CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LTD AND OTHERS v. TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH AND OTHERS
Taking a broadbrush view, the Court found the Plaintiffs obtained substantially the relief they sought by the interlocutory Order and therefore are the effective winners entitled to costs; allegations of abuse or improper motive could not be determined on the material before the Court; accordingly the Defendants were ordered to pay the Plaintiffs' costs with a certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 4653
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: HONG KONG MEDICAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: SMART WINNER INVESTMENTS LIMITED; 4th Plaintiff: CENTRALPHARM COMPANY LIMITED; 5th Plaintiff: HKCM MEDICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED; 6th Plaintiff: MEDICAL CONCIERGE HOLDING LIMITED; 7th Plaintiff: CENTRAL CARDIAC HOLDINGS LIMITED; 8th Plaintiff: HONG KONG BRAIN MEMORY CENTRE LIMITED; 9th Plaintiff: CENTRAL HEALTHCARE LIMITED; 10th Plaintiff: HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LIMITED; 11th Plaintiff: HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (MRI) LIMITED; 12th Plaintiff: HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (LAB) LIMITED; 13th Plaintiff: MEDICAL CONCIERGE LIMITED; 14th Plaintiff: MEDICAL CONCEIRGE MANAGEMENT LIMITED; 1st Defendant: TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH; 2nd Defendant: SHIU SHU MING; 3rd Defendant: JANETTE ELIZABETH TSANG; 4th Defendant: KWAN WAI LING; 5th Defendant: CHAK MEI FUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP1141/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons for Interlocutory Injunction (order 7) and Related Proceedings Under Rules of the High Court (cap 4 A) / Costs Determination Following Discharge of the Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- Defendants ordered to pay Plaintiffs' costs with certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Discontinuance and Leave, Effective Winner Principle, Abuse of Process, Costs Assessment, Data Privacy Concerns
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
HONG KONG MEDICAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
SMART WINNER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
CENTRALPHARM COMPANY LIMITED
4th Plaintiff
HKCM MEDICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED
5th Plaintiff
MEDICAL CONCIERGE HOLDING LIMITED
6th Plaintiff
CENTRAL CARDIAC HOLDINGS LIMITED
7th Plaintiff
HONG KONG BRAIN MEMORY CENTRE LIMITED
8th Plaintiff
CENTRAL HEALTHCARE LIMITED
9th Plaintiff
HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LIMITED
10th Plaintiff
HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (MRI) LIMITED
11th Plaintiff
HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (LAB) LIMITED
12th Plaintiff
MEDICAL CONCIERGE LIMITED
13th Plaintiff
MEDICAL CONCEIRGE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
14th Plaintiff
TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH
1st Defendant
SHIU SHU MING
2nd Defendant
JANETTE ELIZABETH TSANG
3rd Defendant
KWAN WAI LING
4th Defendant
CHAK MEI FUNG
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Interlocutory Injunction (order 7) and Related Proceedings Under Rules of the High Court (cap 4 A) / Costs Determination Following Discharge of the Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are the effective winner and therefore entitled to costs
- 2 Whether discontinuance required leave and whether that affects entitlement to costs
- 3 Whether the proceedings were an abuse of process such that costs should be denied or shifted
Ratio Decidendi
Taking a broadbrush view, the Court found the Plaintiffs obtained substantially the relief they sought by the interlocutory Order and therefore are the effective winners entitled to costs; allegations of abuse or improper motive could not be determined on the material before the Court; accordingly the Defendants were ordered to pay the Plaintiffs' costs with a certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000.
Court Disposition
Defendants ordered to pay Plaintiffs' costs with certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000
Orders
- Defendants to pay the Plaintiffs' costs of these proceedings with certificate for one counsel, including costs of arguing costs and costs reserved per §5 of the Order, summarily assessed at HK$450,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment