RE ZÜRICH LEBENSVERSICHERUNGS-GESELLSCHAFT AG (also known as ZURICH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) AND ANOTHER
The Scheme was sanctioned because statutory requirements under s24 were satisfied, the Independent Actuary concluded there would be no material adverse effect on policyholders (including on reasonable expectations and financial security), the Insurance Authority raised no objection and the Scheme is fair between...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2447
- Parties
- Petitioner: Zürich Lebensversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG (also known as Zurich Life Insurance Company Ltd); Petitioner: Zurich Life Insurance (Hong Kong) Limited; Respondent: Insurance Authority
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2021
- Case Number
- HCMP460/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under Sections 24 and 25 of the Insurance Ordinance (cap.41) for Sanction of a Transfer Scheme / Sanction Hearing and Reasons for Judgment (order Made)
- Outcome
- Scheme sanctioned and Order made under sections 24 and 25 of the Insurance Ordinance (Cap.41)
- Legal Topics
- Scheme Transfer Under Insurance Ordinance, Portfolio/asset and Liability Transfer, Actuarial Opinion and Solvency, Regulatory Approvals (sfc, Insurance Authority), Disclosure of Transfer Agreements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zürich Lebensversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG (also known as Zurich Life Insurance Company Ltd)
Petitioner
Zurich Life Insurance (Hong Kong) Limited
Petitioner
Insurance Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Sections 24 and 25 of the Insurance Ordinance (cap.41) for Sanction of a Transfer Scheme / Sanction Hearing and Reasons for Judgment (order Made)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory requirements of s24(2) and s24(3) of the Insurance Ordinance were satisfied
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to sanction the intra-group transfer of long term business
- 3 Whether the transfer would materially adversely affect contractual rights or reasonable expectations of transferring and non-transferring policyholders
Ratio Decidendi
The Scheme was sanctioned because statutory requirements under s24 were satisfied, the Independent Actuary concluded there would be no material adverse effect on policyholders (including on reasonable expectations and financial security), the Insurance Authority raised no objection and the Scheme is fair between affected classes; accordingly the court exercised its discretion to sanction and made ancillary orders under s25.
Court Disposition
Scheme sanctioned and Order made under sections 24 and 25 of the Insurance Ordinance (Cap.41)
Orders
- All contracts, rights, obligations and commitments of ZLIC with respect to the Transferring Policies and ZLIC HK Business shall, on and from the Transfer Date, be transferred to and vested in ZLIHK pursuant to s25 of the Ordinance
- Petitioners to post the Order (with Annexures), the Petition, the Independent Actuary’s Report and Supplementary Report and this Order on their website and maintain posting until the Transfer Date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment