GREAT HONOUR INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. KO YIN AND ANOTHER

GREAT HONOUR INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. KO YIN AND ANOTHER

Joinder of the solicitors was refused and the Master's order allowing joinder was reversed because the proposed joinder would cause undue delay and expand the ambit of proceedings materially given the stage reached; the appropriate course is for the plaintiffs seeking contribution from the solicitors to pursue separate actions promptly with liberty to apply later for consolidation if they catch up with the main proceedings.

Citation
GREAT HONOUR INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER v. KO YIN AND ANOTHER
Parties
Plaintiff (hcmp No.4950/2001): Fortis Bank Asia HK; 1st Defendant (hcmp No.4950/2001); 4th Defendant (hca No.298/2002): Sino Global International Limited; 2nd Defendant (hcmp No.4950/2001); 2nd Plaintiff (hca No.298/2002): Wall International Investments Limited; 3rd Defendant (hcmp No.4950/2001); 1st Plaintiff (hca No.298/2002): Great Honour Investments Limited; 1st Defendant (hca No.298/2002); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim): Ko Yin; 3rd Defendant (by Counterclaim in HCA No.298/2002): Wang Yan
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
26 January 2004
Case Number
HCA298/2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (joinder/case Management) / Judgment on Appeal From Master's Order (in Chambers)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Master Au Yeung's order permitting joinder of Li, Wong & Lam to Action No.298 reversed
Legal Topics
Joinder, Case Management, Delay, Costs, Consolidation, Attribution of Knowledge, Negligence
Source Language
EN
Civil Procedure Professional Negligence Agency Law Civil Litigation Joinder Case Management Delay Costs +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fortis Bank Asia HK

Plaintiff (hcmp No.4950/2001)

Sino Global International Limited

1st Defendant (hcmp No.4950/2001); 4th Defendant (hca No.298/2002)

Wall International Investments Limited

2nd Defendant (hcmp No.4950/2001); 2nd Plaintiff (hca No.298/2002)

Great Honour Investments Limited

3rd Defendant (hcmp No.4950/2001); 1st Plaintiff (hca No.298/2002)

Ko Yin

1st Defendant (hca No.298/2002); Plaintiff (by Counterclaim)

Wang Yan

3rd Defendant (by Counterclaim in HCA No.298/2002)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (joinder/case Management) / Judgment on Appeal From Master's Order (in Chambers)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed joinder of solicitors (Li, Wong & Lam) to Action No.298 should be permitted
  2. 2 Whether the likely delay and differing ambit of issues justify refusal of joinder
  3. 3 Whether the solicitors' knowledge can be attributed to the bank

Ratio Decidendi

Joinder of the solicitors was refused and the Master's order allowing joinder was reversed because the proposed joinder would cause undue delay and expand the ambit of proceedings materially given the stage reached; the appropriate course is for the plaintiffs seeking contribution from the solicitors to pursue separate actions promptly with liberty to apply later for consolidation if they catch up with the main proceedings.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Master Au Yeung's order permitting joinder of Li, Wong & Lam to Action No.298 reversed

Orders

  • Master Au Yeung's order allowing joinder of Li, Wong & Lam as a party to Action No.298 of 2002 is reversed
  • Great Honour and Wall International are directed to proceed separately against the solicitors for the present and to advance those proceedings with dispatch; they may apply later for consolidation if appropriate