HKSAR v. RELOSO DANIEL RUIZ AND ANOTHER

HKSAR v. RELOSO DANIEL RUIZ AND ANOTHER

The Court upheld the Magistrate's finding that the complainant had ample opportunity to observe the appellants, that his detailed descriptions were reliable and corroborated, that the Magistrate properly applied the Turnbull guidelines, and therefore the convictions for theft were safe and upheld.

Citation
HKSAR v. RELOSO DANIEL RUIZ AND ANOTHER
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; 1st Appellant: Reloso Daniel Ruiz; 2nd Appellant: Bondoc Roman Valencia
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
18 November 1999
Case Number
HCMA679/1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (magistracy Appeal) / Appeal Against Conviction Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeals dismissed; convictions and sentences upheld
Legal Topics
Theft, Identification Evidence, Appeal Against Conviction, Sentencing
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Evidence Theft Identification Evidence Appeal Against Conviction Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

Reloso Daniel Ruiz

1st Appellant

Bondoc Roman Valencia

2nd Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (magistracy Appeal) / Appeal Against Conviction Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether identification by the complainant was reliable
  2. 2 Whether delay between offence and police report rendered identification unsafe
  3. 3 Whether the Magistrate properly applied Turnbull guidelines and was entitled to accept witness credibility

Ratio Decidendi

The Court upheld the Magistrate's finding that the complainant had ample opportunity to observe the appellants, that his detailed descriptions were reliable and corroborated, that the Magistrate properly applied the Turnbull guidelines, and therefore the convictions for theft were safe and upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed; convictions and sentences upheld

Orders

  • Appeals against conviction dismissed
  • Convictions for theft affirmed