HKSAR v. JAGJIT SINGH

HKSAR v. JAGJIT SINGH

The magistrate's credibility findings were supported and partially corroborated by CCTV (Exhibit P4) which confirmed the appellant threw a can at PW1 and the police acted with reasonable force during the arrest; therefore the convictions for common assault and resisting a police officer were reliable and the appeal was dismissed.

Citation
HKSAR v. JAGJIT SINGH
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: Jagjit Singh
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
1 November 2005
Case Number
HCMA642/2005
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (on Appeal From KCCC 11682 of 2004) / Appeal Judgment in Court of First Instance
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; convictions for common assault and resisting a police officer upheld.
Legal Topics
Common Assault, Resisting a Police Officer, Use of Force by Police, Witness Credibility, CCTV Evidence
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

Jagjit Singh

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (on Appeal From KCCC 11682 of 2004) / Appeal Judgment in Court of First Instance

  1. 1 Whether appellant assaulted PW1 by throwing a can (common assault)
  2. 2 Whether appellant resisted/arrested police (resisting a police officer)
  3. 3 Whether police used excessive force against appellant during arrest

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate's credibility findings were supported and partially corroborated by CCTV (Exhibit P4) which confirmed the appellant threw a can at PW1 and the police acted with reasonable force during the arrest; therefore the convictions for common assault and resisting a police officer were reliable and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; convictions for common assault and resisting a police officer upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Convictions for common assault and resisting a police officer upheld