IP PUI LAM ARTHUR AND ANOTHER v. ALAN CHUNG WAH TANG AND ANOTHER
Leave to file the variation summons out of time was granted because there was no prejudice to the respondents and the substantive variation was raised within time and argued on the papers; however the variation summons was dismissed and indemnity costs were ordered because the applicants pursued an application that was untenable in law (lack of jurisdiction to order the affidavit) and had been put on notice by prior correspondence and authority, such conduct justified indemnity costs.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1621
- Parties
- Applicant Joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy: IP PUI LAM ARTHUR; Applicant Joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy: IP PUI SUM; Respondent Joint and Several Liquidator of Asia Pac Infrastructure Development Limited: ALAN CHUNG WAH TANG; Respondent Joint and Several Liquidator of Asia Pac Infrastructure Development Limited: HOU CHUNG MAN; Bankrupt: HO YUK WAH DAVID
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2020
- Case Number
- HCB3819/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings / Application to Vary Costs Order; Decision on Costs and Leave to File Out of Time
- Outcome
- Variation summons dismissed; retrospective leave to file out of time granted (filing dated 2 July 2020 to stand); costs to Liquidators on indemnity basis
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Costs Assessment, Leave to File Out of Time, Discovery, Court Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IP PUI LAM ARTHUR
Applicant Joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy
IP PUI SUM
Applicant Joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy
ALAN CHUNG WAH TANG
Respondent Joint and Several Liquidator of Asia Pac Infrastructure Development Limited
HOU CHUNG MAN
Respondent Joint and Several Liquidator of Asia Pac Infrastructure Development Limited
HO YUK WAH DAVID
Bankrupt
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings / Application to Vary Costs Order; Decision on Costs and Leave to File Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether retrospective leave should be granted to file the variation summons out of time
- 2 Whether the order nisi for costs on indemnity basis with certificate for one counsel was appropriate
- 3 Whether the court had jurisdiction to order the filing of a specific affidavit
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to file the variation summons out of time was granted because there was no prejudice to the respondents and the substantive variation was raised within time and argued on the papers; however the variation summons was dismissed and indemnity costs were ordered because the applicants pursued an application that was untenable in law (lack of jurisdiction to order the affidavit) and had been put on notice by prior correspondence and authority, such conduct justified indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Variation summons dismissed; retrospective leave to file out of time granted (filing dated 2 July 2020 to stand); costs to Liquidators on indemnity basis
Orders
- Leave granted to the Former Trustees to file the variation summons out of time; filing on 2 July 2020 to stand
- Variation summons dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment