WAN WAI HEI WESLEY AND ANOTHER v. GOLDEN LAKE DEVELOPMENT LTD AND OTHERS
The court concluded the application failed at the first stage because the primary issue — beneficial ownership of Horizon Drive — is triable and the court could not be satisfied that Fortune Wealth would obtain judgment for substantial damages; accordingly the discretion to order interim payment did not arise and the Master's order was set aside; additionally the existence of a significant $25,000,000 advance undermined the exercise of discretion even if jurisdiction existed.
- Citation
- WAN WAI HEI WESLEY AND ANOTHER v. GOLDEN LAKE DEVELOPMENT LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Wan Wai Hei Wesley; 2nd Plaintiff (suing for Himself as a Shareholder of Golden Lake Development Limited): Wan Wai Hei Wesley; 1st Defendant: Golden Lake Development Limited; 2nd Defendant: Tong Do Ye; 3rd Defendant: Tong Yeung Hon Kwan Catherine; 4th Defendant (applicant for Interim Payment): Fortune Wealth Asia Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 August 2008
- Case Number
- HCA22/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Property Ownership, Company Restructuring, Trespass and Interim Damages / Appeal by Rehearing From Master's Order for Interim Payment (application by 4th Defendant Dismissed on Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; 4th defendant's application for interim payment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment, Use and Occupation/mesne Profits, Trespass, Beneficial Ownership, Derivative Action, Restructuring of Ownership, Mortgage Finance, Accounting
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wan Wai Hei Wesley
1st Plaintiff
Wan Wai Hei Wesley
2nd Plaintiff (suing for Himself as a Shareholder of Golden Lake Development Limited)
Golden Lake Development Limited
1st Defendant
Tong Do Ye
2nd Defendant
Tong Yeung Hon Kwan Catherine
3rd Defendant
Fortune Wealth Asia Limited
4th Defendant (applicant for Interim Payment)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Property Ownership, Company Restructuring, Trespass and Interim Damages / Appeal by Rehearing From Master's Order for Interim Payment (application by 4th Defendant Dismissed on Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2002 restructuring/assignment should be set aside
- 2 Whether Golden Lake is the beneficial owner of Horizon Drive
- 3 Who owns Golden Lake and in what shares
Ratio Decidendi
The court concluded the application failed at the first stage because the primary issue — beneficial ownership of Horizon Drive — is triable and the court could not be satisfied that Fortune Wealth would obtain judgment for substantial damages; accordingly the discretion to order interim payment did not arise and the Master's order was set aside; additionally the existence of a significant $25,000,000 advance undermined the exercise of discretion even if jurisdiction existed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; 4th defendant's application for interim payment dismissed
Orders
- Master's order for interim payment set aside
- 4th defendant's application for interim payment dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment