KIN SHING ENGINEERING (HK) CO LTD v. VINSON ENGINEERING LTD
The alleged trade custom that payment for variations is due only after Housing Authority QS certification was not proved to be notorious or certain and was inconsistent with the Works Orders' valuation mechanism (General Conditions 3 and 4); therefore no such term was implied, Vinson could not withhold payment...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- KIN SHING ENGINEERING (HK) CO LTD v. VINSON ENGINEERING LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kin Shing Engineering (H.K.) Co., Ltd.; Defendant: Vinson Engineering Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2005
- Case Number
- HCCT108/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff Kin Shing Engineering (H.K.) Co., Ltd.
- Legal Topics
- Variation Claims, Implied Terms (trade Custom), Quantum Assessment, Certification by Employer's Quantity Surveyor, Defects Liability and Maintenance, Procedural Applications to Amend and Adjourn
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kin Shing Engineering (H.K.) Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff
Vinson Engineering Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a term should be implied that payment for variations is payable only after certification by the Housing Authority's Quantity Surveyor
- 2 Whether specific quotations for variations (Quotations 25, 26, 109, 110 etc.) were agreed and therefore payable
- 3 Quantification of sums due for agreed variations and disallowance of items not extra or unsupported
Ratio Decidendi
The alleged trade custom that payment for variations is due only after Housing Authority QS certification was not proved to be notorious or certain and was inconsistent with the Works Orders' valuation mechanism (General Conditions 3 and 4); therefore no such term was implied, Vinson could not withhold payment pending QS certification, the court accepted Kin Shing's evidence that Quotations 25 and 26 were agreed and assessed reasonable quantum for other variations, disallowed specified items, refused late amendment and adjournment, and entered judgment for the plaintiff for the computed balance with interest.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff Kin Shing Engineering (H.K.) Co., Ltd.
Orders
- Judgment for Kin Shing in the sum of 1,635,727.8 HKD
- Interest at 1% above Hong Kong prime from date of writ until judgment and thereafter at the judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment