RE THE PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
The court found the statutory preconditions under s24 satisfied, gave decisive weight to the independent actuaries' report and the Insurance Authority's non‑objection, concluded objections did not show any material adverse effect or unfairness to any class of policyholders, and held that amendment mechanisms...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE THE PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
- Parties
- Transferor/1st Petitioner: The Prudential Assurance Company Limited (PAC); Transferee/2nd Petitioner: Prudential Hong Kong Limited (PHKL); Regulator/party With Right to Be Heard: Commissioner of Insurance/Insurance Authority; Policyholder/objector: Mr Chan Ka Yeung; Policyholder/objector: Mrs Lily Chan Sham Yuet Wah (on behalf of Mr Lawrence Chan); Policyholder/objector: Mr Poon Wai Keung; Policyholder/objector: Ms Kam Lan Fong; Policyholder/objector: Mr Cheung Dy Mo Hua; Policyholder/objector: Madam Wong Chuen
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2013
- Case Number
- HCMP2027/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Business Transfer Petition Under Part IV Insurance Companies Ordinance (cap 41) / Sanction Hearing/judgment on Petition to Sanction Scheme
- Outcome
- Scheme sanctioned and order made by Court of First Instance
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Business Transfer, With Profits Fund Allocation, Court Sanction of Schemes, Actuarial Report Reliance, Scheme Amendment Provisions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Prudential Assurance Company Limited (PAC)
Transferor/1st Petitioner
Prudential Hong Kong Limited (PHKL)
Transferee/2nd Petitioner
Commissioner of Insurance/Insurance Authority
Regulator/party With Right to Be Heard
Mr Chan Ka Yeung
Policyholder/objector
Mrs Lily Chan Sham Yuet Wah (on behalf of Mr Lawrence Chan)
Policyholder/objector
Mr Poon Wai Keung
Policyholder/objector
Ms Kam Lan Fong
Policyholder/objector
Mr Cheung Dy Mo Hua
Policyholder/objector
Madam Wong Chuen
Policyholder/objector
Procedural Posture
Insurance Business Transfer Petition Under Part IV Insurance Companies Ordinance (cap 41) / Sanction Hearing/judgment on Petition to Sanction Scheme
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mandatory statutory conditions under s24 were satisfied
- 2 Whether the scheme is fair between transferring and non-transferring policyholders
- 3 Whether transferring policyholders' rights and reasonable expectations are preserved
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the statutory preconditions under s24 satisfied, gave decisive weight to the independent actuaries' report and the Insurance Authority's non‑objection, concluded objections did not show any material adverse effect or unfairness to any class of policyholders, and held that amendment mechanisms consistent with s25(1)(e) were permissible; accordingly the scheme was fair and sanctioned.
Court Disposition
Scheme sanctioned and order made by Court of First Instance
Orders
- Order sanctioning the Main Scheme and the EEA Policies Scheme under s24 of the Insurance Companies Ordinance (Cap 41) and approving the transfer as set out in the petition
- Order that the effective date of transfer be 00:01 am UK time on 1 January 2014 subject to required English court sanction and conditions and undertakings described in the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment