KAM SHAN MING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING LTD v. 陳松周
The court found the Family established adverse possession of Lots CD from 1977 such that the owner's title was extinguished in 1997 under the Limitation Ordinance; the 2004 Tenancy Agreement and any payments did not revive the owner's title nor negate the Family's earlier animus possidendi; the Family failed to prove factual possession or animus for Lots AB and the plaintiff, as registered owner, is entitled to recover Lots AB and mesne profits from 29 August 2012 at HK$800 per annum.
- Citation
- KAM SHAN MING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING LTD v. 陳松周
- Parties
- Plaintiff: KAM SHAN MING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING LIMITED; 1st Defendant: CHAN CHUNG CHAU; 2nd Defendant: ALL PERSONS IN OCCUPATION OF LOTS 767 AND 768; 3rd Defendant: JU TAVORNPANICH; 4th Defendant: CHAN SHUK FAN
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 2016
- Case Number
- DCCJ877/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings and Counterclaim for Adverse Possession and Recovery of Possession and Mesne Profits / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff in respect of Lots AB; Judgment for the Family (1st,3rd and 4th defendants) on Lots CD — Family granted possessory title to Lots CD
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Mesne Profits, Tenancy Agreement, Rescission for Misrepresentation, Encroachment, Possession Evidence, Limitation Period, Possessory Title
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KAM SHAN MING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING LIMITED
Plaintiff
CHAN CHUNG CHAU
1st Defendant
ALL PERSONS IN OCCUPATION OF LOTS 767 AND 768
2nd Defendant
JU TAVORNPANICH
3rd Defendant
CHAN SHUK FAN
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings and Counterclaim for Adverse Possession and Recovery of Possession and Mesne Profits / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Family had factual possession of the Four Lots for 20 years before proceedings
- 2 Whether the Family had the requisite animus possidendi (intention to possess)
- 3 Effect of the Tenancy Agreement on adverse possession and title extinguishment
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the Family established adverse possession of Lots CD from 1977 such that the owner's title was extinguished in 1997 under the Limitation Ordinance; the 2004 Tenancy Agreement and any payments did not revive the owner's title nor negate the Family's earlier animus possidendi; the Family failed to prove factual possession or animus for Lots AB and the plaintiff, as registered owner, is entitled to recover Lots AB and mesne profits from 29 August 2012 at HK$800 per annum.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff in respect of Lots AB; Judgment for the Family (1st,3rd and 4th defendants) on Lots CD — Family granted possessory title to Lots CD
Orders
- The Family shall deliver vacant possession of Lots AB to the Company forthwith
- The Family shall pay mesne profits to the Company at HK$800 per annum for occupation of Lots AB from 29 August 2012 to the date of judgment in the sum of HK$3,024
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment