HKSAR v. TSANG SAU YING

HKSAR v. TSANG SAU YING

The Magistrate had considered all relevant matters, the appellant's occupation was relevant only to a fact in issue, no legal error or unsafe basis for the conviction was identified, and therefore the appellate court must dismiss the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
HKSAR v. TSANG SAU YING
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant/defendant: Tsang Sau-ying
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
14 January 1999
Case Number
HCMA1104/1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Judgment (appeal Heard and Decided)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Blackmail, Theft, Evidence, Credibility, Magistrate Findings
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Blackmail Theft Evidence Credibility Magistrate Findings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

Tsang Sau-ying

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Judgment (appeal Heard and Decided)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the magistrate failed to take into account all surrounding circumstances leading to the alleged offences
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate rejected the appellant's evidence because of her occupation (bias against a nightclub hostess)

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate had considered all relevant matters, the appellant's occupation was relevant only to a fact in issue, no legal error or unsafe basis for the conviction was identified, and therefore the appellate court must dismiss the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed