MA PO CHIM, PERCY AND OTHERS v. LEE TUNG HAI, LEO AND OTHERS
The court granted the application because it had jurisdiction under the consent order's liberty to apply and Order 15 r.6(2)(b) and because facts demonstrated a real risk to the integrity of the electoral process (resignations of convenors, factional mistrust, significant discrepancies in the members register);...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MA PO CHIM, PERCY AND OTHERS v. LEE TUNG HAI, LEO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant / Proposed 4th Respondent: Mo Loong Kwong; Applicant / Proposed 5th Respondent: Lee Dai Chung; Applicant / Proposed 6th Respondent: Yuen Cho Mo; 1st Petitioner: Ma Po Chim Percy; 1st Respondent: 1st Respondent; 2nd Respondent: 2nd Respondent; 3rd Respondent: Chungshan Commercial Association, Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2006
- Case Number
- HCMP3253/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp 3253/2004) / Interlocutory Application Under Order 15 R.6(2)(b) and Liberty to Apply
- Outcome
- Application granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Enforcement of Consent Order, Appointment of Independent Professionals, Verification of Members Register, Adjournment of General Meeting, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mo Loong Kwong
Applicant / Proposed 4th Respondent
Lee Dai Chung
Applicant / Proposed 5th Respondent
Yuen Cho Mo
Applicant / Proposed 6th Respondent
Ma Po Chim Percy
1st Petitioner
1st Respondent
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
2nd Respondent
Chungshan Commercial Association, Hong Kong
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp 3253/2004) / Interlocutory Application Under Order 15 R.6(2)(b) and Liberty to Apply
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants have locus to be added as parties to enforce the consent Order
- 2 Whether the court may appoint independent professionals to replace the Preparatory Working Committee
- 3 Whether the extraordinary general meeting should be adjourned pending verification of the members register
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the application because it had jurisdiction under the consent order's liberty to apply and Order 15 r.6(2)(b) and because facts demonstrated a real risk to the integrity of the electoral process (resignations of convenors, factional mistrust, significant discrepancies in the members register); accordingly independent professionals were necessary to verify membership and prepare the candidate list, the applicants were properly added as parties to protect implementation of the Order, the time for the work was extended to 30 April 2006 and the meeting was adjourned to not later than 1 June 2006, with costs of the applicants to be borne by the 3rd respondent.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part.
Orders
- Leave granted to add the applicants as parties by naming them as the 4th, 5th and 6th respondents respectively.
- Horwath Corporate Advisory Services Limited appointed to replace the Preparatory Working Committee to carry out the functions in paragraph (3) of the Order dated 7 November 2005 and time for carrying out such work extended to 30 April 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment