HKSAR v. JUNG KI BOONG

HKSAR v. JUNG KI BOONG

The magistrate's adoption of an 18-month starting point for the offences and application of a one-third guilty plea discount producing concurrent 12-month sentences was within the range established by authority and not manifestly excessive; therefore the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Citation
HKSAR v. JUNG KI BOONG
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: JUNG KI BOONG
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
12 October 2005
Case Number
HCMA650/2005
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal Immigration) / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Using a False Travel Document, Making False Representation to Immigration Officer, Sentencing Starting Points, Guilty Plea Discount, Concurrent Sentencing
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

JUNG KI BOONG

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (criminal Immigration) / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence was excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Appropriate starting point for sentence for using a false travel document and for making false representation to an immigration officer
  3. 3 Whether mitigation (bankruptcy, personal circumstances, lack of previous convictions) justified a greater reduction

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate's adoption of an 18-month starting point for the offences and application of a one-third guilty plea discount producing concurrent 12-month sentences was within the range established by authority and not manifestly excessive; therefore the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of 12 months imprisonment on each charge to run concurrently
  • Appeal dismissed