HILLHEAD LTD. v. SEAN ERIC MCLEAN HOTUNG AND OTHERS

HILLHEAD LTD. v. SEAN ERIC MCLEAN HOTUNG AND OTHERS

It is inappropriate for the judge seized with the substantive proceedings to hear the trustee's Beddoe application; the Beddoe application must be adjourned to and heard by another judge to preserve impartiality and prevent disclosure of the trustee's legal advice.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
HILLHEAD LTD. v. SEAN ERIC MCLEAN HOTUNG AND OTHERS
Parties
Plaintiff: Hillhead Limited; 1st Defendant: Sean Eric McLean Hotung; 2nd Defendant: Eric Edward Hotung; 3rd Defendant: Mara Tegwen Hotung Lamb; 4th Defendant: Sheridan Patricia Hotung Shea; 5th Defendant: Gabrielle Marie Hotung; 6th Defendant: Patricia Ann Hotung; 7th Defendant: Anthony Eric Ryan Hotung; 8th Defendant: Michael Eric Hotung
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
15 January 2003
Case Number
HCMP5250/2002
Procedural Posture
Beddoe Application (order 85 R.2(1), Rules of the High Court, Cap.4) / Interlocutory — Adjournment to Another Judge
Outcome
Application adjourned to another judge for hearing; three hours to be reserved and an early hearing date to be fixed.
Legal Topics
Beddoe Application, Recusal, Adjournment, Directions to Trustee
Source Language
en
Trusts Civil Procedure Equity Beddoe Application Recusal Adjournment Directions to Trustee

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hillhead Limited

Plaintiff

Sean Eric McLean Hotung

1st Defendant

Eric Edward Hotung

2nd Defendant

Mara Tegwen Hotung Lamb

3rd Defendant

Sheridan Patricia Hotung Shea

4th Defendant

Gabrielle Marie Hotung

5th Defendant

Patricia Ann Hotung

6th Defendant

Anthony Eric Ryan Hotung

7th Defendant

Michael Eric Hotung

8th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Beddoe Application (order 85 R.2(1), Rules of the High Court, Cap.4) / Interlocutory — Adjournment to Another Judge

  1. 1 Whether the judge seized with the substantive proceedings should hear the trustee's Beddoe application
  2. 2 Whether the Beddoe application should be adjourned to another judge to avoid disclosure of trustee's advice and views
  3. 3 Whether common parties between Beddoe and substantive proceedings requires disclosure to the judge seized with the substantive matter

Ratio Decidendi

It is inappropriate for the judge seized with the substantive proceedings to hear the trustee's Beddoe application; the Beddoe application must be adjourned to and heard by another judge to preserve impartiality and prevent disclosure of the trustee's legal advice.

Court Disposition

Application adjourned to another judge for hearing; three hours to be reserved and an early hearing date to be fixed.

Orders

  • Adjourn the application to another judge to a date to be fixed with three hours reserved and an early hearing date to be given.
  • No order as to costs of the hearing today.