ORIENTAL PRESS GROUP LTD AND OTHERS v. FEVAWORKS SOLUTIONS LTD t/a ALIVE! MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS AND ANOTHER
The actions were to be treated as one action for costs from the consolidation order of 23 November 2009; although plaintiffs obtained judgment only on the Mar 2007 publication and defendants succeeded on other publications by establishing innocent dissemination, both sides had substantive successes; accordingly the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- ORIENTAL PRESS GROUP LTD AND OTHERS v. FEVAWORKS SOLUTIONS LTD t/a ALIVE! MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: ORIENTAL PRESS GROUP LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: ORIENTAL DAILY PUBLISHER LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: THE SUN NEWS PUBLISHER LIMITED; 4th Plaintiff: MA CHING KWAN; 1st Defendant: FEVAWORKS SOLUTIONS LIMITED trading as ALIVE! MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS; 2nd Defendant: ALIVE! MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2011
- Case Number
- HCA597/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation (consolidated Actions) / Decision on Costs After Trial and Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants ordered to pay one third of the costs of the consolidated actions incurred on and after 23 November 2009; parties to bear their own costs incurred before 23 November 2009.
- Legal Topics
- Innocent Dissemination, Costs Orders, Mediation Refusal, Sanctioned Payments, Taxation of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ORIENTAL PRESS GROUP LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
ORIENTAL DAILY PUBLISHER LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
THE SUN NEWS PUBLISHER LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
MA CHING KWAN
4th Plaintiff
FEVAWORKS SOLUTIONS LIMITED trading as ALIVE! MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS
1st Defendant
ALIVE! MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation (consolidated Actions) / Decision on Costs After Trial and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the two actions should be treated as one action for costs
- 2 Whether plaintiffs are prima facie entitled to costs under RHC Ord.62 r.3(2)
- 3 Whether special matters under RHC Ord.62 r.5 justify displacing the usual costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The actions were to be treated as one action for costs from the consolidation order of 23 November 2009; although plaintiffs obtained judgment only on the Mar 2007 publication and defendants succeeded on other publications by establishing innocent dissemination, both sides had substantive successes; accordingly the fair costs order is that defendants pay one third of the costs of the actions incurred on and after 23 November 2009, and the parties bear their own costs incurred before that date.
Court Disposition
Defendants ordered to pay one third of the costs of the consolidated actions incurred on and after 23 November 2009; parties to bear their own costs incurred before 23 November 2009.
Orders
- Defendants to pay one third of the costs of the actions incurred on and after 23 November 2009.
- Parties to bear their own costs of the actions incurred before 23 November 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment