RE TBS
The Court has jurisdiction to make interim residential, care and access arrangements for a mentally incapacitated person pending appointment of a guardian by invoking its inherent protective jurisdiction to cover matters not squarely within s10A; s10A applies to property and affairs and may cover residential and financial provision but does not by itself encompass all care/access arrangements; the 2nd Interim Arrangements ordered were in Mother’s best interests and do not fetter the Guardianship Board.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2919
- Parties
- Mentally Incapacitated Person: TBS; Applicants: Applicants (three children); Intervenor: Intervenor (2nd son); Official Solicitor/committee: Official Solicitor
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2019
- Case Number
- HCMH51/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Part II Mental Health Ordinance Proceedings / Post Inquiry; Appointment of Committee and Interim Arrangements (reasons for Decision)
- Outcome
- Mother declared mentally incapacitated; Official Solicitor appointed as Committee; Court made interim arrangements (2nd Interim Arrangements) governing residence, care, access and finances pending appointment of guardian by Guardianship Board.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Care Orders, Appointment of Committee, Jurisdiction to Make Interim Arrangements, Part II Mental Health Ordinance S10 a, Guardianship Board Proceedings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TBS
Mentally Incapacitated Person
Applicants (three children)
Applicants
Intervenor (2nd son)
Intervenor
Official Solicitor
Official Solicitor/committee
Procedural Posture
Part II Mental Health Ordinance Proceedings / Post Inquiry; Appointment of Committee and Interim Arrangements (reasons for Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Court has jurisdiction to make interim care/access arrangements under Part II of the Mental Health Ordinance or under inherent protective jurisdiction
- 2 Scope of s10A "property and affairs" and whether it covers care and access arrangements
- 3 Whether interim arrangements fetter the Guardianship Board
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has jurisdiction to make interim residential, care and access arrangements for a mentally incapacitated person pending appointment of a guardian by invoking its inherent protective jurisdiction to cover matters not squarely within s10A; s10A applies to property and affairs and may cover residential and financial provision but does not by itself encompass all care/access arrangements; the 2nd Interim Arrangements ordered were in Mother’s best interests and do not fetter the Guardianship Board.
Court Disposition
Mother declared mentally incapacitated; Official Solicitor appointed as Committee; Court made interim arrangements (2nd Interim Arrangements) governing residence, care, access and finances pending appointment of guardian by Guardianship Board.
Orders
- Official Solicitor appointed as Committee for Mother with agreed powers
- Order incorporating the 2nd Interim Arrangements (residential arrangements at Kwai Chung Flat; care by domestic helper Lily)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment