YIP KU v. KWAN KUK LIN

YIP KU v. KWAN KUK LIN

The Court has no statutory jurisdiction to order an interim lump sum payment on the basis advanced; Rule 78 of the Matrimonial Causes Rules cannot be construed to create a substantive interim lump sum power beyond the MPPO and MCO rule‑making powers, and only clear legislative provision can confer such a power (following authorities including Wicks v Wicks).

Citation
YIP KU v. KWAN KUK LIN
Parties
Petitioner (husband): Yip Ku alias Yip Ku Cheung; Respondent (wife): Kwan Kuk Lin
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
11 December 1998
Case Number
HCMC5/1997
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Ancillary Relief and Setting Aside Dispositions / Interlocutory Application for Interim Lump Sum During Trial
Outcome
Summons dismissed for want of jurisdiction to grant interim lump sum.
Legal Topics
Interim Lump Sum, Ancillary Relief, Jurisdiction, Rule‑making Power, Trusts, Avoidance of Dispositions
Source Language
EN
Family Law Matrimonial Finance Civil Procedure Statutory Interpretation Interim Lump Sum Ancillary Relief Jurisdiction Rule‑making Power +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yip Ku alias Yip Ku Cheung

Petitioner (husband)

Kwan Kuk Lin

Respondent (wife)

Procedural Posture

Matrimonial Ancillary Relief and Setting Aside Dispositions / Interlocutory Application for Interim Lump Sum During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court has statutory jurisdiction to order an interim lump sum payment pending ancillary relief
  2. 2 Whether Rule 78 of the Matrimonial Causes Rules can create a substantive financial right beyond the powers in MPPO and MCO
  3. 3 Whether Section 7 matters must be considered before any lump sum order and therefore apply to interim orders

Ratio Decidendi

The Court has no statutory jurisdiction to order an interim lump sum payment on the basis advanced; Rule 78 of the Matrimonial Causes Rules cannot be construed to create a substantive interim lump sum power beyond the MPPO and MCO rule‑making powers, and only clear legislative provision can confer such a power (following authorities including Wicks v Wicks).

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed for want of jurisdiction to grant interim lump sum.

Orders

  • Summons dismissed
  • Respondent awarded costs of the Summons with Certificate for two counsel