PCCW - HKT TELEPHONE LTD AND ANOTHER v. DAVID MATTHEW McDONALD AITKEN AND ANOTHER
The ex parte injunctions were set aside for material non-disclosure to the ex parte judge and because parts of the injunctions sought were too wide and/or amounted to an impermissible restraint of trade; however, on the interlocutory application the court found a serious question to be tried as to possession and risk of misuse of particularised confidential materials and accordingly granted a limited, precise interlocutory injunction protecting specified documents and discussions from disclosure or use by the 1st Defendant until trial, and dismissed the plaintiffs' interlocutory claims against CSL for inducement.
- Citation
- PCCW - HKT TELEPHONE LTD AND ANOTHER v. DAVID MATTHEW McDONALD AITKEN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: PCCW - HKT Telephone Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: PCCW Services Limited; 1st Defendant: David Matthew McDonald Aitken; 2nd Defendant: Hong Kong CSL Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2008
- Case Number
- HCA1089/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Injunction and for Interlocutory Relief / Chambers Hearing on Summons (application to Set Aside Ex Parte Injunction)
- Outcome
- Ex parte injunctions set aside; limited interlocutory injunction granted against 1st Defendant in precise terms; interlocutory relief against 2nd Defendant dismissed; nisi cost orders made
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Breach of Confidence, Restraint of Trade, Inducement/procurement of Breach, Telecommunications Interconnection Regulation (fmic/fmc), Privilege and Solicitor Client Confidentiality, Material Non Disclosure in Ex Parte Applications
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PCCW - HKT Telephone Limited
1st Plaintiff
PCCW Services Limited
2nd Plaintiff
David Matthew McDonald Aitken
1st Defendant
Hong Kong CSL Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Injunction and for Interlocutory Relief / Chambers Hearing on Summons (application to Set Aside Ex Parte Injunction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a serious question to be tried on breach of contract and confidence by the 1st Defendant
- 2 Whether particulars of the alleged confidential information were sufficiently specific to justify injunction
- 3 Whether injunction sought amounted impermissibly to a restraint of trade
Ratio Decidendi
The ex parte injunctions were set aside for material non-disclosure to the ex parte judge and because parts of the injunctions sought were too wide and/or amounted to an impermissible restraint of trade; however, on the interlocutory application the court found a serious question to be tried as to possession and risk of misuse of particularised confidential materials and accordingly granted a limited, precise interlocutory injunction protecting specified documents and discussions from disclosure or use by the 1st Defendant until trial, and dismissed the plaintiffs' interlocutory claims against CSL for inducement.
Court Disposition
Ex parte injunctions set aside; limited interlocutory injunction granted against 1st Defendant in precise terms; interlocutory relief against 2nd Defendant dismissed; nisi cost orders made
Orders
- Set aside the ex parte orders granted on 13 June 2008 against David Matthew McDonald Aitken
- Set aside the ex parte orders granted on 13 June 2008 against Hong Kong CSL Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment