STATE CHINA FINANCE LTD v. LEUNG MAN WAI
The court found that the applicants raised serious questions to be tried on clog of the equity of redemption and on the existence of a resulting trust in favour of Sin; damages would not be an adequate remedy for the applicants and the balance of convenience, together with practical considerations about purchaser's title and ensuing litigation, justified granting interlocutory relief subject to conditions (undertaking as to damages and payment of HK$457,000 into court).
- Citation
- STATE CHINA FINANCE LTD v. LEUNG MAN WAI
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant: STATE CHINA FINANCE LIMITED; Defendant/1st Plaintiff: LEUNG MAN WAI; 2nd Plaintiff: SIN SAU CHING
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 July 2010
- Case Number
- DCMP1985/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings and Civil Action Concerning Charging Order, Possession and Sale; Interlocutory Injunction Applications / Interlocutory Hearing and Decision on Applications for Interlocutory Injunctions
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunctions granted in both actions subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Charging Order, Equity of Redemption, Resulting Trust, Possession and Sale, Undertaking as to Damages, Priority of Registered Interests
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
STATE CHINA FINANCE LIMITED
Plaintiff/defendant
LEUNG MAN WAI
Defendant/1st Plaintiff
SIN SAU CHING
2nd Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings and Civil Action Concerning Charging Order, Possession and Sale; Interlocutory Injunction Applications / Interlocutory Hearing and Decision on Applications for Interlocutory Injunctions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conduct of the judgment creditor constituted a clog on the equity of redemption and thus gives rise to a serious question to be tried
- 2 Whether Sin Sau Ching holds a beneficial interest in the property (resulting trust) rendering the charging order void
- 3 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy and where the balance of convenience lies for injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants raised serious questions to be tried on clog of the equity of redemption and on the existence of a resulting trust in favour of Sin; damages would not be an adequate remedy for the applicants and the balance of convenience, together with practical considerations about purchaser's title and ensuing litigation, justified granting interlocutory relief subject to conditions (undertaking as to damages and payment of HK$457,000 into court).
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunctions granted in both actions subject to conditions
Orders
- Abridgement of time for service and leave to rely on affirmations in DCMP 1985/2009 granted in DCCJ 2213/2010
- Leung and Sin to pay HK$457000 into court by noon 6 July 2010 as condition of injunction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment