HUNG TUNG SHING AND ANOTHER v. THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF KWONG SANG HONG BUILDING BLOCK B AND ANOTHER
The 2nd Defendant was negligent for failing to provide waterproof sealing as required (Reg 36(2)), and the 1st Defendant, as manager of the common parts, was negligent in failing to remedy the defect after notice; the court dismissed the claim for injunction for lack of jurisdiction/evidence on rateable value and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HUNG TUNG SHING AND ANOTHER v. THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF KWONG SANG HONG BUILDING BLOCK B AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Hung Tung Shing; Plaintiff: Wong Kwan Ching; 1st Defendant: The Incorporated Owners of Kwong Sang Hong Building Block B; 2nd Defendant: Perfect Construction Engineering (Int'l) Limited
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2002
- Case Number
- DCCJ3013/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Nuisance/negligence Relating to Building Works and Property Damage / Judgment (district Court)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claim for injunction dismissed; Plaintiffs succeed on damages for nuisance/negligence against both defendants jointly and severally; indemnity claim by 1st Defendant against 2nd Defendant dismissed; costs awarded to Plaintiffs against 2nd Defendant on assessed scale.
- Legal Topics
- Nuisance, Negligence (duty of Care), Injunction Jurisdiction and Joinder, Maintenance of Common Parts, Statutory Compliance With Building Regulations, Assessment of Damages, Indemnity Claim
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hung Tung Shing
Plaintiff
Wong Kwan Ching
Plaintiff
The Incorporated Owners of Kwong Sang Hong Building Block B
1st Defendant
Perfect Construction Engineering (Int'l) Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Nuisance/negligence Relating to Building Works and Property Damage / Judgment (district Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Court had jurisdiction to grant the mandatory injunction sought
- 2 Whether other owners of affected flats must be joined before a mandatory injunction is granted
- 3 Causation and source of seepage/damage to Flat 12-I
Ratio Decidendi
The 2nd Defendant was negligent for failing to provide waterproof sealing as required (Reg 36(2)), and the 1st Defendant, as manager of the common parts, was negligent in failing to remedy the defect after notice; the court dismissed the claim for injunction for lack of jurisdiction/evidence on rateable value and for failure to join other affected owners; damages of HKD 20,000 were awarded to the Plaintiffs against both defendants jointly and severally, interest was ordered, the 1st Defendant's indemnity claim against the 2nd Defendant was dismissed, and costs were assessed against the 2nd Defendant on a Small Claims Tribunal scale.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claim for injunction dismissed; Plaintiffs succeed on damages for nuisance/negligence against both defendants jointly and severally; indemnity claim by 1st Defendant against 2nd Defendant dismissed; costs awarded to Plaintiffs against 2nd Defendant on assessed scale.
Orders
- Judgment for Plaintiffs against both Defendants jointly and severally for damages of HKD 20,000
- Interest on HKD 20,000 at 4.07% per annum from date of writ until judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment