HKSAR v. TONG WOON TONG and Another

HKSAR v. TONG WOON TONG and Another

The magistrate correctly applied sentencing principles, treating the offences as exceptionally serious but giving credit for guilty pleas and antecedents; the appellate court exercised mercy by suspending the imposed custodial sentences for two years because the appellants were unlikely to reoffend, had significant personal mitigating factors (age, health, clear records) and the offences followed proactive ICAC investigation, but the convictions and nominal sentences were upheld.

Citation
HKSAR v. TONG WOON TONG and Another
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; 1st Appellant: TONG WOON TONG; 2nd Appellant: HO SHUN
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
26 February 1998
Case Number
HCMA1080/1997
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; original custodial sentences of 5 months (1st Appellant) and 6 months (2nd Appellant) upheld but suspended for 2 years as an act of mercy.
Legal Topics
Bribery, Offering an Advantage, Sentencing Discretion, Entrapment/commissioned Investigation
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Anti Corruption Law Sentencing Bribery Offering an Advantage Sentencing Discretion Entrapment/commissioned Investigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

TONG WOON TONG

1st Appellant

HO SHUN

2nd Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the magistrate erred in failing to give adequate credit for age and health
  2. 2 Whether the magistrate failed to account for initial telephone offers being rejected and the role of the ICAC-initiated meeting (entrapment issue)
  3. 3 Whether the sentences were manifestly excessive or wrong in principle

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate correctly applied sentencing principles, treating the offences as exceptionally serious but giving credit for guilty pleas and antecedents; the appellate court exercised mercy by suspending the imposed custodial sentences for two years because the appellants were unlikely to reoffend, had significant personal mitigating factors (age, health, clear records) and the offences followed proactive ICAC investigation, but the convictions and nominal sentences were upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; original custodial sentences of 5 months (1st Appellant) and 6 months (2nd Appellant) upheld but suspended for 2 years as an act of mercy.

Orders

  • Sentences of 5 months imprisonment (1st Appellant) and 6 months imprisonment (2nd Appellant) suspended for 2 years
  • Effect of suspended sentences explained to appellants