YAN MEI and YAN DONG the Joint and Several Administrators of the Estate of FONG LAP CHUNG GEORGE, Deceased AND ANOTHER v. FONG LAP SHAN
The court granted interim payments in part because the claim for possession satisfied O 29 r 12(b)'s first precondition and a provisional view of the evidence supported that the plaintiffs would be liable for mortgage repayments and rates/Government rent during the action; accordingly the court ordered payment of the calculated shortfalls ($95,983 and $98,770) and periodic monthly payments ($45,000) and ongoing quarterly rates payments as just and necessary to prevent prejudice to the defendant pending final determination.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3464
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff; Joint and Several Administrator of the Estate of Fong Lap Chung George (deceased): Yan Mei; 2nd Plaintiff; Joint and Several Administrator of the Estate of Fong Lap Chung George (deceased): Yan Dong; Defendant; Registered Owner of House 10: Fong Lap Shan
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Case Number
- HCA1562/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (consolidated HCA 1562/2022 and HCA 104/2023) – Interlocutory Application for Interim Payment Under O 29 R 12(b) RHC / Interlocutory (decision on Summons for Interim Payment)
- Outcome
- Interim payment application granted in part; costs order nisi that there shall be no order as to costs (subject to 14 day variation application provision)
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment, Use and Occupation, Constructive Trust, Possession, Mesne Profits, Mortgage Repayments, Rates and Government Rent, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yan Mei
1st Plaintiff; Joint and Several Administrator of the Estate of Fong Lap Chung George (deceased)
Yan Dong
2nd Plaintiff; Joint and Several Administrator of the Estate of Fong Lap Chung George (deceased)
Fong Lap Shan
Defendant; Registered Owner of House 10
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (consolidated HCA 1562/2022 and HCA 104/2023) – Interlocutory Application for Interim Payment Under O 29 R 12(b) RHC / Interlocutory (decision on Summons for Interim Payment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pre‑conditions of O 29 r 12(b) RHC are satisfied for an interim payment by the plaintiffs to the defendant
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs are provisionally liable for mortgage repayments and rates and government rent in respect of House 10 notwithstanding the contested title/constructive trust claim
- 3 Quantum of any interim payment and whether periodic payments should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted interim payments in part because the claim for possession satisfied O 29 r 12(b)'s first precondition and a provisional view of the evidence supported that the plaintiffs would be liable for mortgage repayments and rates/Government rent during the action; accordingly the court ordered payment of the calculated shortfalls ($95,983 and $98,770) and periodic monthly payments ($45,000) and ongoing quarterly rates payments as just and necessary to prevent prejudice to the defendant pending final determination.
Court Disposition
Interim payment application granted in part; costs order nisi that there shall be no order as to costs (subject to 14 day variation application provision)
Orders
- 1. The 1st Plaintiff to pay the Defendant the sum of HKD 95,983 forthwith in respect of mortgage repayments for House 10 for period 1 February 2017 to 30 June 2024.
- 2. The 1st Plaintiff to pay the Defendant HKD 45,000 monthly (3 days in advance of the first day of each month) from after 30 June 2024 until final judgment or further order to enable the Defendant to effect mortgage repayments of House 10.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment