CHIEN KUN ALLEN v. AIM GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD
Service of the 2nd IP Summons was valid; the applicant established a prima facie entitlement to the further interim payment of US$4.8m based on the parties' own expert valuation and prior reasoning in the 1st IP Decision; accordingly the court ordered payment in terms of the 2nd IP Summons, permitted service out, and assessed costs against AIM and Liu.
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 570
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim); Defendant (hca 2495/2014): AIM Global Holdings Limited; 2nd Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): Lily Liu Durr; 3rd Plaintiff (original Action); 3rd Defendant (counterclaim): Shanghai Weicon Optical Co. Ltd.; 1st Defendant (original Action); 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim); Plaintiff (hca 2495/2014): Chien Kun Allen; 2nd Defendant (original Action); 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim): Rising Dragon Global Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2026
- Case Number
- HCA2495/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Civil Proceedings (hca 2217/2014 and HCA 2495/2014) / Hearing of Summons for Further Interim Payment (2nd IP Summons) in Chambers
- Outcome
- 2nd IP Summons allowed; order made in terms of the draft order placed before the court.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment, Service Out, Costs Assessment, Valuation of Shares, Consolidation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AIM Global Holdings Limited
1st Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim); Defendant (hca 2495/2014)
Lily Liu Durr
2nd Plaintiff (original Action); 2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Shanghai Weicon Optical Co. Ltd.
3rd Plaintiff (original Action); 3rd Defendant (counterclaim)
Chien Kun Allen
1st Defendant (original Action); 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim); Plaintiff (hca 2495/2014)
Rising Dragon Global Limited
2nd Defendant (original Action); 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Proceedings (hca 2217/2014 and HCA 2495/2014) / Hearing of Summons for Further Interim Payment (2nd IP Summons) in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant entitled to further interim payment of US$4.8 million
- 2 Whether service of the 2nd IP Summons was valid
- 3 Whether orders permitting service out should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Service of the 2nd IP Summons was valid; the applicant established a prima facie entitlement to the further interim payment of US$4.8m based on the parties' own expert valuation and prior reasoning in the 1st IP Decision; accordingly the court ordered payment in terms of the 2nd IP Summons, permitted service out, and assessed costs against AIM and Liu.
Court Disposition
2nd IP Summons allowed; order made in terms of the draft order placed before the court.
Orders
- Interim payment of US$4,800,000 to be made in accordance with the 2nd IP Summons (order in terms of draft placed before the court)
- Orders permitting service out of the proceedings (given service addresses provided are outside Hong Kong)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment