RE KULDEEP KUMAR

RE KULDEEP KUMAR

The applicant failed to set out grounds of appeal or reasons why the Court's Decision was wrong and thus could not demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success; accordingly time was not extended and the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Citation
[2019] HKCFI 1305
Parties
Applicant: Kuldeep Kumar; Putative Respondent: Appeal Board
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
24 May 2019
Case Number
HCAL921/2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Extension of Time Application / Interlocutory Application Heard in Chambers
Outcome
Extension of time refused; application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Judicial Review
Source Language
EN
Constitutional and Administrative Law Immigration Law Non Refoulement Leave to Appeal Extension of Time Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kuldeep Kumar

Applicant

Appeal Board

Putative Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Extension of Time Application / Interlocutory Application Heard in Chambers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to extend time for filing application for leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether applicant has reasonable prospect of success on appeal
  3. 3 Application of extension factors from Khan Mohammad Shadab and related authorities

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to set out grounds of appeal or reasons why the Court's Decision was wrong and thus could not demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success; accordingly time was not extended and the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Extension of time refused; application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Refused extension of time to file application for leave to appeal
  • Dismissed application for leave to appeal