KONAMI KABUSHIKI KAISHA (KONAMI CORPORATION) AND ANOTHER v. INFO POWER LTD
Leave to appeal was granted to the 1st plaintiff on the copyright claim because on the undisputed evidence the defendant had likely used a whole or substantial part of the artistic work and it was highly arguable the judge was wrong to find the fair dealing defence available; leave was refused as to the passing off claim and as to the 2nd plaintiff's copyright claim for want of demonstrated rights or interest.
- Citation
- KONAMI KABUSHIKI KAISHA (KONAMI CORPORATION) AND ANOTHER v. INFO POWER LTD
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: KONAMI KABUSHIKI KAISHA (KONAMI CORPORATION); 2nd Plaintiff: KONAMI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED; Defendant: INFO POWER LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2007
- Case Number
- HCMP2589/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Order 14 Application for Injunction and Damages (copyright and Passing Off) Originating in District Court; Leave to Appeal Application in Court of Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Order 14 Application
- Outcome
- Court grants leave to appeal to the 1st plaintiff on the copyright infringement claim; refuses leave on the passing off claim; refuses leave for the 2nd plaintiff on copyright for lack of demonstrated interest.
- Legal Topics
- Fair Dealing Defence, Summary Judgment (order 14), Leave to Appeal, Ownership and Standing, Evidence Sufficiency
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KONAMI KABUSHIKI KAISHA (KONAMI CORPORATION)
1st Plaintiff
KONAMI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
INFO POWER LIMITED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Order 14 Application for Injunction and Damages (copyright and Passing Off) Originating in District Court; Leave to Appeal Application in Court of Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Order 14 Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reproduction of graphical images from video games constituted infringement of artistic copyright by use of a whole or substantial part
- 2 Whether the defendant could rely on the fair dealing defence under s39 of the Copyright Ordinance for reporting/review/criticism
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs had produced sufficient evidence to obtain summary judgment under Order 14
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted to the 1st plaintiff on the copyright claim because on the undisputed evidence the defendant had likely used a whole or substantial part of the artistic work and it was highly arguable the judge was wrong to find the fair dealing defence available; leave was refused as to the passing off claim and as to the 2nd plaintiff's copyright claim for want of demonstrated rights or interest.
Court Disposition
Court grants leave to appeal to the 1st plaintiff on the copyright infringement claim; refuses leave on the passing off claim; refuses leave for the 2nd plaintiff on copyright for lack of demonstrated interest.
Orders
- Grant leave to the 1st plaintiff to appeal the dismissal of the Order 14 application in respect of the copyright infringement claim.
- Refuse leave to appeal in respect of the passing off claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment