. relied on the Scandecor Development AB v. Scandecor Marketing AB and Others [1998] FSR 500 in which it was held that there was no general principle that all goodwill generated by use of a mark under licence should accrue to the licensor on termination of the licence. It was a question of fact as to whether the name was distinctive of a particular party s goods, not of fiction or equitable doctrine. It may well be what Wadlow said at para. 2.62 needs to be reconsidered in the light of Scandecor. However, as far as the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark is concerned, the goodwill generated by the use of the trade mark under licence can only be accrued to GDF. GDF had already built up a long reputation with this mark and I just cannot see how a licensee could have acquired the goodwill from the use of the mark. (9) Payment of fees for use of trade mark A question was raised whether the licence fees were paid by Foshan Foods to GDF or to CNC. By a notice dated 11th March 1994 (Bundle D9/252), GDF requested Foshan Foods to pay the 1993 fees for the use of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark. In the notice, Foshan Foods was asked to remit the money to the account of the CNC, Guangzhou Trade Mark Management Office. Mr Dong explained that CNC had a Trade Mark Management Office in the office of GDF, the staff was from GDF as well. Since the Pearl River Bridge trade mark on canned food belonged to CNC, CNC established a Trade Mark Management Office in order to facilitate the collection of trade mark fees and trade mark management. Mr Dong was also the Deputy Secretary of the Trade Mark Office. After the unpegging of GDF and the sub branch companies in January 1993, GDF used the CNC account to collect fees from the sub branch companies. The CNC account was used for three reasons : (1) it was the first time GDF collected fees from the sub branch companies; (2) GDF had no separate account; and (3) the fees were to be used on trade mark management and not for other purpose. In fact there were separate entries in this account, one entry was for CNC s trade mark fees on canned food and the other entry was for the GDF trade mark fees on processed food. The fees were used for trade mark management and expenses in relation to the trade mark and they were not intended to be profits. After 1993 the trade mark fees were remitted to the separate account of GDF. GDF continued to collect fees separately for CNC until the Autumn Trade Fair of 1997. On 7th March 1995, Foshan Foods remitted to GDF money for the use of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark in 1994 (Bundle B1b/435). I accept the evidence of Mr Dong. I am satisfied that the fees were collected by GDF for itself. (10) The s_lKjLrs|R ~bs| s from GDF on the production of the three wine. On 20th April 1994, Mr Dong came to Shiwan Brewery and said that GDF had registered the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark and in order to strengthen the trade mark management, GDF asked Shiwan Brewery to sign the Production Agreement. After consulting the Factory Manager, the document was signed. After the Production Agreement was signed with GDF, Shiwan Brewery suggested to Foshan Foods that a similar agreement should be signed with it as well so as to ensure the Brewery receive protection in the use of the trade mark. The Production Agreement with Foshan Foods was then signed (Exhibit D9). In the Production Agreement signed with GDF, it was clearly stated that GDF was the lawful owner of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark. What Mr Chen said about the circumstances in which these documents were signed does not diminish Shiwan Brewery or Foshan Foods recognition of the right of GDF of the trade mark. The Production Agreement with Foshan Foods merely stated that Foshan Foods was the lawful user of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark. This document clearly is not sufficient to support the Defendants case that the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark was a uniform trade mark. In the Production Agreement with Shiwan Brewery, it was stated that GDF agreed to Foshan Foods acquiring from Shiwan Brewery the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu. An issue arises that GDF recognized the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu belonged to Foshan Foods and hence GDF only ask itional wine. He agreed that from an economic point of view, the more products GDF could export on its own, the more profit it would make. However the decision of not handling the Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu at that stage was because if GDF recovered all the products from the sub branches, then they would not have any business to conduct and it might cause unemployment to the workers. It was not possible to carry out too drastic an action in a socialist system. After all from 1954 to 1992, GDF had been responsible for the loss of the sub branch companies. After considering the business activities that the sub branch companies had carried out for GDF, the welfare of the employees of these companies, GDF decided not to take back all the export products from the sub branches. I accept what Mr Dong said regarding the reason for only taking back three of the wine. The decision was not a recognition of the propriety interest of Foshan Foods in the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu. (11) Use of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark in advertisement The Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark was used in the advertising campaigns. The Defendants witnesses again played down the importance of the trade mark. Mr Cheung said that the emphasis of the advertisements was on Shiwan Mijiu. Certainly from the advertisements, the words Shiwan Mijiu were featured most prominently. However, in the advertisement in 1976 when the Shiwan Mijiu was first introduced and in the advertisement in 1979 when Shiwan Mijiu was reintroduced in the market, the Pearl River Bridge trade mark was also featured separately and prominently in the advertisements. Similarly in the advertisement on buses, even in the 1990s, there was a separate feature of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark. Likewise, in respect of the Super Mellow Mijiu, the Pearl River Bridge trade mark was featured prominently in the advertisements. Similarly the same trade mark was applied, again prominently, throughout the years in advertisements of other rice wine ^qgs|R -Nq\s|R ]N_ls|R \O(u e said the emphasis was still on the Shiwan Mijiu. He played down the importance of the trade mark by saying the Guangdong Mijiu which also bear the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark did not sell well. He further said that the use of Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark was not the deciding factor in the quality of the product. Before 1979, quality control on products with the trade mark in the Mainland was good but after that the control was less effective. In my view, the product may not sell well for a number of reasons such as quality and the amount of promotion involved. However there is no denial that the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark helped to sell products. Certainly in the consumer market in Hong Kong, the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark has acquired a general reputation of quality. A goodwill has certainly been built up on products of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark such as soy sauce and other types of rice wine. The use by the two wine of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark in labels and advertisements was to ride on the goodwill already generated by the trade mark so as to give recognition to the new products. (12) Period from 1993-1995 From the time of their introduction in 1975 and 1979 respectively until January 1995 when the Zu Miao brand of wine were introduced, the goodwill generated by the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu clearly belonged to GDF. After the financial peg was removed in January 1993, Foshan Foods used the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark under licence from GDF. The earlier licence was extended to 1993 and licence fees for that year was paid. This was followed by the new licence Agreement signed by Foshan Foods in early 1994. 4. Public perception : Reference to the parties on wine labels (1) Main label I have already dealt with the question of public perception on the ownership of the goodwill in relation to the main label. The activities of GDF which I have dealt with extensively in the earlier part of the judgment clearly indicated that it was engaged in a trade whi wcpsO wcpsO wcpsO wcpsO wcps|R wcpR 9}vaR Ym_l. 9}va 9}va TXLr wcpsO [Oq\ ]FUL t@\ wcpsO an annexure to the letter dated 30th October 1996 from GDF to the Foshan City Middle Court (Bundle D10/203-207). He said that the label was used when GDF exported the wine and when the wine arrived in Hong Kong, the diamond shape label would be imposed in replacement of the simplified label. This step was confirmed by Mr Leung of Yau Shing Hong, the new distributor in Hong Kong of the Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu. (3) Public perception of Shiwan Brewery In a letter dated 7th June1995 from G [Oq\ ]FU@\, O(uOUL 6R/f1u ND}T~ }/f1u _8^(W w cp iQW[ :y/f0W eyr"u 79 and in the beginning of 1980s, there were extensive reference to the Shiwan Brewery. Further, there was a popular television programme in 1980 which featured the Shiwan Brewery as well. It was submitted that the consumers would associate the Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu with the Shiwan Brewery which was formerly *Y TR *Y TR wcpsO R(g=k R(g=k, vaWS vaWS, wcpsO wery. He said the words Shiwan Mijiu represents products of Shiwan Brewery. He had seen the quality approval certificates but the words Shiwan Brewery only appeared in the past seven to eight years. The customers would not be given the certificates when they buy the wine. (v) wcpsO wcp wcp ^ T wcpsO /f[Oq\ wcpR vs|R SvQR vfit NEN` gyr%Rw *X1zs|R s|R d the product would not appear, and in fact was not allowed to appear, on labels of products destined for the export market. Mr Tang had never seen any back label. Mr Leung of Yau Shing Hong had not seen any back label. Mr Chiu said that initially there was a back label attached to the Super Mellow Mijiu. It was a white colour label describing the quality of the wine. It was later cancelled because of problems of sticking the label to the bottle. He, however, had not seen the back label now relied upon by the Defendants. The two witnesses who said there was a back label to the Super Mellow Mijiu were Mr Chen and Chung Cheung. Mr Chen claimed that he had a discussion with Mr Chan Fai of Foshan Foods on the back label. Mr Chan was not asked in his evidence about the back label. Chung Cheung also said that the back label was used in mid-1983 to 1986/87. The original case of the Defendants, as evidenced by Chung Who Cheung s affirmation in support of the Defendants application for interlocutory injunction, is that the back label was used since the first bottle of the Super Mellow Mijiu was produced in 1979. Chung Cheung said that the idea of the back label was suggested by Leo Burnett. The back label ceased to be used when Shiwan Brewery changed the bottling of wine into an automatic system. In support of the Defendants case that the back label was used, he relied on the promotional proposal by Leo Burnett, the advertising agency, (D3/1050) and a document dated 5th May 1983 (D9/151) in which the wording of the back label was specified. Apart from minor differences, they matched the label now relied by the Defendants. He further relied on delivery notes dated 15th August 1983 and 28th February 1984 (D3/1393-1414) in which the back label was included in the description of the goods delivered by Tung Fook (1982) to Shiwan Brewery. Mr Chen stated that in 1983, a representative from Leo Burnett visited the Brewery, and he informed the representative that the Brewery wanted a better prom wcpR rom 1987 onwards. I do not find Chung Cheung and Mr Chen to be credible witnesses on the back label. Chung Cheung had given evidence on many issues which were not within his knowledge. He explained that he said the back label was used since 1979 because his staff had told him that there were a back label to the wine. He then said that Leo Burnett suggested the use of the back label in a proposal prepared by it. Then he said that the original proposal did not contain any reference to the back label. The idea only came from Leo Burnett some time later in 1983. Mr Chen conceded that in 1983 the name of the Brewery could not appear on the products, but he tried to explain that the restriction only apply to the main labels but not the back labels. I find that GDF had not approved of the use of a back label. Tung Fook (1982) might have supplied some back labels, but I accept Mr Liao S.C. s submissions that if they were used, they were being used secretly and only for a short period of time, or they were used on bottles destined for the domestic market. The Defendants relied on shipping documents, invoices and printing orders in which the back labels were included in the description of the goods. From these documents it appeared that the labels, together with other labels, were delivered on two occasions in 1983. The labels were, according to the documents, consigned to Foshan Foods. It is extremely odd that Foshan Foods was not able to say that there was the back label on the Super Mellow Mijiu. In any event, I find the back label had no effect on consumers or had any bearings on the question of goodwill. The size of the back label was so small, and as Mr Liao, S.C., said, the words could only be discerned by the use of a magnifying device. When the back label is compared with the main label, it dwarfed into total insignificance. (5) Bar Code As requested by the supermarkets in Hong Kong, GDF started to use bar codes on its products. This started in June 1990. It is not necessary to base my finding on the ownership of goodwill on the use of the Bar Codes. (6) Name of Shiwan Brewery in the cartons Mr Chen said that Shiwan Brewery would put a quality inspection certificate in the cartons containing the wine. The certificate referred to Shiwan Brewery and gave a description of Shiwan Brewery. As these certificates were found only in the cartons, the ordinary consumers of the two types of wine would not be provided with such inspection certificates. (7) The manufacturer as owner of the goodwill Mr Tang S.C., referred to Passing Off Law and Practice 2nd Edition by Drysdale and Silverleaf at para.3.13 in which it was said that : Disputes not infrequently arise between the manufacturer and importer over who is entitled to the reputation in England. At common law as a general rule the owner of the reputation is the foreign manufacturer and not the importer even if the importer is the sole agent or distributor in this country of the goods in question. In Van Zeller v. Mason, Cattley and Co. [1907] 25 Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 37, a wine vineyard known as the Quinta de Roriz and a wine shipping business were originally in the same hands but belonged to different owners at a later date. After the severance, the successors of the wine shipping business registered Kopke Roriz as a trade mark for wine. The owner of the vineyard applied to restrain the owners of the Kopke business of this mark. The defendant shipped to the English market wine of the Kopke Roriz brand although such wine did not contain the products of the vineyard. The Court held that the defendants passed off the goods of the defendant as and for the goods of the vineyard. Many of the cases in this area arose as a result of the dispute between the manufacturer and the importer. However, the conflicting claim of the manufacturer and the importer is not the only situation when one considers the ownership of the goodwill. Hence, I do not find it helpful to rely, as a principle of law, that the goodwill or reputation belongs to that of the manufacturer. Mr Tang S.C. is of course right when he said that the mere fact that there was a trade connection between the product and its owner is not sufficient to establish an ownership of goodwill. The trade connection cases relied by the Plaintiffs are illustrations of the control exercised by a trade mark proprietor who himself is not the manufacturer. In this case, GDF has clearly satisfied the control test in establishing the ownership of goodwill in the two wine and is successful in its claim based on passing off. (8) Tung Fook (1982) The status of Tung Fook (1982) was merely the distributor of the Pearl River Bridge Super Mellow Mijiu. This is clearly spelt out in some of the advertisements of this product. It cannot satisfy either of the tests in proving the ownership of the goodwill. 5. Trade Mark (1) Registration of trade mark by Tung Fook (1982) The Plaintiffs seek rectification of Trade Mark No.2010/95, registered by Tung Fook (1982) by substituting GDF s name as the proprietor or by expunging the registration from the Trade Mark Registry. Tung Fook (1982) applied for registration of the Super Mellow Mijiu trade mark in 1993 and the application was approved in 1995. Chung Cheung stated that as early as 1989 he had asked Samuel Yeung & Co., Solicitors, to apply for the registration of the Super Mellow Mijiu trade mark. He wanted the registration because in the market there were other types of Super Mellow Mijiu produced in the Mainland with similar labels. In his evidence-in-chief, he stated that GDF and Foshan Foods also suggested to him to register the trade mark. He stated that during the 1992 Trade Fair he had invited Mr Ching Yau of GDF and Mr Yuan of Foshan Foods to lunch. During the conversation, they asked him to register the trade mark quickly so as to protect himself from imitation products. Later on, it was discovered that Samuel Yeung & Co. had not proceeded with the trade mark application. He was then referred to Hasti y applied to register the Super Mellow Mijiu label when Mr Leung informed him that GDF intended to supply Super Mellow Mijiu in Hong Kong. At this meeting Mr Leung took out a label which was similar to the Super Mellow Mijiu label. In another Trade Fair, either in 1993 or 1994, in the presence of Mr Chu and Mr Fung, who was a manager of GDF, Chung Cheung further informed them that he had registered the Super Mellow Mijiu label. The Defendants case as pleaded and as contained in Chung Cheung s affirmation in support of the Defendants application for injunction against GDF was that Tung Fook did not and was not required to inform GDF of the registration of the Super Mellow Mijiu label because GDF had no interest in the label. Chung Who Cheung s affirmation expressly dealt with Mr Dong s contention that GDF had never been informed of the application by Tung Fook (1982). However, Chung Cheung changed his approach in his evidence. I do not accept that he had informed GDF either in casual conversations or in meetings that he had applied for the registration of the Super Mellow Mijiu label. GDF had previously wanted to register the Super Mellow Mijiu label and was advised by Wu Fung Hong that it was not possible to do so. Had Chung Cheung informed GDF of what he had done, I have no doubt that GDF would have taken action on this matter. Furthermore, what Chung Who Cheung said regarding the reason for registering the label was unconvincing. In paragraph 35 of his first witness statement, he stated that in 1993, Shiwan Brewery, Foshan Foods and Tung Fook (1982) decided to apply to register the label. No reason was given why this decision was made. Chung Cheung now said that he decided to register the label earlier and he tried to explain paragraph 35 by saying that after GDF and Foshan Foods suggested that he should register the label, he pressed Mr Samuel Yeung on the matter. Mr Samuel Yeung is no longer practising in Hong Kong. Mr Ching had left GDF in 1991. I find too much of an coincidence that the application for registration of the Super Mellow Mijiu Trade Mark was lodged by Tung Fook (1982) on 10th June 1993 when during the same year GDF and Foshan Foods became unpegged and the requirement of export licence was cancelled. Mr Yuan also said that he had suggested to Chung Who Cheung to register the Super Mellow Mijiu trade mark in order to protect the product because of imitations in the market. He said that someone from GDF was also present at the discussion. He said that the person might be Mr Ching yau. I find his evidence to be extremely odd and not credible. Foshan Foods had already registered the Zu Miao Trade Mark in the Mainland in 1986 to 1988. The Zu Miao Trade Mark was also registered in Hong Kong on 5th October 1993 by a subsidiary company of Foshan Foods in Hong Kong. Foshan Foods regarded the Super Mellow Mijiu to be its own product. In the ordinary cause of events, it would be extremely odd for Foshan Foods to ask or allow Tung Fook (1982) to register the Super Mellow Mijiu Trade Mark to protect against other imitators. In my view, it was part of the concerted effort by Foshan Foods and Tung Fook (1982) to have the Super Mellow Mijiu Trade Mark registered behind the back of GDF. I find that Tung Fook (1982) clearly did not have any permission from GDF to register the Super Mellow Mijiu Trade Mark. (2) Rectification The power to rectify entries in the register is governed by s.48 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, Cap.43 which provides that (1) Subject to the provisions of this Ordinance any person aggrieved by the non-insertion in or omission from the register of any entry, or by any entry made in the register without sufficient cause, or by any entry wrongly remaining on the register, or by any error or defect in any entry in the register, may apply in the prescribed manner to the Court or, at the option of the applicant and subject to the provisions of section 80, to the Registrar, and the tribunal may make such order for making, expunging or varying the entry as the tribunal may think fit; I am satisfied that the grounds for rectification have been proved by the Plaintiffs :- (i) The registration was applied for and obtained by Tung Fook (1982) in fraud of GDF s right in the label in that the goodwill in the label has been vested with GDF. The label had been in use long before Tung Fook (1982) s application in 1993. The label has always been an integral label incorporating the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark and GDF s name in Chinese and English. Section 12(1) of the Trade Marks Ordinance provides that (1) It shall not be lawful to register as a trade mark or part of a trade mark any matter the use of which would be likely to deceive or would be disentitled to protection in a court of justice or world be contrary to law or morality, or any scandalous design. In Smith Hayden, the owners of the mark Hovis opposed to an application to register Ovax for impovers and moistening agents to be used in making cakes. Evershed J. held (a) (under section 11) [i.e. H.K. S.12(1)] Having regard to the reputation acquired by the name Hovis, is the court satisfied that the mark applied for, if used in a normal and fair manner in connection with any goods covered by the registration proposed, will not be reasonably likely to cause deception and confusion amongst a substantial number of persons? The authors of Kerly s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names 12th ed. suggested that the qualification to the principle should be as follows It would seem, however, that on the one hand (a) here should rather read: Having regard to the user of the name Hovis ; whilst on the other hand the requirement that the deception and confusion be amongst a substantial number of persons is a judicial gloss which needs to be properly and sensibly applied. Also the inquiry must now be directed, both for goods and for services, also to marks for associated services or goods. In Hong Kong Caterers Limited v. Maxim s Limited [1983] HKLR 287, Hunter J. held that in Hong Kong s.12(1) makes the likelihood of deception and independent ground of objection. (ii) Tung Fook (1982) was, until 1995, the distributor in Hong Kong of GDF s Super Mellow Mijiu. GDF had, by a licence agreement made in January 1994 licensed Foshan Foods to produce the wine and used the label. Tung Fook (1982) had applied for the registration without notice to or the prior knowledge or consent of GDF. In GYNOMIN Trade Mark [1961] RPC 408, a former agent of a foreign manufacturer, having received in confidence knowledge of the formula of a product of the principal, marketed the product under a trade mark knowing it to be a mark of the former principal, and registered that mark. It was held that in view of the close relationship between the parties and the respondents, knowledge of the information which was communicated to them in confidence, they were not entitled to claim to be the proprietors of the trade mark GYNOMIN . (iii) Tung Fook (1982) is not entitled to claim to be the proprietor of the label because it was merely GDF s distributor of the Super Mellow Mijiu. The reputation and goodwill of the label vested in GDF and not in Tung Fook (1982). Section 13 of the Trade Marks Ordinance enables any person claiming to be entitled to be registered as the proprietor of a trade mark to apply for registration. In the matter of the trade mark of Elaine Inescourt [1928] 46 RPC 13, a businessman in Switzerland manufactured and sold a self massage rollers under the trade mark Le Vampire . An English merchant imported the rollers to England and registered the words Le Vampire in England. The Swiss merchant applied to expunge the trade mark from the register. The trade mark was struck off, Eve said The result of the evidence is that the Mark was used in this country in connection and as identified with the Applicant s goods before the application to register, and when that application was made it was not open to the Respondent to claim successfully any right to the mark for herself. In the Australian Law of Trade Marks and Passing Off by Shanahan, it is stated that A manufacturer who has applied a mark to goods to indicate that he or she is the origin of the goods is most unlikely to be denied proprietorship because of the activities of some dealer in those goods. The evidence in these cases will generally show that in the hands of the dealer, the mark has retained its initial significance as an indication of the manufacturing source of the product. The dealer does not establish proprietorship by showing only that purchasers look to the dealer as the sole supplier of the goods; they might well do that in recognition of the dealer s exclusive selling right, while aware all the while that the mark denotes some manufacturing origin. This is particularly likely where the manufacturer is actually identified by the labels or the goods are clearly of foreign origin. In this case, it is GDF who is identified as the trade source of the wine. (iv) The copyright subsisting in the label is vested in GDF beneficially. The trade mark is a reproduction of the label and the use by Tung Fook (1982) of the trade mark constitutes infringements of GDF s copyright and it is unlawful : s.12(1) Trade Marks Ordinance. (3) Expunging a registration Section 49 of the Trade Marks Ordinance enables the court to expunge the registration of a trade mark, of any contravention of, or failure to observe, a condition entered on the register in relation thereto. The question of condition is discussed in Kerly s at para.8-57 as follows A trade mark may consist of a device: the logos recently fashionable as house-marks of commercial groups are examples. In general, the only question is whether the device is striking enough or well-known enough to be distinctive. Colour may contribute to distinctiveness. Where, however, the device includes words, letters or numerals, the question arises whether the mark does not essentially consist merely of them: whether, that is, if those words, letters or numerals are disclaimed (as the Registrar will normally require) there is really anything left. Blank space conditions : If it is sought to overcome the above difficulty by registering such a mark with the words, letters, etc., omitted, leaving blank space, the Registrar will if it appears to him that the mark does include a blank intended to be filled in when the mark is used consider not only whether the mark is distinctive as it stands, but also whether it will remain so when the blank is filled. Accordingly, from about 1950 the practice grew up of requiring, as a condition of registration, that, in use, the blank be occupied only by matter of a wholly descriptive, non-trade mark character. In the present case, the trade mark was registered subject to the condition that the blank space in the mark shall, when the mark is in use, be occupied only by matter of a wholly descriptive and non trade mark character . Tung Fook (1982) secured the registration of the trade mark with full knowledge that the mark had been used before the application in a manner contrary to the condition and would be used after registration in breach of the condition. The trade mark has always been used with matters not of a wholly descriptive and non trade mark character. Before 1995, the blank space was occupied by the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark, GDF s corporate names in Chinese and English and the names Super Mellow Mijiu and Tung Fook (1982) clearly constitutes a breach of faith and a fraud on the registry. In TIME Trade Mark [1961] RPC 381, Time Inc. applied to register as a trade mark the cover of the magazine Time , the space normally occupied by pictorial matter special to a particular issue being left blank. It was held that In my view as a general rule, where the Registrar sees in a mark a blank space clearly intended to be filled in with undisclosed matter which might affect the identity of the mark unless it were of a wholly descriptive non trade mark character, he is justified in requiring an undertaking that, when the mark is used, the blank space will be occupied only by matter of such character. In Dunhill s Trade Marks [1969] RPC 640, it was held that If the appellants in use insert distinctive matter, for example, other trade marks owned by them in the relevant blank space the effect of the mark as a whole in my view is likely to be totally altered. (4) Submission by Trade Mark Registrar There is no dispute that GDF and Yau Shing Hong are persons aggrieved by the registration of the trade mark. They were alleged by Tung Fook (1982) to have infringed its trade mark. The Defendants have not shown why the discretion to rectify the entries should not be made. However, before I order a rectification of the entry, I would, as suggested by Mr Liao S.C., invite the Trade Mark Registrar to make representations on whether he will remove the blank space conditions. This is an issue that will invariably arise if I substitute GDF as the owner of the trade mark in the Registry. Hence, this matter should be dealt with first before any order is to be made in this regard. 6. Copyright GDF argued that it is the beneficial owner of the copyright in the labels of the Shiwan Mijiu and the Super Mellow Mijiu. (1) The Law In The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs by Laddie, Prescott and Victoria, a useful summary is given on the ownership of copyright in equity 11.79 Ownership in equity can arise where the circumstances are such that the copyright, although belonging to the author at law, can properly be regarded as being held on trust by him for another person. For example, a work may have been created by a partnership or by a director of a company or by an employee in circumstances where it would be inequitable for him to claim rights in the work as against the partnership or the company and he will be regarded as a constructive trustee of the copyright. Or a copyright work may have been brought into existence at the request of or on the instructions of the intended owner who has paid for the making of the work. Illustration (1) In Massine v de Basil [1936-45] MCC223, Massine, the choreographer, agreed with the director of the Russian Ballet at Covent Garden that he would compose and arrange suitable dances for the ballet. He was held to be under a contract of service but the court said that even if he were an independent contractor and entitled to the copyright he would nevertheless hold it on trust for the ballet as he had been paid specifically by them to produce the works in question. (2) In Harold Drabble v Hycolite Manufacturing Co [1923-28] MCC322, D, an advertising agent, had written to the H Co offering to improve on the wording and layout of their existing advertisements. H Co supplied D with information and paid for the materials used in such re-design. H Co placed the resultant advertisement in a newspaper and D was paid a commission by the newspaper. Later H Co placed the advertisement in another newspaper without the consent of D. It was held that there was insufficient originality in D s advertisement for copyright to subsist therein but that if it was a copyright work there must be inferred a plain consent that the advertisement should remain the property of the H Co to insert whenever they chose. 11.80 Such a situation commonly arises where a manufacturer pays an outside designer to design either a new or a modified product to the manufacturer s specifications. It may be a matter of dispute whether the manufacturer has merely purchased the physical designs and has a licence to manufacture from those designs or whether he has bought the copyright and, being the owner in equity, is entitled to call for a legal assignment to him. Where the outside draftsman was merely commissioned to produce engineering or production drawings from rough sketches supplied by the manufacturer the case for saying that the manufacturer is the owner in equity is very strong indeed. The principle in operation in all these cases is that both parties intended that the manufacturer or commissioner should have the rights necessary for him to protect the property he has purchased and the enterprise for which the drawings were intended to be used. Copinger and Skone James on Copyright at para.4-67 stated that there are no set rules for determining equitable ownership. In James Arnold and Co. Limited v. Miafern Limited and Others [1980] 397, Paul Baker QC at p.404 stated that Mr Spalding argues on the other hand that in the case of commissioned works where part of the process is sub-contracted it is the person who commissioned the ultimate article and is to pay ultimately for the process who has commissioned the making of the engraving. With a little hesitation I accept that argument. Someone who orders a particular design to be made and executed by a particular method may fairly be said to have commissioned all the necessary articles to be made even though he may be unaware of the need for them. (2) Copyright of the Shiwan Mijiu main label I accept Mr s evidence that he instructed the sub branches to prepare the labels for the new wine. The Plaintiffs pleaded case is that there was an express agreement that the Shiwan Mijiu label was to belong to GDF and that there was a similar understanding in this regard. Mr Tang S.C. referred to the contemporary documents which he said reflected the political climate at that time. Slogans of political class struggles can be found in the reports submitted by the sub branches, Shiwan Brewery and the Foshan Foreign Trade Bureau. Mr Tang S.C. submitted that in such a climate, it would be highly improbable that the parties would consider intellectual property issues such as labels on the wine. These are capitalistic ideas not in vogue at that time. In my view, looking at Mr s evidence, the Plaintiffs case that the label belonged to GDF was one of understanding and not of an express agreement. The reason why the label belonged to GDF was because of the use of the GDF s Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark on the label. It was only when being pressed by Mr Tang S.C. in his cross examination that Mr Lor seemed to suggest that there was a discussion on this matter as well. This, however, does not cast doubt on the credibility of Mr Lor. The Shiwan Mijiu was a product developed with the authority of GDF. I find that the label belonged to GDF. Certainly, at the time when the wine was developed, there was no contrary indication that the label would somehow belong either to a brewery which produced the wine or to Foshan Foods, which was merely executing the business activities of GDF. I find that Mr Chiu and Mr Chen must have understood and accepted that the label belonged to GDF. In John Richardson Computers Ltd v. Handers and Anr. [1993] FSR 497, where R engaged two computer programmes W and H to refine and improve a programme. W s evidence was that it was always understood between R and him that R owned all rights in the programme. It was held that this amounted to an acceptance that W held any copyright which in law belonged to him on trust for R. Although Shiwan Brewery actually carried out the instruction to commission the design, it was merely acting on behalf of Foshan Foods as GDF s agent. The design fees were not separately charged but were included in the cost of the printing of the labels for the Shiwan Mijiu. The fees were accounted for and included as part of the cost of the Shiwan Mijiu for export. It is significant that after the cancellation of the four rice wine, the label that was being used for the new Guangdong Mijiu was the same label as the Shiwan Mijiu. The Guangdong Mijiu was produced by different breweries, the decision by GDF to use the Shiwan Mijiu label for the new product can only point to one conclusion, namely, the Shiwan Brewery was merely a production unit and the label belonged to GDF. I accept that GDF was the owner in equity of the copyright in the Shiwan Mijiu label. In a letter dated 12th March 1992, GDF s Trade Mark Dep wcpyr wcps|R O(u< SI{I{ ^(W9ei >eMR s_lKjFU O(u/f est was a normal request and this was not an indication that the label did not belong to GDF even though it had paid for the design. I accept what he said. The ownership of the label has to be determined by reference to all the evidence and not simply on this letter. There was clearly an infringement of the copyright when in February 1995 the Shiwan Mijiu produced by Shiwan Brewery, supplied by Foshan Foods and distributed by Chung Tai used the same design with the substitution of the Zu Miao trade mark instead of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark. This was done without GDF s permission. (3) Copyright of the Super Mellow Mijiu main label It cannot be disputed that Chung Yuen was acting on behalf of GDF when he instructed Ngai Chung to prepare the main label of the Super Mellow Mijiu. The contract was entered on behalf of GDF. This is clear from the evidence of Chung Hau Yuen and Mr Lor. Tung Fook did not have any beneficial interest in the copyright. The beneficial ownership belonged to GDF. I find that there was an express agreement between Mr Lor and Chung Yuen that the label belonged to GDF. This was not the usual arrangement in which the label was designed and printed in the Mainland. On the contrary it was to be dealt with by Chung Hau Yuen in Hong Kong. It was reasonable for the parties to have expressly agreed on the ownership of the label. (4) Domestic sales The Defendants relied on the domestic sale of the two wine, although the purpose of this is not clear. Certainly it has no bearing on the question of goodwill of the two wine in Hong Kong. The Defendants seemed to suggest that GDF, by reason of the domestic sale, must have knowledge of the use of the two labels by Shiwan Brewery in the Mainland. This constituted acknowledgement of Shiwan Brewery s rights in the two labels. The Plaintiffs accepted that there might have been some domestic sale of the Shiwan brand ( wcpLr) as still a shortage of food supplies in the Mainland, and Shiwan Brewery just could not obtain the raw material, namely, rice, for the production of wine in the domestic market. The raw material must be supplied by GDF. Furthermore, there was shortage of packaging material, namely bottles and paper for printing labels. I accept their evidence. The witnesses from Foshan Foods did not deal with the question of domestic sale. The only evidence came from Mr Chen of Shiwan Brewery. I do not find Mr Chen to be a credible witness. He referred to tables showing the figures of domestic sale. The tables were only prepared in the course of the trial and no discovery was made of the documents on which the figures were based. In my view, in the 1970s, if there had been sale of the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu in the domestic market, they would be under the Pearl River Bridge brand and of very small quantity. Shiwan Brewery had applied for quality awards of their wine. The applications showed that the Shiwan brand of products were only mentioned from the 1980s onwards. Mr Chen attempted to boost up his case on domestic sale by saying that he had told the designer of the Shiwan Mijiu label that the wine was for both export and domestic sale. His evidence is not credible. I do not accept that Mr Chen had informed the designer that the same design for Shiwan Mijiu label was to be used for both export purpose and internal sale. The new product was introduced by organizations engaged in export trade and was intended for export. I do not accept that in 1973/1974, when Mr Chen instructed the designer to prepare the design for the label, he would at the same time inform the designer that the product was to be used for internal sale. Attached to the draft label design for Shiwan Mijiu was a white sticker. Mr Chen seemed to rely on the wording on the sticker to support his contention that he had instructed the designer that the design was to be used for both export and internal sale. He said that the phrase N~vKQ them because GDF is the owner of the reputation and goodwill associated with these two labels in Hong Kong. As pointed out in Copinger at paragraph there are a variety of cases where a claim of copyright in a work has not been enforced because the court has considered the work to be libellous, immoral, obscene, scandalous or irreligious, or to involve deception of the public. In Wright v. Tallis [1845] I CB 893, a plaintiff failed in an action against the defendant for pirating a work of a devotional character, on the ground that the plaintiff s work falsely professed to be a translation from the German of an author who had a high reputation for writings of this kind, and that this had been done to deceive purchases and to give the work a value which it would not otherwise have had. Tindal CJ held that The cases in which a copyright has been held not to subsist where the work is subversive of good order, morality, or religion, do not, indeed, bear directly on the case before us; but they have this analogy with the present inquiry that they prove that the rule which denies the existence of copyright in those cases, is a rule established for the benefit and protection of the public. And we think the best protection that the law can afford to the public against such a fraud as that laid open by this plea, is, to make the practice of it unprofitable to its author. Other cases illustrating this principle are Slingsby v. Bradford Patent Truck and Trolley Co. [1906] WN 51 (CA), Bile Bean Manufacturing Co. v. Davidson (1906) 725 and Davies v. Bowes [1911-16] (US). (6) Name of the Author The Plaintiffs further relied on s.115(2) of the Copyright Ordinance (Cap.528) (section 20(4) of the Copyright Act 1956). They argued that when the copyright relating to the design of the Shiwan Mijiu label and the Super Mellow Mijiu label was published in Hong Kong, the name of GDF or its pseudonym appeared on the two labels; GDF is either the author or publisher of these two labels and under s.115 is deemed to be the owner of the copyright unless the contrary is proved. In view of my finding on the ownership of copyright, it is not necessary for me to deal further with this point. (7) Assignment of the copyright in the Super Mellow Mijiu label Chung Who Cheung said that his solicitor advised him that he had to show that Tung Fook (1982) had the copyright in the label of the Super Mellow Mijiu. After the actions were commenced, he asked Mr Ngai if he could obtain the copyright of the label. Mr Ngai said that since the label belonged to Tung Fook, it should be given back to Tung Fook (1982) but he needed to consult China Advertising first. An assignment was later executed in favour of Tung Fook (1982). It was accepted by Tung Fook (1982) that the assignment was made for the purpose of the litigation. Mr Lau Kar Yee ( ^JTlQ esign fees. The copyright was no longer of use to his company and he agreed to the assignment. In my view, China Advertising held the legal title to the copyright of the design on trust for GDF and owed a fiduciary duty towards GDF. As part of the business operation engaged in the promotion of the Mainland export products, China Advertising must be aware of the significance of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark and the words on the label of CNC, Guangdong supervising the production. By reason of the incorporation of these two items, China Advertising just could not say that the copyright of the main label belonged to Tung Fook (1982). This is so irrespective of whether Tung Fook (1982) is a successor of Tung Fook. By assigning the copyright to Tung Fook (1982), China Advertising had clearly acted in breach of trust and its fiduciary duties towards GDF. The breach was knowingly and intentionally induced by Tung Fook (1982). By misappropriating the trust property belonging to GDF, Tung Fook (1982) became a constructive trustee of the copyright in the works of GDF. Furthermore, China Advertising had acted in breach of contract with GDF by assigning the copyright to Tung Fook (1982) and Tung Fook (1982) had induced and procured the breach. Shiwan Brewery produced the two wine, Chung Tai and Tung Fook (1982) distributed them by using the same main labels as before but with the substitution of the Zu Miao trade mark. This clearly constituted a copyright infringement on the part of these Defendants. It should be pointed out that the Plaintiffs have not sought relief against Shiwan Brewery for infringing the Super Mellow Mijiu label. 7. Injurious falsehood (1) The Law In Gatley on Libel and Slander at para.301, it is stated that There are dicta from which it might be inferred that an action will lie for any words, whether they are defamatory or not, which are followed by special damage. But if the plaintiff can prove (i) that the words are false; (ii) that they were published maliciously, and (iii) that special damage has followed as the direct and natural result of their publication, an action on the case will lie at common law Ratcliffe v. Evans [1892] 2 Q.B. 524 (C.A.). 303. Malice. The malice essential to support the action is some dishonest or otherwise improper motive. Such a motive will be inferred on proof that the words were calculated to produce actual damage, and that the defendant knew that they were false when he published them, or was recklessly indifferent as to whether they were false or not. Malice in its proper and accurate sense is a question of motive, intention, or state of mind. 328. The damage must be pecuniary. Such damage must be pecuniary or capable of being estimated in money. Section 24 of the Defamation Ordinance, Cap.21 further provides that 24. Slander of title, etc. (1) In an action for slander of title, slander of goods or other malicious falsehood, it shall not be necessary to allege or prove special damage if the words upon which the action is founded are calculated to cause pecuniary damage to the plaintiff and are published in writing or other permanent form; or if the said words are calculated to cause pecuniary damage to the plaintiff in respect of any office, profession, calling, trade or business held or carried on by him at the time of the publication. (2) Section 22 shall apply for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of the law of libel and slander. (2) Newspaper announcement and letters The cause of action is based on statements published in the newspapers on 28th January 1995, 29th - 31st May 1995 and 2nd June 1995 and also statements contained in letters dated 8th June 1995, 28th June 1995 and 11th July 1995 from Tung Fook (1982) s solicitors to GDF. In respect of the newspaper announcement of 28th January 1995, the Plaintiffs case is that until 1995, the Super Mellow Mijiu, Shiwan Mijiu and the Yu Bing Shiao were produced by Foshan Foods and Shiwan Brewery for GDF. The production was under the appointment, direction or control of GDF. The Pearl River Bridge trade marks were used on these wine under the licence of GDF. Neither Foshan Foods nor Shiwan Brewery had any right in the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark and they were not entitled to replace the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark on these wine with another trade mark. The announcements stated that products with the Zu Miao Trade Mark were genuine articles. This impliedly suggested that the Super Mellow Mijiu, Shiwan Mijiu, Yu Bing Shiao of the Pearl River ine of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark were also not genuine articles. The newspaper announcement on 29th - 31st May 1995 further stated that only the Zu Miao Super Mellow Mijiu was the genuine article. (3) Chung Who Cheung s evidence Chung Who Cheung said that he did not know GDF is the holder of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark but he knew the mark is registered in Hong Kong by CNC. In January 1985, Foshan Foods asked him to go to Shenzhen. He went with a representative of Chung Tai. Foshan Foods informed him that it would not use the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark but the Zu Miao Trade Mark. He said that Tung Fook (1982) would continue to buy the wine if there was no change of the brewery, the quality and the label of the wine. In March 1995, Tung Fook (1982) organized 60 wine merchants in Hong Kong to visit the Shiwan Brewery. (4) Cheung Chun s evidence Regarding the advertisement of 28th January 1995, Mr Cheung Loy Chun ( iao Shiwan Mijiu because it did not matter whether Zu Miao or Pearl River Bridge brand was used, the most important thing is the Shiwan Mijiu. He denied that he had participated in discussions with Foshan Foods to change to the Zu Miao brand but others in Chung Tai might have discussed it. He further said that Chung Tai agreed to the change because Foshan Foods and GDF had arguments on the trade mark and the situation in the 1992 and 1993 Trade Fair had changed, and GDF wanted to get back some products and produce them on its own. Mr Cheung denied that the reason why the Zu Miao Trade Mark was adopted was because Chung Tai and Foshan Foods wished to set up a separate stove to exclude GDF from the business. He also denied that the new trade mark was adopted so that Chung Tai, Foshan Foods and Shiwan Brewery could use it to take over the goodwill of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark products. (5) Change of Trade Mark It is unbelievable that for such a drastic measure of changing the trade mark of the wine from Pearl River Bridge to Zu Miao, the two distributors would only be notified in January 1995. Both of them were extremely reticent in disclosing their knowledge of the change. The true picture only came at the end of the Defendants evidence when Mr Yan gave evidence. Mr Yan said that the idea of using the Z uR TLr) rewery and the distributors were also notified of Foshan Foods decision around that time and at the end of 1994, there was a business meeting in Shenzhen with the distributors and Shiwan Brewery in which Foshan Foods informed them that the Zu Miao would be used. (6) The decision to change the brewery I accept Mr Dong s evidence that GDF s decision to instruct a new brewery to produce the rice wine including Super Mellow Mijiu and Shiwan Mijiu was because of the newspaper announcement in January 1995. Mr Chen seemed to suggest that even before the newspaper announcement, GDF had instructed other breweries to produce wine including Super Mellow Mijiu. He said that in November and December 1994, the staff from the Shiwan Brewery was visiting the Namhai Xianhua Brewery taste and without the certificate of quality inspection. What Mr Chen said regarding the discovery of Super Mellow Mijiu in the Namhai Xianhua Brewery was not put to any of the Plaintiffs witnesses. I do not accept his evidence. I further accept Mr Dong s evidence that the reason why GDF stopped placing further orders with Shiwan Brewery for other types of wine was because Shiwan Brewery had delayed in the production. (7) Malice established Stable J. in Wilts United Dairies, Ld. v. Thomas Robinson Sons & Coy., Ld. [1957] Reports Of Patent, Design, And Trade Mark Cases 220 held that : . As I understand the law it is this : 1. That if you publish a defamatory statement about a man s goods which is injurious to him, honestly believing that it is true, your object being your own advantage and no detriment to him, you obviously are not liable. 2. If you publish a statement which turns out to be false but which you honestly believe to be true, but you publish that statement not for the purpose of protecting your own interests and achieving some advantage to yourself but for the purpose of doing him harm, and it transpires, contrary to your belief, that the statement that you believed to be true has turned out to be false, notwithstanding the bona fides of your belief because the object that you had in mind was to injure him and not to advantage yourself, you would be liable for an injurious falsehood. 3. The third proposition which I derive from the cases is this, that if you publish an injurious falsehood which you know to be false, albeit that your only object is your own advantage and with no intention or desire to injure the person in relation to whose goods the falsehood is published, then provided that it is clear from the nature of the falsehood that it is intrinsically injurious I say intrinsically , meaning not deliberately aimed with intent to injure but as being inherent in the statement itself, the defendant is responsible, the malice consisting in the fact that what he published he knew to be false. For ease of reading, I have numbered the three tests in the judgment. The issue is whether Shiwan Brewery had acted maliciously in causing the newspaper announcement to be published on 28th January 1995. Although Shiwan Brewery said that it was only responsible for its part of the announcement, it is clear that the wording of the two announcements was very similar. It is inconceivable that the newspaper announcements were prepared by each of them without consulting each other and later inserted as one piece of publication. The heading of the announcement must be applicable to both of these announcements. I think the reality is that Shiwan Brewery and Foshan Foods must have discussed the matter beforehand before the newspaper announcement was published. The heading referred to two other types of rice wine, namely, the Pearl River Bridge oposition as well. It is clear that Shiwan Brewery had overstepped the line of simply protecting its own interest. The announcement that Zu Miao Brand wine were the genuine articles and the reference to prevention of imitation is clearly for the purpose of harming GDF in respect of wine produced under the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark. Likewise, the newspaper announcements by Tung Fook (1982) on 29th 31st May 1995 clearly constituted the tort of injurious falsehood. Tung Fook (1982) just could not have any bona fide belief that it was entitled to register the Super Mellow Mijiu Trade Mark. The only other Super Mellow Mijiu available in the market at that time was the Pearl River Bridge brand by GDF. The reference to the counterfeit products and infringing articles were clearly intended to injure GDF. The series of letters written by Hastings and Co. to Yau Shing Hong (8th June 1995), Sun Fung Lin Trading Co. Ltd. (28th June 1995) and Park n Shop (11th July 1995 after GDF adopted the new label) could only have been written under the instruction of Tung Fook (1982). These letters repeated the newspaper announcement of Tung Fook (1982) issued on 29th 31st May 1995. These letters went beyond merely protecting the rights of Tung Fook (1982), but were clearly intended to cause harm to GDF. The newspaper article in Tin Daily News on 2nd June 1995 appeared almost immediately after the newspaper announcements on the previous three days. It is inconceivable that the writer of the article had not obtained information from either Shiwan Brewery or Tung Fook (1982). However, it is not necessary for me to deal with this matter further. In considering the question of malice, it is relevant to consider the background in which these newspaper announcements and letters came into being. (1) On 5th November 1992, GDF notified Tung Fook (1982) that in future GDF would directly sign and carry out sales contracts in respect of the Super Mellow Mijiu. On 10th June 1993, Tung Fook (1982) applied to register the pictorial part of the Super Mellow Mijiu label when it was still the distributor without notice to GDF. At the beginning of 1994, Shiwan Brewery signed the Production Agreement with GDF to produce for GDF the Pearl River Bridge line of rice wine. At the beginning of 1994, Foshan Foods signed a licence agreement for the use of the Pearl River Bridge trade mark and label for one year ending 1st February 1995. Tung Fook (1982) and Shiwan Brewery shortly before the expiry of the licence agreement embarked upon a series of publications of false statements making threats against GDF s distributor and Yau Shing Hong s retailers. Tung Fook (1982) wrongfully obtained an assignment of the copyright in the Super Mellow Mijiu label. With this background, the publications were clearly made maliciously. Tung Fook (1982), Shiwan Brewery and in my view, Foshan Foods as well, had clearly acted in concert in a scheme aiming at injuring GDF s business. The Plaintiffs further relied on some recent events, namely, in October 1998 it was discovered that Tung Fook (1982) had posted up on its show window the announcement which appeared in the Tin Tin Daily News of 29th 31st May 1995. There was also a recent television advertisement by Shiwan Brewery in which the Shiwan brand of Super Mellow Mijiu was said to have changed its design a bottle bearing the Super Mellow Mijiu label now under consideration was shown in the advertisement. It is not necessary for me to make a finding of malice based on these two new events. What had transpired previously clearly establishes a cause of action of injurious falsehood against Tung Fook (1982) and Shiwan Brewery. 8. Unlawful interference with business and contractual relationship (1) The Law In Clerk & Lindsell on Torts 17th ed. para.23-56, it is stated that Unlawful interference with economic and other interests. There exists a tort of uncertain ambit which consists in one person using unlawful means with the object and effect of causing damage to another. For example, in J. T. Stratford & Son Ltd v. Lindley, two of their Lordships gave, as an alternative ground of their decision that an injunction should lie, the fact that the defendants had used unlawful means to interfere with the business of the plaintiffs. In addition to interfering with existing contracts the respondents action made it practically impossible for the appellants to do any new business with the barge hirers. It was not disputed that such interference with business is tortious if any unlawful means are employed. damage is essential to the cause of action and must be shown to have been, or to be about to be, caused by the unlawful interference. The essence of the tort is deliberate interference with the plaintiff s interests by unlawful means ; and the intention to injure must be a contributing cause of the plaintiff s loss. The Plaintiffs claim is that the letters sent by the solicitors for Tung Fook (1982) consisted of false claims and unlawful threats which interfered with the contractual relationship between GDF and Yau Shing Hong and also the contractual relationship between these two entities and their retailers. These letters clearly had such effect as shown by the withdrawal of the stocks from Park n Shop. However, as I have already found for the Plaintiffs, it is not necessary for me to deal further with this cause of action. 9. Estoppel The Plaintiffs further relied on estoppel against the Defendants. The grounds relied upon were the Trade Mark Licence Agreements, the Production Agreements, Tung Fook (1982) s application to GDF to be a distributor of the Super Mellow Mijiu, Chung s request to GDF to reintroduce the Shiwan Mijiu, and its application to GDF to become a distributor of the Shiwan Mijiu. The Plaintiffs argued that the Defendants are estopped from denying that GDF is the proprietor of the Pearl River Bridge Trade Mark and of the labels of the two wine. In view of my findings in this case, I also do not think it is necessary for me to deal with this aspect of the Plaintiffs claim. 10. Counterclaim The Defendants are represented by Messrs Hastings & Co. At one stage it ceased to act for the Defendants but has since resumed its representation. On 24th August 1998, Master Poon, on Hastings application, allowed it to cease to act for the Defendants. This was shortly before the case was due to resume for submission. Following this order, the Plaintiffs applied for security of costs against Tung Fook (1982). On 7th September 1998, I granted an order requiring Tung Fook (1982) which had lodged counterclaims against the Plaintiffs, to provide security for costs in the sum of HK$4 million. The security was not furnished within time and Tung Fook (1982) s counterclaim was dismissed in accordance with the terms of my order. In any event, Tung Fook (1982) s counterclaim on passing off of the Super Mellow Mijiu would fail because it was not the owner of the goodwill of the Super Mellow Mijiu. Further its counterclaim on infringement of the copyright of the Super Mellow Mijiu by GDF and Yau Shing Hong failed because the ownership of the copyright is not vested in Tung Fook (1982). Likewise, the counterclaim by Shiwan Brewery on the passing off of the Super Mellow Mijiu and the Shiwan Mijiu would also fail because again it was not the owner of the goodwill of these two wine. Its claim based on the copyright of the Shiwan Mijiu label would also fail because the ownership of the copyright vests in GDF. Part IV CONCLUSION In the end, I find that the Plaintiffs are successful in their claims. I will grant the following orders :- 1. As against Tung Fook (1982) and Shiwan Brewery. 1. An injunction against them for passing off by the use of the name of Super Mellow Mijiu and its label; and 2. An injunction to prevent further publications of the false statements contained in the newspaper announcements and letters. I would defer dealing with the remedies arising from the registration of Trade Mark 02010/95 until I have heard from the Registrar of Trade Marks. 2. As against Shiwan Brewery and Chung Tai 1. An injunction against them for passing off by the use of the name of Shiwan Mijiu and its label; 2. A declaration that GDF is the owner of the copyright in the Shiwan Mijiu label; and 3. An injunction against them for infringement of the copyright in the label. 3. As against Tung Fook (1982) and China Resources Advertising (HCA No.A11061/1995) 1. A declaration that GDF is the owner of the copyright of the Super Mellow Mijiu label; 2. A declaration that the assignment of 1st September 1995 by China Resources Advertising to Tung Fook (1982) is null and void; 3. An order setting aside the assignment; and 4. An injunction against Tung Fook (1982) for infringement of the copyright in the label. 4. Consequential relief The consequential relief, including assessment of damages, arising from these orders have to be dealt with at another hearing when I will also deal with the submission from the Registrar of Trade Marks. I will ask the parties to agree on their terms before the next hearing. 5. Counterclaim The counterclaim by Shiwan Brewery is accordingly dismissed. 6. Costs I will order costs nisi to the Plaintiffs in respect of their claims and the Defendants counterclaim. 7. Remarks This is a lengthy and complicated case lengthy because the history of the subject matter spanned over 20 years; complicated because of the many issues involved and the lack of published materials on the operation of the economic structure of the Mainland during the planned economy. I wish to thank Counsel for their assistance. The solicitors on both sides have also spent much effort in the preparation of the case and their work is also appreciated. The evidence in this case was given in Chinese without translation (except Cantonese translation for Mandarin speaking witnesses) while the submission was given in English. This approach was adopted to maximize the efficient use of Court time and service of Counsel. This, in my view, represents a truly effective bilingual system and reflects the unique position of Hong Kong in the crossroads of East and West. A translation of this judgment will be provided to the parties in due course. (P. Cheung) Judge of the Court of First Instance, High Court Mr Andrew Liao S.C. and Mr Martin Liao, inst d by M/s S.H. Chan & Co., for the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff by Counterclaim Mr Robert Tang S.C. and Mr John Yan, inst d by M/s Hastings & Co., for the Defendants and the Defendants by Counterclaim - PAGE - - PAGE - `4K: PNG IHDR gAMA PLTE wwwfffUUUDDD333""" ff3ff f3ff33f3 3ff3f33f 33f33 pHYs IDATx r737 ` 0 h@( OgA1 5?NM M``< I:kk 6p6$ !i{o ShL;+B ?Hj4 C@LJ n8EV pw LR iC X D%N `xFy t> U$1c# Hh @[ j2t- ghcB ' $X ` &P N ,Qp `U> baHI% YG@% B-h! Y_Az boz_ N`@y fI) :im" :I^$Q wMat Bo ` DhO Y!qHG fnMn J[oi P3LN Do12 8l0'3 V3mO bEO E 3@lOq *^9go 1F6k S"DURe p`9n #Rx@ y4yl t~$akz< nSDd M(uq r@rC\ A1%8c +6xlm 8F{^ 'KOA ;i|0c azY] {haw; < P xUBk oI7U U4Ei 6d0P } A. 13 [ Hq6d vt0O| 1@7z O4< asz 6X@% !m)OO 2Dbacrx SG0F H\>y 4)_u 0T:biM Sk^OA kjwLX[ S[L\ B_d\CiC Tts. &7@4 XL=3 'e" R< OfP` ]2q{ zSfz U^;K y6Uf ;DLv+ mTAm $8~!qD x4=-| G,^ s]9\ \#eh B:\A tt$M sU'@ d_[fA 5? j t &1 ],.D(% 7l#v IDAT Q#;| zm' Hi8w r)N7X E.s5 O4z]] u\mw va%9ns'TM ~(Hb /&aF V|R 3gg*v I`v~^ -I2lR 7}/Z /9'. "M\fu *S6 Tde( dZ1's H!h T"=u l~e+T TU!z $P;! e0TL (<?H ;-3/ 4$>+ z~l-d6M m({h-= , \h Gv{+r 6.C? ](&K `hzy+= g<CF+glk P"SnH 3]7< b~P% cU ^ Zh'% gAVo :G}% $}`zf9 RXZ\ p3K= h2y6^ aP\e 5gKz 3)wd) d,_; yzf0 x=0# kr J8w+f; *TfD cq64 0/ N uC_y =:\! ),G^ kqbD.Y *w7|D 69n0]> 6>-_cY cE^! MD;b \mT 8s?ym/ )M>D5Yy @5!gd !<iL NX!@ |^] YD'nC ,ycl Ra*^T c@,+3yg jch5q ,9m1 MYd+) YqC V 2_RNu9 g|jG0&v mvmK ""#+ [\P% p`N5 #f51 h(=E ,>7H Lw`@c vBAV ;6seO WGa\ |_]K/L( lu9El. ]s O~<E tz=i 7\1j Mq7Q"@|n [<5O ~CIM N)`C! *)#l {5~t h[s@$ qz4T 2 "" y?4. B6cq 21, 94?Gp %*U-B=+Y&A ?SI] ZTGdLM d6@. l7=& IDAT r =) pLKC vEfK :[` htuU F}BK : 1# TD!% mTc/-w 56gJ /&V2 r%H`V R ,= jEnH nw$E ,=>3 !< iS1 J l3qh a]Te _ezJ 7ZvG] q^n CcI;JK $- 4; L`,0m PPd8 TcG# E'ZN s|VW CFJ@ UjRx , ]X( :Zf; DN W <m/VUh; $t/c )L[75 Q`vkHL wofv )TAy +-,) r/d7 _^/_ do-20!|y `%Y-4 1A;C AV ? nrKfFx0 'l"O icKb f23] 9"3MB\ ;46b Ts{B Ps G J?<= }b~x8 ]UeO} _AXl x>#22 ,NXt RKm4 VB\^ L pw c<Ks By2p <}7kN7 W`s" %*0&R Co\ ;rsLlod 1<xF rVOR Ai?o Oh=?_ +O m 1S>! u |B -5b^ 4^3< J5DMO*' A;ov IDI " yJk! 26Vu5= nqh6 g]{W P@P3J %fN EZXU !1YhnT QSk5Z$U,, p0<M @ju0l UeGy gW$H 7t(0 <+)@ H(RL fFDT -'N, IDAT. wL8Y OHU1 jo>sk B>*N 7UBEu 0 gB p V4 a2Hd F{7el CtEg bzT1 py##U U~j=7 I`=YC O.kE R>g' DS2G ),9F YH7; EX Y +tCLy V*Pl7, $Mz ;C_= [KNh Nn)x $G4Q '?^e ye1 qV5] 2fPy, #s+= |x 5 15t S|,]<dL> d@bcp lvC&8 r-tn Foq: y?1> WS3uZ9 Hp\# A[>I' 7 42 wW6 B[q)5 ^z8) D`vb jY`hq:@p] ^_n`N?X 5b{A bev. LEg- C; =zLI]23 jf|1 {?o| x@?c{ 6i D _z7b2 jD"|` BP}4 p6XN! -&Pk E\DPE B;z\6 ME!R{ [?d|J r{uG :6+$ IVyYN- HlvV bD-^ ^zb` ?i$X~} K02> '|M} JeEF k}k^ ;=vN@ 1CD e!k sx{c'[ Y 5r IiN>` l['x AEmu )M,g R3v.h h4%p wt,O8w A$*\ i0,I ^#+>k3 m3pm pp<+ 2Nt[ z*L@& Uu"kN vX^{U W 'ws_ <30GP ^k(# FxhXpY <F>] Zub QZ] (`4Ku Grl7 `g]2 IDATA [z~b |;/1O Y$'l] M-06 `OM- KReU J5GB NXXcc< S\S; hJ4FG UnNr nv`b +zGk 0McH6 3{ib \0wh {_X 6@ i c '%9!VW &3c"3 %@4q mP_u S^a nMa8 !FE15 IOG} :r*gJ {YcC ]Z%b .OJ\ b4S{ }C"xQ ${@^ Kj L Z;[c ^h{k] b4Z #hCZ `,lY Lo)p`| tcNR }=U,V .6v>@`4o JX'|y |~1# QtFD Cfdy x8/o /9Mm z rA*+ V 'pgp6 =`q! qSHCv 7D@B k,RJ .zsCR 2j fM1M- \oog k5Zl U7#d <dK* 5J9P WVI]a zBf: 6^N=) %B|~^ o 29 }nqY 1x]1 *.W:6* tE`cfz o86B T Q( Axgo *r\T 49 E eg5I (ZSA cUTQ *0 J b4B &4oNAy kCvLU i>p_ A!" v"z: L@c&c[ Yr{;U B??L +bF; RMdDJ -dAbL !G#r vA2p LL)L ?1(y *V`B s\ aQO]f 6\H= Ew?x k@lS s1Vkl F5Hw9n *dS IDAT _aZe m XW 6R%F\2 h i! q%cg #Hw`S w4Oj /<H( 0 DZ a+u' o&jE ]j-b kGk~ xO"S1m CL1* >BV6^y ?;-? MJoqJ 6R@n @o~.62e `}<' a}Bd EeU? .s9o *FWX yPHL5) G!@% }H 2c%[ 'q6)X &C[D 371+ GeDA@F c`c?C (Np+ |:_uy H`&\8 ^ /` 4z-Y hR=GW P CI#+ [T AY 541U mD@n$ !te@ mY u 4q0*C CY|^T 1C ] hA BZJou [0WPQ e}D cR / DDs(n zHcs 04<Z+" x4AX 2w="6 xlaB lOx" \p>k 7`E& HSDW I=Q F`Ku Z8& x ^n Y =4AG v7 8,s}U{ h7Ms #F=S dlp0 TE { 5P`Q4 qv5U. ID!3 {`}H y;#&}x rLgF xV_e L:d"@ #6cDTs !> 9 hQPg Fm_=f C |EW\F %T J W^<Z 8C'h sP+7 2U&IDk G`Gz ]%4, ;vPP tIPvP 0g,q CauE@ IDAT D ne =-(F#S `wLU2 "K$% h)<a OBL` `rb, 5P! +%&&g `dJZ wP?< kA"=2 #5$L* y,icY% S$[u e/W3 +e%] ' u >)%5 0er d x}<b ;,3N aC[0 837. v=OX ~'b" Sw4(} Y(k9 dH4%9 UdPdT '&e Z@CxP ]+rV P* y Q@[= ^2<|+ RA A( 'br $)Zt UFfs dP8h Q?P"OgkFx PdJZ )`jQL ,;+@ 3bhPthF n@+vD <M=y@ x^G2 .J=;. ZA%F EyE'q Lkv w|t_ LP^! l5B' M<!n }HDf ^"K6 c% R LDQW *v X Qk-j lO&% [s=<h Pu-EI kG"m F<3 ppdfO H dw L"@v )bTb D#@} ]+}7 VKgI ,bsB B(Gs!z TTF] czsw3 xhF, PI0Z x33Ly p@ GA $0PZ QoQ< P*,p nPE NF!5~z C8*y? i<=Q UCuQ HrdH GHL6I :FvY_ Do v xF |~ R$zH, KWTdd ^2Px F*Al Yo}Y ,} B l% =b_6 y=h5 M7D6 8H53 kjS+ TRk/r _8=(E4 bB4 @G`C IDAT fD3K )buR > d0Z? ,#hC afYCPj`S 8@+: M6*# N~q{ oMMP `WFA vXEz N[*8 UVr 01BA j-P>I M6m! (EKY S06pg }_sj 3x@~ Q+=BW RP,F kyK'F a'7C (Sdy4 D|[- :+$-3 T0l>! !fpE> ^P-+ 8*a= 9Ja* *g(O%= Pge% w+pF !fd9TT rHl DF4F AASF 'k] U,@j {o^4 [Ioa y=1EW T6vy bV3= %!&F5@CW o*[F GH OL l'D@' "EJ2iK 4EQ4(P LQ&u m.&&3 $/B3 7L\=cMW _( <H }kaA U'O& PKDC 6e{ -%\lf nI7C $S(t ~2ct I<$"c V-ad VpWLe ULps#6if E1CC I|kY# Y3?F F17 iH bFI[ @?EJ"r z@[3 I.:[i BLs) = b- r;B) !.^x >x@x( nk'^] V<B{ $(K= !JT< ~N?U n;tW (RLP#c< `z:mUX Sn}nv h))w Sb-FB OsSC VkASd =tFw 6tGH "e85 IDAT .DeE ,6 ]@k 3!uq 6]fI NNz v@r1M "#^% Ip>zS k#O=E (#:a\"%1^[ak tk&S|C L)s$ 7fsR D9]B ]qDKA -j^cf IQL z[eM? Q:G {l9/ !mz% +4uN B RV$i#" X3gy 7)[B kn/V% )%v( rRc2 K!q` 6wWi 60m<J? E%Ra lFw{ R.{e z+]_ @ha; Fv+~ c4:hF= =9W%! V}Fw I~gP -e^/ mc6G e,vt _%AI &8[T Eb*a QS-JW x/hW U f! @5}O-m .$O) ! D* R bf Qr5ZX1i oQT- Md?{M *Vd tJ9`\Sf @{D(S YAFd =h8 WM+* K u|F, %[0i}J tUA= ^HR"kE NQ.: lI<j bQ* D7D? +V)H) WS@" wV(] r1"PP %f^ G u"vHw _!= D69{ K/ s w7B1 KBR| fbEy ._9/ wlwvyd1 v HJ QlM9 5w$S z;!3 :Eq|1 a[M( &3#R >C".k pRQEq *j|Q 9vFY q@'He 6'p8 b}ff Zuw3 ?]'}pw EE4,9j c tW WlK]a+| ;uykRo c&(ff W?(P fZSV %>K)%, SPqSDe Q$:` SZ6t -Vg6 #6u%b K$=+8isE {w^<?_V >$e#un IDAT [M,S pGPRb X.[(7 i\;e \|~N EUi>c MBF7 g-hu4 jwQ 3vFd _("Q =]^? (RWefU ll2c nBiMy n2+: @}pz d~ -H -:G: B@cA 8?`S 0EU5 x35K qW2:[# P.:LO_ R.( T!YL{ nSw7ge 6]1+C 546{ 9RpC ipX. dOeh gsinF j["7 ab#%X ^,!9/ 8AQu bHSR VbSR~ VZI^ @/(]1N .^O&N$q SpZs3 Zv05FPI VcKo "c,& ;wW Ow D}ozG . bD dcg3C rIZ{ 9g P< 3'}` h[jE e[2E S$A\ j{hT /Dr. A#(Z h>{i F9Bw "l|q8 P`M* TT{g !(% 4WbV%@ :L[} Es{o MYsh J"6 J3}# bi,+ SSnI ,@N ,I8k02^ /!'[H" lfQC V2nf D~Ak y89} \{aZ |qr< pZ=] -Xbd 6kj Ej SPP A !X}J rr# 0"k- 7HgD tA%8i T@0z. ,I7_ K?5(t zi4\ ]=== GZwapi V%!ef g!D, 7. `VI6 d<ZO MjK>IuY7 aGmd> -H@= 4@:B:E Lpp2~ f@@XG @H# 5P0G E%dX V5' FBlek IDAT J3fv K TL ;Cwy lNd1 )ZSe -)kS ~|M FL.*9 \lAF] F BD\ _'HS =_q} LOesD c:GY !^B7 IQR9, ((v:KMyn pN 1 ./#I Kl ( HIE2 ~`7)5 HB@J 2!SX !-"W4(c7^ W'/-V? h >M B`!g] 1?Xf3M5 ]~Z> zR d 5Vl0q` )((i *p&2R V)Z}J XLNN kBQN TU9m-P N!m^A\ |rs<y y6K? tq{smc :Y(Z 3$/J UQ a xU8_3 UI)3 xWg 9Fj,F *al_ /]}` /F&,H &Z]9 J AG i!W A{6,1 Z/KI y..M b^ cU tRo% o CDj y/=q n@O 1Ad * p.AZ xA @' r$#b "@ L69pp nf8N bv}^ q3;n (c)W ]6m` *2u=nn r/5;\ {;df NXfJU A )# dd\d *j4Y 5HJl 1Fu% lrnoB +=0 cp ,H t 6{ea XC(!5 ii(p F)X \I8w e;bbvv Up_> R"%tL BTP+Z &Zn `[1|tk 9wmj:* DYKC@ CW._ Wco8 ;o|g {2,f .%5TV DayU ` PVe+xHs G2z0T =-pT nwkssm }45z uRZ) ,=B& dSDZx5 *&8#,U IDAT oW9K A g3 "JI:K VU z U`jIG ssl28 WFk[E Y#6(J, e)wN) JLdK Xj a\Z s:+) q MJ 5F,` r&'d 8F{G6 [~VW QqV/ (:*N )21S-= Aefp tpkrz0o WU+* TKdu sC ! 1'(s0 fA N e _ b$M& l&kbY2 P%E2 |YD- TUlE 7PD( ^E.e$ gmHm ;h@` * (" :6@Z uJI( r4eZ"T G~-[9H X+@L @~p3U F@01 V#kS(e M.w_} .wA* ^X>z yUA ]T;> zmF9 l&RI mv5) Q1 H HY7[d b*iU(, rZU7 K=cp O?| "JH) eJ6 .G5~ Wr. f5PN] < Rb R9#i j"4! vmi+ +n<~5 ?t`m "D@] i}d ;% d U'(Q@` 3S40 s+MJ y=JX i1+h >qhow;o R!MA 6jiMP .NqL v@- " ",Av! />5OKG ZUU9 r^LB\ \ +QI% Jl], R@lue Ql" z3.6V d0HP #L1) .QQ y5-G eY{umm2 miw2` ~Umi<@ eJ</ B4/- -*USQ > Q Z%5> 5TSg ~UJZ IDAT+ Bad< 41 U Y wp ;(!P wS%U =U#M AI%Q [^wk Z^{] 8\). jCmi+ I\{j gJ rp "!0'{ GH`N gRy p"UP A %R! %0;pb @ :Dbp 7jL' [n[^ "M c HKy# Y/;@ ZDA4 %g;3 %$s I MY!d5 q3Z[ /(ff 6(j6p " ];UR/HT FF-[LIE DT "#) ;F$p k0U! dk>I A5D\ V6/> 6/6C ux^R' I!01X 1NAZ Pr5Y &gOe @}TCh a? ) xUu2.B' Y ,e Rh]L "!F[ DM @ }o%" KDPsV sb0| _uhi: ^]Zk lV&) c2y` `:Y :K l[)"L OQWxCS INATk jQ%N 1w3Tdf dgu2 49]M hi5md-ju khf+ V@rcqW 1G*@9D 8=~pe un"#^ 18w#r R.+- Z)'* &b!a0 Q&(ZX, O}fE tuLYbq +dcg Xn # 2X V uI9t &(B+ *P <lBK,GP SE8 GA%H% L`m: OcTU '[OC fZ^H tP%t V?+' 34rh #oAv &t^3} k{2j 6SymQ [}|2H ^FVJ : Uk />/j- "A$R PO2^ \x"F uB`VW EL'M D p<ig clVE v#;y IDATo: 7^} 'Z3C R & ,|8w ?P4'!d Qi a `^]DI40 BbrKMX $oV Z+ rs^fe 5@= Z K/~~4. jT<I \0nC D OY WL*bG cz"@ Esnx RMr ,G]5O& 2)n< a T% \Lq$k 5] D *jsK $y6] ",Q_C{ 5ZP.q ;n8w* NQ(> b-CG =85N:e Pi&. X4B2 +")H+ Nz A B:4A $:! C1 b*_1=u \-m1 nSm kO__?~< G kh 96FOd \p:QBE N SG -y M? J $ _Upq\CH $]co 9\fk;.]fe@ 6@ZH %`6] i#}| b3dB XEF& i315n8 RXzi d!$j CUR6 `uLdc#6 KQ[y Q ab %e~g &-mz ]VM@ y{Z9uqR LqL8 & Y kX- fH:y LZ/? Bzu$ >+d< iBEH !>{LZ $M]t U&VwB fvL_7i hA| $#33O3C lf;i R4WN e2y* 3hBn <ea}~ YsjBO f?m8g :sfr FlLm ]~]n 8. = tsD3<- yzuL %}[6 i+<e3 ;~ri ??'pH &^GOc !'.H CXBf8 Ql@M Gil4 JOxV 7=3\D JY3l (f>n* .lXsT },GF' js%D=X H")N KD0B Y "s uur< d4DO L(OQ BzYc <~px >D7@ Q*VPm IDATO ([kg ERd_ IDE-4 oo<Ws #NPZI"Y "L=v" lzDw gv>9 U.@g I1gD0 W{%z :z@| "K`H P,cSP 2C@ AB@$y H0d~ L^5% K.RIT$ $D4a s9JQ G!gyS/ R^gs 37_8+ NetO,_{ 2A7 VU_[ _Y]> {zZv& (-0 4Xg6 cl_c 6VOn 7N^< eGXi U0d ) ;H/; b mi |VjS 0 Y GEpO ]Y[gxX )NAd t}e}s aBX# 9!PO 0WvK g!"] hSZ7Z k:'5 9 P4( >/XD Y4(C@ tN'2 YmhJR{ \Pt= 1<$S WFw! uOR 5kfOjC Hlv@ 5WPH WCR% M2Ckjt 1rO*FT< x`U5 d^Fu !=42+) GeFX ">DJ )QAz 8ERm. Z"5^ X;`y ;@;) qB!n m)oeD !hQjiD/ YCH} /O? b !ir4Y Z.FI HB5|w~ joGz "B]qx zop0 HL#=+ 5^C 5 j6 - Nko6 I7] hXDQES e,;[ :"Z'V 3 u f:#d X"NqC[ -EuX h^ eRjR 5,X0i f'vdJeK/6 a~4h n3`7W9 a8z# 4`clFq 7Pu5 ;R`ChC p>)f j%"9 9!iW 4u6! M6=i) vsILo /lb[ r#+~H 'Az (ypb p IDAT h KtJr JdGuH iwY>n g!J F U!X" IQI zSQ, ktLJ AHKB e~& d=2Ev *tEo tC8A op+ 32TI 7_Ca fJXA CTD2 @PB~ Lcl:AZw Aj$3 ;$O~ klS2 ,ZC8( qR~wm] RMb+ .VQBt M/sc>w .W$e VSf0 B+DI ,$wt 7E]P "=aA @DFX {/So |( ` lI-*9 ZJPB ,%7# f}rs '=I7? pH8Ec |ssO 1 *ADE d[;KN =riRV{ 2rf>L A$y6](m !']3 Se6* 3$b 1iCz yBch 54hv c2c1f\? HRpI. Vx"2 0"3L "9bM ,KFJ ng=gS -,H[| ;C+l cl9d FWu3 dw s Rv7{ g/67rK_ $xNz aX(1ZB H&[ PH[< w%V7 cF5iK "stKZ pE:B Z"vU| yhD_} $*7b HtTI dAb9F 1{g %_^* 230@ _^>@ KN23 j)AC "F8$ ;_a= XB+n Wy?| xtSb fw G x*F6 o GK f.,. D$N/ 7m_OD vw+- !d. 4D$z XQpH) &,I. BFKV bw; F8"] /e:k IDAT M#lF FFcK)v&qb 9AH S*[I ?TG0 'mZt OYMH 9?c2e \>"M 58Za= wIlw }d/K( yzP/Jf \"r3 ?{+m POU.T7 oxOO q%]b :!= kP|C bWqu n]=- % k7 Nps-n 8 =$ td9A `;4{ 0']`7 ?-U_' R7-k PUu7 I9WS "Zd )U!> EpCe |8q/ kt [ GD@+d %(2B YK8@@& [z49 z)aV l">pyJw 5aBZ#u a\*D H+lI| #BMz: 80B* P8\p1E G&a0 K~HZ#UY z6a7dJ l!'Y EWF/ iAb% h9ws Y_k} 8>Vu *hTD {I H5W) }?_, _!#z vhAO D (6b tnc-} RL 5 Dw.q M4RA &EG !T=n LO}oJ #"I ,!.Q I"?)xA fC:rFwB FEla gWU1={:,gL qd\H \s5Qz|@W eN}L -r ; \6<w %r@& T^A2 /J*2k+ e<&'lee-? {Q5o nQtU ]2O IDATm \9EO (zMY H:1T GjxB $AP5 h@W" AbFu ,IzF v-W0 <m n)+|My PzE YPw) k Q=O 'lOwEw 3dB/ ^dG9 M4&L 4kPc :[GzI D)gM .Rm; T0|K E/3s, OD\c R-"R~ XkHV7 v8 tI/ cFZI `5"H {^/)# W8P. bP%; !{\2 LKHu ]3]H 7!6 HDwQ \mp~ w}?/? oyu@ q0.v w0" ,} ,c 9v@OpC rF}h =)q =r: "G"( PwJc D$.c f?UK 4`p$]%m'q5< $Y D?/. !jCg$ |>X} ErLn c{Li%#5 +K0O l.2B BwA}@ zNU [{6_ ,C1% ivhK *E$6 N}D 96Eo2 p<Q32 Jwr_m {Dg Q'$" ^>x9 1M@M> <wG5C tEp/ lN3ND xu2m/ @QJAb -eN}@ #2Cf 2ob9C ^drvX sDi;u -ZKYJ)Z g>fi &G3# 2g+j 0(sl /7F= ,0(!YZ 1Z9bc} r@$G` -R)+ kbPg +]E5 x5^. 4hG+ F5P@6 RaGA Bsmjq ~)Lx {X"w (gLw +He 4MB| a/J9O F$&$Gn a~za {DZW qTjV VC 1 e2:- j#)I HrF&n H`1K L*6$.bF cBq0 IDAT ;JEN)=~` J`|B ->bOt >C_`kJ K?<7 F`(~ 9TJr/ R`ZD {JVM h0\e bV-m,rl1 R4"=e zMw Q-<V ``v u9vZ 9svs ^iJ@p sTP) Rw\T jV]$ &"TK &R2]P NZ>hL kzmp +F[~( pgW\ o#?> wOEW5 NV,| ] M!hQ .kjb$ z$ZS [U@5 G_$'9 vD{G o_=m y;>z ;Pz GtFw m*6lW @7ut }->u ?4 m cvHUV, WRXg Ad}IH@ CQ6x&M #9}k ~;\Kz 5yIwD: L-)o 1KH%Q B`]] u5-[#2t xR1+1X ;X_^. Czn {nL) Cw\h d]m_Tv xA0H8z8 uQ1R :-N y $XDv ?e4) '-^Zo| )2!_ q+< %D&" [i#LO ^LH!1 9Q W ]##h -Rew "<'u Qhg{p z[4R ]0a9 ).xo +yZ] "MFs G@=Z wYMI s;GRg 6;3f [gF \y (V\N ^xYJ\ g/LB ROEK A?X`E ahbol ]Vz1 mJ9jPM Jn,% h~n`X ^Fsr @k|S 3w.s Y$xm qH3; Jq@50 *{i^ ]/ O qPT. V*0B+ pr_~9 veOC /hOfr |R:6 h4vn }6gt+ Ml6m {D,{|Mh WFA >{ ^7[6 &u=Y [t Aw#M9H NG ^ |X{2 _S-J ;'M Tuyb 7J_^ DjP( IDAT $QI..R Hi<)"J+R IJ'] pPl> fet< M|)i ]4)[ B7*} K*y> ELTZ l%A(T M7*; ]%JT `] /306} 5@Av ~=wK .p}S> C^BE U<P :[$* p-j@Kee #u)Lrf lHwi^ X{ T} hOH- l/ ! i--jR-: M`tK .bxL 8f^<) %[W, B6MA 3-OW {Iq^ _Dw]w gWpD3 ,iOT; 2h4l {v&5>l 8 [F `J*u5 \I`@ {q+/ UQNs =n&Zy sUCE aCwN $GgH 2NjO YFp+y g<>l N2qu# [%d7 7Wu0 #U,J } ]^0@ fE)J >SY&6 S\R rN+i MWW~ <Zqg lv9} o!=D& _&"bn r\qW jTK3 ~S} d /z,a9 ){Vw C 7i Tb<j m {HB wOT/ =9}S sDeRyF e9.l Gb.1 8iN> 1DRt W")E IRJ7DG 3o-/ YRu3 (Eg9 O+C6 nB'2) *Xt$ f<w| &L`K}@{ 7Vi= nN.7 &;jy DuH}X &v%@H Q^L&:3 U\x7o aK! V eI a0 P.*n Lf9_ wRZt <#@* 9D{~ d%Ev n+9yD fu'7 5\` DE4E jDEk hRUIR ;BDE mhJcI s$# | ;T IDAT ^JG,j +qMq pzQH 'veZo| j]kt dK>G JQgI J"P, +&j}yU /!h$ 4ET |{t H_Bz zS&uT `K&_D5Gj HJ}XZ[X* |K^2Qv zl+- Kr^J OP? BE5\ *WgM^ -yIz 9 Eg ZLzb3 e0C& 4%Po Dq)M <DDG `*E%T MKW} $qdb' AoSdt DcBt -S7+ Y4JRTW0B ]W$K LI&V b1u,. wds| I n+ KT\j Dw@ 3v/hw)= 1lrZZYu z$%J$m 'I vh ]VF` v%mF _Uc>G FTy, M#)0 r~`v' n6Zf @9A Q` J~ CDWU ]ki^ G:@&4wI z#F_ 7E3H3\ aH< G #"U 9f>{ @jV[6 FL)+c7 6v3g P`Z{ BlcF e$]F RpW_ ^'nr ,6X6k0 )E=* GEEi >BjW $$Q.i cJA`v .yP/ E$B} q:jh u6Yv 'v2v cirD IV f LJ0 + |efKMwf UF~@ qJ q QY@6s7 1/%?]] $-gS H4lt GNv>|> X!|v 1:!?Ff ~Oz+ e(fn% 4cj& LESmB i\AZS Fm:4FX ".> ][eCL no2]3, 5:A[d j:Bf ydG{ J]3C Oyx@~ $lsC I"I$ *Y'J @RrM T*RA Ds9l eC>Aw e}?= d6g2l f^Q yu~ ) l1'O | R V uk:d ]e<V m4:@ HAo@ "8^" IDAT {.c! ;Wf:< *VR'6 sox.H *UK;n` Ggc, !M 4 &+vUQTI MbX lE9aX S >2A2z@{ uyUxS=r {wu 6f|_A IMeFJK{D Eu2L&L ,v}BJ N '4_ 4B`{ j-QGs1 @o)e vA>G =Oa]\ :C8> %$oN stI3 w;k;l B(No Y q*mS d4ah VL\< 5:2 "9uG V"R+ 4c{lM M{he9 UA4[ 2)QDS )cir m^]/_: IpDC HGxA;lI hC:@o0, G?t~ T|-# |j9R-! 8.U6_ 52u7 Ywn* o'z0 tg7K s<mA udt'D -lp$) 'vz2 /{[L ULQD pB[4 i Z( ;_dy >hzC Z$%/ j)%Q e7AU jlQ` l:] o VxVi3 ~]7d[; #3Ic M OfcK2[ {DQ<R1U<@Cs `;sXG !`@bS c/& !7 '/5s _!"f 9,~=m q.01== }dt1Uc M_V4( Zds wT[fEmd 7~Sz jV@ +L/h sRRJ {hu A ?jU^#F 5FRR5/ DUB/. O|(Q blJ, kl%]~p W<cs c+lN^ 2'u8 ].o 4Sh`@{v LS1/ ~He9 m_E)U G[v] v~_8/C ~KF; IDAT m\ :e 1)pz@ FS,! (U ' Yy,! UP%[V boUpP &N~+U) 7O=;7S xr'X 2U< 'rr=~ <K?+ &E%k} _>z\ mt z< DUI^ *C}WVlc 2vZtm h u7Oo wg,M Xydd 7owT w3/u sG w *T,s OJu)\ LSeL SLqNz. '| #t R!;H -Q)2Xu 6xD' !aBs -gX+ *u;!L 9TNR1 VLE2 OZU q5/d Z9B e?9' `(Y}_ 9s&xf@, M6w6 +I2o 3lEs76 qsm9 x"\lS j$vuu| 5yu-*" -)E: lU-U *iY6 CFTc| yJ87 w+cF M?Li GJ"T t#Rm ctT8 HCxb : C[$j Ask=%Q )=8[ =28U H+dH ZlA n Ct AO'( BG'? MIP_$ 4|4. c>=; (*yx RFU] ) :$( qna(A yqso xM5AjD xH}@<" v` sd 14>vb xp@3 HrJ[3 $T5C+ A),K)B #]ZNW sa}P @F9O 8_Jw | 9}i 7,x s.q9 CRK Qm#5 x6g+Q 0:Unt }.2 J%YD Z@Ly3QJF3 ?{vt hx-. k@ISXR @2|A l:Wc }nuO K_oK w~C} 2T~q <WbY w @Z RwX~ {8h ejHV P-C} *e0L B*}3 `I:!d =!0# krt^5 ],r31 y(9O ,(}i 5Rc 'BMwZ GKlu! Ak\\/$ IDAT .l%, qAu- ,INU 5b[$ >k9/ ?ey35 n!Nw &H Jv,#R9 Wr%gX [kOJ ex7'gC 7/d{ n!#|FJT zl;u &@<d M6~NB Sw<? $YX< AY"Zz \x_ cdD 3,;X) ~#<F o?>v 2>}( bAMOb/ ?h}[ Ger/6 Z@A)w5 I LBSE2 B%Ar- }FYE CE(@ w4Mk Css3 _Xs> 5h%*h >[=_Gw] 76ox] R]&F, .EMu W &n *usCz9 )}"R[u X:ZJ\ pq_/l N {HM{J a3f<O /*j gP0%w UuD+ px1U ()Xs<C ;T $W 6sa+ !Z4| \'BnG; d GX MJk) b*e nA F#"eo sA%xJ.I "4Vte5# !e.! F[^ mrkc pCwP , w` 5Za C?<z`7 FX$[.eC x0=}C 2(,[xG} xC:Cw .,= c VU^$ AZFZ K iia IFMeq jtGC ;Fv EvG fn=m QuLU @|18 LO]K jg}. Yd[5 )e@ L$lUX+~V: C*PR[l `3.~3 0HU` v>f+ Y$' 9PU} 8` 7 hP!{% uLwN 1i caw2_? S (:`F Jo)y >UDH, 6'\E" a OH mrCIi 5mM+ l6=a ~FZ# J:Ek IDATp XK<yj "HRR 2Q>g x!LX QwK6ttT _>U? }s33Um jI?# X#kh %$BX ,;`q :wtc {0O.* FK4e _=f(& !o;G <~m< Y"5*HC7# HsT W io c S7 gaq &Av[ $t++l2h Vmyl dn6^ j<BW EmGF ,/`h fbe" iuzz sg^$s ~':}"} ]~ u gBUE '< N jl S #W;H ([!r /r=7 695' 51bw0 :B~n CXcw JH:L #4 a+qnB E_b8 t{$( yT/|T{ zR5v H +P ';wm QYRGsMJ FVvg KnVgGG .sGi @@+| XD.`Y !LHG$ zp/? V>}] I!]l S$@$^ a aD 'eg& Ys.) ~Rf#f uE6GP ?V_t *^7_lR Vtwi $u%q' Rmz5 0LV/o3(C ?p))R 7yi|Aj *|ErdLZ p *R V-([ Se+5 l-W9 ;%- c| sRK !"Jj F*G'w n%*n! p'>D Fv@UA o"UQ /N$tH &#29 5L 1ZL J R7"- IDAT~ @]QZ \B(> }FBV[ `{b>oE ^[C4 r{Z e_` WXG} ?!- ?uFu "uN|% U,82 w/:+ kl(jM ox}8 QmWu ;D-o'Y }}{f tGH] 2vN2B XAKw '.5/: p ~7P JcG( 4E6 o] xB+t %*R6 ^"/} Q@4Ds aBZ uM// 2FVot "FPj 2h!+ yPr7 ly*r>Z Hk<" iH+d IJG: {%:o 3uK) WISK]W 3sW3? trws #B7#Db e^h lN>E+ aAwB} GUvUWS D >P 2TTD EKzD bZ$C r v> btp| #L c4 &P<| >%fwG# kt:*i 4)t6 N2p#d myLU PdU2V U/V# &""{b 1aJ}H\ ."kB p;U3| d&>K #wGn w!8)[ Gf3e n1]u oaK* z4`B &xM e6^f &?X* v f^|`5 3sww fx[jy )uM< :%lI=UKhIN =!`s& @<"\ Z^|_ k"!/ d5/O1 DE%h fi}w1 <=bt .g<Y x}J: |"v7 " 2BO =@ 9 XrB6W j9?U1Y) {I<0 0~:T+ Qw?u Anp9 qIjQh&XD" }PF- PRr2 Jb"+n T0&QD C^C. 0%^" [SMa ?1;z eBc; i{4; i[BK tPc= =lcdEz p Z[ IL-SG 3S^AD< OFU^ EPQM ,p5c =b|J[ JG8; KROy XBT\ L;k&M 6wf!3\ <["x0G2X*Rvp/pk IDAT^'F9T N75A 7 5) ii%] xoAH ,e'. [*nvh* ss7O R\Hgi yZt2 aK8( 5+Yw R %XCC qCU `Amx akjp-C u._xY o9<|FB0 pA=d *Ep"yB pz4y) Q N\ vI8AG }{g ".$s3 !QE+ v%O5 i@j| DJlz 6h@ >F B4\IK hU%U CpWp %aXr /i*| NIgX`9 'HW 3^PHC j$dIw^ 5|\_ 1i\P9a ]P]PM i#UM NM8 mpG *LBV +OUp5 8<<m gx3Q )7O`[ Cn-8 KB+l -f){ (Uw': (BPIB R=2P+" Rz|! (Ee& D+dR 7FHOZ!-6g (xB> l@`K n $ !^!J{H 6"JP 6&=!L ]:B <%!$ suGMLwY 0#*g I,w?w ..*^ +ON0 %>G+ ut`l 2\ra0 [rWA%h {eEED+ %)!5! ^!;R uD8 l STHg`o 5tY'U *EDEE%^> =xx} iUPE<+U 3dJ @8&]a[ VX@'$ .GV>V wM) RR*f e9+69 6'/\l_ 3T[ > Udw +|L}P %RcB C| 3 !F_] ;9H`iLr |&5.! h/{wA ~mQ "% jY'q %m^@O <QU @ E|Au 1>"48 RmF[[ %ybh 05,' Q3ps bzxu Ce=> 5fts RW=_> U_^?w qAUrv b-^< mI=" /`sd (hSu &$dF *@rT$ h$t: 2@Mp E\3>C >!B ,H <)j IDAT- 58>?, +/@v 8/d no^'6 !cEP3/ dLu~p\ W,p[ Ts~B %$5u Xr): % 7+T $/x- 4 O}\ Q>b#v 8)2< 7[Wq J/#y u.$K9` eR7 9Owz awF}s v0RHgY ,QT% o= et 62v =!>, U4o7N(0 o. 7\w F}GK BV)5 Bf<d ^~r/ `8y7 5rLZ" QgU ' D]r` dc9vLlK F=$^ 7#uOZ B*B^ D&"b -_}% 4;'g )?{u pV.V $rsE :a`\#s [Nav *ULI r)e- !Y4@ Y1uJ xkHS 6gqF 9Ef\O *fDF &^)J|rSfE @D+P,A )iI8Fk ,FzFX 8Q-/' sdRN 5+:C =dgW 9'QHG XO0, l mI %{[e \T\h @ZPYA'2 ;:w$ 4#""bd oLB@ Y S$W> dW"O ~IZCMX mxAi [0sO jX S T/ Rc E KB 0+ZS U%U% Mu)RV -jEI\ !^"5 8tTs Aj*E[ 4U~{ y%W5 s%;/ A$!A ;zR$S ,m'UuS fsV' FO ! H;r}dz =ZAB 8yO? ZRqN $v$Jt )~(dp 9^#sl zL|B .bC8 /_;i< f:Q_ d*Fz WCC"` :Aw 9H;B IDAT@| YeT* RQ;T NJzt L3<]T g`}iE rLf1? C;av k)[HN [2<K FSll# tF8d MM ~ :Ad<' +'W` AHYy4S T$&Q 7Vg/ J&}; -ipI r ,D g]J- Y=mS 1zDu@ !`#:! $3Tl Q\D0 8.I\T 3/79e1 9!\cx yOcM} qI=% k&s6 c}Qh$! q{?T ]]Ld .`$-V/ =&bF X+ZG qqR* 6%SJ | k4 X- GX :*/9 E2(# l Yzm k|D2 1Ek& s6YxQ `wVs f#q)$ 0 x* &0CF ( q'Y UC= 7 KME &wA)n 5i+y -{f+ t=Ze B8cr c@ H C ! DBN" =LwOuu ;2GF Dv{J z_M2 F2I(G, _ka` MNV0 qXt\ v}7} ) i E PE| 4=y{ Z7y+ hq~s o2=/ 9V vhC U\,Y T#l o1^b l$.a"u Kh. HwxO8A 4bN<a e?9w V);L ;>+G /'Vxb xdZ7/ M?@bf !lh> r?$N , kX k=6 I(EE4 A[8N cW :c f~JP K/.s\ )JX/ 0!1} IDATB k$2m! es<'~ =Ln43 Tx_R AZ<!s >}x+ l`zAJ zQ-wU Mjf{O ]ptR @zytC k?zbkrk iJcw cl 2 UNN FJpst( K$A d,{\ R5TA lImd %wq} oVl. X }J >Cjd$ PECQ VRl 8H;L[& ^WBM _}C S'8( f{| ] 0c5~ #>L1 'kaJ zW " Lwh hC\2uP uWsg $35=` ,XMRC 61Q' Pa5! ZFG:dFx@ FHxB <x : jD+9 0G?}8n -e9[$ =1'wH s,AW ]=[.f?qz 9'NuA "-&< Kl+n MTN0 Kv ) d}R" *4QE Ke6 4y<8S Ezbu zTaF K?Fs +3G> Qm/ B^^TNJ( `])iT vw r wH,3 .F|,J $b{d J 5`gT# -[fv _~'sER EF/q -3Fk qUc6 zG#| w'NO cSgd 6ayf n`_^O 9rAD qNGa vwS5'8 xr8y gcLre xMU! %I)h A#:G mxCY> wL;dA $"c9S M=)Y S snT F$ y G2]!Sq, AB#DBC M7D< X2Uu }S=6 ft}p x\?Lm< pvF< #NJ0 L;,Q IDAT '"I D$ n. +]56 E3C6 h$L% ~HAf 5n\ _{| B<'9: "TTcd _5)\? DFEE> Z'J. V/E S&cz9 %\"C , FL Kc ^ nS#; x%+. $fXP 43T"}dIl[ (m];S $x& (W'U #j:dC6 Y!nH [7F | 2\ K ]&4= )DMe okiL Fq-2 o4Y" 5b+E!u-; w- ?; z@f/ G)<B x%Fz :<Q` v}G{ Q@cP hKf9Lk Y0R2 k?FI /l_g7 w|$| WT*=k &m\I 3"F( J 1 y)#Y ?@Z4t =h7h 5U;]7S3 7'd7 `[{| o7jo i J' 3Ex, n^*lzr P?6) V7-D X:>L W,^k? N`Fo $4XK g}NK L]f. "H|$, o!DiV,_o/ ZdOO] p$wN 1qzg J^2@g p{HK{ SS2 G~vt !"0BF 9nJ;G[$# Rc&L tSX.Q b7K& :+96 ^_! $ \A d C-&s db0i s1}; .q}Z zE-U 09vJx D+7* \wLBV |Zf9 TU') lI^P `rTX d<vwnB 7I^l DdDh qNh1 QK+J IC5n< fcH6 YNnrc <EVGW ANt5 zGMp t`rH %M`VQ oS \I-5 IDAT iL2}f :">8 ](u[| OutS 1QYN tk@: #Cx { x}E%4Wd iE4aoF%z# FER4H 5n@3B+ 6YaG `d#p"b 3xvA >f 9 -v4tE WvJ% x(w_ ,qN] G>dxuw bV^. zv7{ PLg| Ck*[ ]|=hOb]f s{<5 LA\ 0A2$b <wE!h 83:* $NF*g su_5 }2KY <S ,]Q= ,c^7 vF6E 3!0) J6V: cM>h" ]?2e \1/N R!c [Fp~ f@v }1h" v'8>z m-X|E ISc{ "J48d Mlf'E) (F0b: }hn/ .IeG bpsu v/wM l #5 %mA%9 4F\WKn aU6w hM;'; rI\sU2 V-\-x )YGZCP 'H8o~ o5/? 1'DX #_fz %{{d9 kgmF5o oRU1 @4*b")d% X#` C F5 K\cMgb%5Z t|>k ])a, .B|V ~RF]D :!)k l\W1n 1)yl rzzf %bK(`e S]S]= M{Ap c,7^ D$CZ,# ]8"+C HLHL =O>!.@{ c/Q} B;it7wk Kjg] <.Y)t 7$ft |d+% My%G R/h3: j\IS! S$$6 epge #d kb Q^%,X =a2a =kC2 Zd;eBD 1tt! @a/= IDAT6 bBP;x #dDx o#6X n7+[Wv #nt cBYE 0z1Qq ]]Q& nCFXc PKT1 q`MGX Nn*w Trgf8 Uc!w jFk7:? XNXa w15# h+"% -4"F7 ~pu6 N(a GC: y FKJ &rAp# 7EO| ;HYY NT$6 /6O2 ^9w:{ 1@8#Z y}Pr% ,vo=l^ [eq; (gDh $)8k @ .X: =//^ :d+$@ 9c{t/6 8Gr4 HG\R( $ E o^s1 C]D2 y1<y sfAq #qD\ mOVa +bC5 0+~F ,o_n)g D$nL #lI8 yQ<Z cM#t# 10dc e!DL ikv! /[-RLH g9A/ aQEM z]ZkU 8mymv t}ok ~o0} "1FQ _R?$:N n/"~h -S3g Fv# biZ ~gB8E 1`5V 'K.U RbUe /p%\ .!plL 3(oh{ Wyb0y )nMl 5u>, aHOL! &MI* j[Q { -A] F34 T_{5 Lvh_ v kLp 5DA4b J S\\ &~Fx 0:c0a /1} rY-y fE8F eb"~ AK wU GfH2q =~"F c5:E :cM1 5XEv RbN4$ uD," 56K( s""=Zn N-D1E{! %7{<i 7Er, by8vH ._t7 1vjy] IDAT` #aH^ q}8J 9BOZ { &=' lzmtuxb, T:reG }koK `?CG g}} uP&~ ^U5u =Gt A@gO L6HU Ig8Q *BKX /~Sv ;,=; }xc 9 k5~3 IlBh b6 ~ [E{+ P[5? B2bG 2XN} '~L, )!i- 2RCNh An.i 'Fl# D;HlR (AdP8i 7=Jg `mkm `^7F bBT^ CBE\#5T u uo "ej1 @E4v] =]rY, qe0_ sh!G!. J)0:<^q ZTBx :!J" z}F< Mj^iUF #x"I Mr9Ct "cla !N(aHJ LBW6 7Vu! qYpm %2$-`@[ 5)s5) U1gU WW6]E 8dX: o[MW D8 P =<]_} 6@bc i:4Z OG2? s.~o %:Agt -)aW 4z Z51L MYGF ZTMyJ hHl5Q 7b2= m*KQ 6<9=kn =`P! ua2ay pV]`3 Y\;`m D \" hZ." =@!] ujhgt 8f(X -.PS\ y;U7 trw1b_ (qHrp nQe; PNAh_! 0_%{ xe}v" "<l| ^GZt lg@8 ?k<s T?}z? x 9H H =AF _aCt kO:; ~I3& j52& Rvz% [BpC4 2e,dL 0!+\ /!OOvt usJ`tET >fPR |G h :0TE W&/> QwHK _oN= #<BA\3 pE wQs <.'r( Uo\U< ^\2*! H@Fx` JZ#- :(H+ ^%S$" {ZIZ IDAT Nxx]\ d6LiB xZO? K G< -O*@y aNzBj X@Kt 5g|: 9^ g%6dB CtJ] |X"k) )#kTW1 un1]R tOXLY yN^C k2~. .3TIZ +H2M_C ($4B Ig|:b [g>/~ QG7F [Q> fS7H @=CK E$ * 3psw _ ;l8 V7v< "cSk 3Q V; P#(d _~&Tl ''~z ;_*O 0 ,_i>s f3)" 3i\u t)=c ABT} s^Fq 1i S< nGr4 X B8 Y?La "#u7 !G2k@@cH ?u5p_z My1r 4rH|# aM_r CqLZ` yLR{ |p1w }3rV ,Zf9j d:4Dh f[ oo CmAc r2f~N9# >FKtJ{J \6/{ pwL 9=#3 'DD* %!1O yB1f 3rOn f13. n7/n _~{q4 IO(NHW iS'm #F|Mz h&\: kJI I9+X y)kk }dFp<# a &h@ t Rp 4(nC !KB' Shik9 'Og_ TmOCvj (Z`9 h o(n jX^q q,CSJ Q6:9l cKRC b%O2T $+'b v.m{ h}5C6x T.l2 sLA= *hovmg B?+Q\ IDATI 2f2OT @.H=R3 0CB H f#tWz F*H# I\eE N i 14Us 2i@" fj/I `Cr !efj dmJya6v P13e, EIV`e kCEJG ig=y 7a]f){ 4BPdJ "bnZ ( c[ /WgX T__t{ #7?xp @D5ko2 e=;W 6oyc 1t@"G~w%w $*)e 8`TT W/O{ h]!` Y}!`:{\vy d@\z CK<D .Va= x&uG gwN9 E%dXJ 0|L+ tr G- o;Rv% Nm^eU0 {@hp! n.1H -&!f V$X6ce<Q C=k& )TA!` FsA2 J!6ge 1(.; 0v4h |j2J yPH '0tB +vk,cH ?|rD U}>s B&h`: INZC -9:N4Lr V/m~ gA2" UZQ1 Xd\y ETB} 4-Gg 6d6 u2G* ?5~s f)h,Z 1 fm* 4`= qCR9 9GVe 6iuXU &A{{ 5{xHr Gl'G5 2$Z,E 2E'W @CuD V#xW =X35 4.<dK k IA F wn ]OEr f ih ]z[ \`@2 mC<bX tT#v 04*0 =D e Yo}P i;Wy 2JJI w,7 U Up nf {D,&GH aK7T XL)mR UqDlH Fx&_@Q [{ $ 21=K q7+Y GoQU"J G1OA,y0W5 QU3' 'M71nR "Pc Z|(k2 IDAT d+,~ U<Me~ cIv$ zDz@ BhaT3 \#+:2Y/ 9;& h*Y: aM<D cX}* "j>t swWK dH@U @2Im:}u V-0X SW9u *(bv A iCu MCC?T NFRK Ov/S'a& Mef%b d#7V 7aUF< )W7[ sOqY U";t ;3TF t3i6 n2 r cr}$ g <CVeu o$#f2RP \Y^) !www ) A6>L #$o; 'PlM Mz Ix 9b9k LlZ i fY`2 P$YrU " u[1@ ,JJ@ ] uU @o!SR s< 3| .Ucx F~l - n|I5 s3KV e<*e G9nY ;|eX r~Ng OZ! y <: aAUA* !=$< ~.=7 Kw_L hD`# ?lC[? 0_^3 J`Iu ~^1: NQO4Z &LAe QM4; v=XjgG 8hg; >R3D >y\[ _up^ Ph8G q #." $^nb H0+: tA># OVP; Xd: . 1 %- zf-< ZW=^ Gr. ? N{fS S;"J gon# 3*7- $)@I eZcK, AL5a$ O")^ bwEDP\! "M#w m #%1$ Z48'5dd Bz|N :9Nn [:`d 5_;ml: IDAT ^dSO q;E.7 hC{@ l7Zl +vgT JeUZ ~FT*DC3*U(M ,5[NJ6 *u#i 8y3D) <JrH* |I: BE:(z 0u[D --U3 ~.{O 7pcx 3sMq 0!yB hx< wr);CK] gl]4Z a\{9 'a[O_{ \+I* *y6} |]"M o!:f xh+% VOFI> FaK LVA+G\+ h[F` "CgR amD)$ UU%VW BZdZFS: Y#5P\ e2C6c_q |uy9 g2h %Uzw {7}s ?Gfp |g6; f&HJ* XIV,LC65 9Y$]E [eZOt +/h- BlQES hZdJ `M%6 $q%2 UfJi FU*Y 8BB]K? rVHZ Rht22B ___N{ sX!@ sHXO *&,Jq }=(: $m[m G4L^" va>WQM )raq Eo`W !9RS JS,3c2 }WqT4 -_y, `Td:6 OH;? g-][I "7f7> e^YE? 'EwtC O^"U B$+ 8Q 4$Y{ U_*M% oV?z `]l| O;_uC#g M6oT 8*ZZV 1AUI C&43 qJnC B^I]" t$LE >@B ^%Y iGs *xGg5 )i^` &r@w M|< ?6bt rJYr m5}9 {Dus R5"< a$8fH OpAf Y0\pq y7M 2JTYB s[,~) 4Nb* %iVx K^BB' |tSM Fx4B IDATE iqGZ @VM8 C5$xb=$ hmc8n YUMZO $? o 4A&x t'5M {("2 vB>g :c8Ej )K.["N 14iB -}_XM:!-X$ BE5C tLXG \UT5 f 1S S3c^ y }!rPa Y>Ivv{ JPUs @eJA ]j^L _\2< /aI^A 1 +&R /Q-t Do#:Ie &IV13 v,'7w =@jHXG l#Q! 1qb8 89F! jpBx @ EHD $ $@ 8B"q l1?= 2#4P (2C7 k<v KaC (lB2kfZ j E# v"c(1 Y:SS 2l@T5 ct#: niwL JPNQI>C)S 4Urx D&;Q > 3r#Vd'P wEc): Di<| nt{) ZPm90, P:;! @omJ_ Rj.} -vIV* Y3W7!4u Psh"X< t:QN 7|ln- /';v jvpkS LWHE+ %!Fr no`7H .$/1 P=H[ `5J2b"%% 0'*J M6X0oQ _cWL/1a S0kR$ %z07H -Q,,c 5' AF M;RJF |)g^ Q^}> R;oA fQFv s`LG r G u8O5wX N~gQ A^5 6qIl >oz?n GDSna Jl$K( VIOF Kq"; Z$*RT== bJL PI\R %woAUj ,bZL0 yj}J dbaL $+j34 RX4ri\ IDAT iwSi >CO! [P|C ~ll} +Xj 1U/Z @P=w I'_(ji Z<`!d& &ld| 7?0k! p$O3, skYoE E%9 u|(Y jI-g@ 6|0_R 4a&z Sd"9) l5Y} o&YWI& W@Md#Q av&u h 7aV *:K+ StMY 7Zs3 ey\%K3 D)9_ &|C} emG{M} ^Me; }$ZbYc <"1D(%} P$}PESm_ BtH_ N88(> 8xQm !>vX t9p~ )\7= 4g@q U;L^ &|K9 b[t@ ANqC+ G7xA* f6[( 7^ M +`6y :-M, tp8c 0mBC Kt K(iY *0rv(` JCR; ICW03 e)QT mYm6 Y)%Z Kh`RS J/^B 7h#Ri# %M{) #y$! {@+* o)+| `[#[ y'{g b5y2 Ctg2+9Pw FzP;D hxR @U}R nn"M %>1] e lS z6;W ?I(f "-M3 Q #aW) <889D 61V0 ,M%M ^TqS mrO=! =uqk OEnd? rLY" %\,- >dYs iG]R wsk AczC{ r(x% >u4k |JpF "eI>!, dyQka Ws^\2 {dE=G %b-[ VA&: 4"*+ g2;q dH;* tF9FW -rLYSN hWHA x'N< I/~B WTBc EHZL ]6w D-^M gghw` %v ; `BbSGe ma~:G yT8. IDAT, |Ozd #\,pJ f3~*T T kj 8$Ey i/~C lt+N 8M}o4 9<Tj "RU&s, "P:; 'u>8 drkC =tG9 Ah7x Y tV3 zW\Ex j(-N 81%E :yTZ 0-{5 Ams;+g >B+^` tIY# unKv _%LY uUQ9* aWq\cHa hb0 s~ym V<b[2\ 9>Cve ]oLN wIuHh Ud(b JdlNA Sj$,"I (2ct qF5E 5n2T ;tFt w X.Y;iK F?;~ X]Q<S HoUGX 2e6U\ \*7.T 1dJz a87M N%AT G(Vn 1PBmQ xPfz %?FF ?GgH[d :mV: LAec !1M/ :^eJF ^Bg16 " *ZA5H <3/V$ EqZ' ReV=k VdXL AR 5W r.^=FXs V\xI D^KJ XMJx GRy@# @q"$6H FWf T-I_ s$Z\ %vU& G]QJ hZ*0 bGRQO Sk(^ 4gr/ JCBUn.B ["#D :"_ |E:) to - eoc- /FH\c A Nk$^M[m =e*k Pj: e |s/4 N"l] M3cbC! A\*c& =C2Ee ;5X/" '&pD~cT K`"IJGs ,S`]UQ 85nT +h2W K&s< i^d;P w5%iEGs Tb=@5 {7D` k~Y6 #~EsD ELjV Ac(S hpi"w WGT.| ],_Y_~i "=ww 9 mJ t:Ji l"Kt yk>? {F'o2z ,q'O IDAT ~'7dT [E j ]BIVb* kE s! S`yA V?tm ~[={ni@f +dH6 d?A:l |F{D{ n3:j %*DZ \].| %:E= #/h& ,GlF/m hv_Z ]3[O?8 ge{a Rgg: vRr$ <rla AW0r T&~T "qD= |~{{ W_0&= " ?d1 {H:@ <i{| [Y(-Z dB8z hLZ63 H]U `KtDj W#.{ %LIB l pu 8`3y Gi%B h-tT f nA (gTQ yw!j4 ]7Y.. >A[d N( g mK&_ ]dum7 Oa!$> E^Qg B#6] fD3n= n}/> zWQ E3]$ >Z6+ 8=Db .)c)d F!GPZA Hmkb >M4O :(QQ 5"*E tPM- TVXV} |x5; 5(%Z, YDW@! \Sbp M,U$ (_^" n<cep =drj ~N++$ ]aAq -pAg0E! x&?D;<A" yG{L " %+ek _KwA 72y' 2C@' $a0-f }i` )c{j g%atSuj" bVd ,335<t ']d?t pn/n (G88H* xGsD j md2[ |I)! Xi&) FAPIX %U.V X[x;.u 0GC^|G _'{G8|K Z_TV W"SHx IDAT wgL43 tJ]S$ >""32 e##!h g$]z iWVUdd< C]D5 VU;wk ?ANY eR{@ 8uGq V+Lv {L_q Q21qz Wo~y 9~KwE Zmgq i&"s S^k.g d&HAN) J4Wy|| zD@; #zNQjL `:@A: u&qk L#>{ ?92N IjAf N Jy VO=| b5QLN}C *fU< :>a[ { B} DYgE gyCJ #A,7 yS'C vt3(L# ?Q ] sP'0 \SoaK B}O9 WlCY3 S:Lk S=,x=- DbYni ?P^! ?"3t fzC} |KY#K0 9j:P^ G|OwM 1F5l )dw"' h"t!m0 3g``< =>a#8 1|L) eF81 OSg> }6[\ B>*h Xn@I hq9m~ lG3 dp|E;U S98] x+~6va oEU5g) nZ9- Ifd(; QD(gh =_CyI} \R>az xog[ tM8U L;oo 51-W> e%m 5~$8 IpA{ 2Cf02 ]## ]#{g :LeW t.-e {.Evq =B@9w ^cWs /SX[ yW|; J65\ !Baph #oPD lKOo IDAT @ 2 5b0)= g)$) .QAf oCLL H+\Q.SI S7r|U .} i Z_{B PwR7"/T 6D{L 0 l-PVY; _m[dAY2 S^B\^E N]u )9?V}fJ GNO@Fw {Kjh 3N"Y .`6h "+8 B 2! whGYS Lf7GW yY<} 1 d]42 :3+l xqv!R eNi9 T*'# kA,[ |DG8 .9KZ/ wVhw@ |6fs =%L ]j+| 1~@W :YV?`G #sp|O= ?Y]\ {4!G> Zz8# {ssw a&-_| f+t4 )_'? =eI} w@:M #6qx vqiw uEuQ( Db}q0 cA36~WTJ& g_4T h?[} HD9= vKy ;|Kw ;)ZD" BADJ 7Fa<1 G<hj 6OEre F oFO ]Rx< `hap euEg #R`D kY"1w OihF %ct? JYR7 ~bE(h \])at Ap?~b ic , >b-j )K(t7 PV 9 1=C: #rDV !bh, %9J<H )Q#I x|2zb= $8z0 >z"W 2Gbuq b(jc Kb&A 1G=G^ 7L~1 pN1e) Ea4C_ asg@ :GB,x _ 9M? :j{V XUUt:~ RB%of :1UF' fFE\ jQ-& cB> "xt? VKJ7EUY QL-{ %A"E ^GEK? ^_n_yL CsEF nZ.] I.J, kI$C FEQs )x|$ P2T: IDAT ]4 T %2E6 9^(c NK_d %L<WR =<TEP F;@; fv'h0 R&[O){ ` ". } ExNU2 8300 kpDK uI/0 J*SK fZV> o<F= ]tN] #,~o~ <Lj4 "]eL (XM= h5o4 ;3,!vE D&i] Gn$I -2Eg u3>x mq 41 u|c> ,*AS =nE42 4+@( @ai> 2*1O 5]}a 3]fhF | Kh V0BG c~Bs (POYw D !& YveH l&)= FA c $T7"Q U?z <fa`F u+eI /H4L $: d #7^Z ]IlU &E5~*ixy NI~ HMH7 cc*uO {nQ= l$ D }HM =!E u| ] [# . 64;t worX l}ig IAN|? ]|A= P<Me VI= V,i&Y` pM6{ anFK IKxQ fADU 3_ic _!#l @G}E)y\ "akp J}=#\ n:o' UuHZ SNE5x $V8}SV 5JlF%; @*Zb$sSm 0^g' o6*c L)- 5u3< Y##h)W oz/{ O<IQ /9 : 5lM} aJ$0; JJi# G4O@ |]\Tsq [yD(- S-" #8^[ IDAT VPJh mA9x #dgH l(W! &pM] LRs +j&) 4Gu| 3h(-H2He ?O c :J$M ;A-\%! mrXl _ACW (a_" Y%w\1! 8A:-xU) Q Kd frk4 K]w4 KU?u/ a3GZ kl3X &[W{ =b| K kX%0 {o[\ R:o6V V-1@ nI0: |B[(# 4 cE ]fH/cJ ~+cP %}|dJw' +cX= 'A[QUt MlNr@ {r=L .ZD% I@[ Glv@ KH6Qf9%k #jKSS 2&st k< 92Bw2 ^*4xIm :lk{ Z'}?+ [@n+Z $ )2 [Rs^A Zpx/ u Paiur BZ6g IQ\@ 3K"n# 4SvC "i@}1 {aJF S_D: d3w5 *!VU &/y` bGU] 5&O; 0{\ { 4 ~(WP $m s b )0C KXj, EZd8Ev f\uc Fd&H$)3% 63izr ,fw! 4OiVzB <G%5 k&sj> Zck\ "mTr sXl iC M md7wr6 )6G] b/10 @+w0 S`2wp B 3Q YL2b WT$ea? CVkn xsNst+} K>76 DzEf [f< $ tHcN 2/n-Po VTT-v ln6& r}x6* &nK-" Q!&S m43 DSiVk/ TgS( +CRv g#~. gL#kt H|)M.wv .6,NK O3^en? cZ?R ,o{+l '.-U f, 7 yyG4 IDAT =kf[is9 &0TfMJ |23r :I J oOlJ &&T/ vHSN _`n/1qT HcLH M9W" |&F4 TjRH $)wuK 4(CDB 6M ` t.Ov |-+G . 8Y X'E6I ;9`,l c)+[ c8W= l+:;9 f)iP? %Rcg }ufn R2)$ W4Zyu HJ)O K2TT NQN; VGu{ Ckb$ BI=! /sjD @FhM /64Y '4[*| FJoA%%_o MLWW f"sp7 :ktvEc 1Rc*E xw>T:b UX ! -RBS $ {H 'XW> z$m0> .a/6 uC*O R[h N;tdT UPB# *%1C rZn>hS3B hXJQ IfR5 ;W!9 BaM$ }V[,, ea8 E]1Zf O|fa< o(Jm& #j^w BBUr qe-G^ yfk N/_j .B]G 7X~- G t? K;BMw )V_K ::F: 6FKh !z"u z:zr ?7u2 dy , R;WAkt 4|&2 0~#i *Wdg# Y<[$ \dx; ).}i r^/q lV^' ?J4^4M 9SYG "A5^5% GV9($ L=<P < &f9 H#`HW V4 +~ -t 3 ::ae F$(zh$ ?x#g Vw# x Oxfir 71"yX 6#&9 &p[> hNil6t 1e*r B)7d vIZ8<" \]| ,$+E IQGZJ >S[7 9v,m XZd IDAT- ,G^E !@I /pD* t`0} vPiCJh +?E3 H40 6_l 7xJ4 &!!!'2R3]e [9>Wz9 ` %6`< y$a) !M `c 4A{H 2a E @ U0 P *1& <X1E_ )F} "jDC 9aS7 VJ~Yf th6' 0@#EA lbCBA Q!m# DB/GX H &tHCD .Jbk RG<E4 <i*B O2i'gzH3 dk,_ 8[T2 H+u' iBjD 4$E% ZoU=O= w;>d qAJQ +b OM> \D=v (~DW {]@l *%(6% ZHU= gIFbD +EA1D, |JsJ PfT KX"K ~@F 6xM\+ .e1.9 TDsQ ],tO "Y4A 3J@M 9So+ ,*D$ vxVr: g]_* 0`vs< 00=C47H OYdxc m@5] obt<x {Z l$ H Mc !A\IV L* W Rb% M :Z=qw9 ^,:Yl %e`* T ]t :|BW %~ju CN|k '|D{P H,L>G* l`G} w/n_< QzN|f Y<'o Z+*^CCY j ]JK Ln4w 5M#A vEjg X u_ 08!c ^4=E Q"5 kr#O" ?j6` "3 lok/ MP~1t Y-mc h4 " C"X7 o\e4 D:iI oTF. ?.uX, rz1AWn (>"P `YQo SczW mpap> !&*H[ "4Vu D\UJS_ Q<HLL % 9[ r9H$ I0z,4 Md&-# |% V "Gt$q 5* l /`JY uaz>N DGs@6X, 6d%! Yg{Rz 6guZ U?%&m t>ZT"6 -z[ |i1\ !ND: #o@TKt 7*R2 VnVk-% 5G63 dW+v: 5~@@ IDATg G+tHO 09N1 (XMk V,tNp FtU5 h3m ^J(% zQb3Fr h) ^ P eC [d F .?~E }Ky8P a{vE oZW(@X bd CN (]zx NY!= MN[dj YD*i _ oJe izP: >Vt |JKO {0lOwNy Xv~V}3 .]O* M8:jJ4t -"&} -&"bT c|'TL> \#/f (ES: )jDB e 9D"Z gk>s3 R+vD {^v_ xw+v wJo^<F 7rA| [\"bE*5 r??Jf $,-}5 mP/ qV3y= **%6s 14fZ S*k| AFwr3FsT tk|B [.<5 'JOy +Q0K r8O" QM^ !Un[t #3]g 5:? 4o&G AbwK x?R( n9z' s|Q 4: EZU*t~O Bc:?, }<L? {,V5Mt Zr:> .+JO ?QCt3B EBD 24#4+ N[>kP1$ &&JzB D13v i_KZ} )fioF l?[b Rk}uS S!)x v!4 w 0Dbqm" TJrP 6=iZ+ =\~Z lO#~ E4,A d;3R tiX@RMm U5$C t+J,oZ0 \\!;$lZ &R(k ABGz >"+$ OY`/ 5uLot]b M"l?qt xs}z{ #=we 7UKl( I%|x X"3-jf <>IP WsS'z RT'3Q 0CQ4 .ZB:* gE^i= KE u &>C* fi<*. OtR^ IDAT)9Dp c3n(` LK 5 Y7% f ]OSs5f !INs 5f.b) )mT}@Wt wxGY %5|e kVo s(b- "WY D y[o, jZxa^ gmtb hDWGEj{< IDTT ts~O 5.vN TFITc .eA% kybh ITz \ $nA; &/Y jW7P6n R_ n 3.0%+ mSc&J IB1; HLLF u=uN ARadI c,mE .b9Nv} 5V> h Rt Cw $<Zh K "a JT]??N, ((aY " A: .9{Q ,#m@o fZ%p gAI\ 5R{#ywE +HV21 \-\MP l!Bv ^KOq rsATY |wW= n'hA f [Lr4 9]nD tHBg 3;$UhG| E6pFFl Ctj_ l\/: g7w7 sIJ*^ n1.) Hx`` w WG jm3_ X2<^ &c1B :~N9OZ J<2D Bm9V(TmC ~2"P 4r8;J ;b{I gO-s^a+I dIT) ,\rAG ' iM Y5A[ U9\P/ ,Oxh ]PGn g\ikD w.+~ vB:vB6 77m5 *z#AD ui94P N[6 iU AzLtT >ask BF3p HQ^h 0/ 1 \RcU `D'D ZiDg Y!w)m \M?w? h[Z8G oV$O` y,A[^ T5K| P-.1 F5 3jk Y=Ax 5u!> Gm#t }|;? =vA&d HCnaU.6 tE[1 4=OC T]V? :#Z.g 1$PzT eK`, KYpPV ! Kk t$#%5 \GV|xQ &9RR? X@Fm q@c%a agdD_ y`xI? ZU&d 3R[# 4Hs GG4OL rUSK !}i=tN Y{ N R0 HH U$TvpO 4];5 2F^" &Y<B oV*+ 8*'9 ukLF IDAT j6C? _7/? @ a2$G KA9EB _fn>45 H5Bz U3/L +yi kvDL k+? o~#} $FS\ >cOH <b nfv 'p.0) gRMi c qI rx$sr #ezZ? HTF! AE>, u8"F +lFN a|ch &Kx[ $Z<J ZA+). XW Wn+U j-6!W b+<i ETwd _>|:B :vaXa `+\r g'56 )-qIa [t!,h I2^r o_ss )R3 b< ck{pc< WOo> fycY "H5h8 ~^]_ ",N 7<$ Ata;+ zWw% F?>l. 6"OL D;g &lF: ?fON !L ` /ymC TIqq Bre . t7[@ ?11h #n{Ya H5_"L t9~{9 W9c3? Kd<]>r OEL-MO <Yzc HXdjmf YCZ+K $JH` C6qU Z4<&| ~rM9a 4_>8^ ] R], >?'7 c"\+ de*y ,*IfiA 5)%M Tbz] 'tH97C Jc)'D y4># ^rqF '|fx 80wIk Bc04Y |!RSd8 HH!f.b 8 {( f`h9} aD%Y L;* P Uk m?3U Ms42 [k*M pq9)Wv \sobE7 kh%| I~)1 f:e [/a1@ S^/+^R M,[P Lrex 3t.? We{8 IDAT (cDQA + Bxty cd/j I%]L oVA' BBTZd ">cna 9z+Kb 3"H/ *+8`GT <2lqIc 8#7H zEc' 'Y^H ni:D 8#1; UYUI dUeeEF Xk"M z3M} v8'c YiC;> %|i- 6'm{ ]bidQ;\ SV3A M_JQ B*{@ /"hy %e3i| MlK9,ca k*aB (( ) 2 N;D 0C;m ,.SF[KeJr!m+m ]T ? {+'Mpd OLND5 *!-*q /W@d Ort a~2 rfDJ p[}U "9h{ 6+Ruk 'c=7 TA_uM $1"4{ 2}*o q~6i v 9( 9{45 6]rEcOE 4-$j> j*f#r ]5F" lqq+ Xd<"rW os y z64_{ PD R9 HkM*% ~Vd#a3 8>l& UO:] 'tFo ![]S z[@Q ^5Y Q Eke]U ,#"- +R|f6i Y\QZ qGz% mjn# <I.M )GWZf }Y]{k }Zz{ wW+? h9V $~$RI %3MUR ]f)_~I E*i. IrB/'hs PI Kec T51=B b}"t "5 B2 {6kD St\e@ [w/< q7Uyq FL[= Qw<# lE_ !e<A ?'iF vQl( TbD)R UBRY\Q R.Y/ 2FkSd -{(/ z$+m 9-(e6[ $VUD ~cCt [`B QwSp #\g 7yvz\ Ye &vK hg<# IDAT /:U2 Iupo:j -8J2 c1B<] d8!A Q+\h1$ 1Z& ):>~ ktb< :tXrK 0w$Z? 8d^5 v#Nly ldsO x#*^ Jf\(9 ZGF@3e 3Eqr \Ft'< < ma kfU8 IR)*) Zr'^ ^1,f^Z^mP sv Tz gV+c #4ZHk2( S=sAUa 0#g& SjAm #vF_ 0-j~ FI-as =5f"x -wwe @{f! X7(x sCrR {eYi 2z;b<D 51i i Xx9c @LErb S !2 I S$ riwh^}+ tV1si 6C|}f] Q'kS F{yZ b7/>7 \sZhYc n!''uk _TDS yqiQ @M2u *S|D 3cT5 GDR# [z[Mz 9Dpc<W1u Pni\% EV37 IL7UBhS %y@ @O=& } q TsSu ik+S wTQcEgPxR ;FYD D.n vK;` =3F.O kdB:* OrPN< HSqb nM13 h#ST m$*K '*72B*\ $]_E 3t$J k]U} >I0W gX,'O f\Kv p!xt# =~Dgd `!:N s,jk Z}&Y 2 me ,dEE? 1(nIt o\C4hI NPcI D;Z]l :fD>tD[: NLj< [<CM 37+Y[ Be6I 'PIK 9*:z $Hl! #b3Z wW<~ z:/O D[}8bK Lqul J`4p !&d3 M]g IDAT -6u$7% QU7_ .Q.V %8rqA xM,Y %oG<0 XPp/5T l #Bc8 I'() ]k z 2c8I fcO8e "1`S$F J}~NopT %ir%v Q+iAA beUfd >*PC 8 \e ";k) 33::_ 2MYw 3~Ee %UM=( peJ aoEd sy+dM W(7| %T[V $Jz)/ hHf6Q @x?q SSH;ds GZNT[ )~Xa TfzD OTrW G .! )XL 1Ri6 0?G|T +bE{ L8Q6 ,2GA, %Kd_ j;dD TH cj'n m}z8= JdfU i [0T ,$Ky ;N[L cpHp vIv) fQ%br :xZ%Lmy5 ]| Z r^8k fQ&2 u32%6Y ^J.R7[ 6 fZX HtDDLP 3@J. Z9e# I%8H d4fu ;o/nN~ {`/J m^8_ !Jgq i?"g %H`t MA6iF :ZiBQ SlH1 ^wcz "Ac8% )j'HS )U]U C)lJ {#1l ceKR :* D txtoS qr" -W de(: ^)W;$ +nmX KONk Mmze;{ 9(|% Z`w0 "\MX i CU w%hs3)QsM5 L@]~ %5y0 sM<9 *~uL u}tn \z5mHs! %l?/_ w q:5 V<K#g UPXg* a6La h``bE a-Gg UO2>z% (_+# gm^- KkK[~ff {E{z8^ K`EdR3]@n :2OS5T ^GW^ ;XNT Z#i- .x>h `ERT :Ebj #Ek IDAT $E([K' d$'/ oV\Lh3H ,snd o##q 3?[f6= ,St A;+< J`j+ :[+d JZ8' XLxN &? [ u!xqE X{}^ ,O@` 1Ur,[ *.BE k@2> S1@I Q$c .cP? XL"} 2=PS rTR9 R3n3R @jvkv q2|w ?9"N -N17 ,a1E !6v? dJ9] 5^2! 7U1[{ RjdJ jTu* "AC2 r5N$`X *o*g kFna *;A= .15pC OO;_ E2`%( lW8) Xz=i03 G:3i K9 X h+:B @ Ml 4 hAEo f6a( k$RIwoC d'GD !>MD T5`C ddf5?#-- Bv,L l@x] P)_h ]&: 7dDM wPEH xf4"P {GD$ p\p7 !k"? mr/} )?#BE -m}) 1sP1( U g %Fy s"\] i<7kO 9v0D v$hm VDG{ d%]O X^?MVw' <*{8 I8Zc v*#Q WY%u X{t`= 6y'] dhF8s ?` :U9U l}njN #@43 y*$4 u:PH^P K\$ 2M+.s5h Y%d@ ]Oq 1SIY &d:G kr\$9i :,G"# /Q\: 0faJO` !F= 3Ls9T @z8#T !0 O d7;f "AZ-] X7K O! p _&" Gn%-z My5 hVf: hqd{e K<2v "J]Q IDAT `@%N v.[$O %}J w,_' VS OI{ M5cy 3E X `;M' lF8| kWoO EQ0c6 #`S02 )#*k ;n}j $F%w5 IiU, b<QG B]l\ +#U l1mnl@Na A,!k_ qJ(y o)fX DR0@ !eQj< K(Eo b\ewUK ]]Un &`,u ,!!dl ?,jFX ^Xc| B&|Q8 ;>X, 7zoi "<Y qB]P x.*,c R&dt X9IGn y,EW ELDA#Q %C\3) ?,'H ,S.# ik'B x8a? |{~x 5DmE re : FF9l "q!v 9,Oz F)~a x 4{z w5G$Y -iNgz /u1- ]`C5fM: 9SV% Jqc" pt D 4\mu- K->Z, 91\ #h qy9| 7?y< (C RK o9\i* ;A6w 1P{9E z!!T Jy5* QEi9 DL6C epNFD .}'; F{$wrsak{ &Qs^ 3f!6 7 m9 'Yy# a'7}#wu[S ^nzx k~6vxK; dn 7w a%b- 2;O( kZ#,8 bV$P \FL6AfaW3 =,+M =ppD 'RX62 O.HV n?,E ~q9sb NuzH<c jfy%G (Tf( E]a=yC HjKY 02#S 3Fho .?rR IDAT v,0y r'@! aS%Fe NO}` Xh(Q ByhW e9ffC ? DmM[$ |L7ODy @-6' 1-G_) U Fl*]D / "92 ew:"d "0XS $o:g ;juyu J2.>L V`lC^H3 U`% mel8 d;`4 3vU%< 's4M `WF}jW bD:C 5* ;E l vvv02 #M]k h$GJ k-~W?\OKP ww~2 Jv!@ $')sm -.Az bX5IN UM4C n[ D A1^& "%9n <FL5_ :|xy bgU8 A_!33 )V4X 9wGlt @b+H 8z*Q s@7/ Smb# <r!& ;|5j Q>^X 3@FD fws] 5E9ws Hu "< R@RN qT)o d18m icJS Ag(: MeIj WTD0# dq$W 1#{H -qq3 l*]r j`u/Mzp T3rc ncC^ z<Mno Do13 SC5E .Se; $j/- jsbyF z(L?% Q 5;kd $eU) Gj*+0 K1',h: dnnD =|kY %")L 4+}G IDAT " 34 9T?fuC {MFz Y2b~ y4WpXN^ '"b8 F:a+at C{VPhP[u ""fQ sRAyZ1>2 Uc t T(-0S 6x[8C` ]n@t kVn@ gEZ% *]E -.Qi *d8$cx E,%AV &JT+ 8Wy/? A=3% grNlw# "oj ,gTI vs& z"R ["6X h Xd dxCz M` ?[dP ?61\ yN{r DTh\vH ><3YS]n $2s* p9mh &AZ'* bV!# 0]/rI (1 K y^C@W C;Ece^ Q@2? C'Jt2' cy+>R &4E9 l5+G @%V A:mi ar2x $Hdd< 3OCt" -0Krb 77*{ \BO}fb4 LO?h f'0i1 5}D| TrD" W(dz!h&J7 LM|d ?|>i UeG6 [{y. +5Z5x p~ HCa [{gd qG2( Nn c S|3H> M-56 =Yny# H?3*v rwlK~ hkkuk40i ?g d g>_n`Y /Vv9 Ez:+ SrLvE #8U_ 'k{m Dhm%Gt G19 0 ]\{, 6p W m&IP83g Sm/4U 3t@o W{RO 7yeS n> WqE< |PRK[ '3+t ]nRIo#9i nf}FuW[d Sa{J 4ktb ]&HZ 1^lM %j/Px# ~<+;' "46C <sWd MCGGL IDAT xVCH# =./1 CWF] & I` w\42l 'bP^ \ 2## Zzy"v ew"k "^np : T8 6fw @a{EQ8 9B Ol K1D e~B/ hBx7g Yn!E 5Ftc r)!x rE#: _s70 I<O$ YU`{ XvS. 8 @s I9"r XSo^ :d&c ^cR` gHr' :A8x J-zx N<"p EWFtw 93ca >jWsP [k<'\ 1W?UT a1P xRF' Tj$k OCy\ }y!f U\H7& jx2& qU\R~ };so ["f] !Mf~ HZ H ]rS>j #\!X, i~W? !6)Kp9 cyxa}5 ?L%r sKaMa IEND PNG IHDR gAMA PLTE wwwfffUUUDDD333""" ff3ff f3ff33f3 3ff3f33f 33f33 pHYs IDATx "Vp%) "bO4R B2Hf #&G3 `F`!g jBE@ R1's BAKk 0D0DB! }I@ g 9kD` X^A@ 3b|,_dMQb H2\4 |l3A ndHf 3 Up 0JL~ =4(XH H0l9 C[;A "D!"7$ EeVQR: f E 9 _B. bEw <*Hd KX)HH }0hi^? ] TN Q<05*@ VaY $Ig8 Zb*S B6ed W7K& (fhE AUJ`V(b c_(n # ;G 9kx9 SDJ8 z)'&E Lk(X YKcQ LTdDT 6h{#) &3C& YQ"(@ `U)AB FDxxT, F%H'O "QZfx VmjV mc'Xj LyFF Z:`T J J{eH@ OJ)wkm eMc?Iav HJ5b e!,a #eSi |uOi/ %g\++ TQSd $6NV *-X1 :R\G G^$P 4-(" SN*A 5KO ;Cq8 ]2Q#n-z pDNGHN %<]* &fdR$ +9"!1 hT8B @!c$ ,-HQ jlC| LOoT Z8#Ng 0 bG@m: mdU= Md1Y 3p"& v)d` Nhx~4k _xM' |t:M /? < '^L4S c91K BQ"Y )NUD aAe 0%SN JZjk MVNb z%F{ :bJG e?_\ "`gb Q20Ak HLfw J#E; TMM,]?W] !M8/ 1FkT o)l{ PtDU U%jI Y,Y#eS 9`Pr YIh~ U34 dUoS, vX&K fm*Y* IDATj c9S`Y(\R % && \ /F Gz%U {(zz ^Q=zG \~_~ dC+$ d|cf,ir =y,l}$ L@f% Jk'v }3@R _H^J z*!4 !AJ} *$@V7 q<+B vW/2 K:Je- 46\_:j3 C]X }0 Bq^l +w^fY |-Vn; q+2U /k|[ <]Hb 2\VXk q-2`j' Sr]3 ]_`W 9p1!k Pv'D lgOf _e.3 !4V2 i,W<# <&([ p'B-O p%,T| e twnW U]gj% LJCI TD'We \\4H l[kfgE (+e0 QLIz <pIN 3 lBD 4RS5 *(SM Bq8< \s}O iz { :#.` NZ8y wuzG~- aO=' LVqf 9fyx 8o` l6*6 'Zgr B$>3o[ 2^nS U}@Hhf y )rI1 '}PS @Inn Q'@f# AJ.1J# vcuZ qda} }:>|5 |vjd- qZMWy 5Q , r\Wz I}j? Oo~< 0EH8P q5,l c+Ch \??8o 5}p{ <r5{/{w l`ky t)RE cK4j $g-} 3 +) [RR, }E(1 nJCt cXij ]E:h AH~' xz^=? cj$ 0!ah WbTB k\(fBb :6|yh` $^&" -n 2 e| uvrr f@?H &H^>S E%* *>5) X B( hOg(5 nk)` ^yZRl Bt!S XS D"&] IDATHa HR#D \jRy+9ZI xCAY Hcmc pNeyi zb, jl\% _(.L!1 =Q= #c8s iXHc d;UetH<N NT?J xzB$ oc0}p[C RJE` V_L )MSUbB V<eH j$6E 5'li laSJ zNync%Y UZ=s .Jf) D@ 3 *r~r I1Nrb(v A:Ys lhAfwd del?X I>\GC 2&%, E:"Aj ORJ! S""Q3V +.>R s=7L e7t5q %mxv s5F- P:S8 E8lv+ gWP,y >FS?v 9"rxE 93N+ OV!Q Zs:x |RRM4 lVFty 4::Z {P@ '+M| >Q8{ R&]t C'5gM {A(2+ %4$s v) G JN ' ?T67 S;fD} US4U ZDUVU 1!c% YjR2Fzn 4:;{_ C{k.Wg QujO$b EMr$ 4 +eGJ s{:. _8vr ^aNt *ab KiZ*d A1ns uly"V u4@6 ?i D +"Ug i@/-4h tg#]- W6vV^t _Yxm @@J< y.:LFV (B10C(i t!0 Rb TA RQc3 h} u \q u ^[2 gBc8 _/wm x`a s~{g hTEH UEUb H4a5 SQT)L)Q jbS& w;7_ 46)i% JQGD o#sz %J'y L?<!|N e1,e dREEo m,r~ =sxJC 61{9| UW?r IDAT h=2u ]<wC 0w70j ==7h +cFf C&9= LoyVh`^ --lXG 4%B5Li w3e! _*W, ;9agW d=Ve x)qg `-Qj # 4 ):+<!/t ;BgG m#\\zYcU a SQ -)WK `+w#B( )D,a C\v3 EDg=~d {p\ q6LjOkz U`B:x! tcM^" aDUU D SILD ZV2UHM b0]GOG Gq ] j<fJ HTU| N&nB Or@?M ;FC: Z`{'' =:|T $-c _3 - P! iHEQ- i E)* 1*EE 1u C/&5 j_8kR y}?z PWEv m<ZI^R te| FRsV TKtX$ el0\ &HGL{: 85CJ W1dpz7 }f[Uuv k1%S{l} "F]r ?lpJ ypAcaI NML? J|Et sJ&0E C t%ed h6L_@ 4vU( /f.^ uW a n%Vt LS(Hi U >k_IS JlQ= `8\} {G.a 7g.$ a8 7 ern&z ;==!! QDzo ;4{`n L?5y u+DB SSs`. ReM:cI pCwp B3*[ vo&g R 3] 21`d PhfRL uC nY!< +a6DA ` D+ $0:F bVi]| >Yzz :{\C hRJ EJ7B %Pz[[ Ot?R3 g_V+ IDAT.o R_GT [`Np b G^B&/ :>_$? ,5* sf0u CJ3FB` t^>x0 nx+6 zlzT^V 6_Gj{ +,8L \Jlfc KY08v otnX y=1w oii gK(L a?L> _aO< :yj^ 9:Y& 8]10 mlr3 =;8} 43&B M"dm 9*K7O /nqE ~?cY wB/h @EOv 4~c4U n&Xo jAp'd mp?L ,rVj ,|-& [1" `<E`N zx ]edd ". "* r,1xk1j zukO8 K#,b X O^s_tm BGI! X=ID kGk{ 6`P< FA7H bG\?[ EQGo Jl6l ov:6{: PHCH ]W w!e }io~ Zvt\ 1FTT V7]) ~o @ AaQF &.P} {eq\z <C?cI PSIS 8h\m6O a:ft51WEXnx -.n| N@Ox n]Mg fT; >F5^vtn1F ->Kl' pTtm Sk*6. /4^:`q DWt( !IuU UNVwF w*Y5 &:f6 [[;k gg?2i@ >'Vs 9=TY R6avQ |%YQ jo<t 58 H{d .2O%r ?ihb U.zP +7<N gO\n `T1 9 ~q uN*3 CU6MIsr #rHn ,;`@ awMW <$L; #p_! ,UZB !TY" %K$&@ q{YN 2m . q7 J !#rO; IDAT ]-U%I /M-8[Z .2RF 5MJif =y(z| UJzD ][]uv 3+/y} NW|\ %'*:+*# +%4!U AhR JI)1t] ltMa Qa>m 95MjBW NWr| ]Wsql $t!d +g`k: {9z- #':, %<{: S}&6!6*)} ?32-cXjl 9)Y1 :bjb EAm7 1m[8T piYN [62y aV>+ T Mu #:~N = I^u _Zjm\ Bsb} }ws5 Y8<.b %gXGO (kjS `i6O> >orv D0-m \Cj(e2^Z (.\X +TA2 ~]Q~4 ^ ,:B =ddm lwZyyK` xp@l z mg f2b" _ivm+ t]Ia #\mB TpAD Q{?O e[-} O/@ sMU/ _-8t {&p>]_ <5.- ]2?V> pm"n D78P CK{"} sGxwK ]3{d R\X\ liK) @?^eB TT1- AIa) [8>[e ~,/? }^zf& _{M} 059(8 G,DK-Y ^x~Y $~v+ B(Iw s(zJ \;zhwfN ~`?m| %V u\Z o64l AQnA [k&O^x 2!fz eT;V @n 'WMK rb!UX )2cB ZNM3 IDAT TFu_ Y4cA ?/ H]2S 1,:Q 'Ln E 8\IQ1 6J;RZ E;zVl CVRo 'M ! 5+>} hwooww ;x-R b@H$ 29k^` 'f(P bK|~ 4YCf' \>'Z BIa["Q %a;I" rc|p uiF1 <\qn -Z;z: ~EYi K$j;` - %^!a GNJ_h [hw>] o=6G| NZ+ , ]vbS[ 9A`T^I '$L0 uK9Z BEO~ 67USn k<T6Ek _=\? 7Tnq eiz` i80oC {6gI^ZW X/.*Y !5Z9 |r}[ PEySu xN(V1 a[CC9 fAKS8Z ew_| NMA)EW Nh%D "O 4J ]J@= K,go hxO{ ?sXR 4@^gC .n?a F /#' @K)T hm [' xw8= wU-] &1ix Kni[ lp]eQ --X\>1+ (f^Q w d? weM! w? b i:ML 7{jP >Smt ZH7b d",X' u*F* I?sf X#nLM^ PYud~ mofq mY}J P #I ~sUd 2Zv% WdeU U%Bu ??3*{ <B" =LJq }Yh:jv $;AU 4J+)] _ Wc2nqs# \3r"K n3s< 78m& IR&9 utBKY 73AH VBXnq .~4Z: 5<|5 T^j2 1(sk IDAT p%jp <%r2 d_Fs Gr|i(Y _[MA 8VL- 0P,2 "Riu Ow;d71 wo?k{k TrN) |Uuk z&x= !v<>x +#)s [9J V:a6 %_## Hlu! Kh@ GS+d trd} [4&/ rtT( j5^Eb t? /h 5H=1g <;4(778lXp H<|d /a6, vsp Mp~~{` J$\)u 2~^k^ fYl {44v BBR) 8$RY ~&Ia< !p` zG? { N];O 74 N 7w|^ u+?Z +g(GI ;@w$ #0`2 =iz $ n| K(@k :Em1 cI5J J^wG d]wo[F o"g* JcI) &QWF$BcP.} G9a!- icI(( u/,}o oGQ% QGPA@eDQt ?QGe @ !d! 3a`= jW^| W0u ! H f!XW ZI5 I XTc ka;< qZvE U0.z b]Q] Lz+/ 3W~r EBWy c&.b 9LY| "Y_xt }^sP1V ?}J}J xm S jh4BKN j]zR+"6 *CCc _ \v Tf!- F]ZP !:(/ smtx yt/bdY B Z0 )5.M p0Dm |#/9}Vh< IDAT s*2\ $*t!nC Rr\& ")WE 'A'L |c f FO}u g7wU GFEE [ lp 9pNG I_]o }{Z#Z =[0> Qx]0 V50F f-fL T 4A 1i%K e/X .23A z+6# r*A? |nYX& --}{ iI<a E%vl K9e!;: ~#WB jynG '_U" E6|C S_`1> LG?6 JzVr | fB5 Qq%t v.#%F gIzv ^F=l (;K H R$ sQ92 *IYJ i>3N ><u: bv3S hlCpn[ I0kAo 53~C sn#: _-al 7^MDB ]!v 'c2- f\=m W z %]W}p iH0B_ w^0@ bLi( 2mmN InNu (V%4 &`\R,d sW&O [>2|C a[spv# <(S4| <st N #q,&0 qk;A >H{: ^wSm E+yDe ]<0Ju Z^[A &4n2 1.4S$ kWQW ^=zj 0^;> 'kmb 6#hn ~SuIe [W>Tx Iy8W j\=(g T0i=: mCIJ n#y&H~^8 c;ZM , WA >m(< z/Lk i{KS "FEB &vQM ng+i b5py B) ? *'L3p r~dO ho-z eI % IDATfx TKuZ#d^ #9<#(6 b[.y 9HAs g_:p =C{i Q ATRR 1%A]:OW %iILM M;6] Ig_. p*0n DFU bc+A,Dh :va u'G= gP5!T s# R h:G Q%$> :(,! (4/w/ O6gc !TO^Z[ k-*& b,q- {.hP- Wxn/ g0Tf & b6. FD F #{bLR 66"] _io6 fZ.J 1&a7 B#B`D() `x #P U2N=SUU YO&X ]Z/4 yoW[b uAgl 8fAsw akjO XBWx*) Q+R[ Z &_ e B8 s3@? $a0. :vF Yh~D faw?_ A#Mo :mgg cZ*I i59X kwM4Y f2K~ w.P#w8 feb7# ~PIK ={34 0, 4 SUS=C da/l 'JHQ: mxM1h hO - LpC% *Vob JzF" +<+i2> "?hc gaX9_ \YJaR OwAA 2d7e )7`<E) !Qv <|?> aj&H t&Eg e aIm RhSU t]%=5 WGPR ~. W pp<p Z}my <!}9( <=rx :"6u tA<"2 ASTC 95Kyi mK)- q J:i (Oc2 _[S(i Gm1* /t`4u 1$E; X^S^Ve9 C?'E ``] *I$x 2`p| ~-n!L (pPJK OMhB IDAT 9BB? ayMJ1TC vDP o* hA?M 8[+% \ a:f" 7[_}c vN(, =Psy ->^w p;TE 1.I- WA=| |X y 9&@" ;x ~ Lg=g^ oge6 eV,v 9 Te 5Ibn ?*R] iY_X !{P} xE,K kl-* JD}% GhUQ F Y^ >r|; F a,6 FJ(Z <%,)4 ]K!P -Oi)M 7^d~ S7mz 9 'l [<v$ n;oZ Ykm} y[w_& 2d9}R B#=Q Q7Vr v4m% '"O(t~ +`9l u0+Ms ]I] '= ,^(*{ #m6| VZi_ %\(@ &o W dQRP as`k Vg)] i Q5w| cKY$ N47W b5U&4 -l;.% &DnPC [J{8,oVFz jQ61 r&7/ 8jd._ ccTWz 0%$>M eJ#, .*l) D+ia 20Cn C+<K 9dR BxZj &p5TE&CT{ -j-5V<fa eJ{N,!l -HXA< t=bnQ ?x:lrR n>l m v[U rnQZ ,x>* %^oQH JJU 7uv: JJiGt I]Q) h$:! (tBh! So'^ 5+wv IKmp g~=+ grMB q`h: YUM5 XGb5 B&@=S 9vxjXU\ yY( 1MEV Aak" 5Ii[ &WRK ?e2ia <O K( +d*T o(%E =n>v IA&* qi]E cDo_ IDAT @A 5 =jTU VnlZ W%vu -[T @HiiOc @ ZI)@J 'EAS "!p; WT ] e*_S oud2 Qr]U ge;77 =l8X1 1bhLJ sf}e JPQ!- )WZIK %LnN 4)(d O8y{ ]{7/ H1kF [tlg aSOM DY : -wG| #D!n 6A*aS pLE)N =bAE=@ )jeWN 9w+ucj 8eHL +GI+>$e I[+Q I#_| ,n9^qW i|fL3 6h#A mw\1 }_no 7UVo 'F&c 'pddME W:)0 /RH#7Y 2B{J 9vLJ VUU. %$al qT/VEo~t 1<Q;v|G P6(l* CaYBcB 5JhK (IFD Wf{L kmUe X3sN gq&C *!wO x;fK[ BVNe M\J RXR* Zi,- N>{jC ,kwA DEE"" $UeyC F :p Fl+$ 55Mh QxRv eNQ< YOG4 4 lh 7Qr?P )8q `E s^U$ I&`2 j`E' C % #p3~L e6m lm)' ~cZn csm V$$C b SB^. y!-/ dvU: %Atq Maf{ :W f[ xhiR Aea+ b7M= O?/l lVFAZ :5\bhPr I![` ECc7 !,B>gHeK2 IDATf Px&Y LeYa+ ^e4z yf)X p f@mkpW w>T, :76a a[Z 6%)A "" @~''? D^+h %aIAD IG-34h js[ xn cmhH b?`b @+mh ={>] Oo66 CZC{ :Rk| L(V /ljD (`SC xe`S V`2% 3 (/t2 sjw/ b~}em o,LTG |5 Zy KiB: [ A kDL# YRH9 #/!2C :k0f; ;xJub A#Z H! };`O |OV7T oO.X 45Nd K J-_z Rk t @k&Ppz Hi%M H 5BUb lwx(2 +_ePs CxU? !H+ 8fZk V"70 *[DL- T6(= kmJ 5o/ 'wm{ Tf.l c[lA$ W.GS _2_0 e't% lT8f D/*T ?[CA \ <]R Qn]u c > ?^{}S ]9.'2 #G"V3 fA`Ki Ck_zX fW)V KW 1 h>?! S@H `-sP a f- Xi!= hO4" /< q@ cg]z `iv: f6\' 7M>qR f :V33i ^%. RiWZ @#0zLw IDAT GE-C &r xzYf &79M `mJaBI /,7j `R$@ QxRrI 5{gr jm ! R+[V v+xMP n?) iI( d;Zg -|<H 0A^Vz $~`j LwpT 'DbC c"f- IH U Ls7` 26D$ Rzw 'clU ={o2 &7_4 jnI,] MN`u yOs& 5MDY ^]fW MS $@+O 6pD 2 :lK'F pkKD+ A|PY 2+>u y`f (HT$ @k!r ,c 7 [~p{ ~in! VOv,I. N2oyydJ RYB)m)%Z =qlM* 2IGII eSeE ID- lOQ\x\ JwK!L 7Z!<S (:!b `ntmy ,Gx>R &do e)'iI|_ /__7 7ytY *peU^[ u3nA ry do reV9 L)S q}o/{ U^o6 .<4X G^jK 6RJO# %I) Z+|)-c WJXbLi" ;` & t;% up3n %yj1 ukS& o+D T k;aVG z|:M *--? BZBi , mY D)mYJ TzA+4Zi 2aoN rAeVI<J `;L yKkO OZBJYe |_a@s `u}u =;Y= @gsS NUEr ajJ) W=oNE DVzU W^!/ s1+2E *ObIm k$XH mLI" Opz7 CU# :F|bv IDATH `rB[ {2vRYU% ; 6Q AJK(_ S !EP OG%| R'!%Z)_y cj S HZ^O fI=S '9q! //+} pY`S +(8:) ^?L ( <|#0) ~{} L{%e 72"a n]'80 *TMjL-nII C;SC)t vK_;X {V)e 0_NC KPJl9 R+_C oK6@ p"[;! @~0O Y8Sp n&cC OI[i DH!: ',0a h_aY m [@ Seb4 P>J(0 LY+D" o6Cs [(;! +pKbx `+{[ 5$(YC B,Zk "`:t eh_K MD*1 " ;( $hfG 0b"qD( hW(HN` ,F4s Dm]m*YY r@+@ ]PB" -K%(T /Q m xhK" OM jV &|V- m[ X ]r#, t8 f uL$/= LA2q 4ZH# 'M)>i B(0IA-( (w|f /ep b a\at W[}FCzg XO<e T_0E a2] t),l ^#r$ wLx4 p2<- :9x; ,/V3 EWro 5JZR Gi%-!e [B![ u +Y jBPX2 ,~zh g+;6 J$h+ Xrt! QH)=O |6m- 3W}i Z F1 luEY"Q:j yWWP U>Z)- UF*a_+i RZZB 'DR) C3)<M #/ULU RJ) BX(_ eIi BK_> ;8Y1 <Z}^- t2n0 jO [b DqSq {DiG mkh6% YJI) JMGN^V LuaO *z!G 7DKGR ;7L<Xpz OOR} RZlN 0F(t IDAT Zi%,K+ Bc*. g0 G awh=} K b[: ,FvX V>Z"@ cwmj q(BD cc8bn db/D |:Lv!c-G F7"9 & i\x4&! }) O! M>y& 9{J] @}l# T1P~F -i K RA!( RZH! VJ+_H I1v7{% >NF# )nM p8kF 9Bm1b&G X8u| A )} /lK+-- 748+q ]P>q 5Q<Eq Av?d H7 >$ eIKJS 6 `TP x1KP *-h 7wpn= _,9F z;lr"t KI2> JXYt _^]: k{;3 wBro cuJ5*f nd^EmT qmR$$ `"fM R& B F7r[ =D0'YO `IW Lv7RPJ -f(R _\simz >4Ao FdOO0 ?&! NtPT V,_u sg_{ EJ~ b(.o W{Um N\P6 qV]K %E[@^* hQ@G tl K v5 m] c@Ci `VlR" >t^Q gkf* <#ag d"8o bbG0 V.l~ $zrX\ 1U%f|! "k02*) 7'[i LebR GQvs LL#@kN X$H3;F \@+P ~?HZ .Ja. 2`M? 0 \2o W?0 ]6 Vdx Ywu$ {\ Zdwc #]K%B n` l+ 2&[I;0 Fry' Xi!MEv ]HWO 8*0 (r4J @W8R ZF!`a YDDA eQYd R*@i vPP*k^ k! /B 7~NU Z()D, }%p : m4!|_8 O*FY e IDAT_ tTyF ytX4 gypa i8Zr )[Ti @Q<v f`N= VA&L C-"p x%| t&i} wwwG vQh- v<2 o7=T% >Pk& }a' 5P` }n7x I) 2UBN $^9s wC~e ' )N Mp | X%W RJP R 9()d$*$xI '}>av O{M@ 4x ^ Y}iunr [D7W +!$Bx " -@ !u7pE% Ks_z 05D3 kO/> #V35/k "RYS N*@Gj *:}D 9!2wDZ XQyl d*v8 )TZJI* _w45e wWvn P^op 4pB, s5}fp e~tR 1N#_ W+X< P654 ^ViJk k2 5 n>4yn0 W~,[ 8;3D +u[u uTe$ ivC3 :"$A Dd ! K+pt M$W8 ^pNE n%{ y=/7G A t J+)]a' Z?F_ VI_u% 5vbi 6gN^ C>)kQ vk0 oXSHg B$}- &@P \- P&H' J|;, S>XBk mxm#n vAo( f-4@+ P SC 'n.1 ]V0iH <_Mau a<Hh %3Ob 6#WX G)OK \OO(a (!55P B730 6B=(k a-T@ IDAT Ja8` vB%) o[iax( aq|] a*dZ" gz[i2 Ix*= %R; ZX C! eCuGr> Ma*_ JPZK =2cq2> {UK4 $$$k _Xc$ KMdSZR8B) J CKK!R S]"^K ^FGql /g]T jB;I8 |1w[ dM R 'Lq8 B G+% "3K$ &o24 7mNy SBM2G$D %/cc= =I5D Zk_8 cSFWi 3]a.RZh 4Zky >gr2v] r`iki dOoH $i_Y@ 5&xD m|7/ DD#Ak |IQg9 ?FD1 gi^] Ep8 vIGBq EBo$B F)_{ S 22E !"( utw[zF /#sE L_xj $y4: `*k; YX?c u=Bq c~VZtQZEY I)<D2.# CKS,S j*=. O63^ tYznU {Dwz> Eg_4 *Y) ""H' i]OA_ >k,-? ULu0 XSMuC ({*= n##? @HP e APYn y|i^ oxj:k [[_B NC&< 1<" PlQn bzh= Lmi)#- (;.Y )-5v aHgNlB IZ*q60 .&/n #NRI 5B(0 G Q ut sM w/ IDAT ~4a bK+^. ep#dGO ,(.Y B<a: )#uA M5%4 p+oR "3u} J` 3_% h w~ JFd- 9%V= XqK( >Nu1 -<q H2,] Vnq AY >%Ph) &II! l>ZN }M45D\ }P W0 @hfGw 50Q< &QXHk HII{{pl Rkd"* D)% A p8,- .|~j^ zLg@ gRoo Q 2ziw gDXe VD2! KX9m{ Pvfw$ g0 n g1fO0 +)_@Z oa`~ 9wl~F o"*T i"D R[JaH TT0"+ i =?s_ <sx 1hjJ w_.+o >'+x sG%9 RRo' ij!B R -0 6.qfR 7?_v 9;x`_ _ymw <q$46 W,i+ il7R =l8N V]x9WM j62s' sg54 @hm'` JJ!lZ .J[ B` @H! ~(), ZaiKk 3~kpw X=1N* o W % qii (;RG t$LY+ d@k# jgw) 3q>c. )[ 7 CmcJ BwKNK D#L! XRfX >>2| gH. ?"f7 _9F, K[8o !%B(m Ne@)! ^L!B N bs95Mt c+*? gb&^|U 7sgt >@M3e] -9TA \Z ) AXk) .Ycg aHSc; pHCj EkKC0 vSwVJ^C BU1o SI9Ia cU.yA vl_?: mkN}; \?xW IDAT ip\5 Nq<L p^JWr` av4fUT5 0l!X )uXk (RZG R#@YH# 9(=) C(:De R qD . GdZ"m ];oS 8>EK gF?x UAC! 6j"F H]-m 0!uzq Rn(H #Jhe j%\O S\z hV/J %LypzF &k~KCn\ StgG )W;:Ci ?^^! )EXY` R^;Y RZ!: Yvy> pyvY 73'k gf@6 *s^5 5f-f acDF (j1B ZFm%5 }FKz _@r~ &iaZ iDPF Rh,) ; BHmY6I hK'aw fX 'S j3/Hc qm`M :CHS *C:\]' m;z; CJkS ,hS %m7X F$VGH! VZkB EYqc? :zzH UE<= GgTT IGUI L+Zp |?\0 e[6w [A:\ #cjn 7Gv ; mK$QG ;jG QaKD 4Pa- Gp=4 Fv;[> pmwWRM B]x SFp LiYV Qy,a< Kv1 o o~ 3!_{ h:W^ o>#>b J A[v !ZY/ j In@jE !Gfw p1j\ |pBd 9"cth !& Wrz_/ GzN= N4s |f/*_ cl)% X#SL VTe6 ?iGeI1 *|Q\Pe |.{h |u0p oj0' 6u"cz +a+1Z! zlTt e6>4 a43s- W5e= gz76| we"3 R t>> !@ - LfeM %=7UG ?kx| #DISv, /~(N $X4 #O3 +_;Vqc ^wvED ?!K# IDATl 2_H t|.1 Ww^r }+v8> ]C=< k=%? !*v0 } ^i ?x#m TIj ;k k pjD& @[Zk v]r(p= 25 1^ {>30 {byXY@mf (Kd icmS|`t<tg m)@J \he g9y> ;?SZs x.h4 +L<J 50EW' O<Gb] ;#euIi}UU Ri-l #D!`% $i 01 -w7m .^?FI ZYZi! Zi2J !EVY297 KAL. tql7 K-Um #ts_ ch-? v)d %9Q# ^`A2 QF&8 ;2ln zjwQ 7;3:" ([3) JXh% v V; 99@O7 'J#L mZui}[ x6,S D*l8>) )m_39 3#4Z[9!Ma /Di]\ TaiY| K^Y_4{ #B:^M B<WV \.P6o ^.B SZ!]v (da~; ?D` 4 :'A/ Mf 0 rp?l B(+_C lvlq rp]q Cl[M DcXJ ! ^KiaR4 GRj!M Ru^h Te.2+.V 3 ]; 9.Je* x6.> E+;Q (| ! UJ ) t+l{F kiWP +35 M J)KK! tf!@ YXJ[ plGK 4]Rk B+LKkC )MAf [9gr Kl Ut3 *F~T Zi 2 k/Zhe P: ,K YHCE yuj4 D4O0 |rF6 e Cb SZKi i)K 4Z)} [``[#M f>HC J`9d T UxY T \v~.2m vtac rj`` &;X ":Ao. IDAT C&@[ ,m~j $Cqb VCFs #drd QUK"MG Ay9s N2?A 0a w (^/T0?C T rV "0B3 a662 &r 1 @ikeY jF Se 4F6m i9V&s nal/ 4u%Ds %!r1D3 =ar Q~Ff q|?cx T-g" *FO fz: z( vJSP ~h%>Cv ?>KM J)-0 <0hN(- ~u[@ gZL+TMU z9f9%) o5S JJ9 "WM8M D G{ ZTE( LII+. ReMs d I7 \uxEG 6]3w +ZCk &(!$ /xd=P @ En+g t L* \.\' #g8~ &85Lm )!9@ #$$2 %k2z8 SCN+ rZIrv ?RWW = e#zj Y !] ={l# sStN 6Nl` ^|/p I& *CE 4&Pff H zwzie VcYa} ;NvV -/WS +{iw< LxN34 zd:k Rs$} \\e&I kC'@ -q$k b2Dcb#C` ,2DC k Pm gjU"3 QR"AYQ+ Z .%$ at Rp 2F4 *8<K GRU( i~JL LUUaP 2OH ^6Rv &)%V ^Olb\ ,2%Qf C-\E Dun! e"Q?<82 ?~ R2 ! j9A4 %CU [FL e 2En **6$#fd c!(C Q@fV 5b ^ ,cq": fBlD DFnA OeF` R./A IDAT 46b&1 cp 0"2+ GDhZ*K B-W+ l/D 0 OE2H @8t Q)kB +\ R(Q6D L%on3 E0;B% GNP[@ _x1h HDQM ndl @Af oGSB Nff^ nIkQ D4QS h b@ @ oo ATE\ e0SUKj `a< `1j 5fRQk }g2$E <wC d+^b t%USP 7kDq dLLl hdd !z V 0o /("( %1/ p iRKff` ErD [? 3 EN|X 3"V Xs*( 5-6r C6?[ Y5S0$! N~$j uj4V% US1c $#R1 gRQbH` `b10 @PQb __]. kg*E x8<)I '(1* X!fk &EhS 2Ui-(kI D5c: >f&b1 M2UC NWzWx Mifz --Ub 4X]." L0b$1 E%Uq TU!@e6 PF-c f&:k S)T' l:-c n3j` PL#y $`| 3<z]W g.o~ $XXP0` (og/Q\ %g^nL P[pyH3a^ Auf\o zG:5 =XF euc ZUKdj zkO- Iam; g_9m S53$ ?pfbf01 ww/O `|mt LQ 0 [[U5 hr[(Y Z,&; bq$> Q{a{g1 ye<| Rpy'` -fQZ bll\D 4el%bx jG[lq A [v97 a("G&> pd%T Z,c> /u;@z @=zj J-}<{ <_MeR' \!Hf {{MYU 0JX_% IDAT nuVW 0N P C`fb. dq,H gt5] Bz}T 6.|l sYf+C "Dcv Ek/< [( F0`.VvP eU]W 0w?"` x9py )dR4R l4BV >P 69 sLdD; ^m|+ p07{3 F ,/ Gig^ 39hgi %3Un shN# Pe2yN Ae-s. Q~% 'G^ ^ aORb/G u ] S' Y +I)|n D)"g =^%7{ C'}` u +)% ) 'X yG?, u0 d@ [KN-.o} ( qVr ~&5N 019Zs x5MSq cl UT &t/Y -.$d ;fnt @ bD LRZ, b?X? c5K;C @3:s2 jT Q ;qV@ cq9N 5 B54 Sy}- UF290 y'UN I@b= _|#M 8|7V uZYf 8<]BH` maz| )fr$QhS5 l\@ onXe _qy8 |<Y[,A 2r'7 D^L. tz6,i 3T+U h# q w/2 ]\Gzn @3^XoM vo}K eQ>MD o?RD [YA5 4`"% X|u= F%f.` w~<D kV V{ G\#U- "nA' 2^%d ;(E W2F!S N#J1 /4M, j,] l"\/ L45>yr=: bL(:P 0YL; }Zk# j"'B *YGk9 IDAT; Jb4wL T#8+Z3D `E)r GMx) f>c5 w)-" -B6X {bm{ bfMP Wasc u{]\| nZ(V ::8Q VP: V(Ba@ 9AOLJ abeA 8t3L wDkk NLV#.cm BZ72 K!Z; B; o lDs7L fai" n4ZR bg+Q >_X O n6' 7lgM /dH7 G!+g {\46= Z-nF e6NB6 ZLLLD Y_Z ? 0wh HIn!p n)N| Xg}~ 4+GwVk %'&w tiL\h kffU i *E kbs} p H0 cm- ` |#Hpqix5 yPeW9 M B< -NbJ i4X" "RRp Y{9Y ]$[' F7-Od t6{;v@ L\>z mlUsR K'W /,+uc zVj*TbeUv #F<{k E =zC jjJAs. \gLD1 gj:gY B>"h +/@d s&Rf d<} Dh/n 6{y#Bf {?>e xYU4 kqcG Dibo 0ifc \=RZ XLp( }%jM 0X{g A YG`* @ql)h 0`I!? [aYu FOOMc Kyig "u( f-$DUI4 FnQ 5wL# a5n%: t(lj4 )]*E ]-W$ *3++ 9"6? 'J4U/Y nE<V f>Ho Vkgo5 !l,L }N<G %h\K] lI"GSM ;J-6 cZ5^ e lLp! &8Uf y "I [c`L K>ms 9;96 R=i# DuKI ~3"6D IDAT "orq 6ac8 X@9i '+Qe <XX %/qB b'ly6 c'sb B+XEM L,Pc- ZF/u]p 1+41 <"kJT kLXv +2 % /E&2 y|08 1=1S 04* x(!4h UaHB \Q!B r2*j @/D XQ8'y 6E;^ `=.P{D #$~kk#Ggr / Lk <+X) eB.j A 3N& *TEs O@Q@ y= ,o!w *2Y( s66dbAk ar(j@!<3 J>Y& '-p *Ca Y63T aYc 2 Q0hs!h l C 2$ \EUr :IDE UsQ r 0_S l?,' Dm~; $(L# JXu( rJH} E}8B. C eUVeqa ( F=A * au q^$"!& _Fpy$ n(0Z +Z Q i]E bM7w IDL8 T@4ITE( !Z$\z #C>8F@ P|24 <+ fAX 9+3y /BpN +@\t0 yEB> UM]\6 S%=pQ l1pl BU(th Ik %'` " 0y 39U(1 "H5+ DmP&% ^DI ?$/+ ]tv` Q@Rl#i TekYM d.SoK )P2` L pD$ 0t d ` RE " m` %_8F 4^y chEX m`v. -FkH kwA5 ::+XX IL9W $ql# \e|d lT+{ "K^`!P pSX?h H,rB# ]d1& X dk; +.M+ &j181 j9!/ wP.]{ >Hj+ $>8; 3Z5p k c|<ILzv !o==\8S bWp{ v59i &NL` Mye\ FvQVL9t 6'kx v2|0 s7;5z IDAT tj#g }"j| {OW> &WOx z{** k&rG:5 Rr*aTW buh 7 cSh^ cT*s C`g0 uL 6+ J Q +8qnj olo} A2Hk ,'R 2DYo '6!@ |hA( 6:X| !+!5 EL~a )`")( 4|W> d0-lma zwaf ]D-\ ,Eg 7g:Y 0x 3 p{h^ PSpoU {%C0 Yx`k >(Ci m"K! `/Cs edmp !{Dq$ ?1{9 amut -$/A WPK` H .C gQ]@ SCLM O"~d# o|$[ G; v CM 1Dh _>yG ?:d; !:E`cy uM0bCBy* +}^W Swg$ qDg8 PPjK *iMbR E;e#d $HV6 TS 4 :|*; or8R7 $PI|_ W'Ob H/l& 4GYCW /v!t u+CI/ ]{/\ PE5@ .NBJ Q#5an JMA, w|e:N )yFK& ZuI5 pN_` O2=N:S- qypp AH <[ !JHQ: u[{/ 4Ma[ ]8 '` %"A4 :I)N ` [-NyG' Cp3, =S4^K SVeR 2 BPUH%Gt !DB8 G3z X69V3- /p&p FPG2m?eX htnZ~ j%Pr C@BP )m ;YIyR ;a0_{ g8 7 )\b/ "%+ uuQ| :0.n j4J? IDAT JqH`^ `BX D(o0 QbyvEx kpK# grLj *Su5 6cEP l.9A 0OyS FxNK 9K$^ "\ s Or:w an%rFu3 jC/z qi%2 Xb/O 'r2_ An*,6 A4i` qhnSlb Um. VI-#v RJ^| a/l} JMlLAI WNY1 %"#F (?ng vp,O c;nc ;Ye; nNs. gr x)#f8 pdfZ;bxm &L"i&U=c ?.Z9 bOJ) :CK= &TzXa =R@/M jcUT s.[{ Lb'? 9vq" p%7s6? =LU5 f#Xt b\eS cxHem 1dY ! !6BhB _r#O ) ' m9wR y6KL #5MoQ jI;v $ Cm =#Hm Wq ? Mv[^ x'_e/_ 0,c5 Yp` 3L]` 5fZb 6nc+3l E.vu + N3 V3Ix aB[* GK+7 x$U?q Xq7t )Zv| 2YA! n6q*; KW7F3 'BGmZ hSnJ 3t%9 x?wr vVyH1(p5W 3jRk' (XQr Z(G) qu|g 88Nw IDAT f^PW BJ!J y\Vj l'V7 W+@S 3e9s3 T7;-+ fsY#9 CN9e X.XzZ )I r 29kR)Z &69I Y7mzW r]~m {d[] Ta>r WWcd xsM_z 2M8)4M &LJ> HfenC u"Z~ 1%ts oQJm UhB-u B bA"m hy4hB m7sZ tiG%q: ,5=i R6\" /!Fm)E F4Yx p4=L cLz_ puC1 fRU3 Ssq8 ^p[op R+$&5 C!6u} 16MS 141N 6m?vn! 63S9 B9}t z:{m 6^0m fPLFa AZ?Qo Mo( =RS Q L_` \n5-3 A!E9 71*i ]gE,# M/KR QzM'.}]& ?]uEbF{ bfpg dO:_ ^Cq}: ;M="K MKsqf ?<Yo /z+?U uRbO P,-Ii PhMI ANm)R*$1 Mls C^ks 64M^_ f~8^ :eT?W 6Z.Co 6j=]vR r !4 (=zU mShBns fj[> 9H!6y 22mN fzSJ F{0D! -XY[ =b|x QB3u]u hS $! Rnb, "Q!Ay mvm[ /3222 9U,1 >h[ kdL*T1I Uo1N mk_w 3~< P 33b! w]5' fx F?o"I ZV@X '+b {\UX!5 ?FoE z\'A T6y` IDAT S6l& vt@I Ut~R 56H3 <lD! Nb*- &@,7?3 o0!M fe%Y^i 4qh$% x)9q' ct(H$ `wGA h`8?a P|:@V B]_X W9[X=0 h:[1 u<bU >n< 0=c' =3s] m\Hw FUOosu U:)w |R+ In?h |4rb g%d^ ?Q; v\2'Sz(4 xU!P E@% u ,h6( ]z{< K{\$% %I~{ S`'{ 0/+; 9%x^R 'U}C+ =G8D2 Oyn| 988x 4rm tj]- =a{< l4HV ~I@ 3lHEC Rg2-= YqcD y`HD= UxTZ e1R;dd { O,[u CNc RvQW ieQ) >AC 9=U_ -{Q<3 Z|_c %,l` mIWU cap]{ Y/+x \%dr8 |s.R F{B oWY M|Tu N.[4#x| >S0IA K?j1 Ac~D "0E|rS K(H7 wfhc =SuA XySq TKua =s ) dN7f H"`=D \U== K> s~N roq@'l #X*-' $fuXi wG*%m MIg2/O< ic:r 9S,8 ;'dS6:= }RNe Q*EY *2-- q; \ ;HX'{jU Y &_ eIDAT LM~$E bwD /~Qa+ ^&'?' [va yh`@K =;v!7 3s`S su ' ~2e} FZqqO^ dRy-y& vyz;> K{l] `bY 8.S^ |@x} U,]<$ vN`# UWQ%FqST1v_ c Ef #|_hHO pIQ: [Onw$ **ys%y S^4P_ AruR .jBP{ rM$5s P72~ #5 | =69W `, 6O+l 9!i[2 (Hwf zQnGj46v {3l;+D n&>$ ky{[ h[&bL u7rneh echz |<nb MM[E /+i# DO/{ neEE A$Tw pJY} 8}/] w~kl G:a= i* &O EkI4w g7'ETR Lb| IEND PS}SG PNG IHDR gAMA PLTE IDATx n , Y#.Dg vj?ho k?ho k?ho ?hwm; k?ho m!Z! Va]P (*o] hmC[o }=z[ ;-IKI 6=dG :"Ua >E2} ,M[y ("2# 40tn hS89 ZZ^SK *O[;Z {Z E iSoD *:^9 v=-) vvcb1 `wZ=E C;0y vZ*N KtV Z=e 8cjM z{n# l[3}Z T ^KkDH 6ih9 mBkN #mJY (-PD L! Z1 k6HY Pd()1+ W-=m J_U. ph`Or 2~$% 1tC[b$ s3#7 =iW- _ig3 Nu8m BNB9 n[x!V sHr~ $h>N ~<4j ND v2 Z2mz $+l= \O}H 0LB `sC8 @[3m>x M0 L -jiK SxjkM 9a.-J nOC%/} 9Z'^b> yV=Zr 5gZ,B Q!mk CKK? ?nj} +'EQ7 :%XG [S0o )=|?d*O c6mE qkWm XQ<Q /D[g*+ 79 4, H{^C =Bv| ~5% 2rz) lA<M +pDe~ PKMf ZEcFuh; 3T~i shU? za?} -I[wb_ }[yg 87wj$ IDAT &WGe K!62 #-l9Z .F[f >P!3>TN OuS%:Z xD[Iw 3=ZZ Ehy)k rO#! FEx L la1[ Yf=m +oC6 GaqN >mIG qzKC /]Y<W )}m4 7t]? "Zv, Uq`G Pk^m o@qK D;Ke #&4nS/ u3mn 2S;I j;~ G[ UJ%| @%Usl% 7]}| . ;m.: kr v \Ee Sg#- Bu5Y /@+( b q RgRS ehW-mN -Ek<-R JR]I 1-*. 2U,' h#C[_L y~>.B &-sG[ &oPY hQ?-A CK'5 iANf8 5&rkoy _9Z7 btPvr] i]Gvh NLKK~ uS2)< :NE:} D:Z'/O 8AE}{i FkBE CTeI mzye \UL[ uZQf oWUB "m|-mg Lsg@:Z h5hQ ~(-U "Zgg:] [AVr *#s,_ B#ZMb VLk@+ hKNFp 2mR<H 2g/$ *DOZ 5)b:) a7?$ 1\iS *|PHoQ |q*$ vi 3 z ZJ Mf`G 4gSd e!Z7 :dzC +|Z|G6 CZ2* O[SV q9sb iQshc 9;1"-< h$$~8 DH/Y TSN2 s6Ko lKk[ ]Z=I HK;,m jhOZZ ]rQv d^j]@ <N=- Sd m |%uD OXI|E / pp >M"# {Ys2 IDAT .|QD M!R\= a%a' Z{ % h2r3b= (pH% @XZf L[,F z*N% PfcZ KQEt6$Y] Tm HB ]Y^y3 6/s: @&zR LJe:8 K[iU ]dAZh7 *p+r ~TZ. "HqzI owZK <Z{Ak 3 =md x"DW QE[hu R{ci Qr}u *?8> l9Z+U irBp \|u vEjh :C!s [<[Zg q ZI QHv"1- 'ol} i)}N 0`#/ tqhW ;F#;# V9hM "|EA L8w -mly hLk8 +9Pyc n9B{6 <eZ> S1[M JKKo g7z!J.! |Ic 8y$ k}|r AKV/ vZ\Hy @+AjQ cH{ bNIv^b >/DK; V&&F ZvdG2 S] S <-mc(9 >r9Zei K/0n[ iq,pK `3i} G?`j $(K7 \ZKir o0[_ aK'o isVj 5g6{ HLWE vWI0Hu- O[th Quoo e# v /j2B 3*[UN w4sv W%h/ @3bE4 [|7ZC |JU>y1E 9G?"C h-'{ mZI7hA F: F y4}+ %c9ZJ )=-\3 >37E ]E~e [Iw_ "id1 D.%U BqO Sv; ;-V3 K(tqE vw{w #$/C Om6* |JB!o #fC6 UZ:5 h,jT_ H<JW . i. U~XL S8_P ;GG ;2Xc +}1Vq nZfr IDAT] ]P&1 -;W~-M goP~ :;t ]{(m% nm 1 ehieh -Bk_ -j`c -H[{ F#9[ \6?I X.|aj il>* C8@# l>mZ NnG= 5F^O Gt>mZ X6L+ ;:~& ` 2V "X^! KZkMGu ynCk ]P{_ ksSK SuMH )gUGx (hmM k-y. -trB I+]m gxpf KqZ5PPm L>@+0 L k8 }Dhsu 2iM ,aN~ rl%g |mM` 9|mw Mm.Rk &kGv `0P: P(J+'hk #diUw K$/k Z=FG iEr- }u5g =hK3 x%m( ?Cws -}SZ) IEND PNG IHDR gAMA PLTE IDATx "J]x h5c,* E2G+ &W$Ziyy MhRE, m['g M{77 V&B6 y7(q* M$fW J!UZ |~EVi" Th h/ cE+xk gG+% mh"ZF+c lDcKh pUtvW- \R + $IK$ lE{a}U$ mV8r XJ@+YmA @{`C E4^f *;t` ;:+] 5 >>s Y#/< lm<$Z W)4C C49j UI9k u[@+-ES l.h\ -~Q? &4nG ZyBi `>d S4fG fMX4 BZEn c%OC ICw|a h3tOK a(Vy W)6S` he$[ ,5i:xf]. *AIX yFd, h Kaw nR[ 3Z h b+fj $Z/z VmU, d!xI E5CKU; 3Sjy _D#y A,I mIC{ dVhI Z4\F& * ~O4p }4F3 BjGF #WqSh0 LET< &u2Bc D3Jm( ^Dw4N h`G S>P 3Z5q 'o"V \c{8 V(6G4 xhQh a9Sr h~`| hiWsw T5 Mi nhgZ mrSCy K=ttV "<u\ 0?(B f6uD cijt- +4'% O6lg .fg4v/ 64Z M +Zs?{ vv0< nhj.r58 c ]7 Z;B; $'A. +DS3 r_qL a y(3Hz [YB,! m`4= fS4= 6!+W ,&/4Zm M2]'t DU[# MZ3: h/Y\# F2?! 1G.+A AG,Y lTGkv) &jk(5S #U:z]w r%Z! rb!Z^ GsxBg A]JM ZZfC pmMZ M(4<K D3)5Z9 IDAT O7 N +8!A5d Q1*4 aMFl Y>1E )sL6 4pjDtj |\jt h9C4 fbzNM ed?JH pE]# !3H SfI' mn*4 `I3` =Ph<, GYWO g7i{ =t@s =`*_Hj ZW0% PG 8 PfHJ:+ !$Zctx !ZMV e* 'M >6_[' Zv'; QV%* )]SQ U,.8 v8twbi Kj`P hqg9 jK-6 Vy4+ =ZW>#C R=ml bJY@< joUS[ [&S4e m]S[ };*6 u w5 A-H}7|j fD@JN Pc|x[> bU:e 4RPf S%QP S<>CVnem D#ep ZOkW cQ4k Wfn? 6R'" VhO7u W=ZB h1lB P* VR,z IHJ D;x\ +Hv5$ GK&h VP^F dW4L ]@KA% Hhfn1. !ZNh) "udB Xg9] de8khp G2`f] RO2v 8j[@ 7FS{ i'$ZV :X2GO 5Z N _>N_ PE4= IEND PNG IHDR gAMA PLTE wwwfffUUUDDD333""" ff3ff f3ff33f3 3ff3f33f 33f33 pHYs IDATx 9'3"22 #TCD y64# h5<Y 6ARF hV5=ct sf+@J 1f 4 Ibl$ `>Mz $`8;] QpUes D&h4 |vVxX| lAzs (`4S NJ3hb* i ;8 LTOv 0?YR8~ ;xF@U dvA7 38IL3 Bry ]gFG 7Mov! 'y7z9 ]5\qr` &dx< rf^ _PE`\g~E= Z_ot p%W!z -q-* jJw{i bWaav =$V_ m8C( P v 24PY o7WJ YXp y+utU VPK6 b"GY H8 Z c$"U$: MdK YCw% $q$!lp [iML *[oK" _j)) a7it T`Ac ,Krn #;xC ~&W[ Ya e rU* YeA Z)4D] qwevjE ZTw4 o?x3 |!@z D[Lg &gPO, Y1+r C)S! 6(cf RG-$ x/:Y rF;4\P (l p dv) #cSF %O6M= ;1 b/d2 ~of5 fqk5 (zlt nz,a Wq2 NZLQ aL*/ %Y/0 o[_\v [>K8 k~U55 L0jlR b54)cG) \HGP 852>a /KkK 6{:* DQ2Kvm T"_7 zEy/V !2zXW w&rwB IDAT KIg;M qNCM 5f]6 fG[0 0vM` VdO" =4Ga@ U(^( Q}AR-O)vYkO# R<yO 7$n6 J-*B p\;n cT_I b.+c}"6 IY)k (aq _t9s XE4{Z ;w$c" `+JJ !p ^: }(IY bxGB.< $dhg%Rh* ~X, ,2Y {Cx >Q_b >cRH <-|=s E@Fk.L 5DNd \'{*FN 6Q) Y xm*3 m93r iR.~ a1Y\T miJ(MX *#Io 7,r/ fIY# Zg. Kplcf` >}!9 8:UOi Iro+\ KISUap y31I Xf0 0=( dY}^ `1-ru |I:I nx_t }Ez0j u.] Y\H}1 U@Qd efea #3on~ =YD/I ]OJ< s]v$ I+`F }B%mox ZW6P f*R{_C #A;j Q;\. ]xS7qy $^_g ZI?{_a j1 QR8?o ,O^: gIQ[9 T5N^ ajc 3v+g _HC'tV q SuK M"Ai "j~\ o3o YYUY RVTdfdx W" m L 2jF)sr/ ly^& e7p fOF'x l ;o nYq}7 G1W Ft3JN [CLAd0 <M|o P`&F |ECC> myYZ asnI =B5% :!UMV+C 3eSz 3MB2 61: bL,@ 37-a gsED FUdT IDATfO ~ (8 S+Ir v-b 5K >}| 9vV[ ]J.%\ ^B;S /gQ wSuuT2 oDM e sVkI eIW7L |:oy ,:Xy Md`#W; `'G]2kOT&= EM|l6)+ 5${~D @sVS z|x| ot|3 YI!\ "E0Jj HW.` >#FQ; ='@! @U8 ( T[V@ g3%]- ^b` "f3~ [O[d _3o0 DhB[ :~pi! sTH(9 }]5v~,@ v"*v nfEQnY : >!/ sSDdA~ 0y2U 1WS+ rKArx ,?]o y\^1 dn?g JYbk SYz[5 ]gE{R f3S 5Et6 # 0u u+R^ *rR9g (Wmfv Hb)N wm-ci FxLt t Ss [Aog B |J+"+ h*vMS Pn`M! e~nU>( LA/M%# )~M=% [ONX 3{`|z jx;H 8#"0 [HXt 6tI> m*UiB XF Kt lVY Uz I }>vM, ta9e ;z!8 ljy( @-@!/ WW&* 7X?S &iT[K "Xt d6-G [,cY Hh nY ~!,Q xauW k(>? ou}> .OZo }<!9b vek/r J4/A%Uu KZ%?\ +ad1 8>'v Q@uZ eP*L ]p8,glwq 1$Cv[ J }. V!(. 2z c+u2+ .,\y LqGdQAjv 8f%E8| D2F,!+ \O_o }3"fa*, a0b H3O8 >:|&( fr4{ 1Zhn_R >l ^&*; ns%_ 5:8*? nm@[% }jo\ [yW` v? 0 IDAT2GW( FF&} Ka2A F{:; !A)F :o d 5SwD k+({q KZnP !lI}P {q9+ )ToA zQs] E#2c0sN AhB! %|Qw. W b+G u,{ U nE\~V:U zI>Y OSia3 $rD( [STw E1k, x<_ Jl9_9c ZgSB +mr<a 5[J} FR+^ rNa?A WGj<k }Z0<_ s,<N a9t1 "3f ^x yXjA 1j;\ }IPP XFf:: ZK0S#`AO# L6d" IV)z ]5-t ;q5 z;g9 b )Kx;g l*fY 3 YMq VBG7S Gfz #N+>& 3b@5 lxz`z] mTy( jwV! M[3G @7;t sV36( 13el iz0vI} B+(M$4 9_j= c<m3 inX/O AHB5 9!O. _VNoGV =V>m Qs6mpjiO DmGH :Jz"R 3x;k qTcP 4 My&0 AmsF 1FO= [w N# j GU [ hN4 V@W) 2 Y\&iS RJNh zB#8g tk9_ RUE[a Zt[Nb Dd9S ){J!s ?2U]( L-=\ h=a / OW Y0HQfZF b4?k 67*P 54- f bw[h 2IP"A lvwuU "r_^ o( ' 3Z `CG GcCN\Q '|qj ]| W D9C.>S>-. oM !nC -}k` R6OJQ hK$( 2QI@A K }!Ef o~4b 9~2`{ IDAT v;N? .A1%2 XIKB, 7ZwW DtX66 ^zB*it Zj[9 =5k_ 3lh& 'J1$aC J@aDQ C]GS 4}>< g'l^ l+4 `ku f qn3+ KAID h YX aPa/S {fVO Uu-2 wNMm Q#dLdv ^e8* p|Xl3 /wD4a .(Rs7 Y1#BD d50FwQ H"Vq 5a1# z\T F [*xD?V 9P/ FaGv [?H: CG"Gg 7.A.s Q!4q 8 gb hYz: FeTM LQZID u #&i74> YEi% i^gG]_d $G iR ;#mz ?&G] lEaE"$[3P @Jctf V|$5mY qCD MFO3 {+U JrTL \1 > V)/xD :4NR T`V6 !ZG6?d /QDh} =.7^ $R5J *h` `4WC 2Ht} [?=. f&Th-<h0$ RahDN #KJ_ pXvY IX3z z}:}x %9": 'c6+ FT-/ /$tBJo9Mo jcSq DTJ@ -+Bt c0Y* k=D} 4$/rd Qw ) d6fP Ot)C /:0): `hmhl ]T~R Z&:Z 2E*sQ JeBd p^%^I $04X( &eq^ gGhmSd (K8L _0%w Xm/[ Rn1@ 8c~ 4,O PeRI Pk Y :\ <+ )@j0 <bB{" yPQ p>q 76": Asz% M0mM" AZ*\ AF2U !8.M( _r)R3 YC@TG h"@W <"fp IDAT L4Mz AK[[ 0^^@7 9V'W 03;z "F]D "e:@ EM_#sP of;v tw5L<> xxyu & }Y MEhT o5Fr TrG^*1YO GxG0"G 'VKe czX1 OCq9 1`< m@?` 8G@:bI ?"m%X ( R2fQ>C tD"U \Wc _}]N XebsT cCG Y `Y?XI y3]9 3'pDt 2 WmB&#?c7X4 *F'O 'C^B :QYW kfmL 0Y@kDhN x$2Zi *3]YiTD I~UT *<!d 0"U U[OI" B18Cy ukMLT6 DCEhU ~F=v a}.H (_Fr H_` 2Ht4M 5/'Jv -3fH ',/~ Ia) @O&V h=U& HI @6` _0"" 1 R]k e_"KF ^#kFfv kVTy 6#u HD!2 -CoM F"T Y 0N89 XqUAs V)HG5 nD Y X+(S R31){ O)'/I 7 W\ Dq%@ 29Yu gK|l 1dK j.,\ \cU| ba0Z H%|- }wD: ; ]2X AEY> T<d y6."k ]9R@] |A4Kl K;QR' H[/J^f|* J'%d &'IiNw a5ra t8hG`0*\B RW!>(yFD v ?a~ 1c$F } ,X6 '}*. ye\# -=yJ yG:~Q9]> s4Zx $1\M QF/7 W@Gtp O7</G )VUB ,R"MJ 4?I>XD~ HJ"Y, Y{6c B|`( A Oa G3y[ h (( 7T7@ %&71, NOo, ?@]c IDAT L?^Co WC8= d~Z l]fD&,--3 gM)b s P_C- 8hL-2J? !w[8 1a{x+R J(|d hb * ne LA ;w)`&5 YJE- D@W,] ~8o9 GWPV ,/Ng xzOx Tq$ 5}*F. 6 rG u LB %m:d o.^Z E]cr ;w>vt >zx +` (| rb H .V88 @W1o* (&Ce; N(.$ <iEe1 %]\``E j:}p co*5 Q\:#`kCb 6;~4 M>1/ FO$ M Vx$%. >ApI +[cV \D56 x#% 4T >g t f-8? & \u P@39k R05K (b;_C#[ QO?~8E [N& :{i] 0"!aJ V'F+M LBu # {YOt {uz>` =3S1I_ d5` ).7KO {%I6_ J*v&jK Y)G 1W4.7 0L0U {}n># LLT< +sbwW a]vvL 5PAm 0X&Og0d Jh`d F1kOFD (n/ +v@Q -qs6 dgoX *^)T c/u7 -2H(p )qyP h 'B sH$ 5t'+C_bX ](L/# QSC@C .`P^& n-Md IGCt IDAT< >?fs MZ'(- N,l) *#/z LEjs O>iVF QT8 EE ^q6`v WIDk hBLfBn v<.% Tq<) #obh J*cMY2 qJtD NBHQ }V=_ XvPEU$ ^LCY4 N5m3EU 59an !i6& Z'~r| Aw M @^z>T' 5rAx >lcEt Cb&Qk 4Uyh@ IP,M ZE61CV[ ,CR | 0*<h4 W q- K|L" T<l % Nq:U- i) [J l%,al bXA: PV+2 @r9x )".5 ?%*0 ":@4 zJrd yMB:p @/j)^U r$q/ &16 ! gbU~ :6s, *x0- cs!E vn=U{ @bsdU lCK=lNq /nzl/ cf t7 @`.5 =E hF V4"< ?>9> \Bv@ n>uao #{iF >13'KU RJj[!ja A-$CV %3Dx 8am8T8k$NB: m@20 q]@u Z ) %=jZO P/P/ /co] 0bEF G:qk ][fK <*n"?) LlCL n?nES24 /O7nnu l .@ *0Cw 0@: vwg: 0+9I. fZQX[ hDJb w9"? v5&Y RJJ\ .aahV s QUs C d vQ+Lq *)J`R ]odb 0'_} S25H lnIQ yM-V 'q}z c$U" mc6)@ *@1g XC0c b`Na. mDm fGfT|, qjQr 2KDg ?:H{e zk^## IDAT# IE.E Q-"8 Z8&F CTaR %B"N 6th0 8 N.R $\Qd v'0< Wt2] &;O% )D!S S^b7 y W: rZ;; Rr.g xSWE > N\ CJ&J L+"6 3 f1 H j! -N{g ?;>: o}p0 :GgR =7ST` Z/2: pje$1 ;:v lav1 /+LY <%@`NBS? RaLn g (;X`" OJL) #@u#fWO r(8m o$tKlu +qCDF [{H= 6t Y! &Esx m?U) ~&#4 F@@^ I?^R &^K% my&= Db_%o R,n_ BQd L<#Z" yj}!GXk= K?>f VE~>m zNb* :qgbQ@ hq6I ]L=Xg v9zc ~>$l ;C*85 @9]. (Qr- I-"}pE 2l`V( OeFx CED,2 uzPC L|G TUsb !Gb) 0(%F '52S hgX= \cAh; RJ& O s)eE !(*0WAxh 4R%"Nl /J>Y IY/L %'W% 0sqG8o# V"OEN5 P !V3R$ ){|O)SJ fuH?q4X HVdU+ U2?2 RG@Jk XP ? vsoR" GBlHsUE ANz,~H ,p9t$ L K4 ([R5 o&J iaO`0#ZU IDATU )n7h z=X py1^ +H;pVH 2C_0 S%jDh8fM "4e2 h1)Qlh 5) hh X_bm @M5Nt uU2U \COq %hB9 Z4W` YB s` &S WW`F r-W7s(" )v<$ sr's kGXd 1AES nb Q aVqx ;V0> tpmg 2d 0h )OL^ mE-m y pP`61es Vqc$ *!AdC >?u *`PIE. 1K'_ |%5{$k-Klms h8;NS\ !-&C "_C*(S O^xU WkY"H }4+l (<1= fp[` ^: @/ 9\d% =) M : @9 Pul!& S SF X|( AmO- 0D%9 o_rC b?O_ztv I3Cu BWPCV4 # 8c H8H-& Sjvz H`H* {A}L!n@ 2eSH &w@ 6=;= um1k +X1@ L3#N bCq Y9w@ Tq<U & u> p>!ebZ ?&yH YJY.k( $"I9 A[0fh_>x . l" WP\np (6VI BLleA` u~S & yCe, L5DF I#', @JFI* &0SA AA0I 4E{\7 {}6=] 0;F#Xs !PTlr~ <0Hh ~?TC{ ! >; B2RY $7H" D m|9A& d i@ mayH; 9z~/> IDATZ" ogojs e[6ey NWeB T[Mfm %"b* yC1'( Q J9 )C<q :'i] =bH)E LZ7WE <F;E @{ QHD l_As %kvy @)Y2U XZa *1|: 'tx. 6!;4w t.PL iVE80 5NcZA gK(6Qg `5k. 68h% O||g BT;D_ @=L:~ ZB,j` *i{ PVpZ /+4`t \qRb'n ErK2 $P`$ jgX H)/p o4G7R [A* +(#D !p,bY -s,b E@\L$& y<{@ 9dd" FdZv (h8x Hbf:> s])yM+ 1+d= .'; rF#" 6UMMrI KTm~ V&pw `S): h9Pv uA9= }XH3 l2uV F2AQs ~MRh V@ R Im-g elJ7 {._{ &NJ@P 6 @D #k"P *(KUsz4 I&$1/ *Q$2 3"gJ Wm5l u1:? <ieL rYmln ?==Y yiPR kh0..`% v&m$ RDFp] =Wsl7& = L+ A.B" L~w1 =)NOB V{d$ %8Sn2 mH#= A5P h"! V_ 7$A `4qG1 |JU vj!' kFbk XEL! t2Gr Ukj5 iPAnA f_0. $jf{ h@chB @kP@Z !t b oClC IDATM ?F+/ 19RS/ XzV5M (5PQ T"lA Mh $P *D^} mM=] D)0i I ,`0 >sc' %XRq <vup4 j`0H: pPUts9"z& (4x fDQ8 +@ K0 H 5 U=8Z dJ@+ Li)l6 <@n y 9-<v {Y 1 KNV4 R !- HHK !3o A5 h X! d [$,e+$ n7$I [o{i #W/m 6tXAW e[/~ j'rz hK5{ 5`#7 /I%;, f VU qGdN GZlE 8.q +O h cszt ~~X* >xnwlc s/TG ` Y! M:kV 1Fb 3lpN3mb DPRR"M s*38` PL6.i a$"u e1f u j=Ja R9"f b(CF r,+N ZoU> 44g4c [456F 2;hN -kAB OZ }[`B3K @MfDz 4v6) U#^h P!`a P L$l kHHO tB:@ ^xo9O PbI|T IC4x 5:" =}o9| !.e4 9V25i# ![x<E0 3W q 08B@[, IDATDF !.4w LhRj ko>| 56#oaQ aV]MQZTb SQ^u`+_) Cz;H >m&oM& :tD3B Bc6w [$4; 7VM3= , 'V!I n7~ /,<2[ (|D9 v{4^ RW8I p_;Pf/ oH'E 32 = BRO~ IgpC>' },38 a-0` &d KJ1 `yd\ u#GA .0wO;S Y# h W/OG {4#|I xO^ !6#_ 1G6hw N3"" z\5u AKB T -h (]T ,B"Z V_zu 0*M/q| SvOX< %PL^ #rOsD {F:"_ oHCl [!SdHsB Y494 ,xq:DQ >TTN u\+* b @l k@W)\f bw|! Y~uu "\c& qEzlK -yA{ TZ!y# +Xfmyc #|Ij }w#o '[0d fVzCE @r?HI bNJ( b.A% ![.LE= vpEs@ -2!_ xL{| 5o9t Ic;k4M s0eUb -KJR x{J6 _Zo/v z>:9 l Fz@ -{n% [!CdH~ =EFHK jyg{0 >I!$ ZhW-:C 'D60 *]on*Z [xIW-;7 e$L>3 a4b0 %_`k 9CCj d1|<hGMs JLFK 7ZT/ FrQa: kvOT~ N[8<J f7 t #GT9 Q${-IP ]BlBh :,^$ ;8dq )E>Z 7J$t 1rJM {^,2 n=1) IDAT Pm8X ~vK'+!. Y* Z OLOFGgk {6G\f6O E[R"_ EF8xG 1|N:.O|sX,] {es}zPfZ 4E{t 8jd-c ,^7E -Lq3 ^65 +aZ*v R3'p W(DX.Df!,iT m..m DQO% #exX aYV@ hSD% KtB> ]"1b rCvt waJ~A '~<H @K-v%T! h]55 ;b2BV XeL~Iz d@jq!M tD?C n@RL 'E,J E]R_Q! :o^0> ,euiJ {v6 60)X3 AZdJ: 9)u `b&)I* Y(\c" #CjI Hneq E1B! "$Ak ^%tK ~gc/s 5,zt [$CO: 2 ?C 2@3z !D\`GB @IL0(- ),). i:ehu* 4hCZ |<?Y o.Ge* XDWB TD${ ]be^3y (K<t v:~s {$p5 AB:A g`!? 9;Q` 97D= }q4~ "Jm b%K)H EB %.a!R:oR s%{X `b"> J]<wk d5uYy j)8&V !#S/ }f.&M vUl3 b~{{ b z Y4Oc cdDz kPXS6 _%hq^` ]2i[ MRr-e j*Udc9 Jk$8& 5+:;v %&cxG AW\? b:$g ?f#HC $%M( eJ>G'1Z 7f.&d eL^B PJVU\Za B<?)*U L FkEcm"V wLu - /#iq -~[57 Fi49V & {4 0CO( : 9@g ([lC: /hO`G ]_^jb p{&z OH3d fFY# ' lKY ) srG:E c$c; winR> TbMR B]XK_ -"=%I IDAT v v1S ^nX]^ )"px 3FBs}+r! CVR "E]e uM)% JnH4X <>>[\ }dDw 1eIz SlD: )z@3#/ 5%#0 {`.`B3 l~ m^ &g7}j ]A_-L &w'E jgl V U\ 9_?e2 FzF~IzJ K^a[J #0tJ %LA zJ: &)B* xn3b #'F*ju OIOa -BD#- x*891({ {4jC H=yI fIE2 Z\GO % ~6 %,5] Qe-h &nH/ 0fqE 7<;9|6}# "/H_ x3d8 p[->> #hJ9 ] tH =^5n ]6CR `fwwP).D sd:) b#5+x5 Kdpk {qH]> (V24 0t I D+E1 \0c#< .W`F cXac A5}ZD@f)bW !2CG !>>lP V[y\$ e&ma 4}|t >t\j {%{<Q Ld-4m 6XPR /L$$I. P 9L 5k7I1Q1 0~2# L?$} >W~{]R *){> CStUE {goF >YmQ |v[r x>+o {0sw e<F.Y LY1J Q;9ZM n2*b>R&f : %Gi ])IRr }Poc'{7 hu5O4 ky1? 6yeJ }J8]) (d*q< !;\] 2_ xg {@Gt _=lm 1@Jv FXp= '|g+ IDAT gu#Q f83{ iHJB G:]% Gg{'d U#S] N=HG !uC4 >,U%i b&IW mVj1 $G~ .g\e >J Qu l0{' _64f \JP Y(B2+})J 9kJMJ *I:cL S4XB Z)DW|P8 9B[$ a Kd 1>eR n<jdz ` ?lu C|=C mD9| PP))C 5TCL ` J) Oo8i =e|y I_Co *o^6 0Bp/ pmTR bZQ| ;iR) 35 b _418 D0aKT P_rg RJ" Vpooh jtX+ 1Tl5 !Pa} |U(. Hoyr PepU';2 Tko] >YJ.@0\ y I) be4t __acF PY+* h*3G" &F%lA i>{pw <:7` +@P}~ [m]w "P:! L]c ` dCJ@ .u]* /8{@V w%1BG$ ${ZH3 niy3 42kg ty_/] p 4f HTIr G6\$ a- Z N8dJ LHZG 3s.K0n BZ_m6 K<{ ~tcb JI}? #2@JP%D ?#Tb 30$J j]=7 n2^~ L(\s 3>a" iI*LMX S@* ':fB #wP5 2YZc -jpe=U` 2VKL IDATz <k7z <Maf #/T5\ BIUx ,$ d Wyy2 ']5C 7 Zi-x l9 L+ %WSA i>o8 d9pT 7/A:` eB5 4~/4s 3t"Y Lm;h5 QW\tS {Fwa T# $UZ%QW r<" [s~Y6L bnBr gdF#|9 /!!PlE KwNYQ RB4F <<=iZ[ ewvr _}!= S@Q- -uEH $ c'C @&*Uz XGI0IJ3E 3!B0;UDH7# O"`. %;E6 @KI, meu~ roz| 4(n0 9d3H V~jQ &yUU{gv mw|p1 PYK"' (@Y#0 fS_2 /&:! 'v!g 4#1 +" ' zurV &Hy~ Hf"A] E2dA j@q7 \B'V7 j1\19 j j. ,g C Ab~ E0"e Q$ IY WR<X6 Hd/T dx?w HPt]+ hfD{ ,tpS 3` { I 5 dO U5E6 00S*u !+h z^u' dfgf) `T!T 7i Q %I. <6#i mBvEt/g_ L#adB vP]W G`te $q:= Q,i] G_ } y 4H- ,ZRKRr& fL~T HJJ3 i`s, g2w61 j_v' *3'^ i^Qq| 5+ I cCJH zY\C 0]wU J)8xL(e @" . vm > Ld?X F/D*zf etQeH %9a# IDATM g}h[ [*"D P]A7 d-om kj}# [1B ;ts, A!JI kt&] aY|? ]7XDA 3Nc` eLO@ Av@ e^Df 0w`6 #@(% X.<6 1J.2 _P\7 fVeO :AZ| wOya'y H2[NZe2 Q4|9 pnhK *8@W {.(P ho~< AT|D@* G/b' g$|\-d \R#Q sd>jm XFk@ ~ 4bjHwF -gD# qH* }TSX .!S|F ug;d+ Wt h uyXr `;[n od>,u =AAjT`D} {*Mz3 !1p ntvOZtWJ eHlb dvPQ 4+K2 fC;x2- xm[4 Jp,H Trpb `-d| c6wH5 '*Fcl Gg0[ .h6O d\T: -|AIx XP&A CiH $ > 4UT+s +n&] ETq\ \bN. -[<H 9 C "W/p ?Y7W u~a8 xj%- Q]uh uInh 6-Y<a f$ U T&NX&U 4I:t FLY8) JGgc WvvF _a6D /HO< 1U;5g,{I IIa =_`S ;wDZX7 _T,7* 3h!# ,BRi dc9w '4G Q%\Dum6 nB!"A, xbvT #J=a} 7Ki# x$X- ULf+ <J*b =w[5 L&ix g"t ;rK &rP< DP\< >dK> tgR* gw7- p5X` k6Mc Cfln Q]']FF4 _"a0k| F x6wd IDAT K[ws{ :&]F. c#_Aj >6XL IIZ$G a<,G"(9 /%G: 4=i* `yw] nI`) RZsTM\ 6,U< d9{F I! :e2u XD_S |u{m Oi3t '[Fm;- j|r~ Z@N_ UQ)K lZ|Mu C&8W }`:XV :e# d 44[l ,%1o B[G[ f.)0 %Z&m /PMA UWV- #VF> 'ij- /L#q *-$|~ qrn? B/`KX *] qu*U+ 45:IU hG^T 8T4 BUu B >Kct 6#M` nmN% U}(5 g=n.)F u:RU6 C$!{ H @02 hu^W H =KUu W'&# $XH- m3b3\ U1 ) P Y@ vw}< &iD{ dx?/& U{Kd^ TSE} {EJ- : c( veD : =mONg H&ujv &D5^1 .) AG z l> .=GA l] [ ZW{B M5J!l" k1=a YH1M"%w 1I*v B@EB&.X tOVyo2[ ::es 3yN} _";8 *|Eu jlM{F aHJB [<j) jtqtp:N jxfc /Ou+R 3W7+ Pk-U E"Y5a d#i 4!ayP <9:ae fo1K Is4J vux%q *zF^ awaDs eoMF O>.) JkTR wd]" h|Kj `0m}5 7Yem FwKS q<Dk IBsG :&*Z P!#u TGp@c G>Ew s)5W /.vU IDAT tsK)F x8}C WWO= l$,G[ "_2x xte< etE[.3" ,cz. xzU$ %7Jp,X d38] 1oNo 3[0<f c<0/ 2wj, D@:D K7b< `7IW {=tu` 4GJE8 iy4> YdWX bSDa Rtal X? m 5JW ;w5o hELP iH5yQ KLc" sW.xk gwDsdt 4z&b 58 ] t ;C ~]Je O}DRr _9(. _aSP @M>B .`xG .Q!,| 1+/m9 njRlZH7 *2b+ (EMK ; |E3y "mcS yFV3[5 DA.~ 9iw"I T/.e S` }X t/yV$& # Ln2 ?Z0xy O'gve `Q(3i BpkqM)8 1'an l1Xn/r[ QrI !HEq mBr!D8 s*Y @%JM $Z#[ W7nW YZf! P1C- hi z e"I2A V-XS g]qK zt*[ ($1G-&":N IUBj& %9[M H<Eu <b$Q/) ?[/ %tD{ v28YV; w8?Y RGW^ "YI& EAY+ RK)D VZ|9 d>[5 r!i0 X]EO k[t3 vIgig C{,/x tB>" mhIc G'-m^ MW>k nqIRb : !p: PJG u ,Tlm xn5U9 cgTC| lo!+ Uc2;= -iS2 `)F8 B V:f!o z!.u X,8? `'XB |JnI SEMr ~US% !mc+ IDAT! ~|yt a"B*O $ lL KB#= v." 3T=xi 9'! X&uP ?BsL 7&%w >%m 9:Djd qi~tzt IR:I ASh- I1DDl zC[b v4[] %W*&Cd )yJ{ wvzb VQvI* |\z blT;LZ MO{dc De1b attoe (UG)N |v#7 k]i% u+\ER@ >"Z1NnI u3}g 0>Su hggb gm;Z2 XI/M Z*/N+0 RqYA giu6 Q%TS XNjv'h U EY W\\8 VuflI xB<$$ Ch)u 0Q5t zAH O0xd E9LTU }QH$>Ur kCoo8 !5ZC io!C Si F 1w6j bRhy W T$ FjWUw q+$2 Drr]& lI5!% 6@2| 6w23. 7IWq R48m N+eBI b@ZU R1,99 TFqo ?t- k Oykz |[uu .6GGxKR 7O:? G K2 fTR 7 n'$9 h#d7A bJ39(Uh #Kr! 9ZQ?J^ +HC~ oX~g .(bA ::%" KdLs CvIK T]v_ MQx p$9r oM*M -XkT:s ^Q0%I "XvIX T+OR ]7Ym # C| 4EG, PJ %Z (sS Y V]X7 :;dq :54_ O}]:X ~A>BGH -?qrxcvq hzfO *XgC 0wMI U,ST%Y V!K_ l=q9 b9 >%/ n IDAT TR%B# k-iU uX1< \5UI )[Wi |;V. 1>Gv HR!g mN~e Jiy< KSoP@ TW29m "l:o ASs QwX'{R( jmi* !3BJ fEbC x@:#+0s 'l{h ?]%O kSQi `z:F 9wZ= UL]w [<#[ `ky-c3t !lUg @YewB " fF(< JJst H(Sh A=j? e'#+ 3lB5B @d&R J +a? 7A<VX F%"n Q0IH EFT{tGxFrT z4ZUL .3'U [A=* 01qLT BLg4 EHI0s+ f+mJ( jqz`l/ K:C3: C|R t fxG{B nIL) +P`Kq ^z,{ wUDR O\vO -+cd{ l^)=w| 6={E %eW<[T ]s3B "):E ,~zr ClA BWQs c6YL FfWKS );bj A~v) 16AVx" TeME V~"Gn ;`6b~ Imin 5 n0 1sS no*E _D$I r<p' ;C"KS h_!] UDUS E4s# u^4: [Fb * 2XTM\R ]X;B ||I9 aN<IH )R t Rz@j |l; z1iv [g+s7 8.%qZ x_Z^ 4Q=B (D3v c|U2; uY&w GUwk? w+"ND _6=v3 6uJI Emit P<!I C(h "RKU \Nmq `gxK TrU^ FpsiW /z+uCDz 2ACM[ IDATzN p`7GM @)nI A0RRR4 +E") wf9: Yv{0? ~7{Re{ <2$): mcSV =l F>e 8yJwBw /I#$ ::Y' KI{9 *Eo 5 ^bS| #Nkp =xyy X6pW.=[!x KTy] 4%6 hwzw /B?tU rN.~rw Pv)q @UIr nt/> ~LuP0 6%=J S=Aw ,[$R 3~yq GG/, 78ML HA0oQ .K6Z Klzn U:c$ *Y ' ^.(P 7,.OR[ 8S!j[ XEBB _OBKI IUEL >\uy^ ]5zv^$L h?iA xPS* }+2x +d # ,D| WS}kkXa rcJ3 peY^} 1>^>* ni'/ FE,` r{B7" qyIg vw[O q3O YB(l jnwddf g*ZN> Lr+tZL[D 22Ys $-`H jP9} 4.(6 ^:-7F -Hs Wg<nh J1j0w sTUTS aBZ iIZ# TO3$w_ <2O# (-$D 4wAAK|ww k=[R (.AB |"D$% \ATU 72eG #-PCB B =$ ,$AN ;*(.Y ;RA< !%8ebi 39.b kP|E8F &aE\ P/!P Z:g& <7zU 7(-?D Xuq4D lp'-p lI<&]a[d 0"]# ear@P wTq/ `Kd@ alpu) IDAT yP_Q O f) sN[$ 0,Vg 0@G0-B # qJ 6%XK {o+O3, *+vh l;l 8lIC !jHd h>a4 ;>X- 6ivMR= T'$! "] B< m8sn4C 20,$ 0toV !zLZ ~ XJ ,:{P 0Zo~ aLZ# sl - "2&;j ]]^M ~L|AWS 0Lp1 MT]D sSG(] G<sN pLZ nF8, BEj3 tWL?&aT |*R)j$ <bB$ 9)bh$ *A<% %1K do3p/ V0Do ~e#O wGn\ !_Q9p r 5R "=Bk| W&i5 RPC5` 6Orq __\K/ yATd =AGt sGN{ ,f"y0 VME8 m<#G ,3K< b|2&" CE5B P?z\ JButw az9| )z@X 9l u1?H pX\4 &&Hq ppus|ua f;fz rc:& xG7/ #Ym&< #|K< I#RX: >?},< ."j` 6#=$ 2mg z8Z ?WU4e k5o9 A"6B& ? NQ >G'cT2 %~vz b^#B o`@wIx :{iq ""Xq Ky/(A <y2 IDAT= ?g/? +_k5 fhtE Mqr! ITI9FY [;7 M !>G;h !(v s _e/G rA e >/%Z8 1a\f! s/?X w=]5 w4=v+ -<h' O xr F^03 Xm.VmZ Z.Zh|x jyV9] (o:w ^6r.= <8;i OD5{ d'?P !*qX={/ A-!3 ^uom 4h-6# JL{i H"DOPp2 sdI|B U)x4 HvGr i_#| pUDBj /@C\a52 7,6X hDo8 d^,oc/Z ]VFZ IUM mdz' C (: Cl S GPbk 7|MqF Z)2 ;Srl 0KJA >^## {\!`= Xw6]x JNiw L6lT =G)x NpG: }X`u >r _ a2Bm /Eq8 Z6s w'jY hGnf.P& .A5h ^{n7s KB2M -9`2M x }O 8j9m>?u w>w{s ;9iY P& Y6 KdJ' (,& rKoH 7P"% xn6:e k[Lb #Fsb 39/ "IC >@J* Hm\T F-\U z>yJ_ ]-qJ hT0B c]spZ 6{bI ^`P Zb5a ^-mW p eJ yu&25 xL/wd [c ."f# )QGJL p}NwJ IAcx8)u 5gSt 9]b5 5 'Yz 1Ze> MwuA t}7y N8F{ SlK1 'u9O@ KODr >F1,s L".inb%*y RU!f [$`F IDAT 7s%O94d 58,)?D WLF n EK&A OUqW jU") $g}8 A[|J( rdMS -qG_ D!zT 2S& g<I% usIC ^CaQP k FWR6 .s"6 ]2m. sG<z 4kK+ \~#> lR5 7)_A lXHCXBO| o!0* ^tW- `;$P <AVh R|+A )GO8 |\^4= q)4i ';{;%JJ g^=` oS<$L !$cEAn9 ckVS ,\s4 S?iC d<*G iDcof2> n{yv w$,A -=L\ cbBG z B8 4h@ !'xG R^2} +p4` x[Tg5# K$k=R nGK[ KdL %zLy ">0+ctU $)uRU qu>S 9b;: 7<e> @ghE b5"h G*f# `XM8&^bu #40n 8uiv qGXRL .xr0RM sKa3 g0AO 48T/P -F/2*9 $"Jr< %;@ ?y`s;H ^ > @"Ra{d Ifi" -"hA\ nYv 1]LT ( 6rT} 2F*$ 0C'9 fk4 ,'@S 9}=3 PWeyqrsI c.nn m$<F0 >"$ws#D +fs: SNcn=m t;&nP ,T"@7 Z-zW -%Ww s9]r C{gP vrw! *! e {>~c }ZZR* 0 & O af&nk( %~T0 gU #v 'G8)Gw IDAT _t3; qZ3[s0 S6Lo e{]wW 8((Jt ocst 0 <O -|TF Ye/v "Z"}l XI}Fw |AM?#6 &y58P |/|q k=}e e+A% #Ni. Ro\k C^6A &Nh@ M;Oj NWQ+ QEXS4P! `5~H @ Lq w~wv8tN" -YgC hx"^o_ -^ 92 ^"]bEsNv R} ] @} k| Xq3f g}W_\ "3pf &hHz ^DLhL j)y7V ;Ea]` rYed N 1v3 9Icz >a;%; ^4z5uF(D %aM_ .9=)u 2k.> V^zf(x! LS}` Nh%+ YG3N li+h0 Ae'Jn <915 s 1\ VE5% nCGHP 3D1gR c7y9$ mU* ;x?, lt<] |Mp, -Sih~ =:!< 7&iN0\ '/Ax yC`P 'hloO GUq= a+Br s`h C yvWa 6VcI`Nl Ke2" YU7w .p=$C Ap :$\' Mj! w)[z :Q l $;jZ 'f.I ='op#tN) &Vb5 ?JBqi ;:q<1 c/>:Q h0}l 83sb ~J3E+\ B9aY >Fk\ Nd3b Zg~YW g,3:K B":#; 8%.( IDAT :_ X> F-pT dDnb EWdc 8y0~~1y a]=%U 4% ' .8Ix24J2^ ^FrlM Y^c} XE&-D 9<e\ i`eJl OTK)B ?F'- ych( nqOE JqHy {knA>"/9 j:/] =;=Z }!#_a !qJ8BB +:C>S *NdFVRxt i ;t SZ2 4H NT7#`G _{'Q[ \^aU z]z+ vM % MJj5 *o_< +W8B& T4em g4gw ^\kW $LE}2 0lUW?w>9[Wn Z>hd pwF+ XbJ-, DcCt> a^4: z:e AZ3) m\}V 5tI3 XA`Vp" M[2e@ p_FE )Ra5 [d@qH: ]\p8 {xKy nP =t ru9L :joZ aBZbWH 5]xt bF3`uL ]`LF 'DE]L -T2[ /S28o b$2T]H~ 5P`+ ]|Hr. I}!@ T%:^s XQSQO xuz+QL1:V auA5 ta +( xzs /}S "H&@ )E0O O>a{n~ =n^Q c1ay BFTw Ety] zZ-R q}kP 0K}= O.4> >/&| UfC w#g[w _'|\ ~U ~ Mb=9Ji q)2/ w}D, lia5 (WHN Qd XCu I+<Q !,Hs >;yg N|O\ [^fP C__>w MM]3 1u@f v #X j)F] v9X" ,g/l# !*u; IDAT 5iZbJ1 9QRs 9y-IF q'@5 CGjB P=]t 19:j@1 2{T;)Dr 3 ,i[ jH E 5byc k)n^C0 Sg2 UwE9S 5A0K y>P{ XqL<# s?(2 z11h/ et~v 1jxV 1wW0F S<C<GF @PTU /e|Bq h&H s5mC 0D(zL HE(; F7ks u(T= .bdgQ [S,i MX6F3 vwa; S:f= P7KI 6z2q D0 1 1lxa dMlI-~V n;/& CJ{ ^ kknox >R`K< bHP 77nB BJ &9n" s\TU x ygP v [< 6S.Z|A TGO6D ["uB13 ?X>wOO 0(T; S9jq PATs '_@| #Z@C bKnM (Fm( Vg[Y N)u Qf &qs0 &-0% < ,@ D8AN d@j !-(E ycWQ Z AdgH jIaT=BI( @Q# !aL8B k5pF H2uT y::M ! $d (KzG qNq dLYY "*)9 j#$^ UF_&7 NopV _1x !L:/P '=Fz c** 9* n* Ha (:"mp% BY([zS lIsE .&&n. 9jf& BP%3 yh 7aC a:(j \Xirb xB;N HJ^\ 7T7I k<vC M$gF; geC1 E 3]S? xcLX =<YN <V|B ABp3 ;!<d ^ 8A%g &zLj Pv~c9 IDATL -~A< V#[R 6f01! (HD"A >~ ` DBDL A!.q d%7=f78 5 9& uSj5 n4IF&& 2 kn G4+fP u?'F hTUl0f& (+4GZ8Ef A*D;<x 2>!^ !2FA= 3TlEV p]~tcKOo s@{Is fF1' u`/7 j _ R_y \FsG BxY*h .{ 2 r<bo >z_c (7$Y1rP !@Fx QO9/ >.c> +N-& roxVM 6ibd ;DS QO_$?w {^P_ !d0CJ0HF pNvL rrTq 'IJ) zE!* M e" ~M{y: ;6}B <c8@ ^2=;S Gq/3 {^' qwOv "~Ns&9q6 <a5 hKXC ?)3d "k7_ h?Q)@ "!A6 #X5BT >^^ 9x l @XBN{ dX\. N+nop9 &=5P @U &n *";~ Y$}] emVYS g8B" +bD< n"yA 9DWPS jE#d `>qJy( VtbIN 9D_6 2IF5 E$& f?(o/ ;z # p5oM \8@r j0=6K j\yE &J4j dg$I a5mN ]!}B 5 5nM_ lDz[ ]#=h _~w, xG01A S.'&A lB(: R_Rz |dM=@ ]1>` .**:C- <06k %<C L >hh 2 oW@@< C{xDf lhxy ?~dD }p`@ !C$b #zXuJ hD5A aE^v >!sp uHCX :=Ts u\?X [G;F IDAT <ct5 9/O{ &CVDO FJBG OLj9 2i@7Wm >wkl3 ,B[ D KrC- .ge [<hP q%\EF M,k1 EA(> >k.n %1#(fR LCAuCp gdSF < G| .5Pu 'kRZFI I#T0 QTlX /zPwi "W!{ mJ5Y *esP4 BD,q `r?' |IcK3( tAEL k%DM _n2S /L]. EZ4C fAS05 YbXv 9<U$F A1bb T5iG KV92 /EXS ^f{wn lK"F I$gn[H (;^B @S>v H$<Gr Rdy] X EN^rS 1:CN 1 @fD ;^U5m {x{w 5xLIv Gb` fdrc9 %I[t G2S? N`Il si)=y (do0 6lIcN %5fT TJNu _Zw/ GTble_ "dEa~ 1)0A rm'K E58= {<l7e kSw\ 72zkP WqCL @B<d f4 zDEu Pb 2@: Zx u'J gjW7q0E hfME ayX4~`f BU#. %;_Aw fd7h Xwbo L:fG MM:1 />{P KXsw |PL' <4&J q~J3 ;dG6 rBK@ !{El iK&7\ KYj~L .!rf u:FW 4?yW, N`@t} =}** C;H f N4 >!'A s= K QUOj >443B fQ@| w[~NJB uKto & _I (mx} IDAT =| 9aH} H@Fx uWs- jqp=m v%L\ (6UQ O, B =0.a #Wx Gh^n ]FsZ etq v^f" vm ; R(b+< 7lYi? `b qI 9;|FU< *s $T! JU~o[_ b8,Y\ G SA x: 5 %"pN =ypn $SmS7 R^6_ T+fC ^"cp Ns kD IuoZ D67&e{ 8 w.> N`6a AXWv w3s 9 7?:o <$ddG4 [ %uCg *2$; 's4( 7`?l 81(` !T69 &/pOP 'B6* m=I& ,k:5 gP` 4gHF 5:v7 <f7 X7,/ pexROJ FAVuZGD$ EGEyd mY1{ Xp0 $fAR kicZ yz4R O*]N 1,&k HsNx NPu3 |N:s v()< C}N6 %GC| B 6V ik%!1 nQEM 6EG0G ?LQb 5GkF +:cb %5u$ kb!I 1"YB$ A;M=M=g r_); !6CGd= \ BSsoL { kPCF ?}bw u RkVjZ #.f. -""* MT7TI 1zS{U )w?W crMr k|I. ?FrgH #)/l Vl'v O8D < S| g_u+ D@P! niQxt G?h_ T_&;" &MQC xD4`x lFK6 xZmc =dM6d XE|H 2|Bs IDAT3 hz66' ~:I( vh&d]X N( "9 (?ZeM^ ]![bS 2. 9 ~ ;> <Ih[ hnn4 hA|@ ztGt }J[ {o~O @3Bp -&#$ MFtE _.U-AR A=$s mQUA - =| ,_$l ,$X2 4[.u8i TUEs !N3H l w nnf)m jYz( bo^o 4]DB6 z7u^ Cn>L :[oa X#g, R"sX i_z` 4[o7 33=4P j]jX [YV+ Za dIqL<!< $X5u E\XP %R` ,ho# | =d ')4m ^[g9 V<q-\ ,2PI .S/RUf G{@{ vk{.m u-H*u U$&j PoKK axq< 4[t: >2@# OVL ?i ^&.RJF %2T: ;0&6( .oP_ kDeLm AH`H $!PT v1/{P o/9|3X g?R\ !ZPVL_g i.\et =ara xhBt/ d E, ic}I {gkW ws "*y )~Jx *BPA J4WQ,f TI)A 7x+( j.4l CpB< 96AG [)pE" g]Ag8 =^Te IDAT bwCz= Bun>Lc 7Pm`"i ,up- jvG7& f# [ SzJ1 W9*y pDU -Xv36 >Za3 6FZt Cp<R praH7G"M $/ A<wu E(J ^q." R7]i> (/C Kt ^7}" YH1RH =oG' a5"Pc x@/! )Br L$ rP!" !`$] 2H[o >2E 9qAq KLf\} @6b[% Vuk$ (xUI CB>R #}?;^ ;%lP 4V^7 s;K/ -EU5 X|*bx "Y7ST BTTT5h 4I1*"*- )BJ + Id ]`Gh 4Q,E5;B H Pl` D:Uh X\9 h2QQ cIG= 5ODE] (jz s C$i s3A; V)|.{ i?Y! Opp. S0(iobg Q\Dzx O_DtrvW +O|k $8!u x D< 'y~} io{< Ml)RyZ nSh6 +?:G Rf`J P f& X<]^ >6C" C<` CHSd]D AP5\ L4BH Q)7{ !t Q$uJ\ ,]dv i_EAJ [EKd qAL ;DCKv OL"3 w{<t DTB2 M Y7\& 7q=r BkD'vR &x7F^ 13({T yF#> C]Mdi^uYof% 5i:A 0uj7+C un( ;Ig&! Uw<g nStI -0Sh bIf 3N(2 { Z VBl c&=0 TlP/ rZ}l+:_{ C=~ ~os= #,HlMc _"c2s(B IDAT\ {;<p [[X8 sTSjS\ p [5 k dnnhN L1ri :^"%! EC{G V)MrTp" WBlx g8'J7 CPM" sEZk ,cm} 7=QM 6%$3 T+vE MisA l0j ZI6-w FE0l 9,I* IL:5;Y _KYa R`{m T:=Q (Zh`_ r9.D U#8p A}IwP J+6 Zg4h &? R i kh T=*kg aQ8Ix \qp4< kDI 1f 3DPk iDwM? OVRV7 >wiU 9WAE ASXER `ZH mXZIX "bPc q jE Z:ij `f05L3 !jSE (Y:] iTjW ^wc% V%iUZ /6|Q AyTP "? `fIwa ~J#b? p)dL ~diVavH I!C%*|U tPhQh9 S[<f V*I> VE$1L emp Y_hT+ =TIw * 8] zfOR V#/* XSmt 5y,t NqD% UqJt s4&w&6[ Emvn ZU r. Y N +_\]>~ \Y9{ =|hWb#[6> A"sA9 R>X P&1# jIn) B#.1i% uh S i"".h Y04R Lcjss 4j-1 $5Uc 6U}1* ?|w{s+ 7|<J ``EP \BM5 +M$: L{.{.[g9 $A,j1-$AF tDb)6 >:l-]v IDAT, olJ0 XV1bm wG[, ZIbMR{ I`ee FY*7fW^A I(N@ j Kb ElM* 1FK) `6m$A m2Ul-{ `d"" ^{UVM %#~4 qdme 'O6/{ *b%# 1 +G 6OM6( 4h"q `dpzp `"8B lX=; IIfqk ]'iS &M+W_r |48}f 6i=I ROJ5 NOLL7'. /hg[ #) f :M'g o -L U#3h Z1P: "2EQ4 )f\2 dma] 03O~ RC2<0 =y1?yv cv]r M,-Q_ y/&8: `MO} 6y(~ P'i! :bq9 @E v$q EQ5$U HB.S -Fp A(x x MHMY o.kwsqzzmmu oH3[ MT31 qn|{ PIlXh -C5A M~7RC "qbm ?1j< Sq0~1a 5.U{ IX.X A/w$I :39!*^|D Et@Y C8cJ PKT >%16-@kq &$B~ dT_J ]"J\ $nHU Zl)(Y `f0 }w9' YG[2A3 5Io7E %!b- IBTC% XfBu =3W5 3Jw4 {]b9 SL|: r^)`H b!e[ ' {b* yP53IB?w CE| "RC +Vsf sO+V "1mLH h4|C <>DZ ~*ii Z$ a 6>A* F7Z; HS6A `=2p sB R K$Tj C">/c n9Yp47 IjTJQ )"M}I JD]zH c3t@u T[,{ L6bx pgtn IDAT e' rH& T5ta @j%+' 9u@+ $Bb PNsa(#= q4b~ .dHos *Z8+ @}@l c$0~ swQ9 pZ!"! Dzy< ? $d0 gaX c =V7i c4`sVc I[3q. {7s$| [W1c <5a <'q9 H&_ kR>+ RDiU ,ig9 &x)n U_|$Y e4`w iAV%) #\Dj| Lasan MoX=r jc[5 "R/z2` "d^bF TUl= )m )yyI , @j$P? xok? QvOf }.-gP_s GT%| wmTEa :r]f M< q< [T+F{L "wuI ,2iq %JKt gL69i<& LXFwZ [t%Y;'Z >0S3 9>{er~gu };\H5 c9Q? t1 n ER5Q h Th , ;h *I!0 ,6BP G>Bc< H4O ~ixoR F!W$ zc>H 1s)] 9:fz e)_W<! @H K {c1Wm ! ,q|> RoxU E4[zM <1b4 WAR!\ WQK.. kRzJ cf^ZJl3 1O@fI ,Z)5 loSW n-q* 39!lsx H3s:jq =}bi m5Yd NhP k;Ls "tzW8~ !l Kl 15'Y {K}y E{x@ eERE R /a F]pK i1Zt u Y:JE b 5a/ WN P IDAT 9AET I_~+ {9}o |:Xr o"=t G\d%O C<2= +z}aem Hr(.HP -HkR <s8'q z2?DO }o5} |<lm FRWTSa KNgU @zXD ZL8> 'Q A 136, @$vthHzc Ca%] _J<@ *5Dx )3.d uU1u 9TxCL !*G5 T%Nh b&ZP '.o: LT-% <`E* YHwpY w #t [xCs gxD5BF |P5!Z FJt0K V.HN nbP) HC)= E;<v9 'S6*F )8w?z( &"4G y!T; 6*S eez+h$ 0I;% w)cY cB+D A$J. %Yijm <(w/ ,RSU ~;o{ ].]` 2DVT c0!< 3l (Zg]\ 2@*DhnS '.zXyS p>[4 ^8/!Al \kKV4 ~OC] ;e;F)) 0Tp0 i2Q& F o{ `XEZ er , na3D m7E%A NPw7] W2U2- <`"! +d,m 31&[ 2q${ =<>N @t+0 Q<[v. ";Lf 9B 8 ?qw=A .!B{ { -Z 7Q6\ Ds0u&~f kDZ1 N|_I Gln#3 nCIs mc#lN > lR n!=l 6COCD 1B% "=w:C/ !,.A qB(W pn} | 9QoN>2 tQnO 96?Lha cs|J }3>A IDAT:~ U E: T%^ 1qY$g d!HK IuZ$i [,2V AIPlz (ZQ_ xcA+( pEW ,ein F lB |NBN FQwu!07- @Lb>m + *f (.P J<"t E|N8 mJ5: ;"l Qu{e $_ME B"xx> =$") # Q$ :RQw 5Z %T ;0#l gX}'/ ~Ghw p aA%! 2r=#v JE+Z Kob H R(2< /-cZn CV+B26 l0oh:< ^`P}l n 6 Mu>s >>Dv` c >G;8H xL3r6D #]7Q x6lU Y=/%T u{3F+ q Ab 5%Pj (9JB wVVlP cdBQ ddO#v 1aB} ;H#Jm" mU2o ^9<: XcW/ +P`m|N BS3}= c8K4l (Xt1 J EX m6WS'g t(QM BiPk ={nWCph\. ?dV0 FwIX n&ECd D17A%f =I6qI %jff UlVc y`\T Ck]f guMtq g]+$L ZSzS Ld&" xM8 :>Gw D77[ X*"* f*hV&$ TD0% is~SZ 8B7)[ -%l ?Cwa >&l } n.r0 rp<<< Ma5! YE E vm%W& ^A k >rvz gK7q7KpoZ l_AD- IDAT/ D+Ru v{}l 7Ej.< 1RQvs JvEx fssD }Th&X H=cOi FDc6 h!4M L;s?U< CD=e 0GS' D'Yh s/B. Vwcj Mtuu TCk}u ^?U%" "x=Q -J-ds =NB1Q Cdfe 5MJ {T;P ' )APww ypKB !Zjg nLX`O kF7ha Tx;l aTk] Qqc\M` YDR{ o}L] N}L| 4>%I *A$e) -H.E Er4Lo@ fEsX _;<, F%jX g"AD ^.mT j}\M& )/;fj X2P3 )0Cq I~82 8Pd5 Vm"l 8V(~H nsqv &!!,R M|A< I_^\ G2g, QP#! >y!+ jI@n eDTCj |DUr ENc[ B`>9yr| $#s@ j(F5 K3F' ~zcwU )(Lc 29OE NZDBF K~)A= n"&Dw 'Te ;s*g b)! iO_1= ONGj]X !q?L nX1t! yATs% bB - e "I I;pM Fc-*M ;pIC /6]? "F\e ] #< XgCp >O{F5 5$kr X.y)4 R`9tV 4zr ^KZ# E@-o3 ;;?= #BE{ '3N/ .pCzp& }dB1GJ THMXP $-Kz 7^}) IDATt]I O 8D/ Mkfwz M P`F )j58 E2xMcw l"yD 2t]Y oh>E ">$n Xe!h .6@$ >{zb 6X^f %qM8Dj jqHJ-U! R=s9 "1WE TTTU4 ew8H 5tJ1E ez[: y~v a=(:A aAu ? ,;XK r6/fwFa\ E+E$ c"# I Yl`5& FfpD< 1m&% &5I* 0,D/ k0b} [<;>q -v}* rmAl i6kUm 3tNX kJ.5 =#:v >zUO }A/i )Bsi itDt %%,8= DBp vsyRUU=* l =t $%.x [wMX@ ) $u _x2lH5 >Evq! 3|Mb ?'>A Cnl]$S ;~rz t<W D1rU 6a7s ] =^ 7^jW t6&$ $u8|= <Mi" 82W{ e9C"gJ&s yJ\Er<a& "EH# g6i~F gHE{ xtD| :#, qrlM r5;8 j1>h6- #C'>" X2G5 &_ME r<oCu Xj\0MLVU L# Y I2oW 1E, 2f`.e 7(w p@q ]dB< nWUWWOd7 %QVdZB$ Uw8w: fpyv c|lD `W=f tG\,( 9\Wg StH8 .WM0 Rrr| &Y$I W!w+ MQSg IDAT avWR93 \jz04 /f[y> fKmR oh?$[2 m$Gr $ $/ e a\V,V P:7]<|: (YlJ Gfa: /V.w \\3w :KgV X%L5 EHX!Qu 'MVt! _ABr W58 r WW+>qq <Q>8ceX #92%h pBX'q !FQ Wea0 uf^D )`@Xb `EY`O Lp~*\ [}B# 4-[0 M&]4U 82GU3#Z[ sF%H _`<F !zp{8 rw2p 9?;;[M X!4m (#w@ ?;{j !5T,/ /w<| =:dW@ p-D; EsSr umLM M|z,> j,pe K\)[T 1AbV dsdIv @-2)i SQu.fG Du 1 y7N (uGI~ `d{c} b5Rb '{yY {v|, t,V 4msr ZBH /W[0 zLuB uCd_e Sz\6 = tu<^ h%WD Tp*N "jyE $$SSS i1`80@ T5)6$ "yVQ ; Y Yj bLml WfY6 Hl;<z uSdm 2z"/ .Xw,v n;;! 4EF1X ]-qz ^ \i3 WDcaV j\k&KL |RrO 7S>z p7cL& UWTE9 w*Zn XU2m }p3s aE8' wo}Y] :@ m 7vI. 1@$-A 'Bby g=bb xNwH8 9vI8 O}2sj +.V2 m8?= IDAT \ >Y z% ! 6MtHK >M&> y/!Y 42N kdSF9O O]nw d~H9 ly?P1CK W&;! @aUfM G?F:)- bTi[h D(AU o*\I I0D= .B R Z\d#J 0WhYO Q3ip Ul58 W^O# NpSX {{<}r N{gRd !&AL A{=4bqC : 8, o8x3 "{D;=+ wg=3 (^%v$j$ 7G%=F= 1:@o pN8!td nH(% $Q@O Pu$[ W% : YzwD zx3$ G) IF :tTV9' F6B 9QJ.:- uG=eS XM<% W?Awiw O?PY ]Gfv %Dc$ jj\L lj|1 dx4r @Sd J, 5 %lc l HIfU 0A$f@5 mbmHR EKvFm$ 9[ { 8M_n u8Jw0tGL y'*z _<jZ De]>=;tZ ("(K x0D% sVk_ qS_s5 ' ]`a n;L- $06skL 0f*'i: QEbz+ fn&" {_{s>_m ^##N #EJ)D tMHzcF" S6O g ylIo :mE6 z9o- X,7`x- :=BuY 9=>G `BsH< YJ( 77KJ K<;+Er Z^,[ r8`s IDAT" '<<~* Q\ B U+cX^4 Bi/] v:mE Jgkh NgmB" FIU? zGun Id9Ao S(;[ TD/{ Z}5_$ 3 {[! gu(M~ ^I,P `% 1 FS8[ AZ8C m5;_ Xw$l HH[\S 3Fov:a }-/p G73< A+af yOfg tla2c" WED<\r+R9 4Kdi e *1 +i/cF WVnso :!^`- `!Z: 6Mc6 `Q1bdZ uUD\d" .q k 9#ww 3MeXS16K ?5L`! LL$y Wp/U |=;9;< %Rbk X@o` HxJl +6a>w SIg` h.Zw 's_4 v;5& CZ7O %y0H :&%P% x4zx >R`+ !g@)Y>&QD 10UB0' +tHi rkP% "fv9|d 9CXP 9MCd % F* !REU] YyyD w89m )V3[Q }&UY $ F5 b2Y' ""!f _$]C JI&dF $ 4: :3uE Mpmc6 e*r* .'.$ !Mo3 gB,! !}(\L2 =Y|EGH t4RPIT ,9k9 gw<d R{/O ? 7O IDAT ;0C7 [C*BD 5!81G5 ^\<, :K["C GISeW ET2( UTIi f'}U grq0 '&QEC2 pr1[ +_`T XzN |HSUj N/3". .G'I R PTUgb"1 eyBDSfQ kd,; sh Ob ~ %T }hrK ;wmo O~Hu ?V-6 _8zr Mh-F C^o]\ 8aD h %;{!_ }@Qz U;[E Z>8/cw` 'n:# 2;cz7 kO&MX 1yJu lBVF <Y{[ At , S9tQ CVO"d,T S3sm h\LI E I) ^w6L:l |7Lk uMC]d '~da IH%" hOLR 9"!. 5]P7 XF7 @M[d 7\wd6 RUeO v)Nm B 5; JSKc p2I);Q PT-; ALKu#+ *4BD<7N &Z K Yd1P ED,& ;8z` YZYY A6'| ._ ] }'/m\ >ayi &H3; tq3Z v*A4%] )Uu f(z}Q EWK ( \b>_ 0Ahw o5zA cdhC 1IS~cs |]&_ Tf$qe Q-1Ci -m(s[ voX9 yoKh& *@$S tng2 tkU5 ,u7_ qywm M)bTK ( T0BD vv%7 HFU$ L+)MEQ ="AG l66l =y3Y S8DZA Ht b IDAT+ X3or 'h$k* Mb2MClL~ mXq@ lM{. r!95R OC=Z, P)[y [uT| hsd6 ]F3L hmua ;}vC 8tU=t I3m.]Z M]Y} LfL' -m~K ".4n t$y1 "O l+" 1wW' ED#/ -7I% -1 {) ]d;. $%{{3 )4e :ZZY |fct mg!P e?v< 6tIW! XRms Hp.S 2u,4 }WQS J"u, gFIQ x{0f @+]^8 =tqs EW'/ 0:vt )IbZ> Y9&C h,0+n&B %Zl,&H7 kbo0 mr'I{ 0~Zi r+[q gI=l 6Z!] |"+'x K>K}3 ,F4\ !2 50C i1kZ Q)}x *1E! fbuUL +Obx !>{N k5?; lolM: "(67 X.lq` E{RY 3E2~ j7* f|xR y-' Z6E,P [P|y T,n% =%14 ='I{ YR6W 4JIyX]$ zK\E S:g9 Sq<E{ M{@D jD$O3} :\X: =!YE 4nz Y&ZCr *Wf. A:Ls Af0 ;t_3 $Ir W ^@)% ivf; i.L9r %mim R-!Js \ -#5> vaJ} D3di a*A` .!T!p x4D[ 3T{( IDAT Wrsv2 F@z0" >>Bw 0C*,C j|DZ% 0=CZB tn9D 80[lj TKY<3 DZKiri R*A{ $M.{ !E W H<, x{ YE/Q ddK:B bYLSL db-f VPSI ;Hao @'X) ~<{o> bj{}?^ @/T- (>7PT @K:B t [0lK># ` v -: 5::U TIO?&zs y"Z?< 5Q{FN, / % Zm5I x/ZMi~A "]<6NE U|~R xO~- w9^/ N%q Q y3Prb wHK. }L9` !fHKv eN9C 4A;lKs %7XZ @"4{J Ol6M oN>X]6 QBV* Z0H^ m7&NLJ 2|~u OH#l )G#l kin# @c:% rE:A RVi8Yo '5jx Y%x<r xW+XV feCd' >c 3|9 CHDli 5;V 3^3z B"MH m)OQ cg0@ 6 ]`kl m*+h ,R+Q ? X)n &4Bi N,?m I]jG 2@F /C(HC KlCq=gG6 l(WH tD9#M ReE:DFh C6^y p~Ls HEC)* . 4H&Ev E$5M}l\^ "C5E ,S3d9 <"gfW ~x8` WZ$BG vfT| Ub;V `=(y zt@>CF "M1# '?"u #.7\u .WKF A39x nj}y $G[EEn qj;xX &*E} n4ta JATbV ts}Dq -XR) R.xO m!,"b %[GS ]-s; `EIQ FsQOH s^7- HJu 'Q|!P IDAT EYsbd NKd!* T_)& mcCb,r 1>d<# CJOy HC:F z{L3k Guw( S3%0$ [M5| /ME, (CTa N!x3 O3C! |tgo [@K: TG >eEY kd|x * 4s Zemm7 7YMch y GAhIv@ [W 6 *N)P H@|)\ Q6[5 .e"e fL>C %eE~ KlK: I{4' J3/6[ Qi$%14E 5bz-]w- ;&DU} >LQv ]6S) te1( :\q| N[4} RMbf w:Db BQmTN ,L74 h"_`k Ncbx:B 56FZ >[|v lP@` z",% .+H [+d n8 RyBq GwJq D{J~ R'Bd r$_c= 92e5 d[Ng %C|[ ,q4k| lXe}R %XQ%;0.Y }n4V gwzp q7@k{+ 3dD{ eh(3 "Zjh7 N Z=B 3bz VDB MS,p Y%&]99fu >>dG /zEv -Vsk t'XA ChaM LD]F`%i ABIn xKlG +3Ts1 n&oSD bE%; #2, 03+QU zCcVr! y ]R i,e )P60 =H\.y s/e8L OUQx 1FE< x1 & WU>P;(O 4iYJ# J3TLi QUq hjtPs [P(K %lHwI :;$X VTbCjx T)\q 1@RC( U!+T* %w:& 9+~ha (JVd 22(F )*tOI% \! { Iwho ,P [d z(d$Iu UqPW IDAT K!\0 )EBqS T`!a 8 IM 6uio@ P2\k x6nXk? f|%Mi %_"V= Nb"^ s<fw \>b> 3NRO .4Uyj AqYI 9^DR Tr1EqWP L$KM C6DR \=]R dx'"_ )vE9 [qDD "5#<h <q%V VjA( H|i5# #f:n qCjh \ sN [RvQr p1}x9{ H>kS FcM) SRm# Ix?j U%E>\V0 21f"b zGnRQ 9B7U 'PxDT -:BZ ?A#4 f8QLE^5 B3 fRJ1 Yq[ i,ZbOs 99DztJ |>/a aGs\A ?UN& ]]mK cntY g b *&B [yXE WmDJM HUcE +%: XxHE PTc$0~ 'av5 bKXS. m);tL cKdB ,'-w? = ia J:$t. 0Q)V\ *CG6 ]eGc ~6/{ ^]k; 2E&u3mA d;tR ]lG^ 3lMy 8k8{ Ujah /0m, HvxZ >zbD 8U+X Ht**m *nHG mh _@ Vscd "*nW-A= eV,[ lfH)%t ED}b J}@(` `Io( WW*i 4w)+, t~Pr3 }Id& PuT- $sQM ZDUI_x oHt/ )$JQ /G _K D!NS5 FTSjR+: tIKs #pp -i QHwY} | +l h_G; C2L(gHB: @osyr 4]kM_ ->7& $"tz 3SA$Y IDAT, o1t?M K BC VAd@ f{w~ Z5A" %#1Z# KGHGY" K W>BNB {r=+c +FLZ7 ,Y1b\ `KJdn eW&-u4( Pjss uB_Eg l~2> |{7}u 4-vM 2eCyF f;tAZ zY_u &Dhf 4+4* OTT3 :M_x i1.^ Z{~fEp "I]vX :/." {)`V- vQPKm^^Og 8;U.cm @Z`KtA6. KnZ ^&X. v7^ ={8# 0V]^+? bdOL 5Dc\ K?)% %e ^ VR&JMj/; UHefbL ~D|8 4 Xl @tYJWRY l,#.5 Kjq) F?^AT C\J5 A}FMn& `>wg Rb5TP CM]9L 6qZE AfR. \ntzj 3XCC7f +4'4w CdL{ Wy\^ oqt[ K%R< -4t]U FguOD d5v7 HS!$ ve(=j ja\y\/> D{%J 4fm= 7?E2 zH> ab%R ),@H .\U$ V|Q1m /V}Ati \cn/ ;E:lM .$4a; [lI: AfwivX ,s8' 1'EH HT%} !AJD A+ES#*V RE=UF ;vC8 %0"j !*0'q) allf I*bEt z)F]5 Q4F}} riv7 eWJImS 5wUuu RN07 u<xD PuYo HRZH 4I@2bx' 'BVWY Jp9G L-c)lQ Y D( QMA* `1#) "?d%u h@F+ P"eJ @Y ` 2 T4 CKz/ \njf.c IDAT *%9}?= Av<k i4J+ c9EO07 ;0\#S( #DuyO5W6 o"<x~ Sh&J ye 9-T> *Rjf 9!KOu |DE" axJ} yrB} k+{+ qw-[ Tn@U Pdo4:& H|N'9a >G9 W/-cF? _{Oh |YQ-a (>{jM s,aP #*"- =hjm |x6P6L \#'4o Hx;_J\" l3Oe 5-1K j2wQa F~Zi Etp>7VU 5FYm fM-vr6 dN3a 2N?U T$l9. /c4 3'q,? ,4z{>zYku fJ3)es:) R7v2 nh_C. 16P. (!"- X]0| l(6R ?iz( fU>Q @ J4lQU5 L}|a T|3x s0.<4 h3Y8 Pf~P L` 3 Yh)Uoov K+(ZEJP F>VM (Jj2 5~ME 1?k" Nhg< J39l m/Sm& [&3c HZ5Djy !x4? j%}8- Q:2, euc r5 5! C )Z2i +_b2 6?_z <Upu h4p2:F. $K"?K P8X@aQo+f O_U%v e8O CtxB }x/'PM^ I#jS -Vv NtRJ +|^mV A>a6 =g~K BEA/a P;dBYP 8;sI NH33r ~#rD Vp)M U"n # Kg$J5 `\. 1Meg29 18Tr 17%V ,"P\" w$!v [f#t cUGA IDAT8{ JYO8 8M^^Zm &de) Bao1 4Ob OwO6, |Z'o ?#H< YLI; -eLT Uw6z#G8 D v, FW#: zA {> 2RF$ E$. )]yw {XGs IAg0 r2k. !)F ]bkf @$\!% t$A$Q6 "a7>" 9q%ZB I)QD bVsS w-5$ UJ#V ;I?xa7 8n-v }SN< s^oX< nY?y J[Tk 1hTQtU =UyX ,WxlG Z'": c^C2f$ /=2j #!+* g"S5 %#csl ~0=W ];lj}|( C{Y7 brZ?j OA)O` bW.m( /%l?M Nz$<5jf Aqcd QBxO n@6R Cx{za xeV= 3x!>d WgI+ .WF,b /xsB;C I=?= 1E(W3 ~ Zj m6@# 9$KA qc2'3U mD+f |3;}mrr (Yp _"gI TDcPe p)VTu 2-veTF Qc8AFb ogx5 B7gsN 6E^2 iHu[k ,5Qw 85ja {eT6 He0A fZTDl ;PZp /j>r TbxI@ J qzdi z@vN9!3 Q_0y (FeC S+& ;J^H "{%' 4A$z rwR$B D_0< beMRW% ct2^ tw=& Ozn{ hh89 zQnU czu]n mZn7 O !1< `D&* (hYS ,a3* j\OX 'p). N#=^V , 0; mBOu#hC 0Yqd )oJb X z2! ~s0k6M ?Z?m n7Gl IDAT ~ ps}q 8D4=8 Gv[4 {E ' I.$X# F9tJ a#pDt >rGy !;?/ wfd >s8g#!-r$\H #<;& #;>` -OX} @IZXw N4mHY 1IS+ PsE/F7 ;m1X i%1+ jS[V thT_SS QI!U bd3ra EJxX -_>p}3 [p t jaMX *gov Z1\s +kj A$@q >D4; HOH! lFw'; __`Z vqZN eWhDkD |+OqD O0(_ d~[i 0'YTUL sF[ X-@ dC6i =deSiE ]Z$w H` ^# $'`C 6$*W `h4M TO$- M &* `f . gPH0 I$KCx#=) -/~f \#>` =tP& 8~o{ %M* vZ7} #HwRJ gX\7 )%9 6X/ f' V tw<= \nO<v^_^ iI&I6 <Z {? 5D:X K3,: Qen@ ,5.; */-hDg n/8Nw d Hb {n 3$/] u.Kb `LYb #fe_ Uq&R" cf#K A|7z s^*OF F>+c9 DZZCZ& ig x {fa0 ]byB v{\a alOw{[]_ tD 0DEy 1g [FNy pnLJ X5#Y zd:5 Y+@) ]T0V y5 0* %cqf KN(bd m%g f `R|' `g,7 v8.W} gmM 8 IDATy EjUPmt BC^" QP]4 kdq2 KjlE 1=e\ #*/-`k Y, Wo #M"u WGvX4 vw/; -.6) bpHTuEi hlEqiK36 PfPK Df~1 Ul(L u0(D 85_]3 }"-" FAo! $e^f `0ad. `-KY S(>2C v8=Lg%[ "4mYg .;z]K7T OI'Z EriP ,bHR :\$g yf17 _U`% XqWF#c z]t- ni1 (^5_ "+~eD G8<zz< 1}8u? ;Bfd :v<+ ^ao & A =3 2#GpP l9-Yo:H H3)h rTauvz BdIe +)tXu#y femD XsX dfBy %t(UA" c gfkSy:) =K]B 'f.PtMq/ k&g\ *L- \auAg fm==< ?Z\\ TD*r Rwi] pr5p* $LrF q>|d T*"I Z@Xk Wa\] ?V() /<\FY"{ !qnr ?bBo^ [9mi 1KleB< uJ5j iAuo 1Sof n?]N}3 /~kw uaTC St4N K x84K F /d 9RYIDT %KMB LYEWJ DQ<Y l1+X y1 '2 mpY8pK.H DquL :S=. L.+ei @12A \FwW u%3J &UVh g.-B O/G_ vXoa LN7}O '_]u$ 4,eS Jvid <rX_ A@pf L+( IDATIA ?zeGtb m)KSz xtm `<<<_^ c_?< x'-:k Tj*? z1i]Is @a]y huz^ KS|d ]ZFy *VfrDg o/>DM \n=E <-yd e]>\F #xt2A kpRwW+ tmz3 &"Fp GHJu vVsF kS6] :77? % W3 NXv^ N+on @bo4 :#0 [5F1 3U]oU Q`]@ bi\D 3S+sQ "vhn1 _$jJd GSeQ 3J}S!Eb Dn3L <??? 'a^QqS& p-rk= Dn'^~ hC= h-#W Dg MTsN 0UVi(R 1h P- ,7h8 e^i& 9z/U cz`{L p&~< =]=> T^_~ k*@ U- , FTyw. HymX; ,RS{ Vu.J &*A3 Az,w jX4b o=rqQ GG8im t7+] hZnvVm >%_j cff:S &QU,m Q>T[ c=g< <~7>8 J+X V.RR (m0z @2V`h ^ ;T ka\9%+ x@/0EP 3D8M ZjzN5 $w=?N {:p$ Hj:J xzY_ !]>-B NhGq IDAT AdNp, LwxV wp&XD t1/s $qp5[ 4jJ4 ow/9_ eyo?v 3'[ YUYsfeUf k l 8+)h >6sO~ @QWF(+ bPM_Y wsL1' p-Rj \qy9/ rN1 GeTB XsU! e+Ci &j4t. av P xnc5 MxpG XuY_ BSP.t =-Y\ |[X: Q>Y# :1Zj) %o8Z GKS, .3oU {+kK h fbTN .'Y[Z 'F#u wUJY ,/y nZle @FsB]z' 3WyE (NN$ +cP, $a"n *lvj "GYl wvJg a?>< j$%5b .(C) 9U0K U3VQ`H +;@Y E6N, fSXv x2M_ #W#7X X2_NnH:jX [vk-] 8CAb td9D gpI- pGM=_> 4) 4~ `_ L 0U 2 Ve/uK "k j D`L$% qb/:^nk _~NZ ^J n E_!ue _an 59+# z{me Piw) 44qT MAJ_ H55i @r^9 )paL@ #1Ce -.{P] HI3sKd -?R6 ut1Y KiAr ~s~~ Z.w7o0 vFT0JM_ ghsAq0T \Na N`z2 cAIxyUn J& 5X3 9=se N GU"+ >!iWt Xgr$z @H#x 9Ft+ lr1*1 dZ!e U30JZ !s\GB# D QHD_3 &P+FT kIDAT !q{'U3 NsXg& fe1& #RA# -M)er 9sa`k he6d ,`V b9=' ,kyX #66& ]MmO Qi5N P5s^. g3g' Fc0T* @bbm Kr]7 H Z 2:0Z| ](h% 80@.a Gw?~ ;G ! o`zp Dt|,$ ]9;T K{1K(j.h ;>"/ ZJMJAzW 8c+, o<se LN7" NS`CZw bb} X-YF :ELR; Ai6mgl@tu Dm&X R"R! `'+3 %0u#210 Oi-YU ]9lR KD-] \e2l XWOX V t6cQ3 d>rRy >gCj w?vF V9fYU &uKF I @& lO,9 mL~[ ?Y16 l)BS1i -T}h 49>B 'zz}# Lt7fWT HfW`2i OTK` ;yA_ysO ?E) ('` m;X~ 1LD}%` _' AWzS q/;& mzbl KW?*/ jK)E OX.h }M|Sza; O,hl si?'b( u V4 ~20\ (7h t=X WL(I YU#, ko'u jW lRbwuW! 0m9@ @7|?& E$,7 =M$, 72, > p/yi SpcqY X+oO \TbO /`wf q;S;u&mD t8;/ l<` >0$Jx xXi[h cG8> XNlD BFx) ~1}K IEND :4p[ PNG IHDR gAMA PLTE wwwfffUUUDDD333""" ff3ff f3ff33f3 3ff3f33f 33f33 pHYs IDATx Y==# &eSF U_c, 9L. 4 btd ]GnVx~0 ]"`H F"HsZ \!O5 r+so` hd=G >=*+ }Cy3 atk*WZ #FpU faL, .=2\ $Rr[ Pxv+ Cp6+f Mz,) <jK?( LKpU YTiU8 Fikd [@K4 ZRt{y:( <vxcxk 4h%XK /=`k l%U* =P4@ AA"Y kdW@ onpy pqrW! [Oo| {v,% `&z.>g |])Yme 3"&@F ++|n v1 ]Z/ $%c] g)lB M|Bi Hfq0 &N9I AZFg:s yT @ _yKWS ds^.a |17_ hM%f zq7` oC1 eY/f P6T[ AAIP 48et m)') -$R< &,u+G ?4p ~ _N #m <u0!@ raOC GfJ sVAzim Kd [ H@z;( x|B} _ onVm' O/wX 5et %xZ~R'a# Py-dp \k+Q RY.\ n tO Zi 45 u/6p |;? vY@Mw WU'IgK L#Yn JuK,2 z#Dy (W7_n %D-| ~`~5 cfnA >:-_ $eSvb 2~A[ 0!N] cF\^R vN-u on<ASZ %@8n=6 82 P{&o QS, Ou}aBhw IDAT c+":S e3.PP B/tc5 <dFp{ ?# PhA* !B/(B b'HK}eN Vt92 nM$F aS:7 F6/L(u 4:\f[ C`R`b f ]1 oSAi L~%] 9`"+ 1P.3 #<C; e8Y. *wJ;9 XD6O_> YWYN J:x&w 7RJ@ #$8. 6Xxp thP] 3 "y ZrPX. >r<a$ -Rw3 >2[I W.2&K :kZO 8AXa+ b7+3 5WNQE %j99\5ff e,CB L3L_ U4S tBqd t%Z4 }h-!(M xSTB 4Hm+ }&5) `q"a V:Hd =I<S3 ^,", RdBno pdrET ?w*? `GEV dEuj B2=t v0a= 1;WE3P< F3.0M Hc,+ ~hRp# +s9g!. (+DI f&8K _B69 -M@O 2,6 Cb>_ q)/< [a> J8 N ?lvm{ .6(+?; i Uyu+ /Foh GvU(( eo|$ /\r; vTy7 DHc)l AU'o 6<3Z >uxS o$m) zoEk# ~}`n,% %SID 7^{rmzv |h\m \&#/ lFdm E^]rm {e9/ t_Y- ml}5 , 'J0 d-V 4.[z SGU?2 dq,g SBY>3* IDAT {{d| %I#d Ww~r |r!y nF34 qqr%2 udT7] Ds\j|o Og|L 7a7p _pd8> u"Z9 FYD # $~ KVlT ]du]q S2 ~? ] Q `WHa v5Vw v2v{ C<WQ 0t&ANBS :4:1 Bh,R !< = UDR-i@V _:+)GJ7 hV"8 g4p9 8S3sG p>mC )g l 6[.,'m XDg' GCUv" blePU5 Fpc `I[e Io#pt % ^WN hz g *=y ? Ktr= ,D+5@ gMrae UN!3 KHUe t6F<?7q D1 m H.${) |$;* p8~B gCZXj [,riWC ECwt> k?|2D I~O^ @b,br @=_n *bS1 Q%2 <{jd {=:9 0kqs #qU/ 3c*B1 L9A #JC 3Yq| KpPE V>:# "(jy L2K=r Crzb r#'K) zU,K $e| a&/ ]aX 5_SR f $\(h pj%@ |)#IG_ ~W]c c=Mc Jl;Q @#`yPS<J ;O'Y {PMY R+^ ( IDAT 2Ggh [ /FZ ~dt ':uS& 0.k^ *8! *G8F jq0F CnR?a q7mwx (3jlH 5Hyv B $_ LEHM' >V#W (FM^V g7^^ #37I> L{@T< a4Cu 'OY4y x>}S qWkr DI h )_ T6*). 6 r|MF {1%` XjQMD rIyj 'F!u d-zP mVKy th7 mX!L` :q<a` x|C/zI h3py7: !>JL ry0c Hp,m j!L- Waz*n Ogn@ }mrp Z>ym 91:& 5N. Cj'# @)|^ Wo1;b &Ew7 d8~B ;> v l[uj /wTn t+6U ~Onpk [3;^[a o7xw %\uwp \[:u vo@5H i0QL 7w|v( [m}k "CZCe 8MP(cz O`t ,?t\ )L ~~ AS|P JCG}8 2h@@)8p 0@NB &Y 6 yQw@ j@w%x #g&L B=l0hF :~%c "g,2O 78\[ [!Bt TUCU} w9ko w$m! +r3_; }[aX {aJD Z2Zp y/B_ ?FQ,j 3c!2 1a2r Eg=# ;xCK 'p}` i9j\Pmh c/." qT@X W/QGNb lx &h rs1o- 5u9~9 z\7I 8GB! 9?iH JWs= iBGk[~ IDAT? x'p:Y j@3 #z)n w|TU i>5d4 VP'[ 7tG VaI(l%!T {>MP V#+Vv ?9Y! 'D2J ;4WKp Wp'z5 Gp?w t@7l .qf> Y#(n R2ba \W/ t>#f RJi* hDz+ ~7trr :Vk| }]XCd% c ~7K u0p*R @79cY $'X< mS$o mZ:I Og32V C\w'G 1B1l E(12 2`1E VpOc DR~ 2ovjq 5Fye$gw _ T |'ZN *[1r Iwgvt b7B% wP7% ! i6 *Fgjv!B h$<B% _AE9=0- vb@2 qVl4 &EVl 7_SF HHgT c9Be gA A ShI> wqyQ )t,7 bK^K '=hOu D`#c 4(]J ^j|\1 Z&GN<m sTw #\pk I4+F <9#T dKs- =<c~A L LDFbj ='Z4 `1Yd,19bz #&*& f`F-L e(24D oL2~ x5 i` F13z6d -cjZ; xuq 2tpB0 hlIt A(pKX{0 l'kz IDAT 'ti4 BJa" ZC)]' eiU2? pkN}@ xSwmw0 gPYE ~;$e A0Hf]T a:< c gzn- v7W5 &awD DHp^K #2&g R82p| v UG o?usMx ;Hw+ o ;H By:[ ZFlw_vY J^0)P IxGJoV {O/i Gcbg P$(R DDQ fi~|wv YExg qq_Z _IY#%: sf@= NR=}+( Xin) 1vhZ$ @("V' <p,)]*D H!tEm $FXQv FcTE PaT2i %`( -p7l u_[G >Z0q 9XkZ 7RHA 9DQ5 AYO8 n\xt G}A: y 5[ ]{JP pU!! v c6[r l8[n ""H-v? 8}; }/Pd KNE* .0iL2 -WRk= d:RX )}$i ~q;K=?kHg Jj6'V _Wx. z`du FFM#t !PP$ e&LJ _\Hi 3i>_ 2'"fYR ]gW? k"V6)N0 K@f@3dA +u_mOY +Cu; 9ZaS $k'q zp^c @U i) iF'I ).ehc 2$i(6 =__Q o7v>^ ./WR i]4SV jyo?y "5K E lRJ)c V&Hj <ul} N@} U w"W" R{c/ \k@" (;JFv XJ04 A"}H @AHM 4D1V( ~ "o q_pO lFIb Kwuu ,^L H( :%%| (IOp EXx8\ y9\t (F jW j!D26F /{>` }4~I>4 8c2U94& V>la *"sJ "i|w; B`(3(%X ) c @ h+9g@ IDAT qKQiEA4z s4cG uf{]4@r 3AK1 k175 n+Jl |s*gL QF"yKl r;U2 B[8QYa +9&{ v%/- SSG} =#hZ x+ve`s gF{o? C#8p6 4&(~ 3u|t hV8PTjk; iIWe D+e" h?rj 9"0pX0 [8vE[ YK,H[ G3gC |6'8w4 z-ypt, nywB 3vDW GQie B(S+ /y@w~ 0USe =cxW gH-g 7C5N@ CN Y rr%w J~*[ Q_Nt llNvT Hzeb P U0 Xz}g qxL`tI| jT#5 zvfl [BpW] cKA+ )Wf:: * HtBH wn;%^ -/ ; &`;48&B 6: . zEIb mPM x"paA _<C5qAh= N^)p< X({G|3 p C~ KC7* d twh\ ;.-_ #@dc$~k~ .o}~c dQ*{r VvQ K JIWFX a-o. d>/? 'zGf cT,I f(w.wy S;Hx ^2<7 S+1K) pAWj s3;' F~0U N)n) VM e+ 2UW2 6_p]j "SK. _Baz0 t}Dn{ 3*', :"k?Mu "tzq 4@Zie' h-PV S"W] ;Z)> \bn] f]>; tNZ LG AO"} pr q .c@] {dlg JYi1, ){W <SPx( QYlI A;tA, _H$g `W<J\ 'Jl QZ.}( @{`PG t( UCB)% aEIZ* 0B"0 ."Sf uy;C FA;l .}2x^x gYz@ IDAT j_IW= X3mN 3+dt] i[O^] ;A]m T);a $Heb ]}$! uNY\ mi]~v R v[ 4)0" JvU3x TO]N j L 0xr `:61r^ ,=\i 6Y4~ ^.|* `8fo> {wd$= WM9. ux/i O7 { f:_d+ "*?` @i)4 B ej !G;H )px#& 0dr0 lG61j9g 0uG9 MmN3 Tu H sInf K 44 1hX; lvW]@7n 0fyX rH[q b$%B Cw I8K +NP2 @jmeD {rJO y3TYId M6co VTS3 3YpZ 7"8C%W RXw* <M5pG RkI8 G8ts 4jNA2K V> - xVZwe _G0Ys 2F,M ;?`i eoxx Zit:q B CJ $j;E ajN/ LtOji NwXY Gfy m2{+ $K ^D ynS, Iim_D#RX5 BH$J %S'_5 u/%sN d rO{+gl< u7;L %Pxp% 8<yvb _Ld; *>*\ ZBhs $9HH 5R eaY o&2|M| ?G_n %sb A*e& 'tNao D<!; ;yD7 vmEC N<l3T lL8; y<d$} v.{4 >)}>! Vsmv 55ha8 }X% d.W{ 9mCt e ;!d! le8" N.E| 3rz" kU8; N)9x O!bnR-PQw [EMs< IDAT u`y>? 'Jh) OzY@}< ~sdu~ ?{Xk V6Rj Ftp| LfVFz TvB# R<o. "@&! q?C9 ek[8E $=+ X_A6 H.!7 3aTY gTz'EM ^cW#C Jk%e ^:Wp 5gKo7 Oi|[ *:q_f 8E/ _[Qu B|_8 )M H a*z&3 U]Mz[ />fD |"E : lfSrV %snQ waME 42Y Bp$H M/B t7o K'8h Z+[ !qM= Jkl%\\ 6BJw V G_ 9!." W&ek} DP`L ky{% 2e;.* v(a I%ycTh aZ_H/ 2q=I pioC > wBGXx Q/" S3LT _R45 Da3O.% s7 L t5&W i`2lX > #Q S8lb 1&ew n};< =~q5 {J<7 ['8/ MWrL< .X E a'73 } VvKz q-0 hQJi 61i@5 @uxsM _ab;5h M X3bD uJHlz 8s% Oaj5w )FFfd b$eo L{ER =GdK p}6w po|pl s6ZZL x .%l e[i>,0 .lj9 <mDY 5xVyE *mkT" (D Z YOy #9!' 8;=FF vmc H'Mh uIw| y+Z D&&W(R0;E! !tAR &.`&~,4 ]F-q[ m0H 2n$3 8.rE 7!]" ]Gm8 GyU\y L<'j2 nh" E 8:"DG uw\WTV Qo/! Td&v *;/> ?UTQ 22f" FW@[D IDAT 'GP9 |;wp G&_w r%U2sjf #ny) o*zr Q{K] M0f" A7 L zdqm +z1x 2dAj b]`p \61:Ls M/"u L^6_ JPJ) ?_<x uE3z )s[F DSXr i[n#m B+WJGx^ $nTf Tron dg&K 5mk; p-\ X?Ez* "DFfDq ab[Q5 >VV$ g!Gj a/8ltXd BD(d ^uS~ pu^ opx( 'dq w|%7] Fa.bY =9| } fSb ;Chog {$#& $L] z]XRdw(V '-yg %3/I Qm":B [dW. F%aq; vgE<E p}b\ UG.` *%~4" odJDg ?qjj Z4jmq2q >Ttsu#C %F{~ [zdY l:Sj Ub]lK HP?m jc5Q C.8K* L cGs] FzE/ #`P T/Y< ]Y7a {^Q1)! 8RRm &X /Xo oei) OP < `n~xt K}wU cn&4 N1mB|'x 8k6sy &7rz SrF} # kO# M\Hih J|J(( BI(y i*~I 5uv9 MT@#c |?s q1F+ ?l~h 4'aAK 6R"* iExm1 K1Nb MCv_ v(}Y g<%J f#^W }i|3SD OsKk olkHR\ F!+{ B)TC= (+zE sl=B Ua2n @iQF{ IDAT %FD hvT ; MB$! AB0\+C I`DU C$`| UUyr Cx0v q5b"V nBG; c._Xv SO88 y.8 1dN$ 8x12 6sB- @nd! sjX& @PtG #9pw$ b:}k(r ~+1: Wfy] dP6 q ,Fhr8 K[Wc iK7`m )=HM vmYHH k_ZO 8b~. BG$ ]stV NEuyr :3a. Bq>e d fY sur} \tT WEI; QWY/ Y{ #;*d h wz ZK7: W$d:. []] >t,& ( 5" &=5? 4sLJ @mGW NaB2 2 #%+ Ly T} G_\& K._r O"4e "v}} N dg $mGX ,K]c uYy,S eJX-MRk z )y /(in` "FkW ;9d/t3 d4 0 QS.gf} 83f$ f;V@ [9t` /m p- )p@&7. C[ G `O'Y= {bs= B-,Z o~^~ !xuO Aa{% Zuz*) ZV%GGD .5 E `X3{v,L &LFA jMe7o 82\D s*U6. 4>xW 8~hf PU(} /&: I^RQ 0m>N nI4_ocXh 01l`a )c:B *oRM lD/+G !,I;$ `oWW %LXf7vl 3r1r0 vb]< x3aJ X:]/ ZRa1 6y-3L IDAT Tj> C+)E5 veoU Q7ml wCgw NPc$' 6]*V '@B 7(<-=> &Edj G`hf XK>K ;W~_ DE/anS AZTW y0/F`x @C{,^ *"B3 i4>s# WcUl Mzyt \XvCS 4uRY -M7> 1N1: jjr@d k:k E "6, %> 3 L|eD KJ.; *e*D 92j6 ]y\0 [ Fs >Njw 3TSeU ,+]z !a(4 ~Z[2{).4 $")? 9ZgDU Jo87p z m ~T 4 >dM]! `H>` x#NXhy ))|w nrr u^XK 'Jz` J 43( t&Q' @= K Sw#6ND#) =% ] gsa2L #vJdw c0*WE \\N5/ @A,+ K~d78C "^8ngE\ 9N|dF pwmAP RG5R LP\Wk IkM b o(hN 2{BF 4tCw 1&>L| a^ c &Cp& gd`@@ @u`* `1z (Azd 5[ ' =v;Ein 61Yp })OK lidw sa7y S i{ ll L !*; dTB0 L.a&xS )gLI %<a5=4 (E2G \7=f M{z( 52up VB@7 N"'7n Q,8 k(aI xC{q g/? sjaw QQ+ ?$ B^OB !% 4M ~^t? 0oGvlg w;dt Y<Uby=~ &0vH MWx3 <TNO?~q N:Jg a=n8 -D}p5{ 73G; N y1& L9.y sNAP QQ`I v t6 a 4" IDAT "YE> J<uD ?z%B +d&S ^qc; vmhE Q)9% f2}b k&"B ]Tu3LL D*5'y xc\fQ ~Xa8 Fk-? $GKQC >3S# nM)^G. e:wmh ),/O -,>Z 3X>PyMD tv&} 6]F-H ZH+V R-Xd /r! ;AGTm 5y*% *xW< ZMw[ BjJH %i>7# t\X3 oud+c* r}**p K}Gi. ,UE< ~X}&8 vXZC C(we h8 B :'Q" n$rV dR[\ / Qq _XIb*f d&a/ :)7M Xk7<j Mr_ *a3M ri ] zX W 0X,<h- 8+eg &f"~ ]Hd4 B3N1[ d)&ea %2SM ; ;a ?a,J n f. eY7k qC81 $ q2 HRfh{ oh`zWO MG7A upJd 38O] ga?< u#66 MuN\ FJPJ !! ! WdQ@py PjyW -0-t >eXmV9*$ \*s& ~||k J0Bd! 7dY/ _3@iE X[a' vV@g {q$, p+0#%z( 1a*N= +}I{ 0&"f gO<bz -z\| x[K> b\fm`, K|D$p %"VL IDAT ]`Qu 55 2 NcQD ozZ* p3u~} w="v3 @;\6 =TUx- ,A{`D NUtC "09q P_fd RLF`Dt gN?fx K,L( `@ BM xY_9D Y*>V ctc= BPhZ a5PT Pu6?' is@R? PK$" #W@P 0c|Kwd cS$E oEEOoS w]f" DD*A }Y^-( IMM#js 3^ \ RNIN dLj^ 6GH`5@Kc) LP \m}CM X-(+ S[Go 5|dMmC} e(e& 5<2P +bV` q|sSc dw7da =iL> "YE [n[2 Z8cLsK qdGWO #+k3 SXL\3 %sF94k6m #N8l e,J^ Ppr5 A*T% s&Og2 B3}qJ 'j2# #GF)CJ9 0;L WFfZS.? {#0/ (ZON #./! $hN` [r9o &-8l E9R. c&f\ X??g Jb0' b(ID pV-p XU?2 $p1BO) g!(mZ LLv` fffhPY u2m)VZE=J[ b2bb>7 2a/R Bm@0 0w.x'Vl w> t {l}6&Y t\J" CO8` ejKH IDAT qe Ih \ ;} P2qF 7^X\ S/d8 AdsG e2A )(ez % {W BA$R mwT=a q<kt W4>B 5KV- Vox; E7\z r$YO :1@P GvRY D1R[; E8&2 e{VZ>" ; Eb &V[e QC*4 Q,"" 04;? `D1k G<h2 au&EE ,&';l `[q?m 9i3k Vlt$0 b+= TVdh 'W]u "[wnEP K}; 8Y/b <$Had U#Im \@7CwT]M lM+y^ Hv :{v &QYZ g}ot \~yP r.|'S qKw! ;Jx0 K# [} 0+mC568 0FXA 65,$0 `#p!pw tA]fL$ ;_<c aJ1) 1Mcf |-FA bjTC quhL ~Xggw g49;" `[u JO_~ d(6{ z7|Pm G45d r-=- b{.D D( <& ,@De 0$bl@-VK NH:$ JOUu \#Y n:;1 D*2< 8"/l[ ]MS{ * eXA # g_ NmS75 , #j X#;4 "(V* [wn( |USM 2c7d *ZTDl$ yB6} EM)? n-GjE 5u{? '$bR *j!H nj?T 05Zk j'Oz7L/ 5k q IDAT =BST PP"X Fx\5 {^Co L*#L ]3?r ~p 6 S5>SIlZ @P@[w JO&q ;hUcD | MK @]!^ [H^* i"P J Qye[ !=TN ~}w5 ,XU!hTi 7LBUbn+ e X | PCV! =}}+>tlg PjrG a#&% & <`% hqzH |d-V] *%J| v E Hk=Fi j {|sZ 7 @[Gw DakC Ad@LVj 5C T LF &v+ Pg1u :;g{ 3JnCc D )I Z%H0 5Dp@ nkFf 8dYC [<on G.^| r2--m :qsd /$6. &[S UX+5 I>'^ oUCQK AaC~ k'[%! vLvf !ea LkFs\ ~0J] ;Wv- VD") 8qB/ P-EXk }(*>4 @]+B 9"#A422p ..[r 2114 l*?o J8lm Q` p "$\M Bj@P N,J" HaUH9 6PH G?*D ,b1t"Uu dIih -DEp * S@d A9|~ O|gv 6Oh+ <W`Y (8.bac @(*YE# wlqg UYeO !u<v 3&.8 lgk32 $fJtr !"@dQ "#({ uOjmln` uBl:6 IDAT @L* 7(,Z 7mfk N}$.u,6 FL#gc bh =[>p xKC }_Yq 554; 4PDGw :;mkW X^,F h5[ kjxg~p2\ FL?` , !=p JT,Uv a( qw %)9O9 h\3dL tUJX NrR" D@ll K*onK cBv<" f8i_ &Ns< _^tQ KV^z cxtt (W6E 1c}q$ O0U# pgb`+ P}Wma0 ohM5 raO[g 0^ h " qG/D 8,QX cZ2>Oll<e /0TTD 0)hBKG1W m!9 xc-Rs Uf-Yr `L.y 0 i&"8 AYB@ 5Nl$ 'XUJVm P0i2l'3 V >b x3x} HCj^ "J=g} <O[OkE BQQ^}] )(/P xJE FcC_ DU#a J)0 D WZA$ m"Da V>usK ols! Zk? u~lLc@h2 E$FL, 7)t$b-ayK X+VD zpK\y rE Jk% Pd4` &uvD'6o 2wN Q%.A =QUd Q8rt 9/FS iQJe JR!l U+Vld {vK[ pssc 9=;sZ kO/^r 'W?W X<]-@ ,Z\J @c.l C9>J He2M/ ,fG$ __Y QXQ kE HtlD \vjh eQiq 1ny9\ a\Who: TdR%N uBSj PJpT ')bS VBjG\ +!4= .@iW> d?3N'OK gm_Wg IDAT *wNc d4.cPk uLmA c5:I| 3DD)k} rJ)+F)m% jMR,G <sJi M/%/J hcq x? D RV!JM qJKel< }@c# *vP( H%xJ +)v( B)1V PHll #&OU "(mPJ$ bmX1} hO{: K!!V D"q *QSh Uj 6- fg)\ j?!1J3 pi_8 .8;X1 wbMV Q'~5_?s {b}N -(O) G.-} 3%J@ u /Q "; UO-y 5w~s i{_R h:y(*ue: S [r (Bc5 ft]9n e=B# wuvuuv ;lm% =] FMYULV sI4> JO+ks 82#k Z7em 8QiF _Oj< 1V)m /]|U x~+]N *pV]v. R^|{~JY JD%Y cbI0 #cE }pVy `mP* 5W]w ;Gr Zamh"Om bu* a&<8 ?PGn NRdT *-FQ DV2J,.{ y-<= ty*L &BkRasx y Jk; bL92 qtJl!b \P[ #gqw Q%4~` EmNCG ~@a4- F)kM csxn I$\$e D!b0Jy Ac!) n:2; |MI w4)} jO1nj y<|? #V@9 V*^& cZZ;k {K]} i<PJ p0L 3.OGD+ ETD'u qUn%!xC IDAT t1*S KuIw f1@& {tS} l@#F NSxA [)4o m#'5 W_~v PSvf kU3K E[~I [jc; Ok%V 1F%Tl t Qb-Zk VDiO fxu\ 5oV_ "UsS sfy* l]IgUj 3eKq p P3 A{/, (2S:w ykEk > PV WJ8z!V t:?3 ^+Jj2 VDA$ Mu.b p6<1 Mdy' =CAZ 7,mV R8TP JSLK @9&)x 7;~D (wtk $~{7 SQYFm +} b { u! qm),W YxU~ V$p;5 *~K|8 6cR> C1!Zo OY\R;8 {jN# K6oL 4x`wW O>&EjG Ip 4 ',<zaqo '"V \bHMV/ lb|' S;/( #} c / S{> ; yG ;3k< d =9 0&N` l6OcG ]Sm} ycH: !4B[l( FKcUO $:Cj D]?u j@ F 5M\ne IiBu B?\Y :cMo Q09# Jth< _\,u j#B@ 7]6F 5["or [n!z )ipG ) mj oK&& gsA! cU4p |X8bF`{K= uBaJk R0nJ 7#%U b_\YyaY ?bJy WBrPw "gL AaDt b]iDI IDAT G`m!p fR#&;7* B'I4r LZz4 Zyi{t g%/gP K#=Fa )VRP P%:H ObQ: s=Re NnC7P> M.,j6 ,!w@ EW>Z O~:v; >F|(QD+$w Gc;NIsT RKAA 5CC2 in Z4)r KjXD v[lZc +W]0 #9US 'o:) )IV3'p OEpT M6Wj (wsr V t2 xU<N "P?& XC A GZxm @/&q S5 J eZ,vY cNP 5kLM u2I| 52vhA Z(I} 8+]E INr' xU]rS Z j^Z dgvj *gCX 8qA 0#cL p+'7q po09 Lc\/.. >'l9 Dw+Q?} hKeL@ +AqE AnMM fW- h ^ve% Om^8Z.b* acmy 4 1 E 8Rq ?Ex %iJX McG; 1^_tj( ?`6F) ;|*2 )5yi ]Uqn )5qa Nlg0x -4JI x5F)G we7} Al;TaE }.c] 8Yb` #g*W, [?Os Q*'d 9 j_n4 qr?G }tW3f& bXK1 xZ{Z d_&115 E.Or;50 =iHX Q,n~ *kJ- DHQ| KnGwr sEMwbVE BJpO 2STe t^OP" Akm0 eu~{ =Ow #}|x 31k4a # 5vBk1 moUMeM BxtW D)#"8~~ ?bo (rR( IDAT F~/'+ Y*O.;Ee GF[/ 2pa2t@ (.(n Q 5&&1 Yobb MrMb tWWW VZYH 6[km+e )-o. VR)% 0Gnb 8>VG \KMQ ((5U* G! i .gR';$ J$Jh PR @ ^jq) &[(Xh- R;J) sw\XC(M e;5Pn )ff9 3=^h] #p ( L#$`7 (A.g f@K3 MU2-U[ ":%z >P`i (-O= 7gE( K&SZIg f<Th !Hi-5 3!fE l.7O Xj&I jH J)m2'z 2,@ \W) 4RJo D "Q O|#4 7H1- BP 'M RhT* ,g~<Z7? K+## %ZNR .3= :Ffl8UG })+5 j$@y ZXi\K 5Nc h!{D f<; 0>Z3 yQPBp 5{Jj nrK>=! H\0*2 *xs# E@O&C5L sMH: <Or>j M[+,^ ~rI| Eo1c BXZG4 #!4H!\ E )$YRw `tIC kDf0^ zPp -gs% l+k-Dv Bh\W ! p RqS} ]*RB tp$ \Xy* H V@ 4G)z @iW}, vA0( kZd3 GZ*? QSGj nOm( gDy} w~M$ B+!- Z i t6 <2kv*$h/ Z+%< '/No< [n _r uCAK r_Z8r >UzG Rkl[ $<Yj RNWw N'vG8 Bl J \LhL h)RZ %8J[ VZi% RBKa! Md:n \gg. IDAT Zj~i Qb3( lNp,)\ i}A4 t_Ir r;)> ww7r XOr?V Kun; c5]} m'~w -,[CIn Z+)4 q@jW! <f") P7{Z)nc =2n5 9zc8 ,]6=j \+,xg }%QW *Y\} =dL= ^)m+ [g$] 4xx0 k)m.E pb$' ^9k"[ `9AH s[>o y {FK9 Z)WK 0+x=N /|AU ;|.8 dLSkC ndT+ =L " xwss WB - ?! %p6 PgX5C jVn` !_y< Ha,?ak $Bh PVM 48 3 4L5F .^~G #`Jw,"y '*&J ]~Qb b`F != 5 lf1!%H }!22~ \@i= /;+~)= P\]O :(g{ PiuC X8;@Y YP O ,16F pvbMgA aJbv BXR{ > Bf g:w/+ 45St _m9= i>mO P[I2 %`ma >4&V| yGpzJ r\,Iv Rke h,g} #%CT: $"1m N@'4C MXt~ 5!<gM(1 ' M 3+C#> %P([( fS1* 5)!cZ ~j<2 ~B_' pu:2 PdtFv=*K., tR|X 's3Rt 5dn% WZ6r Knv \`B.A_ &MHC aK&4g G7 & 0\i| 1p1T |Z h 93wIn AE?Vm *" ";J UQGE a/\ R'vB Ot>m m6eM aO+E `5TA -cZK J@); (tC|; fU[h IDAT @Rfd ;o[i J+a( VX6{ .?wb Iteb ^AN' 5x}3sn) Ga,x hlxk] k9t=s_:[f_; %hS PLi@J)#ZYJ v=[; /_|oo 'g};| 8bcby $8 O9 e.A` P )P wB&| CH- B*`` U<H` ^o^/= fgUCN 8q"Z+uV K@k+ =9H) Bc ! :w[ i^@t, E](# w,5e U,fs ARW- kIK"w> 5#M] \Jk>U5 }#~W dH#Ns zIoc %&]u R a37 aIS#cq Qw@FB >_Fg Qz w w+G] [8uK PpK j>B^ PHmi Rim| Of@E -k_C #L[JT 5 Fvn Mi=l sry$ N~A8 ]0sTEq o(VS t<> B)C$B /53" )]48 c/Tm R238 B 2i>Fz?S2 Kp/MKI e*2D Z3{R Jk)@ _A+e sl4} D[9I =3gV$ev4 ZNEX\ _.W_ Y*MJ h=@*x d:^i7 |G7d zH/ Y QOO+y (ai* UIB" a/D6 %, JI aYJ* WHI 5^M' o:]_gd &g.> 0y HO7<2 !x7\ WBh/' ^8o] o|ym 5!L0 j-|>\@ Y.,] {Eqw 'zXO >ok4i <Pw\ Zjzz"bz ?2abmp a~t{ _eo BHe{ ;=&& ";`\ l:3i IDAT ^Fog D`Q4ifu 4ytf #=3v ?3-b Vq'6 heiaWY P( q>H4D L.GVEc #fO 6>MI jZ<jw 'J$B ~4Ri .Keb V|+e A&Tp htRAs,Z FNtJ isC3. MDv( l[)i } *0"h 3Wu4 hwL~~ ~u{O3 q}w+ 17FK _{ v sT4X2n 5;7E 21=~B 4Zi% Sm*]#N !Mf7Ma H46cz ZZ"pd _q #' 6 Km) X` a 4cAo s=#k O*c9 #{>1 ]{MR I`Aq GZ wkRhs a o[ xus! }oB~I }e*2!t Vq{F b:gs Ffq, Io,m |4{ Isx |0`; Gxg+ =>3} '[#[ !odg+ e$_|c Y:]d$ !e<S 4R a +'MM #3/y +\9$ (f,f Zm]Zm !m*+ SOj) 8-)j 7\(! !4}@) !> 9H WO){ osb[ Q<nu ?;MQ #'Yt [3Vx 0"A9 44gL =DBh N ^%Zs q<7s 5glEf IDAT6^[ XFo: nR@& Nqmt RJ&F 5!4 7ieJ 6SJM R*!c B!5 \K2\7 %%/G N[3G )okc J.uR Vvgs`& X'g6 a[6Lc [;EVl n@m"+DvB r,=>N JWX5 5^JL #@hH =OCz} P]oK ?&)(K V<?p*3 g^26 z:}| S`XC a3r, ,CY# WU\& i6'[ 13Ma !4]( ^]3: O ##t, R@X^ js\6 %7^) ),+_{ h#ow 7p$< dio4 t]h b-^QA *4eF ~aC H) k2u} h&S$ Icf} Z&c29J & c* TJiR9 \I7 /j5o a:,? 09ey^h/ o.;R !_ > nd M Hb@. t1rN /[n; ih"A V)Lab* #cS TJ ) |Qj"\ ."=<| &+d4' Zz}\= k[}3 !FKzs^ <@</ P\8Z o6[2 :9^OW )Ug{Ms .za| [d{}4 SBXJ v nfOG Dzjz #voq t~TIiG| n*6p _oN_Kv 58W, *:q2 a()M M7t Uz\.PA OJ'*66 s'RUNJ i)BzC Sm[3 ?eN3Z OzJx2] >KgO 7UXF5CG tM(l Vats g{9g_ Ck|J6t) ZJ&#f1{2 =o/_5l ugG$ K~%w kfLF Ll!9}y ]?EyF a|TDe <?C< '4S !"D@ ! {( IDAT q#{k >b): tyzG kh=M ~|_Yd L`o z"A5 +5k[ _A54C? w0]x^ &y]qn /f`: zS+R }]4R 7bX 7;Kh fJG,!iH HejBS* i*$! %GOZ &K~eH b:b ^jq/ U/3< Jg'Q h>Ch i`mfH3 @ !M UMF76 3xW` d$| j{'*. !z[9 ?. 2eIqh \yUa BF-1 >c.Mwt f8#x gZ)m 1 4=.I q9HM ">O. T9S V1tt .R7u >2R=i =@S?Uo| F 5MG 4]h1a x&A3c >.{P t<q_ 'k93 'W`v 0p@; R//6 fl~G e1]Fe (LLTl LbTrJ )]r_ g;S^+5 _6~r a6LK@srwQl +[^8\l 4[m4" ZF$z m/G[ L}tM 33zfV| }[eQRJ) vKh#? _9{x Vxg> fF|X-Li s_,qy+ M FFR +>vG m0Eto L #T ~mOL rOYT V&+= tS&y IDATS OPo0 jomH s'-` ,krdb IK!MC" ) Q"eJ[ ~m3} 1o)jS/ +xUo G,?Z Zn}5 U{Gpm]f ==}z >?8v# }'/FZr#CaO "ke< DRG) ]^vb 1;3|T vq4Cg %hk IOQ-1 9},y #P} %ZI! hl;k j*FX kk:jo p:(}$ HXD6a $D! 6D>VHY g? K15 92FG SD5v :l{Wg </+B v'*9Z W4 2 5k+} z-SQ>?J5da s:Js {g>N J8p) cZw E]$' Cj.fV jsUGj 8o`U dC,* ~Y]jD gIw(^ e45s &)iW) "w^; N04B bX)\nQw E1_^ %]+ %\o^ v2?I !m@)C s_H< J2 b (k%f =. , b_hv :R24 w ~6 aE'f !0 T Fc)m c@Ht &;H aNxW i c% W }T^ H7eJ Lpy% %Zi! Gzno YX;g BLOP 47 \ C/9m d;qQ@ *uO n j1r-V JTE7I 0J~,J K.@# m[k' 6Q\W H tq; e e*HC IWI! m'pn.c DU(g1 !F]-R \z[A RB;Gw 6jWE Q/a8 !t7u {@ M>c F x i 4B8ks qaGJ ]'@Jx 8{<9Z ! kFq!b 7e, <w-6 B+-rZ IDATY x^#; U0D<H PF\1 J2Q2 dSh?:AU :ME3 ([G0J j#3K i$x: cT627 ]Gx N_ks aI#( >Or/ aj:X E|}<= ?M M ZfST SVG" 36GC J,AY5 37Ee% t52? 9H`) rzNR fzFi \8M, @ _=F= )AK) B -u"k F)%3 Lx(1x(i h38% ;Y=C T04O tt09 2A&Cw? L9{'i ;Cx) n '|4fY[ q)KVa \/*D" N1os =N4E U '8 NUQ ajd.0 NHI- \(MG C21WV /T.p 1<qz~ (_NM qb5tma Ma25 ]B CS- 2{C5M) Y,?! quutE a"Aj7vt "]O8Cy >Mt? UWpa d2M{ FiH) VNGc GuD I.$h[7 Uek# }oTULM '3uK )gyg Zdl^8G Hnb"Z? )oJE}#g -b,/ 9\fZ PkVeV >@o# x2: /_Fu Yz4| 2LO5( q1TQ NET) *_{ /,|c mumr~ ,nl# MU0j 9QG< l];w B+i` =DSh )ts\: .4v>, .-"? 7O' [f0z >#Bh Re p}g- ]mMt /!3sW cHsJ `3zl {|xm Bci ?~xw \hR8 Nayfx 1Qa be. VT_y qA 'JP &' 2< NrqP$ ZxTI =LM! X;~} dh Q g1=B g`RL KkGq 3,%x2 wz8^ x!*m'q =7Si" /\oob V1O MZ8A IDAT? C4*s j-L7 V'Ms 7ooO- _~>Bu k_\z }47q $CrT+ !^Y; s/~e D*`B D!H-% VT@A Y<Ha I),GDa<J en$:]=L Du5sy znBu 29]) ~m*, T2'fk ~\ m -q4o T9Od 7eeu |w#?vr.L @@`q I!DD +C$w* (FNK * X%Wv P?<0 ITsA@ aNA!4 ( l: fsL& \Z.U QV/Ws _4qDT yOVN R!2 1.RP F].j Dl`D! `_R`J 6&%VF SWDt h"W5 drB-' PXRmP: ;V&a P"Qe( 8HI@ ,C@ 2 g&_y sYP'. Gl6w r?&R A/0P^a pyHP@ 01Q!l /O~6 e""-fH 3Hs5 ga0. 7v67 :}|u pz2j _vJs O|%K 5kBKl gfDCfVU L#QQ !hlw2|' 1HEE iuZI KsIs <~,*BQ NUU HtbL Xb&f@ X=6U A;i> a{`\s ;2!B r,/B W lF 3!XM' *Wmd sql c @$?jH \u,R1 c4~D `d2?. rq<j <0oy D}fNs S6)i m *C ;I:? 2)\hL RR" Z4z` p/9U d8J] D&L'B/ iJTE: Y3 saXUd QU%7 IDATOj _?X2 gAT<h e2?Q pf#Ew L"Y2 L`re5 PE!\ bc=f !@A" Y$Tb Q5*]5i}b p%Xh E.H4 'i>T DziBa h @. ")z> 2v J sJ4R 5 ?bR@sQe 9;ty7 ZBH- WdfD FW&8 m-:i [Ep2 dJY- @{x(VY U]tr+ DI"8 g u< )Z v fDw' vW|( D+SV2vI <rk3bc !J-9 8kg5 Z6QM7 z:m2# 8f"> Bfvy ` ! icX! ,alS .WGV KOi6 _^K= ,skZ% ASfvB i;1* X}l# @<r!r4A MqWb @\0#" MImT x%il STYr5 "vA* +Y-{2 $mu< hnJ2 JU8 F& aHiD !T|T Pu o!B{L2k E(Bp> 45Y556.A JWWS klgtf b|BIPB 5$0 lb8* `%&1 g *,PFl A$HTB) d~q> m'bPl VNJ|X @$j4Fh 4s$P @5Bj) L% ) R"@j*Q B$!f }#jT Ce_N1g M39( *|@] )'M% #A c, $m 1A L ,%s 'K^BU ~7m%) 0Ij} mBDB 6765l +P9Wz &bS5 u4m% .=9W/ ]QN$% b"/: ;o%6 +J/_ ox}: 6P k ,] k TI-s -/;u V0Uw ]]9k }jei 4cL- :$4q bg8, iiPcMC !@D" I(HSS 4H [<r IDAT cFd[I b`Bh c"tzg wn@J =zn8) J9sR+ p&p(< j@/J w"D~` zH;o ;U@bk %U/! cus~ m6gRs* L$\8{ dj"Q `yY} 3X]H T Az +VWVVO Be'O *l!] pg4> xqaX& S#CQ AU3V z>K3 gv3n *V}] fnnm gRye6 U@!G xAU/ x4<u @Uom )lko ]iqB S1DP( ON{A Tg/^cQ 3. 43 @e9y 9qfk N.Du~ \fU[>. ;pQ< Ah%& wdXc gB ? Q1"Nh ? 'U |;ac dYa [nRkb SUQc\ Gm|C d0KJ $mqgy PLwG >~iw;x! (K0Y_ ZE^/d 8uzi DoNT iG_C $<7Y 9TY+s* .Z 1 }hVY iYDMx. 7o] A b/Op 3e % 4Fpm _eZ3 &v 1 1 omo< 22&L S$rX8 PB\cO 0CDA rbWO U]< [;o6 9kVC @T3% {oO| >ujn 'sI2D xQ<FXz JEp0.0 4pZq0# UPi)) `h2qs QIh8 uMAh p K '`"%& -]h97 {O]<X sG"-6 88 '"h& m9YZ iRI C^[z ^2bec, LK[I2 2du= eEZ{- ( $AB ===== ("p` 3HUU5 gH`^vrL ZxnP |-Cg fYv{ m[!P %bT xh1t [`D| 2/&q; }Ud S 4JP IDAT bcRjq3 qJdE ^t /( uKax :g<C *McZ C $dS w J j]+Rj rO!S&* ]yq{ @CAix O!j# nw7.\8 B Cy*^ .uH[\ 5Ga>n Xad Q 03H<a xM s y&0S a'Jn D(4 @e o}tu A(L*^ "#PN ]%kS Bu" N&l* n}qy n;6t S:en $4&TU z"c- LTdR jK2; s11U [{P| |R"Tg& eZ =rW 6c,q! {!!X@ We!c* ]NZ(p }YvG{& ;H;G Y+^84\ ;^wJ sb-= ;8iTh )6Q* D-k8 J1`% 9Q& 4[ j _o RELU 3W:U n 7_ &kMN & 2D Z 1'q ^FYV QJ&V i&a,j+ 3"6* ]Y2+ , eP }At" Q;jcu t1wc' GS& Awe~9 yrN& M4ZZ ":,f& Zg+F Md'H )}c -l26[ o-$" 'KK3m^~ ,>|k dr^< R8I#Y k/4:s EE5"$6>| jo'_ PU%e Hh /V ]??|i Dc*} E#0)[ R8 Bk e*R^ \<Zr (2!- >r~; lv9F vj%L *"^J gi}h bRKl \}`~a? B_:] d&&? 4B ,D3A8 "6wp T0mWP?( ;T(' KgnNJ sG>s _;w|O ? Hah$ \\=7 Jl*$ d&xz IDAT9 }7^z zo *=i% d0.[ NFk1 OGx- ^>8b +WGE 5yn&y? 5K): Hi\r YYG7A ec2J Q0MX z~TU _9ZHB 6s%@ cfm j=wDu 0vTZ pqm2 Qq-qV ^ P W^I, iWzL *U & MPKg n8~m b-Md BB&: D ,* XpIj 7! OJ c i j5cJ bvJC_ TI& S(mU fxQS OfSU # o S5l* EU+ :W`}| {`O| BaMB p&Pq zH9v 9`[Y &*@d +6#& e82L @7Zm 1XFY67 0bV2 @ !c' txqn pu)ioL zXbS @'$>B ( >ETp Cw?z t;!4 T=fN ijvb. P7Hgox 3/:o 2K\: dmup &:ah( a DUq ?,.@ \qb` b!tK B `j tb4X^ p'Jg &vl\ k#8E 5MSS3 jgYY &tD 4;5A\ B\RZMb FzhuRyj /{D' Nudl +DQ XJAU WERR thbj !"j @!AUAFj !dc5Ojh *9\7 ByE} y#3K@! fx^35 :Mte k4!R LuuT 7ch A!aM5$ 7jElC ,T+ KD` ~b"Vc kG! U Ll@( D\.e &exl 7th0B o:j zOn9 Y*&@ yXv UEf$J f6 S^wI .hK| 6r033 x= $l fN~{ ,L0?3 { 0K ;Y/L 0aJ ]92JS q1^~ <11Y `jr. X$bt 7YN/l "YVLbn Y,N. IDAT K@3d fEx@ 9a:cZ iMSy s@ c d ZO ?C f @\/ {7m=k ww?N Seg8 Bl^G I*DL 9*Q.~U T- 1 06$ rv.\v ['_v a6*#J S<OU 4s:f Pi]K ^V"/?[ M2a& oozq \paU4 tZyQ= abb oM|! Xgn8 W\x}w D(n~ W^58 aw2!W wV$K Z2Uh$+ %Kj1 HPhr f I7y' 5s+~2 {1ua ff&WZ UA`M -*S /( j* erCa 6ILB `&|,plt7 ?;=N -ebR NuofX -o/C s/9{ \t'7v KTru ]8@D gh2Z f^};( HJQ8 "SX,ES m_>@ }20& "Nvxm8 OM # =3J { jII nDse &y#K ABJL" jf(YJf2X V>Ih ?_>R [K5idb 'f:(, -_yt 98c 3ba0 Z(AB ^b4I 54%UkK |A9] Y&0h ::><^]^ %/nRP ,>wg yWF`( bGkA U Y.tF (B{] 9fr / *;L! +:{& F@yu sMfy :HM0B pW]? 4L`$|TmZQ xImB qR V jeJlPgrT 8Z"wp s.<orr Dg`L IDAT0 [ M " 6uYU)p l0N$ FM\Yz|nfc |8s- Z6Lg `!Wx u]\/ Ti}t :Y2K dqnI dD5V \ 36 D1a !0Ua DP(%s-1 j $b Y )lmX 5Xd98 =D%i* J:0j AiXk D.Ht ZGe5 r=95 K bV aC %J )9tk@rj &m[dd =m^} 'O>5= SD}? lEUG ;smr4 oL,| S. 7 )_W; vVnd? aOGa3u 81tC li.a iJC1L) !UUH Dt=}z p#US 0\NWW0 bHCU O aZ kmG, /~~~_m DO)U B|`] Lgw5 :iW2 f}=1 DLOa ?<=X j:]x= Y=Z[ <jtJ! ; kO^=7 \tL%|ms- ;>Or IM\:?8 pz4`dKrzb2 <[Q=~ vmhx &Pzx *$,[ <1q/S \D8 opao}1 `-}{s no#B 4 +"Io! Bjrt b-G] 1( e '-|K {0 z YH\t M EQ C/ e8 \=X_ MzDt B)r~ 0 cdxc 83WI{ tH-U f6KE DV_;v zF}u[ riA; s?;[ _yz~ \wu w|d 'a+ZJ 5Ov? C Vo= 7V>J +H^?z Y_)r g^hF Y>N_ 7zET !)?tz E!p:\ +iJZ^ GSIc vA*[nE q] T wEVv a5^[= Sk*B YA+V ]4Z; bqad%P Q4F/ &3fb ND9:S *{?D [<y5 6gFvV6 /2"s R(>= -2[: Se+} :p_P IDATR _,|o B(TM 8?V\;' Mv2d hkrNo ~~n1S &BP iW|c %" ~ HF (z d,AC Hy;R| iFFJ (A.t* m&'0 )p aeb -1>^ QaCw y(fyX "2T1? ="Sg2 <La n2or Q[L/ Cv#e,+ %Yo% ybjmO $_$z fF(Ui #s<\% >"1MG% 2Yj* :DChSx 8lsm #qJL7 vQmq tO^,O OXQ ^BqrO z@T' Q"18G (zQ6) ^|QvnR |w8.s -Ffy' =O^a ]e9Gl &/\f Z$<KG G$~Vh @+(( >Xo07 H9(JR y"Nv C>Du o2<E \~&Btb b]es E {At s y2By FR%4 XZ`a *RHU U` Q+H 'r-_ Btc! 6(`A3; 'tz4 2A;K ;x^F 5I,F{ $~P] -\~t 27>b8Ea r|L ;D5r% )I+K0F'H {7H? .<IW \-#< %-tA StSL 2{SE )z(h !QPP ,oNI ObNR W; -*i O7{k +5mD .0mc VlcW 8Ui_ v.= H)$^ Pd7W vyg> 8Yc_0 >N%;{ .m2Q ^ 'y (<5L| 2 H+{ &RZiH Oa3D =HE4AU > f7 6 b_ ,d! dO:;m l*6Y t(B( O>qr [U_ R*mUY QTUA IDATJ wc} s*Ob K\^' PeVY R2($ kiv x!W, lb'_ ( l7 nfKe ~_A7 &okon 6~^) mUUZ ',r=O /a OdGCc- 7215 0O+( n +y -+y W+= 9|IU? uQH% <@) B e;l+zJ9 ;+%uu H5b1NR|K Ieb`. )Q8@ -S{Zf b5kx* q0K< YQ%X J=WO ,&ke]X `Jxi &q65 p!'qG UoIy {5`,v q$e1 =4rjj[k1 $Fw9 '),7 _r]Q |h*c ,4zY RNtM 5cv rfEv L`-k zPyt >WI9 C/oKy]@ x+oLm />4C Bj +"Q )!A9' ylAS r.&y xI-G +'0B 9wKi x=of ?llP 8~P- A@n> {s|s 0pZf ,r5o -WN) O+c\ 1f)- Bc'fJ 0MU: ^Y_T Z`;ky+ yw-pw=G ,6,$ Hndh a/;V Ye06 @%fF l+#~ Cy*/ w\_C h i| q,Cs X 8@!7 e34Bm sr-` pTS({X w2-2 *y5E TDN! z! b IDAT M5Fd qjh^ +6a[ }I / 4sgn4 Wq5W ela}U'7 g{]r v7N> o=o)V >\\U yt-V kYcJ <K>M* nG1u ]Mzi)f TVsC3 &vc5 -5Y~e ) >Pr RJb( ;'p# ^_k ObH} K"Kr9_ K;w $RYBJ 1-VZ &a|J Nav :?)d! 'K&aTZ rH9I% dJHM &4/m hIEe Rsp7 ~E x Cf996 ~+tL> 0uU]* '+Uu :%4[ EQ, 8 K? "Rc7n@f sNR ] wr&o _x<g r_Rm:}* 0'H] L-yj; 3;8 17Mn3 oy s\ [B// /p:w oMrx Xuu& d)#OY% {3WpH >UW*} ~}0MR WW.5} .mk5lK jUZj~ />f) Mnb& MmMq [i>( <y,8 `m%7 '7]6oi }y97 f_jr B-l>~ 4%7s# Zq3D ")uQ- R]-WW9 {pem 8wg/V omlV <II& |GlcO^ Gp)O T[/,N "Z!2 3*Lr r3Hh I>mo "KKjc >5~h $^F W}kU .2^\ 37q5 9D,{ |b7ej ";`wh Fi< r=K( ;*Ie[e\ ~RSrt!3ZGUx @Pvnb L8*o IwpGT" lUD]8 \:kSHP )y1UR IDAT $i 4 CPBV O)/-vg [,V' Dkj< $I+g& TE[y XJ"*. X-b0E "zI$" n:"d B=F- 9 w~ }[5 D ebtu )M[\R 'Lqd (yPi e6!]'a hq?d eocy[3T !H|bAm Swha K,(I /4e/ dHw[ .Vvd ` oxLa Bk%A <F/k Sg-t A1/yw G'F .03- LDHr "Hr,b ; "8 F8%D! 3Pz2w &E!0w <P-L }1hv iOp1 wHvw (T`cJ 2;`I5 0sGJ X6 Po FY {JY0 bk{y VfG' s"qJD OD>uC mYj ;@ZR Ubn( D$$fw$ D'3!aK UB2$ $g 2 ]n/_hF IeD_ g#cS EA| V9;Ft A- a I%cm X`H, r{X_ )BkE #T^GW> U+|5 ^pa-1 %!O? PX\PBf~z Uw&h ^T= "j_ slQ` q#MK j/[ tUUm ?3PZU DAXV `c. @EJ%q# 26U1 Vw_sn VUFv "r*} eOC)$ <"_: XN6F_ A3"@ PDUe V-G2 -/!#s zoA&OR !0;8 vsD: ,UT0B !@F{ gK%C8 XM4 gLvE ?7,bDp 9mgC juPepaK9 !-#c V%19wDF )a@R xT[iU [Br** %- .`/ IDATu /"eU5 ;K-" PQk_ )_i' YS-w7 -1'' ;r+0 bjpQ] jU1#L C['> zXt8 Xk19 05A a%q(I k?d$ <?Pb ='i^ I2$g 3[Bo n"x6 3%2k -/<TUZ E<I2 2F.Q ^?7! kd1 g_Kz !8{/ CTg,|% Vi#N}r ;w>! W'1A Q6pm `;N@k 6FJe {Wt% =,Pc;=Ny KJ " j#_v43o %l"x Dd)<L4 Hgb# LX\27 |N%f RSCs" QJ3mq r$t K rIr_Z i|^tD g2T> 6oSs Nev|S 2{"S[U BGo& CLi6g\ r:|bt 7];NP- "80Y sTk\ 6hoJ gu]&: ?^((3 Zwf )k^ Y{5$ C)]1g @ ^O EIX` n`[yC TQnH )WAku 9,9B '^}`v F2#" Nm f kcOZ a_9. r)bo -M|vG %of0 +XUk takTW Nye[ L]Dk f p0T 0{YK* t]u>.W M]:K * ]{1g 0)n/ [aB| c#&w ]U[P D9G4 N6yI q/c15_0 =;ssR A;eHZ{UU PM 5 FX;|+ <}8{ Z*tVZ^ )S(= #L"[ ^-tw { ff& q9-Uu sNZ& IDAT=]e *lKhY 9B'{ T8## Ii-! p3"%3; eBta YkEnNCEw 71i \k5( [:;hs fAg(X U' Z B[3S 3.>z i2XR $Td:8 sgM& `oK' t% I IEND :4p[ !!BBBeee Ez D +tZ*T %BI<'& t0TZ} _jxt _jxt +tZ* & 6" JUDGMENT ON ShiuHan SumNg Normal Microsoft Word 8.0 JUDGMENT ON Title _PID_GUID _PID_HLINKS Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8