CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LTD AND OTHERS v. TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH AND OTHERS

CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LTD AND OTHERS v. TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH AND OTHERS

Taking a broadbrush view, the Court found the Plaintiffs obtained substantially the relief they sought by the interlocutory Order and therefore are the effective winners entitled to costs; allegations of abuse or improper motive could not be determined on the material before the Court; accordingly the Defendants were ordered to pay the Plaintiffs' costs with a certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000.

Citation
[2025] HKCFI 4653
Parties
1st Plaintiff: CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: HONG KONG MEDICAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: SMART WINNER INVESTMENTS LIMITED; 4th Plaintiff: CENTRALPHARM COMPANY LIMITED; 5th Plaintiff: HKCM MEDICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED; 6th Plaintiff: MEDICAL CONCIERGE HOLDING LIMITED; 7th Plaintiff: CENTRAL CARDIAC HOLDINGS LIMITED; 8th Plaintiff: HONG KONG BRAIN MEMORY CENTRE LIMITED; 9th Plaintiff: CENTRAL HEALTHCARE LIMITED; 10th Plaintiff: HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LIMITED; 11th Plaintiff: HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (MRI) LIMITED; 12th Plaintiff: HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (LAB) LIMITED; 13th Plaintiff: MEDICAL CONCIERGE LIMITED; 14th Plaintiff: MEDICAL CONCEIRGE MANAGEMENT LIMITED; 1st Defendant: TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH; 2nd Defendant: SHIU SHU MING; 3rd Defendant: JANETTE ELIZABETH TSANG; 4th Defendant: KWAN WAI LING; 5th Defendant: CHAK MEI FUNG
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
30 September 2025
Case Number
HCMP1141/2024
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Interlocutory Injunction (order 7) and Related Proceedings Under Rules of the High Court (cap 4 A) / Costs Determination Following Discharge of the Interlocutory Order
Outcome
Defendants ordered to pay Plaintiffs' costs with certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunction, Discontinuance and Leave, Effective Winner Principle, Abuse of Process, Costs Assessment, Data Privacy Concerns
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CENTRAL MEDICAL HOLDING LIMITED

1st Plaintiff

HONG KONG MEDICAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED

2nd Plaintiff

SMART WINNER INVESTMENTS LIMITED

3rd Plaintiff

CENTRALPHARM COMPANY LIMITED

4th Plaintiff

HKCM MEDICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED

5th Plaintiff

MEDICAL CONCIERGE HOLDING LIMITED

6th Plaintiff

CENTRAL CARDIAC HOLDINGS LIMITED

7th Plaintiff

HONG KONG BRAIN MEMORY CENTRE LIMITED

8th Plaintiff

CENTRAL HEALTHCARE LIMITED

9th Plaintiff

HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LIMITED

10th Plaintiff

HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (MRI) LIMITED

11th Plaintiff

HONG KONG IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE (LAB) LIMITED

12th Plaintiff

MEDICAL CONCIERGE LIMITED

13th Plaintiff

MEDICAL CONCEIRGE MANAGEMENT LIMITED

14th Plaintiff

TSANG WAH TAK KENNETH

1st Defendant

SHIU SHU MING

2nd Defendant

JANETTE ELIZABETH TSANG

3rd Defendant

KWAN WAI LING

4th Defendant

CHAK MEI FUNG

5th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons for Interlocutory Injunction (order 7) and Related Proceedings Under Rules of the High Court (cap 4 A) / Costs Determination Following Discharge of the Interlocutory Order

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are the effective winner and therefore entitled to costs
  2. 2 Whether discontinuance required leave and whether that affects entitlement to costs
  3. 3 Whether the proceedings were an abuse of process such that costs should be denied or shifted

Ratio Decidendi

Taking a broadbrush view, the Court found the Plaintiffs obtained substantially the relief they sought by the interlocutory Order and therefore are the effective winners entitled to costs; allegations of abuse or improper motive could not be determined on the material before the Court; accordingly the Defendants were ordered to pay the Plaintiffs' costs with a certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000.

Court Disposition

Defendants ordered to pay Plaintiffs' costs with certificate for one counsel, summarily assessed at HK$450,000

Orders

  • Defendants to pay the Plaintiffs' costs of these proceedings with certificate for one counsel, including costs of arguing costs and costs reserved per §5 of the Order, summarily assessed at HK$450,000