ICI SWIRE PAINTS LTD v. TECHI MOTOR ENGINEERING & TRADING CO
The court found that, applying the established test for implying terms, an implied term existed that ICI would supply goods to the Defendant for the duration of calendar year 1994 subject to stock availability; ICI (through Mr C.C. Cheung) unilaterally terminated supply in late May/1994 without mutual agreement or adequate contractual justification and therefore breached both the 1994 Sales Agreement and the 1994 Authorised Dealer Appointment; the Defendant is entitled to judgment on the counterclaim with damages to be assessed.
- Citation
- ICI SWIRE PAINTS LTD v. TECHI MOTOR ENGINEERING & TRADING CO
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action) and Defendant (counterclaim): ICI Swire Paints Limited; Defendant (original Action): Techi Motor Engineering & Trading Company; Counterclaimant: Cheung Kin Man trading as Techi Motor Engineering & Trading Company and Techi Paints and Accessories Specialities; Counterclaim Defendant: ICI Swire Paints Limited (counterclaim Defendant)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 1998
- Case Number
- HCA7251/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute (dealer/distribution Agreements) / Judgment (trial Decision; Damages to Be Assessed)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Defendant on the counterclaim; plaintiff found in breach of the 1994 Sales Agreement and Authorised Dealer Appointment; assessment of damages to follow; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Termination, Breach of Contract, Dealer Agreements, Trade Credit, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ICI Swire Paints Limited
Plaintiff (original Action) and Defendant (counterclaim)
Techi Motor Engineering & Trading Company
Defendant (original Action)
Cheung Kin Man trading as Techi Motor Engineering & Trading Company and Techi Paints and Accessories Specialities
Counterclaimant
ICI Swire Paints Limited (counterclaim Defendant)
Counterclaim Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute (dealer/distribution Agreements) / Judgment (trial Decision; Damages to Be Assessed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1994 Authorised Dealer Appointment and Sales Agreement contained an implied term that the supplier would supply for the whole calendar year 1994 upon orders by the dealer
- 2 If such an implied term exists, whether the supplier unlawfully and unilaterally terminated supply in May/June 1994 or whether termination was by mutual agreement or justified by the dealer's conduct/credit position
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, applying the established test for implying terms, an implied term existed that ICI would supply goods to the Defendant for the duration of calendar year 1994 subject to stock availability; ICI (through Mr C.C. Cheung) unilaterally terminated supply in late May/1994 without mutual agreement or adequate contractual justification and therefore breached both the 1994 Sales Agreement and the 1994 Authorised Dealer Appointment; the Defendant is entitled to judgment on the counterclaim with damages to be assessed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Defendant on the counterclaim; plaintiff found in breach of the 1994 Sales Agreement and Authorised Dealer Appointment; assessment of damages to follow; costs reserved.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the Defendant on the Counterclaim (breach found)
- Assessment of damages to be conducted on a date to be fixed (preferably before the same judge)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment