KCMA v. ABC
The court exercised its discretion under Order 15 rule 6(2)(b) to order joinder: PBB was joined in his capacities as Trustee of both the Family Trust and the Education Trust and K (H's father) was joined as 4th Respondent. The joinder was necessary and just and convenient to determine whether the disputed assets held by the trusts or transferred to K are in reality family or H's assets subject to a s17 avoidance order, to facilitate the court's inquiry, to enable discovery and to assist enforcement or subsequent proceedings abroad; while respecting existence of Nevada in rem proceedings, those orders did not preclude joinder for the purposes above and did not make joinder inappropriate as...
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2822
- Parties
- Petitioner (wife): KCMA; Respondent (husband): ABC; Trustee of the Family Trust (2nd Respondent): Paras B Barnett; Trustee of the Education Trust (3rd Respondent): Paras B Barnett; Father of H / 4th Respondent: K; BVI Company (holding Company) Non Party: Intero; BVI Company (holding Land in Usvi) Non Party: Bremen
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2019
- Case Number
- HCMC1/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial Ancillary Relief/variation of Nuptial Settlement and Avoidance of Disposition (s17 and S6(1)(c) Mppo) / Interlocutory Application for Joinder Heard in Chambers (decision on Joinder)
- Outcome
- Joinder granted in part: PBB joined as Trustee of the Family Trust and as Trustee of the Education Trust; K joined as 4th Respondent; matters remitted for directions hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Trustees and Third Parties, Avoidance of Disposition (s17 Mppo), Variation of Nuptial Settlement (s6(1)(c) Mppo), Service Out of Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Foreign Trust Orders, Discovery Against Trustees, Spendthrift Trusts
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KCMA
Petitioner (wife)
ABC
Respondent (husband)
Paras B Barnett
Trustee of the Family Trust (2nd Respondent)
Paras B Barnett
Trustee of the Education Trust (3rd Respondent)
K
Father of H / 4th Respondent
Intero
BVI Company (holding Company) Non Party
Bremen
BVI Company (holding Land in Usvi) Non Party
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Ancillary Relief/variation of Nuptial Settlement and Avoidance of Disposition (s17 and S6(1)(c) Mppo) / Interlocutory Application for Joinder Heard in Chambers (decision on Joinder)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees of offshore/Nevada trusts should be joined as respondents to a s17/s6(1)(c) application
- 2 Whether H's father K should be joined given transfer of Indian apartment to him then to an Indian trust
- 3 Whether Nevada in rem orders oust Hong Kong jurisdiction for purposes of joinder
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under Order 15 rule 6(2)(b) to order joinder: PBB was joined in his capacities as Trustee of both the Family Trust and the Education Trust and K (H's father) was joined as 4th Respondent. The joinder was necessary and just and convenient to determine whether the disputed assets held by the trusts or transferred to K are in reality family or H's assets subject to a s17 avoidance order, to facilitate the court's inquiry, to enable discovery and to assist enforcement or subsequent proceedings abroad; while respecting existence of Nevada in rem proceedings, those orders did not preclude joinder for the purposes above and did not make joinder inappropriate as...
Court Disposition
Joinder granted in part: PBB joined as Trustee of the Family Trust and as Trustee of the Education Trust; K joined as 4th Respondent; matters remitted for directions hearing.
Orders
- Join Paras B Barnett in his capacity as Trustee of the Family Trust as 2nd Respondent
- Join Paras B Barnett in his capacity as Trustee of the Education Trust as 3rd Respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment