SILVER SEN NAVIGATION INC. v. XIAMEN SHENG LI ECONOMY AND TRADING DEVELOPMENT CO. AND ANOTHER
The summons for summary judgment was dismissed because the 2nd Defendant's defencesraised (illegality/ultra vires under PRC law, lack of authority to execute the Guarantees and the limited reliance in the Chinese proceedings) were arguable and not frivolous or hopeless, the estoppel argument was not pleaded and was insufficient to dispose of the triable issues, and the matters required trial rather than determination under Order 14.
- Citation
- SILVER SEN NAVIGATION INC. v. XIAMEN SHENG LI ECONOMY AND TRADING DEVELOPMENT CO. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Silver Sen Navigation Inc.; 1st Defendant: Xiamen Sheng Li Economy And Trading Development Co.; 2nd Defendant: Overseas Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 1998
- Case Number
- HCCL110/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial List (court of First Instance) / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's summons dated 9 April 1998 dismissed; Order nisi that Plaintiff pay the Defendants' costs of and occasioned by the Order 14 application, to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee, Estoppel (approbation and Reprobation), Capacity and Ultra Vires, Choice of Law, Jurisdiction, Novation, Summary Judgment (order 14)
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silver Sen Navigation Inc.
1st Plaintiff
Xiamen Sheng Li Economy And Trading Development Co.
1st Defendant
Overseas Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd.
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial List (court of First Instance) / Order 14 Summary Judgment Application (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd Defendant is estopped by approbation and reprobation from denying the validity of the Second Guarantee
- 2 Whether the guarantees were validly executed and whether the signatory had authority
- 3 Whether the underlying charterparties and freight payment agreements were illegal or ultra vires under PRC law (lex causae) such that estoppel cannot validate them
Ratio Decidendi
The summons for summary judgment was dismissed because the 2nd Defendant's defencesraised (illegality/ultra vires under PRC law, lack of authority to execute the Guarantees and the limited reliance in the Chinese proceedings) were arguable and not frivolous or hopeless, the estoppel argument was not pleaded and was insufficient to dispose of the triable issues, and the matters required trial rather than determination under Order 14.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's summons dated 9 April 1998 dismissed; Order nisi that Plaintiff pay the Defendants' costs of and occasioned by the Order 14 application, to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- The Plaintiff's summons dated 9 April 1998 is dismissed.
- There will be an Order nisi that the Plaintiff do pay the Defendants the costs of and occasioned by the Order 14 application, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment