INFO ALLIED LTD v. LEUNG TZE CHING AND OTHERS

INFO ALLIED LTD v. LEUNG TZE CHING AND OTHERS

Summary judgment was refused because the 5th defendant and Newide established arguable triable issues on alleged misrepresentations and rescission, the conversion claim could not be struck out given the lost share certificate and issuance of a new certificate, and Newide could not be treated as a bona fide purchaser without notice given the chairman's knowledge; the matter must proceed to trial.

Citation
INFO ALLIED LTD v. LEUNG TZE CHING AND OTHERS
Parties
Plaintiff: Info Allied Limited; 1st Defendant: Leung Tze Ching; 2nd Defendant: Leung Ka Woo; 3rd Defendant: Ng Yau Yung; 4th Defendant: Young Siu Sun; 5th Defendant: Leung Ho Chiu; 6th Defendant: Newide Pacific Limited
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
14 April 2008
Case Number
HCA774/2007
Procedural Posture
Equitable Claim Concerning Share Transfer and Conversion / Application for Summary Judgment (interlocutory)
Outcome
Summary judgment refused; applications to strike out counterclaim and conversion prayer refused; matter to proceed to trial; leave to amend granted.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Misrepresentation, Rescission, Fiduciary Duty, Conversion, Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice, Counterclaim, Malicious Falsehood
Source Language
EN
Equity Company Law Contract Tort Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Misrepresentation Rescission +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Info Allied Limited

Plaintiff

Leung Tze Ching

1st Defendant

Leung Ka Woo

2nd Defendant

Ng Yau Yung

3rd Defendant

Young Siu Sun

4th Defendant

Leung Ho Chiu

5th Defendant

Newide Pacific Limited

6th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equitable Claim Concerning Share Transfer and Conversion / Application for Summary Judgment (interlocutory)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment was appropriate against the 5th and 6th defendants
  2. 2 Whether representations alleged to have been made by IAL induced the sale and give rise to rescission for misrepresentation
  3. 3 Whether IAL held an equitable interest/beneficial title and whether 5th defendant was a bare trustee

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment was refused because the 5th defendant and Newide established arguable triable issues on alleged misrepresentations and rescission, the conversion claim could not be struck out given the lost share certificate and issuance of a new certificate, and Newide could not be treated as a bona fide purchaser without notice given the chairman's knowledge; the matter must proceed to trial.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment refused; applications to strike out counterclaim and conversion prayer refused; matter to proceed to trial; leave to amend granted.

Orders

  • Summary judgment refused against the 5th defendant (Leung Ho Chiu) and the 6th defendant (Newide Pacific Limited)
  • Application to strike out the 5th defendant's counterclaim refused