HUI SHUI KAY v. HON TO AND ANOTHER
The Declaration of Trust dated 7 March 2002 was genuine and established that beneficial ownership vested in the plaintiff prior to the bankruptcy; the trustees' asserted settlement was a counter-offer and did not constitute agreement; because the trustees have no claim to the property they were obliged to vacate the registration of the bankruptcy order and the court ordered relief in favour of the plaintiff; costs were awarded to the plaintiff on an indemnity basis assessed at HKD 200,000 to be borne by the estate in the first instance with a hearing for trustees to show cause why they should not personally bear costs.
- Citation
- HUI SHUI KAY v. HON TO AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: HUI SHUI KAY; 1st Defendant (bankrupt): HON TO; 2nd Defendant (joint and Several Trustees): FRED LEE and CHOW WAI LAN CHRISTINE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2017
- Case Number
- HCMP3399/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy/property Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp 3399/2016) / Judgment (26 October 2017)
- Outcome
- Declaration of trust granted in favour of the plaintiff; order nisi made to vacate registration and for re-transfer; costs awarded to plaintiff on indemnity basis assessed at HKD 200,000 to be borne by the estate in the first instance; trustees ordered to show cause why they should not personally bear costs; further...
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Trust, Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Registration of Bankruptcy Order, Vacating Registration, Costs Indemnity, Trustees' Duties
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HUI SHUI KAY
Plaintiff
HON TO
1st Defendant (bankrupt)
FRED LEE and CHOW WAI LAN CHRISTINE
2nd Defendant (joint and Several Trustees)
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy/property Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp 3399/2016) / Judgment (26 October 2017)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Declaration of Trust dated 7 March 2002 validly vested beneficial ownership in the plaintiff prior to the bankruptcy
- 2 Whether the trustees had validly reached a prior settlement with the plaintiff
- 3 Whether a registration of a bankruptcy order made under the Bankruptcy Rules can or must be vacated where the trustee has no claim to the property
Ratio Decidendi
The Declaration of Trust dated 7 March 2002 was genuine and established that beneficial ownership vested in the plaintiff prior to the bankruptcy; the trustees' asserted settlement was a counter-offer and did not constitute agreement; because the trustees have no claim to the property they were obliged to vacate the registration of the bankruptcy order and the court ordered relief in favour of the plaintiff; costs were awarded to the plaintiff on an indemnity basis assessed at HKD 200,000 to be borne by the estate in the first instance with a hearing for trustees to show cause why they should not personally bear costs.
Court Disposition
Declaration of trust granted in favour of the plaintiff; order nisi made to vacate registration and for re-transfer; costs awarded to plaintiff on indemnity basis assessed at HKD 200,000 to be borne by the estate in the first instance; trustees ordered to show cause why they should not personally bear costs; further...
Orders
- Declaration that the 1st defendant held the property on trust for the plaintiff (referencing Declaration of Trust dated 7 March 2002)
- Order to vacate registration of the bankruptcy order and memorandum to court of resolution at the Land Registry against the Property
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment