JB RESEARCH, INC v. STARLIGHT MARKETING DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER

JB RESEARCH, INC v. STARLIGHT MARKETING DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER

The defendants' 15 September 2000 letter was an open statement of their case and constituted an admission of the sum US$534,042.15; the defendants failed to particularise or provide evidence of any specific deductions under Order 14 and their alleged liabilities were speculative; accordingly part judgment was entered for that admitted sum with interest and costs.

Citation
JB RESEARCH, INC v. STARLIGHT MARKETING DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER
Parties
Plaintiff: JB RESEARCH, INC; Defendant: STARLIGHT MARKETING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; Defendant: RELAXOR HOLISTIC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
28 May 2001
Case Number
HCCL10/2001
Procedural Posture
Contract (joint Venture/accounting Dispute) / Summary Judgment Application (order 14)
Outcome
Part judgment entered for the plaintiff for US$534,042.15 with interest at 1% above HSBC prime from 15 September 2000 to the date of judgment; costs of the application to be taxed and paid forthwith.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Admission, Without Prejudice Privilege, Accounting, Interim Payment, Letters of Credit, Particulars (order 14)
Source Language
EN
Contract Civil Procedure Commercial Law Tax Law Summary Judgment Admission Without Prejudice Privilege Accounting +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JB RESEARCH, INC

Plaintiff

STARLIGHT MARKETING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

Defendant

RELAXOR HOLISTIC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contract (joint Venture/accounting Dispute) / Summary Judgment Application (order 14)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' 15 September 2000 letter constituted an admission enforceable on summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether the defendants' letter was protected by without‑prejudice/negotiation privilege
  3. 3 Whether the defendants had identified and particularised deductions (US tax, returned goods, remaining stock, accountants' fees) sufficient to defeat summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' 15 September 2000 letter was an open statement of their case and constituted an admission of the sum US$534,042.15; the defendants failed to particularise or provide evidence of any specific deductions under Order 14 and their alleged liabilities were speculative; accordingly part judgment was entered for that admitted sum with interest and costs.

Court Disposition

Part judgment entered for the plaintiff for US$534,042.15 with interest at 1% above HSBC prime from 15 September 2000 to the date of judgment; costs of the application to be taxed and paid forthwith.

Orders

  • Part judgment for plaintiff in the sum of US$534,042.15
  • Interest at 1% above HSBC prime from 15 September 2000 to date of judgment