HERMAN ISKANDAR v. BONARDY LEO AND OTHERS
The Court preferred the honest and consistent evidence of the solicitor (Mr Lui) and attesting witness (Miss Neo) and preferred the handwriting expert Mr Davis over the defence experts; the 1st defendant failed to prove forgery to the requisite high degree of probability, therefore the alleged Will was genuine and probate was granted in solemn form.
- Citation
- HERMAN ISKANDAR v. BONARDY LEO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Herman Iskandar; 1st Defendant: Bonardy Leo; 2nd Defendant: Sariwati Tjandra; 3rd Defendant: Liong Pauliana Lugito
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1987
- Case Number
- HCA9/1984
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree: Probate of the Will granted in solemn form; Will declared genuine.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Forgery Allegation, Handwriting Expert Evidence, Attesting Witnesses, Burden of Proof, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Herman Iskandar
Plaintiff
Bonardy Leo
1st Defendant
Sariwati Tjandra
2nd Defendant
Liong Pauliana Lugito
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the alleged Will was forged
- 2 Whether the Will was duly executed (testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval)
- 3 Credibility of attesting witnesses and preparer (Mr Lui and Miss Neo)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court preferred the honest and consistent evidence of the solicitor (Mr Lui) and attesting witness (Miss Neo) and preferred the handwriting expert Mr Davis over the defence experts; the 1st defendant failed to prove forgery to the requisite high degree of probability, therefore the alleged Will was genuine and probate was granted in solemn form.
Court Disposition
Decree: Probate of the Will granted in solemn form; Will declared genuine.
Orders
- Decree probate of the Will in solemn form of law against all defendants.
- Costs ordered against the 1st defendant (subject to submissions).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment