HANSON JAY WANG KIT v. ERNEST JAY WANG KO AND OTHERS

HANSON JAY WANG KIT v. ERNEST JAY WANG KO AND OTHERS

Allegations against the executor were either unproven, trivial in context of the estate's scale, or subject to adequate alternative remedies; it was improbable that an action to remove the executor would succeed, so the court refused to adjourn/stay and refused to remove or suspend the executor, granted Beddoe-type protective orders to permit litigation to continue under estate control, and ordered indemnity for costs to protect the estate's interests.

Citation
HANSON JAY WANG KIT v. ERNEST JAY WANG KO AND OTHERS
Parties
Plaintiff: Hanson Jay Wang Kit; 1st Defendant: Ernest Jay Wang Ko; 2nd Defendant: Wong Yam Yin; 3rd Defendant: Mok Siu Bun
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
22 May 1985
Case Number
HCMP3473/1984
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Probate Proceedings Concerning Estate Administration and Related Company Claims / Originating Summons Heard; Application to Adjourn/stay Refused; Reasons Delivered and Orders Made
Outcome
Application to adjourn or stay refused; Beddoe order and related procedural orders made; executor indemnified for costs; costs apportioned.
Legal Topics
Removal of Executor, Beddoe Order, Mareva Injunction, Indemnity for Costs, Selective Litigation/alleged Misconduct by Executor
Source Language
EN
Probate Estate Administration Trusts Civil Procedure Company Law Removal of Executor Beddoe Order Mareva Injunction +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hanson Jay Wang Kit

Plaintiff

Ernest Jay Wang Ko

1st Defendant

Wong Yam Yin

2nd Defendant

Mok Siu Bun

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Probate Proceedings Concerning Estate Administration and Related Company Claims / Originating Summons Heard; Application to Adjourn/stay Refused; Reasons Delivered and Orders Made

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the hearing of the originating summons should be adjourned or stayed pending an action to remove the executor
  2. 2 Whether the executor (Hanson) should be removed or suspended under statutory power
  3. 3 Whether allegations of misconduct and selective litigation by the executor justify removal

Ratio Decidendi

Allegations against the executor were either unproven, trivial in context of the estate's scale, or subject to adequate alternative remedies; it was improbable that an action to remove the executor would succeed, so the court refused to adjourn/stay and refused to remove or suspend the executor, granted Beddoe-type protective orders to permit litigation to continue under estate control, and ordered indemnity for costs to protect the estate's interests.

Court Disposition

Application to adjourn or stay refused; Beddoe order and related procedural orders made; executor indemnified for costs; costs apportioned.

Orders

  • Beddoe-type order made permitting prosecution and defence of actions in the interests of the estate
  • Ernest appointed to represent the beneficiaries to date in the proceedings