HKSAR v. CHAN YIU SUN

HKSAR v. CHAN YIU SUN

The abrupt and very hard braking that caused two passengers to fall, absent evidence that such braking was necessary to meet an exigent danger affecting safety of third parties, constituted a departure from the standard of a reasonable, prudent and competent driver and amounted to careless driving; the trial magistrate s factual findings were open on evidence and the conviction must therefore be upheld.

Citation
HKSAR v. CHAN YIU SUN
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant/defendant: CHAN YIU SUN
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
17 June 2000
Case Number
HCMA141/2000
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (careless Driving Under Road Traffic Ordinance) / Hearing and Judgment in Court of First Instance on Appeal From Magistrate
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Legal Topics
Careless Driving, Standard of Care, Emergency Doctrine, Appeal Against Conviction
Source Language
EN
Traffic Law Criminal Law Negligence Careless Driving Standard of Care Emergency Doctrine Appeal Against Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

CHAN YIU SUN

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (careless Driving Under Road Traffic Ordinance) / Hearing and Judgment in Court of First Instance on Appeal From Magistrate

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether abrupt braking constituted careless driving contrary to s.38(1) RTO
  2. 2 Whether emergency (door flung open) justified departure from the standard of a reasonable driver
  3. 3 Whether the trial magistrate erred in fact‑finding and law in convicting the defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The abrupt and very hard braking that caused two passengers to fall, absent evidence that such braking was necessary to meet an exigent danger affecting safety of third parties, constituted a departure from the standard of a reasonable, prudent and competent driver and amounted to careless driving; the trial magistrate s factual findings were open on evidence and the conviction must therefore be upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Conviction for careless driving under s.38(1) Road Traffic Ordinance affirmed