LAU CHI WANG JAMES AND OTHERS v. IP FOOK CHUEN THOMAS AND ANOTHER
The court held the entry of judgment was irregular and must be set aside because (1) the claimed sum was not a liquidated demand but required accounting and inquiry, so judgment for a specific figure was improper; and (2) the unless order was a time order and the affirmation filed on 20 November 2001 constituted at least substantial compliance such that the plaintiffs should have sought relief inter partes rather than entering ex parte judgment. The 2nd defendant nonetheless had failed personally to file an affidavit but her failure was not contumelious and time was extended for compliance.
- Citation
- LAU CHI WANG JAMES AND OTHERS v. IP FOOK CHUEN THOMAS AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (hca 18950/1998); 1st Defendant (hca 18995/1998): LAU CHI WANG JAMES; 2nd Plaintiff (hca 18950/1998); 2nd Defendant (hca 18995/1998): LAU CHI MING; 3rd Plaintiff (hca 18950/1998); 3rd Defendant (hca 18995/1998): FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED; 1st Defendant (hca 18950/1998); 1st Plaintiff (hca 18995/1998): IP FOOK CHUEN THOMAS; 2nd Defendant (hca 18950/1998); 2nd Plaintiff (hca 18995/1998): RITA FU
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2002
- Case Number
- HCA18950/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (application to Set Aside Default Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part. Master B. Kwan\'s order dismissing the application to set aside judgment set aside; judgment dated 30 November 2001 (sealed 21 January 2002) set aside. Time extended for 2nd defendant to comply with discovery; conditional unless order made against 2nd defendant. Costs order nisi made.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Venture, Partnership Dispute, Specific Discovery, Unless Order, Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Accounts and Inquiries, Peremptory Orders, Verification by Affidavit, Irregular Judgment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAU CHI WANG JAMES
1st Plaintiff (hca 18950/1998); 1st Defendant (hca 18995/1998)
LAU CHI MING
2nd Plaintiff (hca 18950/1998); 2nd Defendant (hca 18995/1998)
FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff (hca 18950/1998); 3rd Defendant (hca 18995/1998)
IP FOOK CHUEN THOMAS
1st Defendant (hca 18950/1998); 1st Plaintiff (hca 18995/1998)
RITA FU
2nd Defendant (hca 18950/1998); 2nd Plaintiff (hca 18995/1998)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (application to Set Aside Default Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a partnership/joint venture existed and parties\' entitlements
- 2 Whether the judgment for HKD 24,641,460.63 was irregular because the claim was unliquidated
- 3 Whether the affirmation filed 20 November 2001 constituted compliance with the unless order
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the entry of judgment was irregular and must be set aside because (1) the claimed sum was not a liquidated demand but required accounting and inquiry, so judgment for a specific figure was improper; and (2) the unless order was a time order and the affirmation filed on 20 November 2001 constituted at least substantial compliance such that the plaintiffs should have sought relief inter partes rather than entering ex parte judgment. The 2nd defendant nonetheless had failed personally to file an affidavit but her failure was not contumelious and time was extended for compliance.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part. Master B. Kwan\'s order dismissing the application to set aside judgment set aside; judgment dated 30 November 2001 (sealed 21 January 2002) set aside. Time extended for 2nd defendant to comply with discovery; conditional unless order made against 2nd defendant. Costs order nisi made.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed and the order of Master B. Kwan dated 12 September 2002 is set aside.
- The judgment dated 30 November 2001 sealed and filed on 21 January 2002 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment