T, RH v. K, CS
Senior Counsel fees of HK$235,000 were allowed in full and solicitors' costs were assessed at HK$70,000, resulting in a summary assessment of costs in favour of the Respondent totalling HK$305,000 payable forthwith by the Petitioner because Senior Counsel involvement was justified by prior instruction history and the circumstances of the hearing.
- Citation
- [2024] HKFC 110
- Parties
- Petitioner (father): T, RH; Respondent (mother): K, CS
- Court
- Family Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2024
- Case Number
- FCMC8704/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial Causes / Summary Assessment of Costs (decision)
- Outcome
- Respondent awarded costs following summary assessment
- Legal Topics
- Interim Access, Summary Assessment of Costs, Costs Order, Counsel Fees
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T, RH
Petitioner (father)
K, CS
Respondent (mother)
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Causes / Summary Assessment of Costs (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's claimed costs are excessive
- 2 Whether instruction of Senior Counsel was justified
- 3 Proper quantum for solicitors' costs and counsel fees
Ratio Decidendi
Senior Counsel fees of HK$235,000 were allowed in full and solicitors' costs were assessed at HK$70,000, resulting in a summary assessment of costs in favour of the Respondent totalling HK$305,000 payable forthwith by the Petitioner because Senior Counsel involvement was justified by prior instruction history and the circumstances of the hearing.
Court Disposition
Respondent awarded costs following summary assessment
Orders
- Ex-parte summons (on notice) dismissed (17 April 2024).
- Respondent awarded costs of HK$305,000 payable by the Petitioner forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment