LAM MUI as the lawful administratrix of the estate of WONG SHING, deceased AND ANOTHER v. FRONTRICH INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS
P2's deliberate concealment of P1's death, dishonest explanations, inordinate delay and opportunistic/persistent litigation conduct constituted special and unusual features and abusive conduct warranting indemnity costs; the 2024 Summons is dismissed with indemnity costs and the Defendants' costs of resisting the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3367
- Parties
- Lawful Administratrix of the Estate of the 1st Plaintiff (wong Shing, Deceased): Lam Mui; 1st Plaintiff (deceased): Wong Shing; 2nd Plaintiff: Wong Sui Hing; 1st Defendant: Frontrich Investments Limited; 2nd Defendant: Chan Ming Yeung Alexis; 3rd Defendant: Chu Kwok Fai; 4th Defendant: Kong Kwan Tung
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Case Number
- HCA34/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Costs Application / Decision on Costs (post Hearing)
- Outcome
- Costs orders nisi varied: 2024 Summons dismissed with indemnity costs; Injunction Application dismissed with costs prior to 14 May 2021 to be borne by P1 and P2 jointly and severally on a party and party basis and costs since 15 May 2021 to be borne solely by P2 on an indemnity basis; costs of the costs application...
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Variation of Costs Nisi, Abuse of Process, Non Disclosure, Retrospective Leave, Summarily Assessed Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lam Mui
Lawful Administratrix of the Estate of the 1st Plaintiff (wong Shing, Deceased)
Wong Shing
1st Plaintiff (deceased)
Wong Sui Hing
2nd Plaintiff
Frontrich Investments Limited
1st Defendant
Chan Ming Yeung Alexis
2nd Defendant
Chu Kwok Fai
3rd Defendant
Kong Kwan Tung
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Costs Application / Decision on Costs (post Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs are appropriate in respect of the 2024 Summons
- 2 Whether costs incurred after 15 May 2021 should be borne solely by P2 on an indemnity basis in respect of the Injunction Application
- 3 Whether P2's conduct (concealment of P1's death, delay, non-disclosure and opportunistic litigation) justifies an award of indemnity costs
Ratio Decidendi
P2's deliberate concealment of P1's death, dishonest explanations, inordinate delay and opportunistic/persistent litigation conduct constituted special and unusual features and abusive conduct warranting indemnity costs; the 2024 Summons is dismissed with indemnity costs and the Defendants' costs of resisting the Injunction Application incurred after 15 May 2021 are to be borne by P2 on an indemnity basis; the screenshots relied on by P2 are inadmissible without leave.
Court Disposition
Costs orders nisi varied: 2024 Summons dismissed with indemnity costs; Injunction Application dismissed with costs prior to 14 May 2021 to be borne by P1 and P2 jointly and severally on a party and party basis and costs since 15 May 2021 to be borne solely by P2 on an indemnity basis; costs of the costs application...
Orders
- The 2024 Summons is dismissed with an order of costs in favour of the Defendants, with certificate for counsel, such costs to be summarily assessed on an indemnity basis and payable forthwith.
- The Injunction Application be dismissed with an order of costs in favour of the Defendants, with certificate for counsel, such costs to be summarily assessed and payable forthwith. The costs incurred prior to 14 May 2021 are to be borne by P1 and P2 jointly and severally on a party and party basis, and the costs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment